Arguing in a Social Context Iyad Rahwan. Introduction Argument takes place in a social context  Arguing with oneself vs. arguing with others New challenges:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Is SoTL good for faculty professional development?

Advertisements

Challenge yourselves to… Combat that most public communication is inherently untrustworthy anything automatically without evaluation Analyze! Evaluate!

Introduction to Psychology

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING RANJANI KRISHNAN HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL & MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY 2008.

Game Theory. I What is Game theory? The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour by John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern (1944). Especially one institution:

Instructional Technology vs. Educational Technology

Guideline for discussion/presentation/critique #1: Really understand the paper …

The value of the Outcome Harvesting tool in evaluating advocacy organizations Barbara Klugman with Ricardo Wilson-Grau AEA Conference 2012.

University of Liverpool

A1: Surveys for Behavioural Experiments Peter Jones, CTS, UCL Regine Gerike, TUD Giorgia Servente, Polito, TO.

Developing a Research Strategy and the use of Argument Maps in the Construction of Journal Articles.

Coordination and Collusion in Three- Player Strategic Environments Ya’akov (Kobi) Gal Department of Information Systems Engineering Ben-Gurion University.

Argumentation-based negotiation Rahwan, Ramchurn, Jennings, McBurney, Parsons and Sonenberg, 2004 Presented by Jean-Paul Calbimonte.

 complete in natural growth or development, as plant and animal forms  fully developed in body or mind, as a person.

Reasoning Lindsay Anderson. The Papers “The probabilistic approach to human reasoning”- Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. “Two kinds of Reasoning” – Rips, L.

Presented by Prof. Alan Kirtley May 14, 2008

Title of Presentation Author 1, Author 2, Author 3, Author 4 Abstract Introduction This is my abstract. This is my abstract. This is my abstract. This.

Argumentation Logics Lecture 4: Games for abstract argumentation Henry Prakken Chongqing June 1, 2010.

PSYCHOLOGY AS SCIENCE What is Science? What Kinds of Questions Can Science Address?What Kinds of Questions Can Science Address? How Does Science Compare.

CATEGORIES OF PERSUASION  Question of fact  Question of value  Question of policy.

THIS IS THE TITLE OF MY POSTER. THIS IS THE TITLE OF MY POSTER NAMES, NAMES, & NAMES This is my abstract. This is my abstract. This is my abstract. This.

Argumentation Logics Lecture 4: Games for abstract argumentation Henry Prakken Chongqing June 1, 2010.

Teaching and Learning If you don’t know anything about learning… You don’t know anything about teaching! Telling is not TEACHING Listening is not LEARNING.

Research Methods Chapter 1. Behavioral Research Behavioral Medicine Communication Criminology Human Development Education Psychology Sociology.

Welfare Properties of Argumentation-based Semantics Kate Larson University of Waterloo Iyad Rahwan British University in Dubai University of Edinburgh.

Outline What is Instructional Design? History Theories and Models Conclusion.

A Study of Computational and Human Strategies in Revelation Games 1 Noam Peled, 2 Kobi Gal, 1 Sarit Kraus 1 Bar-Ilan university, Israel. 2 Ben-Gurion university,

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The IAEA Safety Culture Assessment Methodology.

Judgment Aggregation and Moral Responsibility Frank Hindriks University of Groningen LSE-Groningen Workshop 2009 Models of Value and Opinion February 12-14,

The Philosophy of the Social Sciences Introduction The social sciences seek to conduct a science of phenomena that have no mass. At the same time, these.

Bettina Matysiak PIDP 3104November Introduction  What are “application cards”?  an informal assessment technique which allows instructors to.

Effective Self-directed Learning Malcolm Shepherd Knowles ( )

Managing Social Influences through Argumentation-Based Negotiation Present by Yi Luo.

Chapter 6: Objections to the Physical Symbol System Hypothesis.

Introduction (Chapter 1) CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College.

In search for patterns of user interaction for digital libraries Jela Steinerová Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia

Abstraction, Big Data and Context Dependency, THEfoDA, Son Bernardino, Mallorca, May 2013 Abstraction, Big Data and Context- Dependency.

Paper 1 A Answer all three SAQs One hour App words Paper 1B Choose one of the three essays One hour App words.

Educational Psychology Define and contrast descriptive, correlational and experimental studies, giving examples of how each of these have been used in.

Arash Rastegar Department of Math. Sciences Sharif University of Technology Arash Rastegar Department of Math. Sciences Sharif University of Technology.

The Design of a Collaborative Learning Environment in a Mobile Technology Supported Classroom, Concept of Fraction Equivalence Sui Cheung KONG Department.

