Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

Published byGeorge Hodge Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets."— Presentation transcript:

1 2009 ITBS RESULTS

2 ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets

3 ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY Comparing Percent Proficient Cross Sectional

4 ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY Comparing Percent Proficient-- Simple Cohort Grouping

5 2009-2010 Annual Reading Goals In 2009-2010, Grade 8 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITBS than Grade 7 full academic year students in 2008- 2009. Gr. 7 2008-2009 71.2 Gr. 8 2009-2010 65.4

6 Corrective Actions If you teach 7 th and 8 th grade language arts, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help students succeed in the area of reading comprehension in grades 7 & 8. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.

7 AYP Proficiency Trajectories Reading Comprehension 2007-2010 11 th Grade79.3% 2009-2010 Annual Reading Goal: In 2009-2010, Grade 11 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITED than Grade 11 full academic year students in 2008-2009.

8 73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72 ITBS Mathematics FAY 2009 Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

9 ITBS/ITED Mathematics FAY Comparing Percent Proficient Cross Sectional

10 ITBS Mathematics FAY Comparing Percent Proficient Simple Cohort Grouping

11 2009-2010 Annual Math Goals In 2009-2010, Grades 7 and 8 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITBS than full academic year students in Grades 6 and 7 in 2008-2009. 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 Grade 6 to Grade 7 67.977.3 Grade 7 to Grade 8 63.561.6

12 Corrective Actions If you teach 7 th and 8 th grade math, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help students succeed in the area of mathematics in grades 7 & 8. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009- 2010 APR in September.

13 AYP Proficiency Trajectories Mathematics 2007-2010 11 th Grade79.3% 2009-2010 Annual Math Goal: In 2009-2010, Grade 11 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITED than full academic year students in Grade 11 in 2008-2009.

14 ITBS Science FAY 2009 Percent Proficient

15 ITBS Science FAY Comparing Percent Proficient Cross Sectional

16 ITBS Science FAY Comparing Percent Proficient Simple Cohort Grouping

17 ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Low SES Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets

18 FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension 2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data

19 2009-2010 Annual Reading Goals In 2009-2010, Grades 4, 5, 7, and 8 full academic year Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITBS than Grades 3,4, 6, and 7 full academic year Low SES students in 2008-2009. 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 Gr. 3- Gr. 4 63.060.8 Gr. 4- Gr. 5 69.659.1 Gr. 6- Gr. 7 50.050.1 Gr. 7- Gr. 8 59.145.0

20 Corrective Actions If you teach language arts in grades 3,4, 5,6, 7, and 8, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat or Mrs. Koether. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of reading comprehension. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September. **Check back to the 2008-2009 APR to see what was written for Grade 3 reading comprehension.

21 73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72 ITBS Mathematics FAY 2009 Low SES Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

22 FAY ITBS Mathematics 2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data

23 2009-2010 Annual Math Goals In 2009-2010, Grades 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 full academic year Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITBS/ITED than full academic year students in grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and 10 in 2008-2009. 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 Gr. 4- Gr. 5 69.659.0 Gr. 5- Gr. 6 66.766.6 Gr. 6- Gr. 7 45.055.6 Gr. 7- Gr. 8 45.545.0 Gr. 10- Gr. 11 61.1TBD

24 Corrective Actions If you teach math in grades 4, 5,6, 7, and 8, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of mathematics. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.

25 FAY ITBS Science 2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data

26 2009-2010 Annual Science Goal In 2009-2010, Grade 8 Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the science subtest of the ITBS than Low SES students in Grade 7 in 2008- 2009. 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 Gr.7 to Gr.8 50.045.0

27 Corrective Actions If you teach 7 th or 8 th grade science, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of science. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September. **Check back to see what was written in the 2008- 2009 APR.

28 ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets

29 FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension 2009 Gender Proficiency Data State Trajectory for 4 th grade is 76%

30 73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72 ITBS Mathematics FAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

31 FAY ITBS Mathematics 2009 Gender Proficiency Data

32 FAY ITBS Science 2009 Gender Proficiency Data

33 FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension 2009 IEP Proficiency Data IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade 12.7 N=51 Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade 85.5 N=278

34 ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets

35 FAY ITBS Mathematics 2009 IEP Proficiency Data IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade 39.4 N=51 Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade 85.0 N=278

36 73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72 ITBS Mathematics FAY 2008 Gender Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

37 FAY ITBS Science 2009 IEP Proficiency Data IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade 49.65 N=51 Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade 82.32 N=278

38 ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results for Reading Comprehension Current Grade Level Grade Equivalent from Last Year Grade Equivalent 2009-2010 2 nd GradeNA2.5 3 rd Grade2.63.4 4 th Grade3.24.1 5 th Grade4.04.5 6 th Grade5.36.2 7 th Grade6.17.0 8 th Grade6.67.4

39 ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results for Mathematics Current Grade Level Grade Equivalent from Last Year Grade Equivalent 2009-2010 2 nd GradeNA2.0 3 rd Grade1.93.1 4 th Grade3.34.4 5 th Grade4.04.8 6 th Grade5.46.5 7 th Grade6.17.3 8 th Grade6.57.0

40 ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results for Science Current Grade Level Grade Equivalent from Last Year Grade Equivalent 2009-2010 2 nd GradeNA1.9 3 rd Grade2.03.4 4 th Grade3.44.2 5 th Grade4.05.0 6 th Grade6.06.4 7 th Grade6.97.0 8 th Grade6.76.8

41 HEART Data Website https://heart.aea1.k12.ia.us

42 Past Data Presentations Online Curriculum and Other Documents www.mflmarmac.k12.ia.us http://www.mflmarmac.k12.ia.us/School%20 Website/curriculum/index.htm

Download ppt "2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets."

Similar presentations

Annual Progress Report 2007-2008 Submitted to The Iowa Department of Education by the Cedar Rapids Community School District.

Annual Progress Report Submitted to The Iowa Department of Education by the Cedar Rapids Community School District.
2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.

2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.

Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
2010-2011 Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.

Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota

NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?

Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?
Washington Township 2007 Test Scores Washington Township Administrative Team October 23, 2007.

Washington Township 2007 Test Scores Washington Township Administrative Team October 23, 2007.
September, 2010 Accomack County Public Schools. DEFINITION OF AN LEP STUDENT  An LEP student is one: Who was not born in the U.S. or whose native language.

September, 2010 Accomack County Public Schools. DEFINITION OF AN LEP STUDENT  An LEP student is one: Who was not born in the U.S. or whose native language.
Contents: Writing Academic Goals, Strategies, and Action Steps Website and eCIP The CIP Worksheet Writing Academic Goals Writing Action Steps, Benchmarks,

Contents: Writing Academic Goals, Strategies, and Action Steps Website and eCIP The CIP Worksheet Writing Academic Goals Writing Action Steps, Benchmarks,
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.

WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
2011-2012 Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.

Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
2014-15 Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends 2014-15 Riverside Community Schools.

Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.

MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards

Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
November, 2013 Next steps – Need to look at new assessment rubric and start looking at monitoring measurable objectives, identifying sub groups and targeted.

November, 2013 Next steps – Need to look at new assessment rubric and start looking at monitoring measurable objectives, identifying sub groups and targeted.
2006-2007 SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.

SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.

Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Springville CSD Where every child will become a successful reader ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2008.

Springville CSD Where every child will become a successful reader ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2008.
Comprehensive School Improvement Plan ITBS/ITED Results for 2006-07.

Comprehensive School Improvement Plan ITBS/ITED Results for

Similar presentations

Ads by Google