ABET ACCRIDITATION STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD By Dr. Abdul Azeem.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
ABET Accreditation for Surveying/Geomatics Programs in the US.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
SEM Planning Model.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
University of Peshawar 13 th QEC Meeting August 18-19,2009, Karachi.
Industry Advisory Board Department of Computer Science.
JIC ABET ACCREDITATION PROJECT
وحدة الاعتماد الأكاديمي 8/16/2015. ACCREDITATION Dr. ABD EL-SLAM HEMAID BADR A.A.U. DIRECTOR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING JAZAN UNIVERSITY 8/16/2015.
Enhancing the Quality of Education through Self Assessment Procedures
QEC initiates SA through the dean one semester prior to the assessment Department forms the PT that will be responsible for preparing SAR QEC reviews.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
COURSE ADDITION CATALOG DESCRIPTION To include credit hours, type of course, term(s) offered, prerequisites and/or restrictions. (75 words maximum.) 4/1/091Course.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
NAVIGATING THE PROCESS OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND IMPROVEMENT Shannon M. Sexton, Julia M. Williams, & Timothy Chow Rose-Hulman.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Accelerated Instructional Program Review Handbook Spring 2007.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL, THE MOST BENEFICENT.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Dr. Mohorjy, Prof. Reda, Dr. Ahmed EC بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1.Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes 2.Curriculum Design and Organization 3.Laboratories and Computing Facilities 4.Student.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Accreditation of Engineering Education in Turkey Prof. Dr. Bülent E. Platin Mechanical Engineering Department Middle East Technical University Ankara,
Venue: M038 Date: Monday Sep 26,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.7 How to write the Self-Study Report ? Presented by: JIC ABET COMMITTEE.
Some examples of quality standards and their use for self assessment and planning CINDA Workshop for TEIs Ramallah, May 2007.
Standard Five - Library and Information Resources Committee Members Chris Brown, College of Education, Co-Chair Scott Smith, University Libraries, Co-Chair.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Periodic Review Report Committee Summary: Amended Monthly Progress Report December 22, 2003.
ABET ACCREDITATION – BS [CS] PROGRAM STATUS REPORT & FUTURE PLANS AY 2015 – 2016 (FIRST SEMESTER) QUALITY ASSURANCE UNIT COLLEGE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE &
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
1 Michigan State University Preparation for EC 2000 Thomas F. Wolff, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies College of Engineering Michigan.
Organizational Process The activities conducted by an educational institution or school is called organizational process Which consist of series of steps.
Standard III Resources Effective Practices in Accreditation ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Feb , San Diego, CA Cheryl Aschenbach, ASCCC At-large.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
ABET ACCRIDITATION (IS Program) STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD ACADEMIC YEAR By Dr. Abdul Azeem Team Lead ABET (IS) 15 th September 2015.
Program Curriculum, T-L and Other Processes; Highly Doable and Highly Useful N J Rao and K Rajanikanth
Perkins End of Year Evaluation Wilson Community College.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Administration, Finances, and Resources
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Standard I Systematic Planning.
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
CURRICULUM DESIGN Part 2 of 2 PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES PROGRAM OUTCOMES COURSE OUTCOMES.
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
ABET Requirements and Procedures
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Sam Houston State University
Quality assurance and curriculum development
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
February 21-22, 2018.
Sam Houston State University
ZZULI ABET Workshop Assessment and Continuous Improvement
Presentation transcript:

ABET ACCRIDITATION STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD By Dr. Abdul Azeem

Outline Overview on ABET Criteria/Standards ABET Related Achievements till now. ABET related Activities of  ABET Members and their Responsibilities  Achievements in ABET related Activities of  ABET Members and their Responsibilities  Strategy for ABET Achievement  Task for

ABET IS TEAM MEMBERS S. No. Name GroupsCriteria/Tasks 1. Mr. Gayasudeen Hashmi Team – A PEO and SO Finalization, Develop Assessment and Evaluation Procedures of SO. Mapping of PEO/SO, Development of Indicators 2. Mr. Agha Salman Haider Team – A 3. Mr. Haseeb ur Rahman Team – B Facilities Curriculum. Table Mr. Ahmed Ali Shaik MeeranTeam – B 5. Mr. Asif Aftab Team – C Students and Faculty Policies and Procedures Collection, Table 6.1, 6.2, Table D-1, D-2 6. Mr. Shiraz Maniyar Team – C 7. Mr. Mohamed Abdul Gaffar Team – D Institutional Support, Policies, SOPs, budget, Support for Professional Development 8.Mohammed AlamgirTeam - D

The ABET criteria can be divided primarily divided in to two categories A. Academic Program Educational Objectives Student Outcomes Curriculum Continuous Improvement B. Administrative Students Faculty Facilities Institutional Support Continuous Improvement  Continuous Improvement criteria is Primarily Academic however also includes Administrative criteria. Overview on ABET Criteria/Standards

CRITERIA WISE STATUS

Sub CriteriaDescription/ RequirementStatus Student Admissions Summarize the requirements and process for accepting new students into the program. Completed/ To be Reviewed Evaluating Student Performance Summarize the process by which student performance is evaluated and student progress is monitored To be taken up Transfer Students and Transfer Courses Summarize the requirements and process for accepting transfer students and transfer credit. To be taken up Advising and Career Guidance Summarize the process for advising and providing career guidance to students. Completed/ To be Reviewed Work in Lieu of Courses Summarize the requirements and process for awarding credit for work in lieu of courses To be Taken up by Management Graduation Requirements Summarize the graduation requirements for the program and the process for ensuring and documenting that each graduate completes all graduation requirements for the program. To be taken up Transcripts of Recent Graduates The program will provide transcripts from some of the most recent graduates to the visiting team along with any needed explanation of how the transcripts are to be interpreted To be Taken up by Management CRITERION 1. STUDENTS – (Admit, Advise, Evaluate and Monitor)

CRITERION 2. PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES Sub CriteriaDescription/ RequirementStatus Mission StatementProvide the institutional mission statement Completed/ To be Reviewed Program Educational Objectives List the program educational objectives and state where these can be found by the general public. Completed/ To be Reviewed and Published Consistency of the Program Educational Objectives with the Mission of the Institution Describe how the program educational objectives are consistent with the mission of the institution. Completed/ To be Reviewed Program Constituencies List the program constituencies. Describe how the program educational objectives meet the needs of these constituencies. To be Taken up by Management Process for Review of the Program Educational Objectives Describe the process that periodically reviews the program educational objectives including how the program’s various constituencies are involved in this process. SOP to be Developed

CRITERION 3. STUDENT OUTCOMES Sub Criteria Description/ RequirementStatus Student Outcomes List the student outcomes for the program and indicate where the student outcomes are documented. Completed Relationship of Student Outcomes to Program Educational Objectives Describe how the student outcomes prepare graduates to attain the program educational objectives. Completed/ To be Reviewed. Process for the Establishment and Revision of the Student Outcomes Describe the process used for reviewing and revising student outcomes. SOP to be Developed Enabled Student Characteristics show how they enable students to attain by the time of graduation, characteristics (a) through (i) as listed in Criterion 3 Completed/ To be Reviewed.

CRITERION 4. CONTINEOUS IMPROVEMENT Sub Criteria Description/ RequirementStatus Student Outcomes List the student outcomes for the program and indicate where the student outcomes are documented. Completed Relationship of Student Outcomes to Program Educational Objectives Describe how the student outcomes prepare graduates to attain the program educational objectives. Completed/ To be Reviewed. Process for the Establishment and Revision of the Student Outcomes Describe the process used for reviewing and revising student outcomes. SOP to be Developed Enabled Student Characteristics show how they enable students to attain by the time of graduation, characteristics (a) through (i) as listed in Criterion 3 Completed/ To be Reviewed.

