UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Progress Monitoring And RtI System
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Overview of Progress Monitoring Training Session Part of a training series developed to accompany the AIMSweb Improvement System. Purpose is to provide.
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: One Year Plan – A Fully Implemented RTI Program by December 2012 Brian Schimel HHES Impact and Choices.
Chapter 9: Fluency Assessment
Big Ideas About Frequent Formative Evaluation Using General Outcome Measures and the Progress Monitoring Program One of the most powerful interventions.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
Reading Comprehension and Math Computation Screening and Progress Monitoring Assessments for Secondary Students Carrie Urshel, Ph.D., School Psychologist.
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
Curriculum Based Measurements and Response to Intervention Loretta Benenati WSU-Vancouver.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level “I think what makes a difference for our kids is that they graduate with a sense of place: high school,
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level. Today We’ll Be Serving… Secondary RTI: Uncharted territory Data-based Teaming Leadership Professional.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
UC Summer Institute June 2011 Alicia Lateer-Huhn DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING & COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING.
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
RCBM MAZE MCAP MCOMP.
David Putnam, Jr., Ph.D. Associate Director, C & I Tigard Tualatin School District.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Assessment: Universal Screening Cadre 7 Initial Training September 29, 2011.
Data Analysis: Literacy NC Content Literacy Continuum Fall Symposium High Point University October 15-16, 2014.
Work Sample Seminar1 Work Sample Seminar Screening Assessments, File Review, & Context Part 1 Portland State University.
Response to Intervention RTI Data Challenge: Setting Individual RTI Academic Goals Using Research Norms for Students Receiving.
What we found in TTSD About students (per school) who need a comprehensive reading program Middle schools: 1000 students High Schools:2000 students.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
Progress Monitoring Cadre 8 Training February 6 th, 2012.
Interventions ARC Chairperson Training Special Education Regulation 1997 Special Education Regulations …providing incentives for whole-school.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Effective Teaming Using Data to Guide Actions Sally Helton & Lisa Bates B ehavior and I nstructional S upport E ffective.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Progress Monitoring Intensive Behavior Supports, 2008 December, 2008.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Progress Monitoring and the Academic Facilitator Cotrane Penn, Ph.D. Intervention Team Specialist East Zone.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Progress Monitoring Middle School Training: Ensuring.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Universal Screening Cadre 6 Training October 12, 2010.
Using DIBELS to Improve Reading Outcomes in Grades 3-5.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Schoolwide Systems Review: Module 3.0 Gather Cohort 7 Middle Schools.
1 3.0 Matching Students to Intervention Support. 2 Examine a process to identify students that may need more support Create a system to efficiently and.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Are students benefitting from core instruction + interventions?
Data Usage Response to Intervention
Improved Outcomes For All Children Progress Universal Monitoring
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level

Universal Screening  What is universal screening?  Why use universal screening?  What universal screeners are used at the secondary level?  How do you conduct universal screening at the secondary level?

What is Universal Screening?  Universal screening is a quick and easy assessment system designed to determine  the effectiveness of curriculum, instruction, and school organization  students’ level of proficiency in essential academic areas  Typically administered three times a year

Why Universal Screening? To Determine Program Effectiveness  Are 80% of our students meeting the benchmark?  80% by ethnicity?  By program sub-group?  By subject?  By teacher?

Why Universal Screening? Program Evaluation  Helps you to determine if the core curriculum needs to be addressed  Intensity  Fidelity  Targeted  Group size  Instructional skills

Why Universal Screening? Identify Students in Need of Support  Periodic and universal screening ensures that no students “fall through the cracks”  Strategic support: Students are placed in a program that provides moderate intervention and progress monitored every 2 weeks  Intensive support: Students are placed in an intervention that is intense and progress monitored every 2 weeks

What Assessments Are Used For Universal Screening With Secondary Students?  MAZE  OAKS  Grades  Attendance  Office Discipline Referrals (ODRs)

What is Maze?  Multiple-choice cloze task  Grade-level passage w/ every 7 th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis  Student reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes  Curriculum-Based Measurement test that is “INDICATOR” of overall reading health  Combines fluency, comprehension, and all other subsumed reading skills  Can be administered to a group; scored later  Easy, quick to administer, multiple forms

