Crisis Action Planning (CAP) and The Commander’s Estimate Joint Pub 3-0, Doctrine for Joint Operations Joint Pup 5-00.2, Joint Task Force Planning Guidance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Risk Management Introduction Risk Management Fundamentals
Advertisements

Course of Action Analysis
Course of Action Development
Joint Operation Planning Process:
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
TROOP LEADING PROCEDURES FM 7-8
MISSION ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Maj Tom Woods
Commander’s Intent & Guidance Deployable Joint Task Force Augmentation Cell (DJTFAC) Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) Major Paul Zavislak.
Course of Action Development
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
An Approach to Case Analysis
Commander’s Intent & Guidance
Crisis Action Planning Commander’s Guidance and Intent
Campaign Planning Process Step 3B – System Center of Gravity Analysis
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
Campaign Planning Process 29 March 2006 Step 7 – Prepare Operations Plan (OPLAN) / Operations Order (OPORD) & Assess UNCLASSIFIED.
Joint Special Operations University
Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Course of Action Development UNCLASSIFIED CTF Training.
Multinational Force Staff Estimates
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team
Mission Analysis “COMBINED” TASK FORCE TRAINING
Joint Vision Why a New Document n Sustain and build on momentum of Joint Vision process ã Continue evolution of the joint force n Lessons learned.
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
Military Decision Making Process – Multinational (MDMP-M)
Crisis Action Planning Process پروسه پلان گذاری عملکرد بحران Situation Development Crisis Assessment COA Development COA Selection Execution Planning Execution.
1 The Military Decision- Making Process (MDMP). 2 MDMPAgenda MDMP Agenda 1. Module 1: MDMP Overview/Receipt of Mission/Mission Analysis PE # 1 – Cdr’s.
Military Decision-Making Process
THE MILITARY DECISION MAKING PROCESS (MDMP)
Prepare and Issue the Coalition / Combined Task Force OPORD Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) Purpose References Discuss the process of preparing.
JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Comparison.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Analysis.
UNCLASSIFIED Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Operation Order UNCLASSIFIED ing.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 1 Course of Action Development (MDMP) 3 Mar 08 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT)
Campaign Planning Process Guide / Brief Template
COMMANDER’S INTENT & GUIDANCE
Purpose To understand Commander’s Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action planning Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
MPAT SECRETARIAT Multinational Force Crisis Action Planning Overview COALITION/COMBINED TASK FORCE TRAINING.
Framework for Effective Multinational OPs Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) MNF SOP WORKSHOP JTF to CTF Transition Guide (Annex)
Course of Action Comparison Purpose u Define course of action comparison and its role in the crisis action planning process u Discuss the associated task.
THIRD FLEET COMTHIRDFLT Crisis Planning & HA/DR Exercise Strong Angel THIRD FLEET HA/DR Team COMTHIRDFLT COMTHIRDFLT.
Campaign Planning Process 29 March 2006 Step 4E – Determine Prioritized Supporting Effects UNCLASSIFIED.
Staff (Running) Estimate
Crisis Action Planning & the Commander’s Estimate Process 23 February 2001.
Course of Action (COA) Comparison
Multinational Force Course of Action Development
Center of Excellence PEACE OPERATIONS COMMAND & CONTROL AND COMMAND & CONTROL AND TRANSITION ISSUES Lt Col (R) John Derick Osman Center of Excellence in.
MNF SOP Planning Options & Campaign Planning Process
Course of Action Development
MDMP-M Step 3: Course of Action Analysis & Gaming
Campaign Planning Process Step 4 – Campaign Formulation
Standing Operating Procedures
CRISIS ACTION PLANNING (CAP) and COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE
CRISIS ACTION PLANNING (CAP) and COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE Maj Kelly Lawson
Religious Inputs/Outputs
The MDMP Process MDMP Inputs MDMP Outputs Step 1 MDMP Inputs Step 5
BSA 376 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
BSA 376 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
BSA 376 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute The Army’s only organization for Peace and Stability Operations at the strategic and operational level.
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
Joint Vision 2020.
Military Decision Making Process-Multinational (MDMP-M) Overview
Course of Action Development
Military Decision Making Process - Multinational (MDMP-M) Overview
MDMP-M Step 4: Course of Action Comparison
MDMP-M Step 3: Course of Action Analysis & Gaming
Presentation transcript:

