1. Presented by: Don Lehner NAVSEA TMDE Program Fleet Review May 2009 CNSL Consolidated TMDE Readiness Assessment (CTRA)

2. 1 LANT CTRA Processes CTRA Program Support CTRA Center Redistribution TMDE Procurement Support MCMS/SISCAL Updates Daily Fleet Support Future Potential

3. 2 CTRA Program Support Test Equipment and/or Installed Instrumentation Pre-CTRA data gathering and prep –SPETERL, MCMS, TCR, MIQ, CDMD, CRL Onboard CTRA –Prime System and FSTER validation –Test equipment inventory and bar coding –Excess, deficiency, and obsolete resolution –Shipboard training (critical due to turnover/recurring) Post CTRA –Recall database updates (MCMS, TCR, MIQ) –SPETERL change requests to NSWC Earle –Data to RMCs (CDMD-OA ), NAVSEA (UID) and SSES (CRL) –Results and questionnaire with revised SPETERL –Tracking of unfilled deficiencies and metrics –Done every two years with periodic tech assists FY08 RESULTS: 37 CTRAs 793 excess removed 527 deficiencies filled $170K estimated cal cost avoided 1,563 recall additions 2,349 recall deletions 4,352 recall updates FY08 RESULTS: 37 CTRAs 793 excess removed 527 deficiencies filled $170K estimated cal cost avoided 1,563 recall additions 2,349 recall deletions 4,352 recall updates Onboard validation and training provides an accurate picture of TE status and increases confidence in Cal readiness %

4. 3 CTRA Center Redistribution Equipment Receipt –Onboard CTRAs and daily transactions –Seal Beach annual outfitting –Decommissioning Equipment Redistribution –Fill CTRA deficiencies and obsolete items –Replacement of BER assets –Navy Wide distribution –GPETE and Cal Standards –DRMO or ATAC transfers Products –Equipment transfers –Bar coding of assets –High value/low availability assets for repair –Asset research to keep valid equipment –RRAM/VRAM –Approval process dependent on Command –Metrics FY08 RESULTS: 4,222 Received 1,781 Issued 2,420 DRMO/ATAC $2.8M Cost Avoidance FY08 RESULTS: 4,222 Received 1,781 Issued 2,420 DRMO/ATAC $2.8M Cost Avoidance Cost effective utilization of fleet assets to support maintenance requirements

5. 4 TMDE Procurement Support Requirements Analysis –Screen initial recommendations –Compare to known requirements –Revise to meet fleet needs Receipt and Validation –Receive and stage at CTRA Center –Validate latest ship requirements before transfer –Identify replacement candidates –Screen during CTRAs –Coordinate transfer with ships  111 issued in FY08 Transfer and Tracking –Transfer equipment and coordinate exchanges –Continually screen inventories for replacements –Data provided to NSWC Earle for CDMD-OA updates Procurement process provides necessary technical refresh of test equipment and improves the test equipment posture of the fleet

6. 5 MCMS/SISCAL Updates MCMS Initialization –Compare CRL to baseline TCR data –Convert test equipment, portable tools, and installed instrumentation data prior to MCMS installs –Update data to latest known configuration –Validation of unmatched records MCMS Support –Receive fleet input and forward to MCMS Help Desk –Update data in MCMS when required –Process TYCOM and Tech Authority approvals SISCAL Updates –Update SISCAL data in MCMS after SISCAL data posted to SISCAL web –Support discrepancy resolution between MCMS and SISCAL data and tracks post-CRL update requirements SISCAL update process supports automated data collection by Teams with no impact to ship or SISCAL evolution

7. 6 Daily Fleet Support TYCOM/Ship Requests –Email or phone call requests –Deficiency resolution and historical data repository –Tech Assists (onboard, email or phone) –LANT central SPETERL/TMDEI request point Coordination –Support offered to ships under 85% cal readiness –History of requirements analysis –Standardized SPETERL validation –Loan Pool maintenance –RMC interface and barcoding Database Maintenance –Reference file for CTRA Process and CTRA Center (combines key elements of TMDEI, METPRO, CDMD- OA, Asset Details, and LOGICOM cost data) –SCAT Reference file of known test equipment issues Daily support is often unscheduled and directly relates to all other areas of the CTRA process

8. 7 Future Potential Standardized reference file sharing Asset screening improvements On line TMDEI and SPETERLs Identification of process improvement steps Analysis of unfilled deficiencies Evaluate pattern from TYCOM actions Confidence measurement for cal readiness Increase application of UID functionality Continuous improvement to support the changing environment is built on proven best practices LANTPACJFMM KEY BENEFITS Common Processes For: CTRAs Equipment Requests Validations Data Integrity Confidence KEY BENEFITS Common Processes For: CTRAs Equipment Requests Validations Data Integrity Confidence

9. 8 CNSL TMDE Program POC’s Johnnie Cleveland CNSL N43/6C8 Office: 757-836-3296 johnnie.cleveland@navy.mil Don Lehner McKean Defense Group, LLC Office: 757-301-6567 Cell: 757-672-6920 dlehner@mckean-defense.com Questions/Answers