Administrative Rules 101 A Presentation for the 2013 New Board Member Orientation 1/8/2013.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Document Categorization Steve Ashbaker Director of Operations Joint Guidance Committee WECC Leadership Annual Training Session Salt Lake City, UT May 6-7,

Advertisements

S.L Part 1, Section 3.(b) G.S. 150B-21.3A: PERIODIC REVIEW AND EXPIRATION OF EXISTING RULES.

Working Together to Prepare Illinois School Leaders Initiative School Leader Advisory Council March 27, 2009.

CHERYL E. BRADLEY RULES AND PLANNING SECTION AIR QUALITY DIVISION JANUARY 15, 2014 Impact of Executive Order on Rulemaking Process.

Step by Step Guide for Regulations S HELLY B EZANSON K ELLY O FFICE OF G ENERAL C OUNSEL S EPTEMBER 5, 2012.

Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.

EDDIE TERRILL AIR QUALITY DIVISION DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AUGUST 21, 2014 EPA’s 111(d) Clean Power Plan Rule: A DEQ Perspective.

Slide 1 EPA Stormwater & Water Regulations: Local Impacts & Balancing Power 2011 Congressional City Conference.

2007 Annual Conference Administrative Rulemaking Instructor: Amigo Wade Virginia Division of Legislative Services

The Rule Making Process. Why Make A Rule? We heard that the XYZ Clinic has one therapist who is supervising 50 aides! We also heard that the therapist.

“How Would YOU Revise the Human Subject Research Regulation?” Laura Odwazny Office of the General Counsel U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Legislative Rule-Making Process. Three Different Processes Higher Education 29A-3A-1 et seq State Board of Education 29A-3B-1 et seq All other state agencies.

Development and Implementation HAS How does a bill become a law? Draw it…

State Procurement Policy Board This board is made up of 15 members, from designated categories of procurement agencies i.e. higher education, Department.

April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW P ART 2 Report By: Junen Baja Ruby Concepcion L EGISLATIVE P ROCESS.

HIPAA Revisions! Section 1104 THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT February 17, Nachimson Advisors, LLC.

East Asia and the Pacific Region

1 Updates to Texas Administrative Code 1TAC 206 Jeff Kline, Statewide Accessibility Coordinator Texas Department of Information Resources February 8, 2012.

State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.

Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing

ASAC Meeting, May 28, Administrative Rule Making Process in a nutshell.

1 of 19 Development of Industry Standards Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Ikechukwu N. Nwabueze, Ph.D. Director,

Operating Standards for Ohio Schools Michael Sawyers Acting Superintendent of Public Instruction October 9, 2012.

Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast David Peterson – La. AG’s Office – Asst. Attorney General - AG Designee to CPRA Ken Ortego – Vilar and Elliott.

Operating Standards for Children with Disabilities Update December 2013.

Summary of Rulemaking in California for the Forensic Alcohol Laboratories Regulation Review Committee Cathy L. Ruebusch, RN, MSN Office of Regulations.

Electronic Records Management: A New Understanding of Policy, Compliance, and Discovery Robert J. Sobie, Ph.D. Director Information Systems Department.

Consolidation Commission Training Session Board of County Commissioners Chambers April 6, 2005.

SCHOOL BUILDING AID Ed 321 Administrative Rule Revision.

Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.

Regional Water Availability Rulemaking Chip Merriam Water Resources Advisory Commission February 8, 2007 Chip Merriam Water Resources Advisory Commission.

RED LIGHT CAMERA INITIATIVE the future of southern california TIMELINE March 7, 2011Proponents Filed Notice of Intent March 22, 2011Attorney Prepared Ballot.

Conference Session Wrap Up Reform of Minnesota Planning & Zoning Enabling Laws 2010 Upper Midwest Conference APA Minnesota Legislative Committee Andrew.

Voluntary Action Program Updates Certified Professional Training October 27, 2015.

1 Washington State Department of Social & Health Services DOP Legislative Preparation Seminar Legislative Bill Analysis December 5, 2006 Christine M. Swanson.

STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE VIU POLICY REVIEW PROCESS. STEP 1 SUBMISSION Scheduled Review  Every 5 years (at least) to Executive Responsible  Delegated.

Rules, Regs and the RD….Priceless Ann L. Berry, ATC 2009 BOC Athletic Trainer Regulatory Conference.

Budget Status Fiscal Year 2011 & 2012 May 11, 2011 Draft.

Chapter 6 Administrative Agencies Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)

Budget Workshop February 15, :00 O’Neill Public Schools Central Office - Board Room.

State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.

DISTRICTS OF INNOVATION OVERVIEW PRESENTATION TO DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT & PLANNING COMMITTEE MAY 11, 2016 Dr. Maroba Zoeller, