Review of Sector 45 - 28th of February 20081 Tunnel Access During Powering Tests Hugues Thiesen, AB-PO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cryogenic system in P4: Possible options S. Claudet & U. Wagner LHC Workshop, “Chamonix XlV” January 2005 (Mostly for RF & beam scrubbing)
Advertisements

1 Powering Tests and Safety Electrical Safety Hugues Thiesen Power Converter Group.
A. Perin, CERN, TE-CRG, 26 May Review of the cryogenic by-pass for the LHC DS collimators 26 May 2011 Modifications to the DFBs, DSLC and cryogenic.
New HV test specification for the LHC N. Catalan for the EI section.
Laurent Tavian Thanks to contribution and helpful discussions with M. Jimenez, V. Parma, F. Bertinelli, J.Ph. Tock, R. van weelderen, S. Claudet, A. Perin,
LHC HARDWARE COMMISSIONING SAFETY TRAINING DAY S. Claudet (AT-ACR-OP) With great help from G. Lindell (Safety commission) CRYOGENICS.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
Session th January 2010 R.Schmidt TE/MPE Hardware Commissioning 2010 and beyond R.Schmidt.
FP 420 Connection Cryostat Design and Integration Keith Potter, Jaak Lippmaa, Guido Ryckwaert, Benoit Florin, Thierry Renaglia, Thierry Colombet, Shrikant.
HC review - 12 May 2005Luigi SERIO - AT/ACR/OP1 SECTOR COOL DOWN AND CRYOGENIC COMMISSIONING L. Serio.
Chamonix Risks due to UPS malfunctioning Impact on the Superconducting Circuit Protection System Hugues Thiesen Acknowledgments:K. Dahlerup-Petersen,
Workshop 12/04/2006AT/MTM SM18 Test Facility A. Siemko "Workshop on Test Facilities and measurement equipment needed for the LHC exploitation"
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Status & Plans – May 2011 MPE-TM – 12 May 2011 M. Koratzinos,
Internal review of superconductor and magnet laboratories1 Status of LHC-TB Power Converters Hugues Thiesen TE-EPC.
Accelerator Group for LHeC LHeC Meeting at CERN; October Questions raised by Max  does the e-ring fit into the tunnel?  can one bypass ATLAS and.
V.Montabonnet - Safety during Hardware Commissioning 18 October Contents  Electrical circuits in the LHC context  Electrical Hazards  Preventions.
2 IMPACT - THE FIRE PERMIT = Hot Work Permit 3 Welcome ! This course is linked to the use of IMPACT, so it is assumed that: You know how to use IMPACT.
7/23/ J.Coupard. 1) Cryogenic risks 2) Cryogenic phases from RT/floating to nominal and additional safety rules A. Sectors warmed-up to RT or considered.
Task Force on Safety of Personnel in LHC underground areas following the sector 34 accident of 19-Sep-2008 Status report LPC 07/05/2009 B. Delille, S.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
For more info:
HC review, A. Perin, 12-MAY DFB Project LHC hardware commissioning review May 2005 Hardware commissioning of the DFBs and DSLs and connection.
M. POJER, ON BEHALF OF THE USUAL BUNCH OF SUSPECTS… S UPERCONDUCTING CIRCUITS RE - COMMISSIONING AFTER THE 2011 C HRISTMAS BREAK.
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
8 th November 07-OP Workshop Machine Checkout E. VEYRUNES CRYOGENICS 8 th November 2007 OP Workshop Machine Checkout E. VEYRUNES AB/OP 2008 AB/OP CRYO.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
