Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.
Advertisements

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 2 of 8 1.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
The Michigan School Report Card Michigan Department of Education.
Federal Accountability Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC) and Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) Meeting | March 5, 2012 Texas.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
Growth Model: A Way to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) The Effective Use of Data to Make AYP AERA CCSSO April 13, 2007.
Using Assessments to Plan for Learning MEAP and MME Data Collection.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Michigan School Data (MI School Data). Agenda  Overview of MI School Data Portal  Navigation 101  Sample Reports  Training and TA  Q & A 2.
Update on Accountability March “…to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Where Are We Now? ESSA signed into law December 10, 2015
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
MACAE Summer Institute June 2010
2012 Accountability Determinations
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Michigan School Report Card Update
AYP and Report Card.
English Learning Meeting June 12th, :00 – 2:15 pm
Presentation transcript:

Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski

2 Adequate Yearly Progress Participation - 95% tested MEAP, MME, or MI-Access Achievement - Proficiency Meet state objective or “safe harbor” target for improvement –Participation and Proficiency Must meet in both Math and English Language Arts Must meet for whole school and subgroups Additional Academic Indicator Graduation Rate – 80% - high schools Attendance – 85% - elementary and middle schools

3 Michigan AYP Targets

4 Math AYP Goals Over 12 Years

5 50 “cells” for AYP

6 AYP Updates New for –Growth Model Pilot –Cohort Graduation Rate New for –New Graduation Rate Rules New in –Modified Full Independence

7 MEAP Progress Value Table

8 “On Trajectory” Toward Proficiency Fall 2006 Achievement ELA Fall 2007 Achievement ELA Not ProficientPartially Proficient LowMidHighLowMidHigh Not Proficient Low Mid High 2,7381,817 Partially Proficient Low 4,636 3,996 Mid 6,635 High Proficient Low Mid High Advanced Low Mid High

9 Growth Model Message Focus on “improvement” –Don’t work only with “bubble” students –Getting from 4-L to 3-L is enough improvement to be “on trajectory” The growth models provides modest adjustments

10 NCLB Graduation Rate NCLB requires that AYP include a graduation rate based on the percentage of students that –Receive a REGULAR high school diploma –In the STANDARD number of years AYP (including a graduation rate) is required for ALL schools

11 Graduation Rates for AYP The Graduation/Dropout Review and Comment Application from CEPI provides the graduation rates used for AYP for the class of 2008 The application will open in January/February of 2009

12 Graduation Rate Clean-Up UIC Linking Transfers –Out-of-State –Non-public School –Home School Contested Claims Fifth Year Extensions

13 Fifth Year Students Districts will be able to designate certain students not expected to graduate in four years –Students with disabilities –English language learners –Medically Condition or Diagnosis

14 AYP and Graduation Rate The AYP target graduation rate will remain at 80% Improvement in the graduation rate will substitute for meeting the target using “safe harbor”

15 New Graduation Rate Rules Published October 29, 2008 Four-year on-time graduation rates must be published States may seek federal approval to use 5 or 6 year graduation rates for AYP Unsure if federal approval is likely for AYP determinations States must justify graduation rate targets and improvement goals

16 Contact Information Paul Bielawski Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Michigan Department of Education PO Box Lansing, MI (517)