Key Components of a successful Proposal OAS / IACML Workshop on Technical Assistance. San José, Costa Rica May 8, 2007 By: José Luis Alvarez R. Consultant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing and Building a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Tool for Public Sector Management.
Advertisements

Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
RESULTS BASED MANAGEMENT
Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix Main Menu.
The concepts/mechanisms/tools for developing a Joint Programme: Critical issues and UNDG Joint Programme Guidance and formats.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Delivering on Commitments to Gender Equality and Women’s Rights Key issues for HLF4 on aid effectiveness, Busan November 2011 Delivering on Commitments.
RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
1 Module 6: Clear link to results and monitoring of capacity development Effective Capacity Development From Theory to Practice.
Cross-cutting M&E functions in MENARID MENARID Knowledge Exchange workshop 24th to 28th of March, Hammamet, Tunisia 1.
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
Page 0 Agency Approaches to Managing for Development Results Why Results? What Results? Key Challenges, lessons learnt Core principles and draft action.
Improving Results Reporting Operations Managers Workshop Kiev, October 2008 Bratislava Regional Center Management Practice.
Session 0. Introduction: Why and key concepts Benedetta Magri, Bangkok, 2-5 September 2013.
From Effective Aid to Effective Institutions Synthesis of Joint International Evaluations Julia Betts and Helen Wedgwood Paris 5 th October 2011.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Leader One Inc1 Performance Audit: ‘ Managing for Results’ to ‘Value for Re$ources’ ICGFM Miami Conference & Training 2008 May 22, Jean-Baptiste.
What makes a successful development project? Kristin Olsen IOD PARC
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Impact evaluation: External and internal stakes Impact evaluation seminar - 2 to 6 December, Phnom Penh.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results- Terence D. Jones UNDP Third International Roundtable Managing for Development Results.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
An introduction to the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) Identi- fication Development Formulation and appraisal ApprovalInception Implemen- tation Closure.
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas Socioeconomic and Policy Research Program (SEPRP) - ICARDA Roberto Telleria, Agricultural.
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
SUB-MODULE. 3 RESULTS CHAIN RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Preparing proposals for funding RIMC Research Capacity Enhancement Workshops Series : “Achieving Research Impact”
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
PREPARING FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION 27 – 31 May 2013 Bangkok Bangkok Office Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education United Nations Educational,
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 25 to 27 September, 2012 Yerevan, Armenia Results Based Management at the GEF.
Using results frameworks to shift the focus of evaluation to a strategic level Emerging research on the principles underpinning results frameworks Kate.
Module 5: Clear link to results and monitoring of capacity development Supporting change through Capacity Development.
Advanced Engineering Projects Management Dr. Nabil I El Sawalhi Associate Professor of Construction Management 1AEPM 4.
M&E TRAINING MODULES Different tools for different applications.
1 Results-based Monitoring, Training Workshop, Windhoek, Results-based Monitoring Purpose and tasks Steps 1 to 5 of establishing a RbM.
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
Social Analysis Workshop on Country Analytical Work June 19, 2001 Anis Ahmad Dani World Bank, Social Development Department.
Deeping Skill in Working with Logical Frameworks Examples.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
ICT4D: Evaluation Dr David Hollow DSV, University of Stockholm.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Monitoring the Paris Declaration Emerging Findings Brenda Killen, OECD Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland 30 August.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Building an ENI CBC project
Country Level Programs
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
Measuring Outcomes of GEO and GEOSS: A Proposed Framework for Performance Measurement and Evaluation Ed Washburn, US EPA.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Tracking development results at the EIB
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results-
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Understanding logic, structure and documentation of the project
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Presentation transcript:

Key Components of a successful Proposal OAS / IACML Workshop on Technical Assistance. San José, Costa Rica May 8, 2007 By: José Luis Alvarez R. Consultant

Agenda Presentation –Key Factors for a Technical Cooperation Proposal –Main Questions to be Solved –Relevant Aspects for Donor Organizations Dialogue –Results Based Management (RBM) in Labor Ministries and IACML __________________ –Feed-Back

Key Factors for a Technical Cooperation Proposal Methodological Approach –The meaning of Formulation –RBM What is RBM? The Evolution of RBM Key Concepts

Meaning of Formulation One of the most important factors to be considered is the difference between the tools applied for making a proposal (forms) and the process by which the proposal is developed. An adequate methodological approach such as the RBM will allow from the beginning the construction of the concept of the project.

What is RBM? Definition: –“RBM is a management strategy focusing on performance and achievement of outputs, outcomes and impacts” (DAC OECD 2002) Facilitates the systematic thinking about three basic questions:  What is our goal? : “Are we doing the right thing?”  How will we reach that goal?: “Are we doing it right?”  How do we know whether we have achieved our goal and that we are doing it right?: “How do we know?”

INDICATORSMEANS OF VERIFICATION ASSUMPTIONS GOAL PURPOSE PRODUCTS ACTIVITIES Logical Framework

What is RBM? RBM is not: - A management strategy focusing on inputs and activities… It should include, but not be limited to, the following elements: -Performance Measurement -Performance Reporting -Performance Based Budgeting

The Evolution of RBM Focus on management, not administration Client-centered and citizen focused Emphasis upon Outputs versus Inputs; reduction in ex-ante controls Extensive use of outsourcing, competition and private service providers

The evolution of RBM Focus on performance not compliance “Did projects spend their budget and comply with rules and procedures?” “Did projects achieve their objectives and deliver results?” Focus on outputs, outcomes and impact, (not input, activities) “How many cases of conciliation and mediation of labor conflicts were attended by Ministries of Labor?” “What was the development result e.g Improved and better use of conciliation and mediation of labor conflicts by Ministries of Labor”

RBM in Development Cooperation  2000 MDGs  2002 Monterrey  2003 Rome  2004 Marrakesh  2005 Paris HLF-2  Coherence  Partnership  Harmonization  Alignment  Results Mutual responsibility for shared results

Lessons Indicators and evaluations should go beyond compliance and accountability M&E should contribute to build bridge between individual projects and sector-wide or global programmes Indicators should measure contribution to relevant mandates & commitments, (e.g. Summit, ILO, IACML) Evaluation of the performance of partners should be based on results achieved towards shared objectives

Key Concepts Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation & Results Based Management

Key Concepts The Results Chain Impact Outcome Outputs Activities Inputs INDICATORS

Key Concepts Input : the financial, human and material resources for the development intervention Activities : The coordination, technical assistance or training tasks delivered Output : The products, capital goods and services which results from a development intervention Outcome : short term and medium term effect of an intervention´s outputs Impact: Positive and negative, primary and secondary long term effects produced by a development intervention, directly or indirectly, intended or unintended RESULT A describable or measurable change resulting from a cause- and-effect relationship (CIDA) The output, outcome or impact (intended or unintended, positive and/or negative) of a development intervention

Key concepts Indicator –A quantitative or qualitative factor or variable that provides a simple and reliable means to measure achievement, to reflect the changes connected to an intervention or to help asses the performance of a development actor Quality-test of indicators:  SSpecific  MMeasurable  AAvailable  RRelevant  TTrackable

Key Concepts Identify indicators for output, outcome, impact –Specify exactly what is to be measured –Use a mix of qualitative and quantitative indicators –Use project rating systems, where aggregation is needed –Consider proxy indicators where direct indicators are not available –Make sure to have baselines and target value

Main questions to be solved  What is the problem which this project responds to?  What is the purpose or main reason for this initiative? What is the long- term goal which this project contributes to achieving?  What type of out-comes or effects are expected to be achieved in the middle term? What transformation is anticipated?  What are the specific objectives/ outputs that will be accomplished in the short term within this project?  What are the qualitative and quantitative indicators that will be used to measure the success of the different results of the project?  What kind of means of verification will be used to assure the evidence of the project’s expected results?  What sort of external or relevant assumptions or risks may affect the likelihood of achieving the expected results? What is the risk mitigation strategy to minimize potential impact of risks and to maximize adaptability of the project to facilitate success?  What are the main activities of the project? What are its approximate costs?

Facing donor organizations, which factors make a project proposal successful? Logical coherence Sustainability of Results Monitoring Systems Organizational Learning & Capacity Building Gender Approach Budget

Logical Coherence Out-puts Out-comes impacts Activities Budget