Example of Maze Assessment

Benefits and Rationale for Maze  Allows for screening/assessing ALL students, ALL groups of Students, and School-wide literacy in time for intervention  Can use same test to monitor progress  Frequent progress monitoring increases academic achievement  Maze scores are a predictor of performance on OAKS AND NOW HS graduation

Reading and Writing Studies Tables of Probable Success Maze Correct Choices 3 minutes Writing: CWS minus IWS 7 minutes Probability of Passing Minnesota Basic Skills Test 4910% 73320% % % % % % % % % Critical values corresponding to likelihood of passing 8 th grade Minnesota Basic Skills Test – Doug Marston, et al.

MAZE OAKS Correlations in TTSDS GradeMedian ScorePassage 1Passage 2Passage

How Do You Analyze Effectiveness Of Academic Programs?  Focused on MAZE, OAKS and Grades  Queried ESIS for a demographic file with student name, ID #, ethnicity, program subgroup  Merged demographic file with data file for each measure  Created an Excel template organized by all subgroups

How do you analyze program effectiveness using OAKS and Maze?  MAZE, OAKS, Grades blank template MAZE, OAKS, Grades blank template  MAZE, OAKS, Grades Data Example MAZE, OAKS, Grades Data Example

How do you identify the lowest 20% of students with Maze data?  Example Excel file Example Excel file

How Do Identify Students In Need Of Intervention?  Post Screening Diagnostics and Placement:  Every student at each grade level who scores in the lowest 20 percent on MAZE, or at or below the 35 th percentile on the OAKS, is: further screened with oral reading fluency measures from 6- Minute Solution (check for fluency & accuracy); then, the San Diego Quick is administered to evaluate what level of the SRAI to use; then, the SRAI is administered to gauge comprehension skills; then, for students with the most comprehensive reading needs, the Language! placement tests are administered.

Progress Monitoring  What is progress monitoring?  What are the effects of progress monitoring?  How do you decide if the intervention is working?

What is Progress Monitoring?  An on-going, systematic approach to gathering academic and behavioral data to  evaluate response to intervention, thereby allowing data-based decision-making regarding instruction and learning outcomes on a frequent basis.  help schools establish more effective programs for children who have not benefited from previous programming.  In other words, it tells us if our interventions are working

Effects of Progress Monitoring Progress monitoring has been extensively researched in Special Education (Fuchs & Fuchs, 1986) Students showed improved reading scores when teachers: monitored their progress (+.70 effect size; ≈ 25 th  50 th %ile. Like it!) graphed their reading scores (+.80 effect size. Love it!) used decisions rules to determine whether to make a change in instruction (+.90 effect size. Gotta have it!)

Effects of Progress Monitoring CBM with decision rules (Fletcher, et.al., 2006)  “ goal raising rule ” for students responding well: effect size.52 (≈ 25 th  40 th %ile)  “ change the program rule ” for students not responding well: effect size.72 (≈ 25 th  50 th %ile)  Results in teachers planning more comprehensive reading programs Additional support for effectiveness in General Education (Fuchs, et al., 1994)

Meet Monthly to Consider… 1. Continuing (Student is making progress, but, continues to need support) 2. Intensifying (Intervention is not working and should be revised), or 3. Referring for Special Education Evaluation (Intensive intervention is proving unsuccessful) 4. Exiting (Intervention no longer needed)

Intervention Change: Language C 3-4 Data Points Below the Aimline!

Intervention Change: Language C Now that’s WORKIN’!

Intervention Change: Language C 3-4 Data Points Below the Aimline! Individualize intervention

Exit From Intervention When: Maze scores indicate 4 or more data points above the aimline AND are at or above the 50 th percentile; AND Grade+ scores are at or above the 5 th stanine; AND OAKS scores are at or above the 35 th percentile

Make a Plan  Select Measures  Decide  Who will assess students?  Who will record & graph the information?  Who will make instructional decisions?  Get Training  Establish  Decision rules  Team Process  Schedule for assessment

Resources  AIMSweb (  Intervention Central ( 

QUESTIONS?