FEEDING THE FINISHING PIG

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nutritional Aspects: Feeding Pigs SAPPO Pig Production Course 2008 Jim Robinson.
Advertisements

Managing Phosphorus with Distillers Grains Diets Allen Trenkle Iowa State University.
Nutrient Reduction in Manure through Livestock Nutritional Management.
On farm comparison of different alternatives for surgical castration without anaesthesia 1)Carcass quality and boar taint prevalence: evaluation on 20.
FEEDLOTS AND PEN FATTENING,STRUCTURES AND MANAGEMENT
SODIUM BICARBONATE IN POULTRY NUTRITION
Pearson Square Diet Balancing. Used to balance for 1 nutrient, CP Balances for required concentration, % Uses 2 ingredients or 2 mixtures of ingredients.
Influence of strain on carcass characteristics of Guinea Fowl at different ages K.Premavalli Assitant Professor Poultry Research Station TANUVAS Chennai.
Improving efficiency and cost of production The Profit Equation PROFIT = PRICE – COP ((Feed Price x HFC ) +(Other costs) ) x Volume (pigs sold x weight)
Cooperative Research Centre for an Internationally Competitive Pork Industry AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE Brian Luxford General Manager Technical Services -
Effects of delayed implant protocols on performance, carcass characteristics and meat tenderness in Holstein steers J. L. Beckett, and J. Algeo Cal Poly.
GPP 5 – Ruminant Nutrition Safely Meeting The Nutritional Needs of 4 – H & FFA Youth Projects.
Growth and Diet Utilization in Pacu Piaractus mesopotamicus Using Soybean Replacement of Casein-Gelatin as Protein Source Maria Esther Palacios 1,3, Konrad.
Modern Swine Industry Modern Swine Production is Extremely Complex –Feeding strategies involve Feed ration formulation – nutrient levels Choice of number.
FEEDING TO ENHANCE LIVESTOCK PRODUCTIVITY
Ractopamine, Response, Economics, and Issues Allan P. Schinckel Purdue University Department of Animal Sciences.
Monogastric Nutrition Nutrient Requirements Simple Stomached –Require readily digestible feed –Cannot use complex carbohydrates Cellulose, hemicellulose,
1 2. Cow nutrient requirements and ration formulation ANIM 3028 Tom Cowan Tropical Dairy Research Centre, UQ, Gatton.
Ration formulation –The goal is to offset the animals requirement with an appropriate level of feed nutrients. –There are economic and possibly animal.
PIG PRODUCTION. Why pigs? For the gals-they don’t turn into men when they get drunk For the gals-they don’t turn into men when they get drunk For the.
 Draw growth curves  Explain different changes in body measurements  Explain different changes is body components  Explain different changes in carcass.
Teacher:prof.Ing. Bohuslav Čermák,CSc
Swine Innovation Centre Sterksel Innovations and insights leading to robust pigs Anne-Marie van Bussel – van Lierop (BSc)
NUTRITIONAL REGULATION OF GROWTH ANSC 590 ANIMAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.
AGRAZINC 100
Chad Hagen, PhD. Source: Agristats 2011  What is Best Cost Nutrition?  Importance of Feed Conversion  Importance of Throughput  Herd Health Effects.
Livestock Feeding AnS 320 “ Swine Feeding and Management” Lecture #2 Dr. John F. Patience Department of Animal Science 201B Kildee Hall Phone:
Feeding Dried Distillers Grains to Hogs Ron Plain, University of Missouri.
Applied Nutrition Andrew Granger LSU AgCenter. Nutrition Defined Match requirements to feed Nutrients Carbohydrate, protein, minerals, vitamins, etc.
FEEDING AND NUTRITION OF AVIAN SPECIES Dr. István HULLÁR, assoc. professor 1. Feeding Chickens; 2. Feeding Turkeys; 3. Feeding Ducks; 4. Feeding Geese.
DETERMINATION OF FEED ENERGY CONCENTRATION PP
Dr.B.VIDYA ASSISTANT PROFESSOR DEPARTMRNT OF ANIMAL NUTRITION CVSc, KORUTLA.
The effects of continuous-suckling and supplementation on growth performance of crossbred Katahdin lambs (Birth weight 4.2 ± 0.2 kg) were investigated.
Feeding Smart Dan Morrical Iowa State University Know requirements Condition Score Make adjustments multiple pens Control waste Use pasture and crop residue.
Balancing Horse Diets All horses should be fed a minimum of 1% BW of forage per day Proper digestive function Prevents colic, laminitis Prevents behavioral.
SUMMER SUPPLEMENTATION: PLANT AND ANIMAL RESPONSE – A KANSAS PERSPECTIVE Lyle Lomas and Joe Moyer KSU SE Agricultural Research Center Parsons.
Energy Requirements/growth Daily energy requirement (kcal/unit bwt) Overall energy requirement/fish increases with size (related to increased biomass)
Developmental Stages of Lambs
Level II Agricultural Business Operations.  Basic principles & decisions  Basic principles of maximising feed intake  Feeding systems: Conventional.
Weaner Unit Jytte Jochumsen. Weaners 5 % 20 % 75 %
Growth, feed and economics
Nutritional Strategies to Reduce Feed Costs Rommel C. Sulabo and Hans H. Stein Univ. of Illinois
Use of ´Novum wheat´ in animal feeding Zalán VARGA Department for Agriculture October 29, 2015.
Finisher Close-outs John Deen University of Minnesota Swine Center.
Nutrition in General Diets ComponentsClassificationsMisc.
Energy Systems for Feedstuffs Energy is the potential to do work.
Impact of increased energy and amino acids in sow lactation diets on piglet performance in large litters Aimee-Louise Craig*1, 2 and Dr. Elizabeth Magowan1,
Collaborative Research & Development AFBI Pig Seminar 10 th November 2015.
PREMIER FEED MILLS CO.LTD.
3. FEEDING DUCKS Dr. István HULLÁR, assoc. professor 3.1. Feeding Roasting Ducks 3.2. Feeding Ducks in Laying Period 3.3. Liver Production.
Eggshell Quality in Laying Hens D. R. Korver University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Silage for pigs Silage for pigs Gillian Butler 1 Chris Walton 2 Diane Holmes 1 David Michie 3 1 Nafferton Ecological Farming Group, Newcastle University.
Dr. Dan Morrical Iowa State University Corn Processing Co-products in sheep diets Buckeye Shepherds Symposium.
Sheep production fed on maize stover (Zea mays) based diet supplemented with varying levels and types of cassava leaves (Cassava esculenta L) in East Java,
Title of Research: Effects of Alfalfa Hay Particle Size and Feeding Frequency on Lamb Performance and Digestibility Traits PhD Degree Candidate: Hafiz.
Factors affecting performance and economic traits of intensively managed beef cattle in Italy G. Cesaro, M. Berton, L. Gallo, E. Sturaro
PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE, CARCASS TRAITS AND SOME PHYSIOLOGICAL CHANGES IN RABBITS FED ON ACACIA DESERT PLANTS عنوان الرسالة الاداء الانتاجى وصفات الذبيحة.
Economic impact assessment for Aujeszky ’ s disease outbreaks Introduction This study was conducted to evaluate the economic impact Of ADV infection in.
Farm management and boars
N P Mokotedi2, K-J Leeuw#1, U Marume3, N Thiebaut1 & S Breytenbach4
Direct-fed microbial addition in Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) diets: effects on performance and health responses in northern Ghana BY SARFO K. GOODMAN.
Yan Martel Kennesa, Janie Lévesquea and Caroline Decauxb
Luc Maertens, ILVO, Belgium Thierry Gidenne*, INRA, France
Sainfoin pellets, alone
Agro Tech International Ltd. New Zealand
Addah, W., Deku, G. and Ayantunde, A. A.
Nutritional Requirements of Non-ruminant Animals
United Soybean Board, Animal Nutrition Group – October 2012
Presented by Christina Bullerwell
Experiment on Mice A scientist who studied 40 mice wondered if he was feeding them food that would make them gain the most weight. He usually feed the.
Presentation transcript:

FEEDING THE FINISHING PIG

60% of feed cost is in finishing 0.1 FCR around £10/tonne feed cost or  1.6p/Kg 0.1 FCR  5%

Two Studies Pig weight & diet change - Performance & change of diet Variation & change of diet Wet vs Dry feeding

PERFORMANCE AND CHANGE OF DIET

Growth Curves of Pigs

Methods Five treatments Eight replicates 15 pigs in pen balanced for weight and gender Diet Grower CP 18.5% Lysine 1.25% DE 14.6 MJ/kg Finisher CP 17.0% Lysine 1.0% DE 13.8 MJ/kg

Treatments Transfer weight from Grower to Finisher 40 50 60 70 +ve 40kg 50kg 60kg 70kg Only grower – no change of diet

Performance of pigs moving from grower to finisher at different weights 40 50 60 70 +ve Sed Quad Feed Intake (g/d) Growth rate (g/d) FCR 2454 975 2.52 2475 998 2.48 2567 1061 2.42 2495 1031 2.41 2458 1048 2.35 36.38 21.95 0.055 NS <0.05 <0.01 P2 (mm) 13.8 13.9 13.2 14.3 0.46

Nutrient intake comparison 40 +ve Growth Rate (g/d) FCR 975 2.52 1048 2.35

Nutrient intake comparison 40 +ve Growth Rate (g/d) FCR 975 2.52 1048 2.35 Feed intake (g/d) Energy Intake (MJ/d) Lysine Intake (g/d) 2454 33.8 24.5 2458 35.9 30.7

Growth Curves of Pigs

Economics 40 50 60 70 +ve Start Wt. (kg) Diet change End Wt. (kg) 38.77 115.4 35.87 50.18 115.8 36.39 62.49 120.4 36.45 72.69 117.8 37.28 NA 119.12 Grower Growth Rate (g/d) FCR 1101 1.85 1135 1.84 1060 2.11 1048 2.35 Finisher Grower rate (g/d) 975 2.52 993 2.58 1040 2.64 1018

Economics 40 50 60 70 +ve Start Wt. (kg) Diet change End Wt. (kg) 38.77 115.4 35.87 50.18 115.8 36.39 62.49 120.4 36.45 72.69 117.8 37.28 NA 119.12 Grower Growth Rate (g/d) FCR 1101 1.85 1135 1.84 1060 2.11 1048 2.35 Finisher Grower rate (g/d) 975 2.52 993 2.58 1040 2.64 1018 Cost/kg gain 50.4p 50.0p 49.6p 50.9p 54.0p * £30 differential between grower and finisher

VARIATION AND CHANGE OF DIET

Design Factorial design: High weight variance in pen Low weight variance in pen Single diet: CP 17%, Lysine 1.0%, DE 14.0 MJ/kg Phase diet: 12-18 wks CP18%, Lysine 1.1%, DE 14.2 MJ/kg 18 to slaughter CP16%, Lysine 0.9%, DE 13.8MJ/kg Single diet Phase (2 diets) Single diet Phase (2 diets)

Performance of pigs on single or two phase diets with high or low weight variance Single Diet High weight variance Low weight variance Low weight variance S.e.d. P 12 week Wt. (kg) Final Wt. (kg) 40.8 116 40.9 114 41.3 113 40.5 117 0.231 NS Feed Intake (g/d) Growth Rate (g/d) FCR 2231 910 2.45 2136 893 2.40 2190 896 2195 922 2.38 61.69 24.94 0.046

Variation using single or phase diets

WET Vs DRY FEEDING

8 Replicates of 15 pigs Start weight 35 kg Diet CP 17.5% Lysine 1.0% DE 13.8 MJ/kg Water ratio 3:1

Finishing Pens

Performance on Wet & Dry Feed

Performance of Wet vs Dry S.e.d. P Weight (kg) Day 0 Finish 36.5 109.6 36.6 107.0 1.39 1.78 NS Feed Intake (g/d) Growth Rate (g/d) FCR 2458 895 2.75 2255 854 2.64 64.07 21.93 0.08 <0.01 <0.1

Slaughter performance of Wet vs Dry S.e.d. P Live finish weight (kg) Probe (mm) Cold weight (kg) KO% 110.9 11.6 86.40 77.98 109.3 11.7 87.32 79.94 1.626 0.460 1.003 0.804 NS <0.05

Slaughter performance of Wet vs Dry S.e.d. P Live finish weight (kg) Probe (mm) Cold weight (kg) KO% 110.9 11.6 86.40 77.98 109.3 11.7 87.32 79.94 1.626 0.460 1.003 0.804 NS <0.05 Carcass FCR 3.53 3.23 0.084 <0.001

Economics of Wet Vs Dry Wet Dry Start weight (kg) End weight (kg) KO% 36.5 109.6 78.0 36.6 107.0 79.9 Carcass gain (kg) Carcass FCR 57.0 3.53 56.3 3.23 Value of carcass gain @ £1.15 £65.55 £64.75 Cost per kg carcass gain 70.6p 66.5p * £6 added to dry for pelleting costs

Conclusions It pays to feed grower to 60 kg liveweight Diet change does not reduce variation Pigs grow faster on ad lib wet feeding Carcass FCR is 8% better on dry pellets vs wet

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS