SIP Reading Goal Our Reality: An average of 78% of the students met standard on the state reading assessment in 2010-2011. Our SMART Goal: The average.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hackettstown Public Schools 2014 October Score Report NJASK End of Course Biology HSPA.
Advertisements

Freeman Elementary…state of the school.. Freeman Building Wide Goals Reading:  By May 2013, the percentage of K-2 students achieving benchmark standards.
Assessment Dashboard March 2013 Page Unified School District Curriculum AssessmentInstruction Data.
Envision Math - 3rd Grade - Topic 4 Data Topic 4.1
Shannon Kewin EFD The Basics a. Terra Nova (TN) Test Score Results b. Wilson School Annual Report Card 2. Breakdown of scores (Reading) 3. Breakdown.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grade 1 By Gender MalesFemales Grade Level Scale Score 550.
Qatar Comprehensive Educational Assessment (QCEA) 2007: Summary of Results.
2013 CMT RESULTS (Connecticut Mastery Tests) Riverside School, Greenwich, CT.
PSSA Cohort Analysis by CORE AREAS Classes:
ROYAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ELL DATA WALK Language Development Opportunities LLC
Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5.
Education & Achievement for Manitowoc County. Manitowoc City Educational Attainment.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
 decimals/cc-7th-fracs-to-decimals/v/converting-fractions-to-decimals-example.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grades 1, 2 and 3 by School Type Grade Level Scale Score Grade Level Scale.
2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient State Performance Targets.
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
7 th Grade: Decreased # of students in Basic by 7% 8 th Grade: Students are moving from BB to BAS scale EOC Literacy: Students are moving from BB to BAS.
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Radar Chart Radar Data in Excel rd Reading Total** th Reading Total** th Reading Total** th.
Iowa Assessment Results and Annual Goals.
Clinton County Middle School Winter 2013 MAP Results.
Beginning in the school year, the high school Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL)
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 11, 2012.
NJASK Comparison Scores to Essex Fells, J Districts, & Statewide (Slides 2-9) Tracking NJASK Scores for 3 rd, 4 th,& 5 th Grades (Slides ) Tracking.
Percentage of Students at each Performance Category in Arabic, English, Science and Math for Grade Level 4 by Gender Percentage of Students English Science.
The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 9, 2014.
Grades 3-8 Assessment Results. English Language Arts.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
PSSA Testing Information Highlights from the PSSA Assessments for 2011 Highlights from the PSSA Assessments for 2011.
A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.
December 2015 STATE OF SCHOOL REVIEW Everett Public Schools Compiled by the Center for Educational Effectiveness.
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 10, 2013.
School Improvement Plan Review Galloping to Success Minneola Elementary Presented by Mrs. Watts.
JDES TEST DATA SCHOOL WIDE DATA – ALL SUBJECTS 2013 Reading92% ELA89% Mathematics84% Science75% Social Studies75%
North Intermediate SMART GOAL #1 Expect 90% of students in all sub groups to score proficient or advanced in Reading on the OCCT’s.
Romeo Community Schools State Test Results May 2, 2011.
Presented to West Manor Administration and Faculty By: Felicia Belcher April 16, 2014.
Manson Schools Preliminary Data
Millbrae Elementary School District
John A. Holmes High School
STRATEGIC OPERATING GOALS
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC
School Wide SIP Goal Student achievement on the Mathematics section of the ISTEP+ Assessment will increase on Spring 2014 ISTEP+, grades 6-8, from an average.
Lakeview Community Schools NeSA Results
PISGAH ACT ASPIRE
Cedar Falls Board of Education October 2017
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?!?!
Woodside Elementary School District
FSA DATA ANALYSIS
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
CHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
School-Wide Achievement Mathematics
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
Education Services October 3, 2017.
Celebration using Galileo Data
Jayhawkville Central High School
PGMS Math Update Principal: Sean Roach.
BAS DATA.
Test Scores: SAT SAT Total Average Score – 1141 (up from 1115 in 2016) - 62% of students met both benchmarks (up from 59% in 2016) - Average.
School Improvement Plan
Dixon Elementary # Dixonscholars
Sixes Elementary Data Overview
3-8 grade ELAR, Math, Science, Social Studies
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
Presentation transcript:

SIP Reading Goal Our Reality: An average of 78% of the students met standard on the state reading assessment in Our SMART Goal: The average percentage of students in grades 3 through 6 meeting standard on the state reading assessment will increase from 78% in to 83% by An average of 81.5% of the students in grades 3 through 6 met standard on the state assessment in

SIP Math Goal Our Reality: An average of 66% of the students met standard on the state math assessment in Our SMART Goal: The average percentage of students in grades 3 through 6 meeting standard on the state math assessment will increase from 66% in to 70% by An average of 74.9% of the students in grades 3 through 6 met standard on the state assessment in

MSP Comparison 2011 to 2012 Reading Percentages rd 85.7  th 72.6  th 85.0  th 82.7  Average81.5  3.8%

MSP Comparison 2011 to 2012 Math Percentages rd 80.4  th 80.6  th 75.0  th 63.5  Average 74.9  7.8%

MSP Comparison 2011 to 2012 Writing Percentages th 79.0  6.9% Science Percentages th 76.7  19.8%

MSP Comparison 2011 to 2012 MSP School wide Overall % 

MSP Cohort Comparison 11 to 12 Last year’s 4 th Grade – this year’s 5 th Grade Class of Reading 72.6  12.9% 72.1 Math 80.6  8.5%

MSP Cohort Comparison 11 to 12 Last year’s 5th Grade – this year’s 6 th grade Class of Reading 85.0  1.4% 62.3 Math 75.0  12.7%