SAFETY DURING HARDWARE COMMISSIONING, 18 October 2007, D. Bozzini, AT/MEL-EM 1 Safety during Hardware Commissioning Davide Bozzini on behalf of the ELQA.
1 Sector Test – Preparation Layout in LSS7 Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Thanks to Mike Lamont and the other ‘sector testers’
MPE Workshop for LS1 / 22 & 23 Nov. 2012, G. D’Angelo TE/MPE-EE ELQA during LS1 train, Special measurements and NCs Magnet replacement: AIV Splices consolidations:
AB/CO Review, Interlock team, 20 th September Interlock team – the AB/CO point of view M.Zerlauth, R.Harrison Powering Interlocks A common task.
AT-MEL Group Meeting, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 ElQA activities during hardware commissioning N. Catalan Lasheras.
LHC Machine Status Report Mike Lamont for the LHC team Acknowledgements: Mirko Pojer, Matteo Solfaroli, Katy Foraz et al.
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Outline  Interviews of all the Group Leaders loosely or tightly concerned by hardware commissioning proposing them.
MPP Meeting 07/03/2007 MPP Main Ring Magnet Performance Panel Meeting Wednesday 7th March 2007 Agenda: 1)Matters arising 2)Recommendations for the case.
An invitation to an open discussion We are team reviewing its performance globally We want to help each other to reach the objectives We know the other.
Closing session Issues and questions from the audience and some from me Rüdiger Schmidt.
Injectors & LHC report S. Baird and M. Bernardini on behalf of OSS members 20/09/2013LSC - EN-MEF-OSS1.
CSCM (Thermal Amplifier) Sequence and detailed planning 07/10/2011 M.Solfaroli Thanks to: K.Brodzinski, G.D’Angelo, M.Koratzinos, M.Pojer, R.Schmidt, J.Steckert,
LHC Cryogenics From cool-down to 1st beams Serge Claudet (LHC Cryo OP), On behalf of cryo teams involved.
TEST FACILITY STATUS FOR TESTING CERN Marta Bajko WP10. EUCARD 2 Task 4 - HTS Magnet Tests, June 2015.
Training LHC Powering – Blanca Perea Solano From Individual System Tests to Powering to Nominal Blanca Perea on behalf of Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
(Access system for HWC)
Considerations from machine protection and the ELQA teams
Powering LHC magnets version 30/3/2007.
Equipment simplified model SMR UR safety
Minimum Hardware Commissioning – Disclaimer
Hazards for Personnel during Commissioning
HEL – Safety aspects Christelle Gaignant
The LHC - Status Is COLD Is almost fully commissioned
Coordination of Hardware Commissioning
Keeping LHC cold during LS periods Preliminary proposal
Powering the LHC Magnets
SPS CC: Final plan for interlocking of crab cavities in SPS
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Rüdiger Schmidt and Karl Hubert Mess
V.Chareyre/H.Thiesen/I.Romera/M.Zerlauth
Mike Lamont 4th HERA and the LHC workshop 26th May 2008
Machine Protection Xu Hongliang.
+ many slides from various colleagues (KH, Rudiger, Paul, …)
Brief report of the hardware commissioning activities
Hardware Commissioning
Summary post TCC#54_02Aug’18
Powering and Safety day Underground access during powering tests
Review of hardware commissioning
Electrical measurements and diagnostics
Presentation transcript:

