Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First Operation of MI8 Collimation Bruce C. Brown All Experimenters Meeting 22 January 2007.
Advertisements

Main Injector Gap clearing kickers Phil Adamson (#) AEM 14th March 2011.
PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
Collimation System for Beam Loss Localization with Slip Stacking Injection in the Fermilab Main Injector Bruce C. Brown Main Injector Department Accelerator.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Accelerator Physics Issues Shekhar Mishra Sept 17-19, 1996 Main Injector DOE Review.
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
Delivery Ring AIP Jerry Annala Dec 12, µ Scope Beam line aperture improvements Beam line aperture improvements Beam line power supply upgrades Beam.
August 05, Startup 2013 Machine Status:  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac Booster  Main Injector Startup.
Recycler Status and Plans Shekhar Mishra MID/Beams Division Fermilab AAC Review 2/4/03 Introduction to the Recycler Ring Recycler Improvements and status.
F Antiproton Source Apertures Steve Werkema DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 22, 2006.
Ff NO A Accelerator Upgrades: Status Phil Adamson Fermilab
RHIC Status: Startup Run 12 V. Schoefer RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 1/13/12.
800 MeV Injection into Booster in the PIP-II Era David Johnson AD/PIP-II Department October 14, 2014 Beams-doc 4683.
Extraction from the Delivery Ring November 19, 2013 J. Morgan.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
1 st September 2005LHC-LUMI 05 - G.Arduini – CERN/AB Optical requirements for the magnetic lattice of the high energy injectors (SSPS in the SPS tunnel)
Overview: Primary Sensitivities Nov S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Overview: NuMI Primary Beamline Sensitivities NuMI requirements are for a very large.
Main Injector Lambertson Aperture Scans David Johnson and Ming-Jen Yang March 17, 2006.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS Injection and Extraction Systems Issues and Solutions by M. Plum for the SNS team and our BNL collaborators.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Fermilab Proton Driver and Muons David Johnson Fermilab Neutrino Factory Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 14, 2006.
Project X: 8 GeV Transfer and Injection Injection Painting Kick-off meeting Dave Johnson APC/HINS June 27, 2008 Beams-doc 3129.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
NuMI Primary BooNE / NuMI S. Childress (FNAL) Primary Beams for Mini-BooNE & NuMI 18 March, 2002 Mini-BooNE inputs from Craig Moore and Al Russell Includes.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
What’s Up in the Booster Eric Prebys February 27, 2002 and March 6, 2003.
Booster Losses Keith Gollwitzer PIP and MI 700 kW review January 2015.
Y. R. Roblin Hall A beamline and accelerator status.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
Magnets Technologies for NOνA Transfer Line (& RR30 section) July 21-23, 2009.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
Proton Planning Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
PSB-PS TRANSFER AT 2 GEV - CONCEPTS AND OPTICS W. Bartmann, J. Abelleira et al. ABT LIU Review, 20-Nov-15.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
MI Beam Loss upon Acceleration 5E11/div 11BLMA=LM GeV/c 9.8GeV/c Start of Ramp Fast loss ~10 ms Slow loss.
August 12, Machine Status: 2013  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac : Roof hatch installed Booster : Magnet.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
Run II Status Keith Gollwitzer Temple Review July 1, 2003.
Limitations to Total Booster Flux Total protons per batch: 4E12 with decent beam loss, 5E12 max. Average rep rate of the machine: –Injection bump magnets.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
MI/RR Operation Status Ioanis Kourbanis August 21, 2014.
Status of RHIC Polarization Studies. Summary of Polarization Studies during Run09 Tune scans: – Nearby 0.7 – Near integer tune Polarization ramp measurement.
AGS FY11 Summary RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 5/6/11.
Maximum Credible Beam Loss in the Main Injector D. Capista January 26, 2012.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
MI/RR Status January 3, 2014 D. Capista. MI Preformance.
Booster Corrector Review, Oct. 10 th, 2006 E. Prebys Introduction/Specifications Eric Prebys Proton Plan Manager.
TBT Data & Lattice Measurement for Recycler Ming-Jen Yang December 17, 2014.
PS2 WG Injection and extraction systems Basics and assumptions
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Alternate Lattice for LCLS-II LTU Y
Potential Use of PEP-II Magnets by Project X
Strip-line Kicker R&D at KEK-ATF
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Transfer Line for EIC.
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930

Opening Statements 7/12/ Major activity over the last year has been further development of 3D model resolving interference issues, inclusion of beam pipe and vacuum components, and optimizing layout of elements. Optics Injection & Extraction transport lines can be described as FODO lattices with beta functions very similar to the Recycler and MI (i.e. maximum betas ~60 m or less) and vertical achromats. Recycler Abort line exists (will have a few modifications) Apertures We have examined all apertures (conservatively) and selected beam pipe or modified magnets to increase physical aperture. Operation Sensitivity to magnet errors and power supply regulation have been addresses in terms of impact on emittance growth. Ring closed orbit bumps and injection steering (POS/ANG) mults have been identified. Lattice matching techniques have been identified.

