Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Landmark-Based Speech Recognition: Spectrogram Reading, Support Vector Machines, Dynamic Bayesian Networks, and Phonology Mark Hasegawa-Johnson

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Landmark-Based Speech Recognition: Spectrogram Reading, Support Vector Machines, Dynamic Bayesian Networks, and Phonology Mark Hasegawa-Johnson"— Presentation transcript:

1 Landmark-Based Speech Recognition: Spectrogram Reading, Support Vector Machines, Dynamic Bayesian Networks, and Phonology Mark Hasegawa-Johnson jhasegaw@uiuc.edu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA

2 Lecture 3: Spectral Dynamics and the Production of Consonants International Phonetic Alphabet Events in the Closure of a Nasal Consonant –Formant transitions: a perturbation model –Nasalized vowel –Nasal murmur Events in the Release of a Stop Consonant –Pre-voicing (voiced stops in carefully read English) –Transient (stops and affricates) –Frication (stops, affricates, and fricatives) –Aspiration (aspirated stops and /h/) –Formant Transitions (any consonant-vowel transition) Formant Tracking –Does it help Speech Recognition? –Methods for Vowels, and for Aspiration & Nasals Reminder – lab 1 due Monday!

3 International Phonetic Alphabet: Purpose and Brief History Purpose of the alphabet: to provide a universal notation for the sounds of the world’s languages –“Universal” = If any language on Earth distinguishes two phonemes, IPA must also distinguish them –“Distinguish” = Meaning of a word changes when the phoneme changes, e.g. “cat” vs. “bat.” Very Brief History: –1876: Alexander Bell publishes a distinctive-feature-based phonetic notation in “Visible Speech: The Science of the Universal Alphabetic.” His notation is rejected as being too expensive to print –1886: International Phonetic Association founded in Paris by phoneticians from across Europe –1991: Unicode provides a standard method for including IPA notation in computer documents

4 International Phonetic Alphabet: Vowels Pinyin ARPABET (Approx.) i /u (xu) IY / UX EY EH a (zhang) AE a (ma) Pinyin ARPABET (Approx.) / u (zhu) / UW o UH / oa / OW / o AH / AO a (ma) AA Pinyin:eARPA:AX

5 IPA: Regular Consonants NG ARPABET: F/V (labiodental), TH/DH (dental), S/Z (alveolar), SH/ZH (postalveolar or palatal) Pinyin: s (alveolar), x (postalveolar), sh/r (retroflex) DX R HH/HV Q Tongue Blade Tongue Body Y

6 Affricates and Doubly-Articulated Consonants Affricates in English and Chinese: Pinyin ARPABET IPA Alveolar: c/z ts/dz Post-alveolar: q/j CH/JH t ʃ/dʒ Retroflex: ch/zh ţş/ ɖ ʐ ARPABET WH W

7 Non-Pulmonic Consonants

8 Events in the Closure of a Syllable-Final Nasal Consonant

9 Events in the Closure of a Nasal Consonant Vowel Nasalization Formant Transitions Nasal Murmur

10 Formant Transitions: A Perturbation Theory Model

11 Formant Transitions: Labial Consonants “the mom” “the bug”

12 Formant Transitions: Alveolar Consonants “the tug” “the supper”

13 Formant Transitions: Post-alveolar Consonants “the shoe” “the zsazsa”

14 Formant Transitions: Velar Consonants “the gut” “sing a song”

15 Formant Transitions: A Perceptual Study The study: (1) Synthesize speech with different formant patterns, (2) record subject responses. Delattre, Liberman and Cooper, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1955.

16 Perception of Formant Transitions: Conclusions

17 Vowel Nasalization

18

19 Additive Terms in the Log Spectrum

20 Transfer Function of a Nasalized Vowel

21 Nasal Murmur “the mug” “the nut” “sing a song” Observations: Low-frequency resonance (about 300Hz) always present Low-frequency resonance has wide bandwidth (about 150Hz) Energy of low-frequency resonance is very constant Most high-frequency resonances cancelled by zeros Different places of articulation have different high frequency spectra High-frequency spectrum is talker-dependent and variable

22 Resonances of a Nasal Consonant Reference: Fujimura, JASA 1962

23 Anti-Resonances of a Nasal Consonant

24 Events in the Release of a Stop (Plosive) Consonant

25 Events in the Release of a Stop “Burst” = transient + frication (the part of the spectrogram whose transfer function has poles only at the front cavity resonance frequencies, not at the back cavity resonances).

26 Events in the Release of a Stop Unaspirated (/b/) Aspirated (/t/) TransientFricationAspirationVoicing

27 Pre-voicing during Closure To make a voiced stop in most European languages: Tongue root is relaxed, allowing it to expandm so that vocal folds can continue to vibrating for a little while after oral closure. Result is a low- frequency “voice bar” that may continue well into closure. In English, closure voicing is typical of read speech, but not casual speech. “the bug”

28 Transient: The Release of Pressure

29 Transfer Function During Transient and Frication: Poles Front cavity resonance frequency: F R = c/4L f Turbulence striking an obstacle makes noise

30 Transfer Function During Frication: An Important Zero

31

32 Transfer Function During Aspiration

33 Are Formant Frequencies Useful for Speech Recognition? Kopec and Bush (1992): WER(formants alone) > WER(cepstrum alone) > WER(formants and cepstrum together) How should we track formants? –In vowels: Autoregressive (AR) modeling (also known as LPC) –In aspiration, nasals: Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) modeling. Problem: no closed- form solution –In aspiration, nasals: Exponentially Weighted Autoregressive (EWAR; Zheng and Hasegawa- Johnson, ICASSP 2004)

34 Formant Tracking for Vowels: Autoregressive Model (LPC)

35 Formant Tracking for Aspiration: “Auto-Regressive Moving Average” Model (ARMA)

36 Formant Tracking for Aspiration: “Exponentially Weighted Auto- Regressive” Model (EWAR) (Zheng and Hasegawa-Johnson, ICSLP 2004)

37 Solving the EWAR Model

38 Results: Stop Classification, MFCC alone vs. MFCC+formants

39

40 Summary International Phonetic Alphabet: –Useful on any computer with unicode –International encoding for all sounds of the world’s languages Events in a nasal closure: –Formant transitions (perturbation model) –Vowel nasalization (sum of TFs) –Nasal murmur (impedance match at juncture) Events in release of a stop: –Pre-voicing in English voiced stops (read speech) –Transient (dp/dt ~ dA/dt) –Frication ((zero at f=0)/(front cavity resonances)) –Aspiration ((zero at f=0)/(same poles as the vowel)) Formant tracking –In a vowel: use LPC –In aspiration, frication, or nasal murmur: ARMA is theoretically optimum, but computationally expensive –Aspiration etcetera: EWAR can be a good approximation to ARMA


Download ppt "Landmark-Based Speech Recognition: Spectrogram Reading, Support Vector Machines, Dynamic Bayesian Networks, and Phonology Mark Hasegawa-Johnson"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google