Review of Sector th of February Tunnel Access During Powering Tests Hugues Thiesen, AB-PO

Review of Sector th of February Sector layout Tunnel QRL ARCMLITMR RR UA PM Machine Access Machine Access LHC surface access LHC surface access  Sector layout

Review of Sector th of February Hazards in the tunnel  Different Hazards Radiation  Beam  RF system Electricity  PCs  QHPSs  Instrumentation  DFBs and theirs proximity equipments  Cryo magnets Cryogenic  DFBs  Cryo magnets  QRL

Review of Sector th of February Radiation Hazards  Radiation risks Irradiation (beam or RF system)  Alpha, beta, etc.. Depend only of the area status, not of the powering tests  RB injection current is 760A (< 1kA) Access  No access when the sector is closed Control of the access  LHC access system (Doors and EIS) NO ACCESS IN THE AREA WHEN IT IS CLOSED

Review of Sector th of February Electrical Hazards  Electrical risks Electrocution or burn  By touching a metallic part (active or not active)  By an electrical arc (initiated by a metallic tool) Do not depend of the current but only of the conformity of the equipments  At 350A the output voltage of the RB could be 160V The electrical risks DO NOT depend on the current but only of the electrical conformity of the equipments

Review of Sector th of February  Electrical risks The electrical equipments have to be conform at the standard (code C1)  Metallic parts have to be correctly grounded (DFB, cryo magnets, etc..)  Active parts have to be protected again direct contacts (IP2X) Electrical Hazards

Review of Sector th of February  Electrical risks Electrical inspection realized by AT/AS3 (Guy Salomon) Electrical Hazards The group/department must request the inspection after the installation and before the powering tests The group/department is responsible of the conformity of its equipments

Review of Sector th of February  If the equipments are not conform? Grounding  Always mandatory Electrical Protection IP2X  Fencing + flashing lights  B0V/H0V Electrical Hazards

Review of Sector th of February Cryogenic Hazards  Cryogenic risks Asphyxia  Opening of the safety valve  Rupture of a cryogenic pipe Cold burn  Opening of the safety valve  Rupture of a cryogenic pipe Explosion  Rupture of a cryogenic pipe  Cryogenic risks vs Powering tests No powering tests  Access in the tunnel is restricted when the cool down is finished (see Serge Claudet presentation “Safety during HC” 18 October 2007) Powering tests  Risk of quench -> opening of the safety valve and/or rupture of the cryogenic pipe (depend on the current in the circuit)

Review of Sector th of February Cryogenic Hazards  Powering tests of the corrector magnets (60A to 600A circuits) The energy stored in the magnet is not enough to created additional risks (has to be confirmed by MPP and AT-ACR) Access in the tunnel is restricted  Powering tests of the main magnets (MB, MQ, IPD, IPQ and IT) The magnets do not quench below 1 kA (has to be confirmed by MPP) Access in the tunnel is restricted if the current is below 1kA above 1 kA ?

Review of Sector th of February Cryogenic Hazards  Powering tests of the main magnets above 1kA Limited asphyxia risk beyond 2 m (has to be confirmed by MPP/AT-ACR) Limited Cold burn risk beyond 2 m (has to be confirmed by MPP/AT-ACR) Limited explosion risk beyond the half sector (has to be confirmed by MPP/AT-ACR)

Review of Sector th of February Cryogenic Hazards  Powering tests of the main magnets above 1kA IPD.L, IPQ.L (arc magnets included) or IT.L => no access in the left part of the sector (C1L to C34L) IPD.R, IPQ.R (arc magnets included) or IT.R => no access in the left part of the sector (C1R to C34R) MB, MQD or MQF => no access in the tunnel QRL ARCMLITMR RR UA PM Machine Access Machine Access LHC surface access LHC surface access

Review of Sector th of February Conclusion  Hazards in the tunnel Radiation hazards  Do not depend of the powering tests but only of the area status  Risks managed by the access system  Access is forbidden when the machine is closed Electrical hazards  Do not depend on the current level  The electrical equipments in the tunnel have to be conform at the standard (grounding, direct contacts protection, etc…)  If the equipments are not IP2X, compensatory measures have to put in place Fencing + flashing light or electrical screen Habilitation B0V/H0V  Access is restricted access

Review of Sector th of February Conclusion  Hazards in the tunnel Cryogenic hazards (< 1kA)  No additional risks if the current is less than 1kA  Restricted Access Cryogenic hazards (> 1kA)  Forbidden Access IPD.L, IPQ.L (arc magnets included) or IT.L => not access in the left part. IPD.R, IPQ.R (arc magnets included) or IT.R => not access in the left part. MB, MQD or MQF => not access in the tunnel Have to be confirmed by AT  General conditions Access must be ONLY given by the CCC for the tests team