Crisis Action Planning (CAP) and The Commander’s Estimate Joint Pub 3-0, Doctrine for Joint Operations Joint Pup , Joint Task Force Planning Guidance & Procedures PROPERTIES OF CAP Series of Logical Steps Recognizes a Problem Develops Potential Solutions Allows Preparation / Execution of Plans and Orders REFERENCES Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT)

Crisis Action Planning Process ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopmentIICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessmentIVCOASelectionIVCOASelection VI Execution VI Execution CAPcrisis action planning COAcourse of action CAPcrisis action planning COAcourse of action Deployment Employment Transition Redeployment Execution IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopmentVExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning PlanningPlanning Form CTF HQ Form CTF HQCAPCAP Warning Order Commander’s Estimate MNF OPORD

CRISIS ACTION PLANNING Phase I: Situation Development CRISISCRISIS VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment COMMANDER’SASSESSMENT SUPPORTED STRATEGIC COMMANDER (CINC) NATIONAL COMMAND AUTHORITIES Nature of Crisis Forces Available Deployment Timeline Major Constraints Actions being Taken Preliminary COAs

CRISIS ACTION PLANNING Phase II: Crisis Assessment Considers: National Interests National Objectives Crisis Determination Considers: National Interests National Objectives Crisis Determination VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment NATIONAL COMMAND AUTHORITIES SUPPORTED STRATEGIC COMMANDER (CINC) WARNING ORDER

CRISIS ACTION PLANNING Phase III: COA Development COMMANDER’SESTIMATE WARNING ORDER ACTIVATION / WARNING ORDER NATIONAL COMMAND AUTHORITIES CTF VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment SUP STRAT CMDR (CINC) COMMANDER’SESTIMATE

THE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE MISSION MISSION SITUATION AND COURSES SITUATION AND COURSES OF ACTION (COA) OF ACTION (COA) ANALYSIS OF OPPOSING COAs ANALYSIS OF OPPOSING COAs COMPARISON OF COAs COMPARISON OF COAs RECOMMENDED COA RECOMMENDED COA REMARKS REMARKS

VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment Paragraph VI Remarks Remarks Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph I MISSION MISSION THE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE 6 Paragraphs

VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment Paragraph VI Remarks Remarks Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph I MISSION MISSION ACTIONS ANALYSE THE MISSION RESTATE THE MISSION LIST ESSENTIAL TASKS GOAL PROVIDE FOCUS FOR THE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE THE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE Paragraph I – Mission

THE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE Paragraph II – Situation and COAs VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment Paragraph VI Remarks Remarks Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph I MISSION MISSION Considerations Affecting Possible COA’s Characteristics of the Operations Area Factors that Effect the Crisis ASSUMPTIONS Threat and Crisis Factors Most Probable Most Dangerous Courses of Action WHAT Type of Action WHEN the Action Begins WHERE the Action Takes Place WHY (Commander’s Intent) HOW (Method of Force Employment) Limit Information to Significant Factors

THE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE Paragraph III – COA Analysis VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment Paragraph VI Remarks Remarks Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph I MISSION MISSION Detailed Description of War- Gaming of Courses of Action Address Friendly Actions and Consequences to Those Actions for each COA Illustrates the Task Force Commander’s Consideration of Most Probable and Most Dangerous Factors for Each COA

THE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE Paragraph IV – COA Comparison VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment Paragraph VI Remarks Remarks Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph I MISSION MISSION List Strengths and Weaknesses of Each COA Highlight Differences in Strengths for each COA Pay Particular Attention to Commander’s Intent and Guidance Comparison Criteria

THE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE Paragraph V – Recommended COA VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment Paragraph VI Remarks Remarks Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph I MISSION MISSION Coalition / Combined Task Force (CTF) Commander’s Recommendation for Course of Action May Provide Rationale Used by Commander in the Decision Process

THE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE Paragraph VI – Remarks VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment Paragraph VI Remarks Remarks Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph I MISSION MISSION Requests for Additional Forces Recommended Changes to the Rules of Engagement Caveats to Courses of Action if there are Changes to the Situation Third Party Intervention Impact of Possible Events Impending Refugee Problem

THE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE Key Points and Summary VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment Paragraph VI Remarks Remarks Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph V Recommended COA Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph IV COA Comparison Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph III COA Analysis (War-gaming) Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph II Situation and COAs Paragraph I MISSION MISSION KEY POINTS Use Mission Statement to Clarify and Narrow Mission to Operational Level Concentrate on Recent Events (Avoid Historical Discussions) Make All Courses of Action Operationally Different From Each Other SUMMARY Submitted by the Task Force Commander in Response to the Warning Order Reflects Task Force Commander’s Analysis of Possible Courses of Action Recommends a Best Course of Action in Response to a Crisis Situation

CRISIS ACTION PLANNING Phase IV: COA Selection CTF COAs Considered: Military Military Diplomatic Diplomatic Economic Economic Informational Informational NCA SELECTS COA COAs Considered: Military Military Diplomatic Diplomatic Economic Economic Informational Informational NCA SELECTS COA VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment NATIONAL COMMAND AUTHORITIES Task Force Actions: Prepare Ops Plans Prepare Ops Plans Force Protection Force Protection Refine Estimates Refine Estimates Resolve Shortfalls Resolve Shortfalls Task Force Actions: Prepare Ops Plans Prepare Ops Plans Force Protection Force Protection Refine Estimates Refine Estimates Resolve Shortfalls Resolve Shortfalls SUP STRAT CMDR (CINC) PLANNING ORDER

CRISIS ACTION PLANNING Phase V: Execution Planning CTF VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment NATIONAL COMMAND AUTHORITIES Task Force Focus: Forces Available Forces Available Force Sustainment Force Sustainment Strategic Mobility Strategic Mobility Timeline Timeline Shortfalls Shortfalls Refine Ops Plan Refine Ops Plan Until EXORD Until EXORD Task Force Focus: Forces Available Forces Available Force Sustainment Force Sustainment Strategic Mobility Strategic Mobility Timeline Timeline Shortfalls Shortfalls Refine Ops Plan Refine Ops Plan Until EXORD Until EXORD SUP STRAT CMDR (CINC) ALERT ORDER

CRISIS ACTION PLANNING Phase VI: Execution CTF VIExecutionVIExecution VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning IVCOASelectionIVCOASelection IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment NATIONAL COMMAND AUTHORITIES Execute Ops Plans Execute SUP STRAT CMDR (CINC) EXECUTION ORDER CRISISCRISIS Reporting

Key Points of Crisis Action Planning (CAP) Develop, Analyze, Select and Implement a Military Course of Action THE CRISIS: CAP FEATURES: WHY CAP:  Threat to National / Regional Interest  May Require a Military Response  Facilitates Rapid Exchange of Information  Requires Collaborative AND Concurrent Planning  Time Constraints Prevent Deliberate Planning  No Existing Operation Plan Applies  Develops Rapidly

Crisis Action Planning Summary Monitor Situation Monitor Situation Gather Information Gather Information Take Appropriate Actions Take Appropriate Actions Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV Phase V Phase VI Increased Information Gathering Increased Information Gathering Review of Options Review of Options NCA Crisis Decision NCA Crisis Decision Strategic Command refines and presents COAs Strategic Command refines and presents COAs NCA COA decision NCA COA decision Deployment plan completed Deployment plan completed Operations Order developed Operations Order developed Force preparation Force preparation Execute OPORDs Execute OPORDs Reporting Reporting Transition / Redeploy Transition / Redeploy Termination / Resolution Termination / Resolution COAs developed COAs developed major forces major forces support support COAs evaluated COAs evaluated Situation Developmen t Crisis Assessment COA Development COA Selection Execution Planning ExecutionExecution CRISIS Commander’s Assessment Warning Order Commander’s Estimate Execution Order Planning Order Alert Order

Questions?