Sub Criteria Description/ RequirementStatus Table 5-1 Describes the plan of study for students in this program Completed, (Students Enrolment to be updated) Curriculum Alignment with PEOs Describe how the curriculum aligns with the program educational objectives Completed Curriculum Support for SO Attainment Describe how the curriculum and its associated prerequisite structure support the attainment of the student outcomes Completed Program Prerequisite Structure Attach a flowchart or worksheet that illustrates the prerequisite structure of the program’s required courses. Completed Hour and Depth wise requirement of Program areas Describe how your program meets the specific requirements for this program area in terms of hours and depth of study. Completed Cooperative Education If your program allows cooperative education describe the academic component of this experience and how it is evaluated by the faculty Partially Completed/To be taken up by Management Teaching Material Describe the materials (course syllabi, textbooks, sample student work, etc.),that will be available for review. Partially Completed Course Syllabi Appendix A, include a syllabus for each course used to satisfy ABET requirements To be Taken Up CRITERION 5. CURRICULUM

CRITERION 6. FACULTY Sub Criteria Description/ RequirementStatus Faculty QualificationsTable 6.1Partially Completed Faculty Adequacy How they are adequate to cover all the curricular areas of the program To be Taken Up Faculty ResumeInclude faculty resumes as in Appendix B.Partially Completed Faculty Workload Table 6-2, Faculty Workload Summary and describe this information in terms of workload expectations or requirements Partially Completed Faculty Size How the faculty in the program are of sufficient number to maintain continuity, stability, oversight, student interaction, and advising for the program To be Taken Up Professional Development Provide detailed descriptions of professional development activities for each faculty member. To be Taken Up/ Management Support Required Authority and Responsibility of Faculty Role played by the faculty with respect to course creation, modification, and evaluation, Role in the definition and revision of PEO and SO and their attainment. Administrative roles of HOD, Dean. To be taken up.

Sub Criteria Description/ RequirementStatus Offices, Classrooms Summarize each of the program’s facilities in terms of their ability to support the attainment of SO To be taken up. Laboratories How they are adequate to cover all the curricular areas of the program Appendix-C containing a listing of the major pieces of equipment used by the program Partially Completed Computing Resources Describe computing resources (workstations, servers, storage, networks including software) other than labs which are used by the students in the program. Accessibility of university-wide computing resources available to all students and their adequacy. Partially Completed Guidance Describe how students in the program are provided appropriate guidance regarding the use of resources in college/university To be Taken Up Maintenance and Upgrading of Facilities Describe the policies and procedures for maintaining and upgrading the tools, equipment, computing resources, and laboratories To be Taken Up/ Management Support Required Library ServicesA. Evaluate the capability of the library to serve the program, B. Adequacy of Technical collection C. Adequacy of Process for faculty to request new books. To be taken up. CRITERION 7. FACILITIES

Sub Criteria Description/ RequirementStatus Leadership Describe the leadership of the program and discuss its adequacy. How the leadership is involved in decisions that affect the program. Completed Program Budget and Financial Support Process used to establish the program’s budget. How teaching is supported by the institution in terms of graders, teaching assistants, teaching workshops, etc. How resources are provided and their adequacy to acquire, maintain, and upgrade the facilities, and equipment. To be Taken Up/ Management Support Required Staffing Describe the adequacy of the staff (administrative, instructional, and technical) Completed Faculty HiringDescribe the process for hiring of new faculty.Completed Faculty RetentionDescribe strategies used to retain current qualified faculty To be Taken Up/ Management Support Required Support of Faculty Professional Development Describe Adequacy of support for faculty professional development. How such activities such as sabbaticals, travel, workshops, seminars, etc., are planned and supported. Completed CRITERION 8. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT

Revision of Mission of IS Department Revision of Program Educational Objectives Establishment of Program Constituencies Coordination Committee. For involving Alumni, Industry and Graduate Schools in strategizing program Revision of PEO vs SO matrix Summarization of SO vs Courses matrices. Deployment of Course syllabus in ABET format Development of Rubrics for all courses Establishment of Process development committee. Activities in Priority – Academic (for this Semester)