1 1 CEQA Scoping Naomi Feger Planning TMDL Section Leader Region 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODOT- Office of Environmental Services. How to plan and implement effective Public Involvement Meetings.
Advertisements

BIE SPECIAL EDUCATION ACADEMY PRESENTERS: JUDY WILEY AND NARCY KAWON I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Bureau of Indian Education.
Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Placement Workshop Y2, Sem 2 Professional Practice Module (PPM)
INITIAL ON BOARDING COACHING
36 CFR 218.  Moves projects documented in an Environmental Assessment (EA)/Decision Notice (DN) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Record of Decision.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Early On System Updates Winter 2011 Early On Training and Technical Assistance (EOT&TA)
Involving the Public in Risk Communication Katherine A. McComas, Ph.D. University of Maryland.
Hartley, Project Management: Integrating Strategy, Operations and Change, 3e Tilde Publishing Chapter 12 Integration Management Practising a common, coordinated.
Booster/Refresher Training: Team & Faculty Commitment Benchmarks of Quality Items # 1 –
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
1 Office of Portfolio Management CEC 31 Meeting – July 8, 2013 For discussion purposes.
Taking Action Before or After a Rulemaking or Bill is Proposed Warren Hoemann Senior Vice President – Industry Affairs American Trucking Associations.
SCHC, 9/27/2005 US Implementation of the Globally Harmonized System The GHS Journey Continues…
Business Law with UCC Applications, 13e
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
CHSRA Unsolicited Proposal Process 1 June 6, 2013.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Communication 2 Report Writing.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
Policy Influencing strategies & Tactics. What is Public policy? Public policy: It is a guideline to the actions of the governments in addressing societal.
Summary of Rulemaking in California for the Forensic Alcohol Laboratories Regulation Review Committee Cathy L. Ruebusch, RN, MSN Office of Regulations.
Chapter 6 Determining System Requirements. 2 2 What are Requirements? “Requirements are … a specification of what should be implemented. They are descriptions.
Public Review Committee Linda Sullivan-Colglazier Assistant Attorney General July 28, 2011.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Part 190 NPRM: Administrative Procedures - 1 -
Anglophone West School District Education Council Sustainability Study – Bath Elementary and Middle Schools Executive Summary April 23, 2015.
1 1 Reasonably Foreseeable Compliance Measures Sandi Potter Engineering Geologist.
The International Financial Institutions and Nam Theun 2 International Stakeholder Workshops Bangkok, Tokyo, Paris, Washington, Vientiane 31 August-24.
STAKEHOLDER CALL/MEETING TO DISCUSS AND PROVIDE INPUT ON ZEV INCENTIVE PROGRAM GUIDELINES CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD March 7,
1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.
Facilitate Group Learning
Agenda 1.Review and confirm areas of convergence & divergence 2.Review draft 1-page workshop summary 3.Review and prioritize next steps 1.
Public Meetings Preparation Type of Meetings Responding to Comments Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
1 Findings and Board Resolution Steven Blum. 2 CEQA Findings in the Board Resolution  Resolution or separate appended document contains findings critical.
1 Responding to Comments Janet Cox TMDL/Planning Communications Region 2.
Responsibilities of Lead Agency Pages 7-8 of Training Guide 1. Preliminary review a) Determine if activity is a project as described by CEQA b) May require.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
Turnaround Planning: Parent and Community Input and Written Feedback REQUIREMENTS OF HB 1842 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY.
Community Development Department May 2, 2016 NEW CPAC MEMBERS TRAINING WELCOME.
Campus Turnaround Plan Webinar JANUARY 25, 2016 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
CEQA 101  CA Legislature passed CEQA in 1970; signed by Governor Reagan  CEQA statutes are found in Public Resources Code sections et seq.  The.
1 1 The Project Description: Framing the CEQA Analysis Terry Rivasplata.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
1 Roles of the State and Regional Boards in the basin Plan Amendment Process.
The Plaza at Santa Monica Project PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
1828 Ocean Ave & 1921 Ocean Front Walk PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Scoping Meeting April 20th 6:00 pm
Stakeholder consultations
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
Assigning evaluators Deans (Education) appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching Dean (Education)
Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
The Optional Protocol Module 8.
Vista Verde Residential Project Environmental Impact Report Public Scoping Meeting May 19, 2010 Michael Brandman Associates.
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Presentation transcript:

1 1 CEQA Scoping Naomi Feger Planning TMDL Section Leader Region 2

22 Today’s Presentation  Purpose of CEQA Scoping  Benefits of Scoping  When to scope?  Public Notice of scoping session  Conducting the scoping meeting  Meeting management

33 Purpose of Scoping  Scoping is required for projects of “statewide, regional or area-wide significance.” (CEQA §21083)  Invite public input early in the process – head off future problems  Solicit comments on the scope of our environmental analysis

44 Benefits of Scoping  Opportunity to inform the stakeholders about Project  Helps to identify range of actions, alternatives, mitigation measures, and significant effects to be analyzed  Incorporate modifications early to resolve potential problems

55 When to Scope?  “As early as possible” (Guidelines §15083)  When you can present and discuss  Project objectives  Draft Project description  Reasonably foreseeable compliance measures i.e., potential implementation requirements – specific actions or measures  Reasonable alternatives  For TMDLs, generally at Project Report stage

66 Noticing the Scoping Meeting  Notify as broadly as feasible  At least 30 days notice suggested  Publish notice for one day in an “appropriate newspaper”  Notice by mail and  Post on website

77 And the Notice Goes To…  All interested parties  Organizations or individuals who filed written requests for notice AND  Everyone else  Any responsible agency  Any public agency with legal jurisdiction related to the project

88 Conducting the Scoping Meeting

99  Take advantage of the meeting to combine it with a public workshop  Make clear distinction between public workshop and CEQA scoping  Options for meeting record  Audio recording  Meeting notes or summary  Court reporter and transcript

1010 Conducting the Scoping Meeting  Manage expectations by clarifying the purpose of the meeting:  Explain the project and the steps in the process  Explain our obligation under CEQA  Hear stakeholders’ comments, concerns, and ideas – not debate issues or make decisions  Review agenda and meeting ground rules

1111 Prompting Discussion  The more concrete information you provide, the better the discussion will be  Take time to explain CEQA requirements and process, including terminology e.g.,  Significant and potentially significant impacts  mitigation  cumulative impacts  Ask for input “Do you foresee any significant or potentially significant adverse environmental impacts?”

1212 Meeting Management  Be clear about how staff will use/honor comments  Explain that we’re not required to respond in writing, but staff will consider comments as we develop the environmental analysis  Identify time frame for submission of comments, provide staff contact info  Note comments on flip chart; ALSO take notes on a laptop, or bring a note-taker

1313 Depending on Your Stakeholders…  Depending on the stage of your project, level of controversy, time/resource constraints and public interest…  You may choose to  Develop a stakeholder involvement plan  Consider using a facilitator (neutral moderator/ WB staff)  Format your official notice formally or informally  Present a blank or a draft checklist  Present draft alternatives

1414 Potential Meeting Handouts  Basin Planning/TMDL flowchart or other simple, helpful handout  Preliminary project report or description of proposed activity  Blank or draft checklist  List of alternatives identified to date (optional)  List of references relied on for research to date; websites, staff contacts

1515 Take Home Message  Emphasize and re-emphasize that Board decisions have not been made, and public input will be considered  Prominently mark all materials “DRAFT”  Note CEQA’s requirement to evaluate an actual project, not just an idea…  No requirement to respond to all comments

1616 Scoping Summary  Scoping provides valuable input  Local conditions  Stakeholder concerns - early in process  First formal step in CEQA – opportunity to get project on good footing  Manage expectations – communicate meeting objectives clearly

17 17 Questions?