Office of Human and Resources 2014/2015 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS & GUIDELINES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Presentation to the Cabinet A Presentation to Stakeholders
Advertisements

Performance Appraisals
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Mid Year Performance Review Process
Manager Performance Evaluation
1 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE Classified Staff Performance Evaluation To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate.
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
Review Period: January 1, 2014 – December 31, STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS.
Unclassified Professional and Administrative Staff February 3, 2010.
UMW Administrative and Professional Faculty Performance Evaluation Process.
Evaluations: Administrative & Classified Employees
Conducting a 90-Day Evaluation in PATH 1June 2009.
Introduction Performance appraisals, reviews and evaluations are all terms used to describe a process for documenting and communicating employees’ performance.
+ NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS March 2010-April 2011 and January 2011-December 2011.
Orientation: Classified Evaluation Process
A Joint Labor/Management Effort Spring “Training on the principles and procedures associated with evaluation and merit distribution shall be conducted.
Welcome to Recruitment Guidelines & Resources
West Valley-Mission CCD Human Resources Department.
Performance Appraisal in the Serbian Civil Service
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISAL SYSTEM
Genius online Appraisal Management System 1. Appraiser Configuration Getting Started Appraisal Management let the user to effectively conduct a users.
Introducing the New College Scheme Seevic Performance Appraisal.
Welcome to Recruitment Guidelines & Resources California State University, East Bay Human Resources Department June 2006.
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
Undergraduate Research Assistantships Student Information.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Performance and Career Management Process OCFO Monthly Managers Meeting May 21, 2012; June 4, 2012 Neli Lopez.
Professional Development Programs
People First Performance Management Process Data Analysis.
1 12 Easy Steps to Complete an Employment Contract Amendment Campus Human Resources Employment & Compensation Services October, 2009.
Reviewing the 2015 AmeriCorps Applications & Conducting the Review AmeriCorps External Review.
Performance Appraisal Process November 2011 – Human Resources.
Performance Planning & Evaluation Classified & Operational Form.
HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Evaluating Central Office Employees Evaluator Training for Clerical Evaluations July 2008.
The Performance Management And Appraisal System (PMAS) Principal Performance Appraisal.
November 26, :00am – 11:00am Monitoring Quality of Tutor Instruction
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
May 4, Evaluations 6 sections: Section I General performance standard Section II Core values Section III Goals (last years’) Section IV Goals (next.
SWRK 3150 & 4120 Mid-term Evaluation. Welcome Please take some time to review these PowerPoint slides. They contain important information for students,
© PeopleAdvantage 2013 All Rights Reserved We will Show You How to Easily Conduct Effective Performance Appraisals LCSA Conference 2013.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
Operations myPerformance Training FY16 Improvements.
Mid-Year Performance Review Process University System of New Hampshire System Office | 5 Chenell Drive, Suite 301, Concord, NH
2014 – 2015 EVALUATION PERIOD KCTCS ePerformance Training.
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation Evaluator Training SY.
Navigating the Performance Review Process
The College of New Jersey’s Performance Evaluation Process:
Performance Evaluations
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
IT-CM Group Meeting Tim Bell 12th January 2016
2016 Year-End Performance Management
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation
Performance Appraisals 2018 Overview
2016 File Maker pro training for Summer program hiring
Online Performance Evaluation Tool
Project Process Leading for Impact®: Building Future Leaders
Performance Review for County Educators
Employee Performance Management System
Performance Review for County Educators
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Graduate Assistant Hiring
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
2019/2020 Staff Performance Evaluation Cycle Goals – Employee Presentation Tony Yardley, Human Resources.
Presentation transcript:

Office of Human and Resources 2014/2015 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS & GUIDELINES

Office of Human and Resources 1.Summary of amendments: 1. Employees should prepare the PA forms as self-assessment first, send it to the manager then discuss it with the managers in one-on-one sessions. 2. To facilitate the evaluation process, the ratings have been amended to Exceeds Requirement (E), Meets Requirements (M) and Needs Improvement (NI). 3. The overall rating is inserted on the cover page, next to the signature to ensure that the signed parties approve the rating included underneath it. 4. Changes in the wordings, more explanations and additional criteria have been added to provide a clearer image. 5. The overall rating sheets will be signed by Deans/Department heads and will not go up to the Area head/Provost unless for positions directly reporting to the Area head/Provost.

Office of Human and Resources 2. Performance Appraisal Guidelines All fulltime contracted employees who have been employed for SIX months or more during the current fiscal year. i.e. January 2 nd are eligible for the appraisal; All PA criteria should be evaluated and a relevant rating inserted for each one of them, otherwise, the overall rating will not be shown; Once the PA forms are approved, signed by all concerned parties and submitted to HR; no changes will be accepted by HR; Any kind of discrimination should be avoided in performing the evaluation; especially in positions that utilize night shifts and/or extended working hours; The appraisal of staff members who report to two different departments should be done collaboratively by the direct supervisors in both departments; these staff members have * next to their names in the overall rating sheet; All disputes will be resolved through both parties meeting with HR and if not resolved, then the case will go to the Ombuds Office.

Office of Human and Resources 3. Performance Appraisal Template Cover Page Employee Data, Signatures, Overall Rating, Rating Scale. Section A: General Performance An assessment of 6 factors that affect the employees’ performance, such as quality of work, initiative…etc. Section B: Competencies An assessment of specific 5 competencies that affect employees’ performance such as: Teamwork, ethics & values, Professional Development…etc. Section C: Job-related factors An assessment of specific job-related factors, which are added from last year’s pre-set goals or included in the Job Description. Ex: Lab technician must have certain computer skills. Section D: Leadership Competencies (Management Only) An assessment of 5 leadership competencies for Managers. Such as Managing Change.

Office of Human and Resources 4. Weights Distribution Appraisal CriteriaManagementStaff Section A: General Performance30%40% Section B: Competencies20%30% Section C: Additional job-related Factors20%30% Section D: Leadership30%NA

Office of Human and Resources 5. Performance Ratings The performance ratings are divided into 3 ratings as follows: RatingTermDefinition (E) Exceeds Requirements Exceeds job requirements (M)Meets RequirementsMeets job requirements. (NI)Needs Improvement Fails to meet job requirements.

Office of Human and Resources 6. Performance Appraisals Findings Goals are to be identified between the manager and the employee to be used during the following year’s appraisal and should be included in the Job Related Factors. Recommendations/Training needs are to be identified for next year’s training plan to develop the employee’s performance and growth. It’s the responsibility of the manager and employee towards the fulfillment of those needs. If the final rating is “Exceeds Requirements” (E) or “Needs Improvement” (NI), then the “overall comments” part needs to be filled out with justification describing situations/evidence that supports this final ratings If the employee disagrees with the final rating, he/she MUST sign the form and state his/her objection in the overall comments part.

Office of Human and Resources 7. Responsibilities towards the Appraisal Managers are responsible: 1. Following-up on staff performance during the year.; 2. Conducting appraisal meetings, finalizing the PA forms and sending it to HR on the due date; 3. Ensuring a normal distribution curve in the overall rating of the office. Employees are responsible for: 1. Preparing their PA forms; 2. Discussing all factors openly in the appraisal meeting; 3. Take a copy of the signed form.