THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE The nature of knowledge. Knowledge  What is it?  A “Thick Concept”?  How is it different from belief?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Theory of knowledge Lesson 2
Advertisements

Best Practice Precepts [... next] Arguments Arguments Possibility of the Impossible Possibility of the Impossible Belief, Truth, and Reality Belief, Truth,
+ Sense Perception Wrap Up 10/23. + Agenda Wrap up yesterday’s conversations (15 minutes!!!) Go over summarizing statements for sense perception. Sense.
Nature of knowing In English there is one word “know”, while French and Spanish, for example, each has two. In what ways do various languages classify.
The Problem of Induction Reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’ by W. Salmon.
The Problems of Knowledge
How Can Knowledge Be Justified?
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 1 The problem of knowledge.
Knowledge Issues The Good, the Bad and The Ugly. Good KI An open question, explicitly about Knowledge. Couched in terms of relations between concepts.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
The noted critics Statler and Waldorf. What critical thinking is and why it matters How it can be applied to different academic disciplines What it means.
“The Problem of Knowledge” Chapter 1 – Theory of Knowledge.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE LESSON 1 The Problem of Knowledge 1.
Bellringer: The astronomer Carl Sagan said “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” What did he mean by this? Do you agree?
Theory of Knowledge - An introduction. Real Headlines: Elvis found working as Plumber in Poland Alien base found on dark side of Moon Alien base mysteriously.
How do you write the best one you can?.  You need to choose the title that speaks to you. Consider key issues such as:  - you, as a knower  - certainty.
Knowledge Claims By now, after many years of full-time education and life- experience, you can, perhaps, claim to know many things. You should be able.
Knowledge Belief and Truth By Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader.
ToK ESSAY The instructions tell you to: Remember to centre your essay on knowledge issues and,where appropriate, refer to other parts of your IB programme.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE. K IS A JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF JUSTIFIED:Justify belief in the right kind of way to be reliable. TRUE: Beyond reasonable doubt ( objective.
What is Knowledge? A definition: Knowledge… the body of truths or facts accumulated in the course of time; certain understanding (as opposed to opinion)
Making a Claim Grounds for Claim Evaluation Beyond Brainstorm.
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
What have you heard about ToK?. What is Theory of Knowledge and why is it important? TaK - What is Theory of Knowledge and why is it important?
Knowledge issues are questions that explicitly address knowledge. Knowledge issues are best expressed in terms of ToK vocabulary. For example, When is.
Man is a credulous animal, and must believe in something. In the absence of good grounds for belief, he will be satisfied with bad ones. -Bertrand Russell.
The Problem of Knowledge 1 Pages 3-9. Table of Contents Quotes p. 3 Quotes Introduction p. 4 Introduction Common sense p. 4-7 Common sense Certainty p.
What have you heard about ToK? What do you know about ToK?
Opinion Belief Truth Knowledge Certainty Information Fact Prejudice Evidence TaK – Knowledge, Belief & Opinion Some key words….. Common Sense Wisdom Assumptions.
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
The Nature of Knowledge
Some channels of shared knowledge TOK. Internet Find two articles from the internet: one that you believe and one that you don’t. Give your reasons. What.
Which table is bigger? How do you know?.
The Nature of Knowledge. Thick Concept When a short definition is not enough, it is called a thick concept word. It can only be understood through experience.
And the search for truth. Knowledge. Knowing: Introduction to a classification scheme In ToK we may treat knowledge as falling into 3 categories. These.
Epistemology (How do you know something?)  How do you know your science textbook is true?  How about your history textbook?  How about what your parents.
Recognizing Perspectives Constructing Knowledge. The Mental Map: What does knowledge look like?  Goal: To understand why people believe so many different.
TaK What is ToK? What do we know? How do we know it?
Knowledge Claims By now, after many years of full-time education and life- experience, you can, perhaps, claim to know many things. You should be able.
Knowledge LO: To understand the distinction between three different types of knowledge. To learn some basic epistemological distinctions. To understand.
World Philosophy Mr. Zuercher. What is philosophy? ▪ Philosophy is critical and creative thinking about fundamental questions. – What is a person – What.
KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONS THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY.
ToK - Perception Some key points: Sense perception consists of Sensation and Interpretation If we accept that pain and taste are subjective, we might conclude.
Basic concepts in Ethics
The nature of knowledge
What is Philosophy?.
Find your seat and try to figure out the pattern
Conceptual Physics Notes: Scientific Thinking
KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONS (KQs)
What do we mean by the word “knowledge?”
Let’s play.
Reading Arguments Critically
Theory of Knowledge Review
Personal and Shared Knowledge
The nature of knowledge
Conclusion – Truth and wisdom
The nature of knowledge
The Nature of Knowledge
Knowers and knowing: Personal and shared knowledge
The Philosophiser A compendium of philosophical questions to get you thinking about thinking. Made by Mike Gershon –
2. Knowledge and relativism
Theory of Knowledge.
Knowledge Issues The Good, the Bad and The Ugly
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Fact and Opinion.
The nature of knowledge
Knowers and knowing: Nature of knowledge
Personal and Shared Knowledge
Fact and Opinion.
Author’s Bias.
Presentation transcript:

THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE The nature of knowledge

Knowledge  What is it?  A “Thick Concept”?  How is it different from belief?

Knowledge as justified belief  Perhaps the difference between knowledge and belief is one of degree rather than kind…..  Belief – knowledge continuum  Rather than think of knowledge as being completely different from belief it makes more sense to think of a range between Impossible Unlikely PossibleProbable Certain Unjustified Beyond reasonable Truth – “beyond reasonable doubt” doubt

Justification  We might justify our knowledge claims by appealing to one of the ways of knowing  Language ‘Someone told me’  Sense Perception ‘I saw it’  Reason ‘I worked it out’  Emotion ‘It’s intuitively obvious’  Reliability of justifications – e.g. telepathy  Context – When you say you ‘know’ something to what extent are you taking responsibility for its being true?

Levels of Knowledge  Knowledge and Information  Superficial knowledge  Facts don’t equate to understanding  Reflection on information can lead to further knowledge Seeing v Observing

Second-hand knowledge  Knowledge by authority or knowledge by testimony Communal knowledge – communication – progress “Standing on the shoulders of giants”  Cultural tradition – the inherited wisdom of the community  School – Selectivity = education v indoctrination?  Internet – Urban Legends  News Media – Bad News Bias, Extraordinary news, Relevant news  Expert opinion – fallibility, limited range of competence  Authority Worship  Longevity of belief is no guarantee of truth  Second-hand knowledge is never an original source of knowledge

Questions  P32 Q1 The philosopher Betrand Russell ( ) once observed that ‘In most countries certain ideas are recognized as correct and others as dangerous. Teachers whose opinions are not correct are expected to keep silent about them’ What opinions, if any, are teachers in your country expected to keep silent about and to what extent can this be justified?  P33 Q 2 What criteria would you use for distinguishing generally trustworthy websites from generally untrustworthy ones?  P34 Q 3 Can we speak of expert opinion in all areas of knowledge, or only in some of them? Give reasons  P36 Q 1 When, if ever would you be willing to trust the authority of other people rather than the evidence of your own senses?