Recycler Injection 7/12/ Continuation of 8 GeV line FODO lattice using permanent magnet dipoles and quads with the addition of a vertical achromatic dogleg Recycler 8 Gev line V1 (switch) V2 (PDD) HBEND (35 mr) VLAM (MLA) K HKICK 848 MI MI QR85 3 QR85 2 PDDM H 102 Inj kicker lamb Vup Vdn Usual complement of BPM’s, Loss monitors, multiwires, and correction elements Only two power supplies required: Vertical switch magnet (ADCW) Injection Lambertson (MLAW) Powered trim quads (MQT) are included for matching (2 each location)

Recycler Extraction 7/12/ Vertical achromat between RR and MI (FODO lattice similar to MI) Design similar to existing R22 and R32 transport lines Permanent magnet quads (with electromagnet trims, MQT) Usual complement of BPM’s, Loss monitors, multiwires, and correction elements Only 3 Major power supplies required: Extraction Lambertson (MLAW) Vertical Dipoles (ADCW) Injection Lambertson(ILA) Powered trim quads (MQT) are included for matching(2 each location)

Recycler Abort Line (existing) 7/12/ Recycler abort line shares the beam absorber with the MI. Contains vacuum break downstream of the Lambertson (do we keep ?) Abort kicker double duty as pbar extraction kicker (pbar function will go away with Nova) NEW > Install gap clearing kickers so the beam in the injection gap is cleanly sent to the absorber 400 LAM402 KICKER LAM402 MI EnclosureWall Dump Assume ~5E13/1.33 sec Assume 2% in gap  1E12/1.3sec  1 kW Oct 2000 Recycler e-log RR MI NOvA doc 1529

Apertures 7/12/ Expect NOvA Booster batch intensity at approximately the same as today ~4E12/batch Current measured transverse emittance of beam from Booster (during slip stacking operation) is roughly  -mm-mr. 6  values of 21.6mm to 23mm and 10  values of 36mm to 38.4mm (for beta=60m) Minimum injection line physical apertures based upon a 10  beam envelope for a 25  -mm-mr emittance (   =60m) Minimum extraction line physical apertures based upon a 10  beam envelope for a 20  -mm-mr emittance (   =60m) Utilize same style of beam pipe that exists in the MI, RR, and 8 GeV. The ADC dipoles and the MLA Lambertsons are having new versions built with wider apertures. The main aperture constraints are at the injection extraction points (partially mitigated by creating a larger aperture Lambertson) Beam pipe choice considered installed magnet pole tip dimensions and design lattice functions (expected beam size). Details in following talks!

Apertures (2) 7/12/ A partial list of magnet and beam pipe apertures Magnet typeShapeHorVerHorVer [in] [mm] ADCW (could be 2x4” MR rect pipe)Special PDD (& PDS)Elliptical PDD_rolledElliptical PM Quad Pole tip MI beam pipeElliptical Recycelr beam pipeElliptical ILA (field region) existingrectangular MLA (field region) modifiedrectangular between dipoles (4”OD)Round ” round beam pipe (through PMQ)Round Gev bpm (4”OD)Round Recycler bpmelliptical Use at horizontal quad locations Use at vertical quad locations 10  of expected beam emittance is between 36 and 38 mm

Apertures Recycler Injection 7/12/ Provide for loss free transmission Expect emittance of  (history shows with large tails)-> clean up with MI8 collimation Would like to provide at least 1  for loss free steering Assume 99% in 6  -> use 10  with 25  beam Vertical aperture Min horizontal aperture

Apertures Recycler Extraction 7/12/ Maximum beta ~60m at quad locations (10  of 25  = 51.4mm) Vertical locations utilize 3” beam pipe (73mm) while horizontal locations use RR beam pipe (95mm) Recycler Extraction Lambertson Main Injector Injection Lambertson

Apertures Recycler Abort 7/12/ Abort line apertures OK for 10  of 14  H ellipse 4” round 24” round H V V V L V ellipse H ellipse V ellipse 4” round 24” round Horizontal aperture (red), vertical aperture (blue) 10  of 14  10  of 25  6  of 25  Need to perform aperture scan of abort line… schedule during start up

Operation 7/12/ Booster is assumed to be operational at 15 Hz Expected operational scenario Injection takes place during MI ramping (implications due to stray field on injection line) We expect all injections into Recycler will occur without interruption, but we will have the capability of interleaving injections at a 15 Hz level Gap clearing kicker at RR40 to clear any beam in injection gap before each injection Beam extracted without capture in 53Mhz (MI is at 8 GeV)

Operation (2) 7/12/ Tuning Instrumentation (use latest versions) 4 MW in injection 5MW in extraction line 4 MW in Recycler BPM’s Loss monitors (extra loss monitors around Lambertsons and switch magent Steering Define position and angle mults at Lambertson (approximately 2mm/amp on corrector for injection line) Define Recycler closed orbit bumps (both injection and extraction Lambertsons) Define MI closed orbit bumps around Lambertson Modify closure program to Recycler and MI injection Matching The permanent magnet gradients for both transport lines set to match into Recycler/MI with the trim quads set to zero Permanent magnet strength ~25 kG/m (2 or 3 at each location) 50 to 75 kG/m Trim quads (MQT) 0.9 kG/m/Amp with 2 at each location 1.8 kG/m which gives a 24 to 36% quad strength tuning range for 10 Amps Recycler lattice functions (  may be adjusted +/-25% with less than 6 amps on any trim quad Use profile matching for Recycler injection (MW) and TBT sigma matching for MI injection (IPM) with profile matching in both transport lines.

Summary 7/12/ The transfer line optics design were based upon existing transfer lines such as the 8 GeV line and RR22/32 (i.e we have experience designing and building permanent magnet lines and rings) The transfer line optics have been firm for well over two years. Beam line designers have worked closely with the Mechanical Support Department (Linda and Bill) to optimize locations of elements and specify appropriate beam pipe apertures. Plan to document existing Recycler abort aperture (upon start up) Power supply regulation requirements and tuning scenarios have been addressed (c.f. NOvA doc 4415,4563,4797, and 4761) Lattice Repository maintained as THE current source for lattice information.