TMT, BUS 251Chapter Planning Reports and Proposals.

Psychology of Adjustment PSY100

An Examination of Science. What is Science Is a systematic approach for analyzing and organizing knowledge. Used by all scientists regardless of the field.

ESCUELA AMERICANA EXTENSION OCTOBER Course overview and structure Coordinator introduction Ground rules Dress code Practicum Reading assignments.

Wrap Up Psychological assumptions… Permeate the social sciences Rational view Behavioral view Biased judgment Malleable preferences Influenced.

Final Thoughts. Health Communication Process Pre-work Formative Research Strategy Development Pre-testing Implementation Evaluation.

Theories of Intelligence. Defining Intelligence What behaviors are associated with intelligence? How is intelligence defined by researchers?

Self Regulation presentation Submitted To Submitted By.

A Brief Introduction to Psychology Goals of the science and how they are achieved.

TOK learning objectives Areas of Knowledge. Natural sciences (objectives) Explain how scientific method work Define ‘hypothesis’, ‘theory’, ‘model’, ‘experiment’,

The Strategic Communications Plan March 22, 2011.

The Behaviour Change Wheel: a cross-disciplinary model Susan Michie Professor of Health Psychology, UCL UCL Grand Challenges Town meeting May 2013.

PSYA4- research methods Section C. Validating new knowledge The role of peer review the assessment of scientific work by others who are experts in the.

Nancy Swisher Lecturer in ESL FLE 402 Fall 2016

4. INFORMATION, MANAGEMENT

Entrepreneurship and Negotiation

Visiting human errors in IR systems from decision making perspective

Argumentation and Rhetoric

MSDM AAMAS-09 Two Level Recursive Reasoning by Humans Playing Sequential Fixed-Sum Games Authors: Adam Goodie, Prashant Doshi, Diana Young Depts.

4. INFORMATION, MANAGEMENT

הוראת מיומנויות של עבודה בקבוצה מחקר פעולה

Models, Theories and Frameworks

Introducing Health and Physical Education

جشنواره ی روش های برتر تدریس مبتنی برICT

What is qualitative research?

CEng progression through the IOM3

A MOVE FROM CRITICAL THINKING TOWARDS CRITICAL PRACTICE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF THE SOCIO-CULTURAL FACTORS Author: Hesaam Kashi Deakin University.

Outline Consumer behavior Social and cultural influences on consumers Psychological influences on consumers The decision process Chapter 5 Account Planning.

Presentation transcript:

Arguing in a Social Context Iyad Rahwan

Introduction Argument takes place in a social context  Arguing with oneself vs. arguing with others New challenges:  How does the audience evaluate arguments?  How do arguers strategize? Opportunities for cross-disciplinary work:  Experimental psychology  Game theory 2

The Psychology of Argument Evaluation 3

Simple Reinstatement H1: Defeat lowers confidence in A’s conclusion H2: Reinstatement increases confidence in A H3: Reinstatement fully restores confidence in A’s conclusion H4: Reinstatement is due to successfully defeating B (rather than supporting C) 4 I. Rahwan, M. I. Madakkatel, J. F. Bonnefon, R. N. Awan and S. Abdallah. Behavioural Experiments for Assessing the Abstract Argumentation Semantics of Reinstatement. Cognitive Science. (in press)

Floating Reinstatement Effect is identical to basic reinstatement! But no preference between C and D 5 I. Rahwan, M. I. Madakkatel, J. F. Bonnefon, R. N. Awan and S. Abdallah. Behavioural Experiments for Assessing the Abstract Argumentation Semantics of Reinstatement. Cognitive Science. (in press)

Argumentation and Strategic Behavior 6

Strategic Argumentation 7 I. Rahwan, K. Larson and F. Tohmé (2009). A Characterisation of Strategy- Proofness for Grounded Argumentation Semantics. In: Proceedings of IJCAI

Aggregating Judgments 8 Not a legal labeling! Theorem: No aggregation operator satisfies: universal domain, anonymity, systematicity, unanimity, collective rationality I. Rahwan and F. Tohmé (2010). Collective Argument Evaluation as Judgement Aggregation. In: Proceedings of AAMAS

Human Strategic Behavior 9 Will people reveal their goals? Will people exploit knowledge of their opponent’s goal? Will revelation enable cooperation? Y. Gal, S. D'souza, P. Pasquier, I. Rahwan and S. Abdallah (2009). The Effects of Goal Revelation on Computer-Mediated Negotiation. In: Proceedings of CogSci

Summary Message Must take seriously:  Psychological validity  Pragmatics (especially strategic behavior) Game theory Behavioral Heuristics 10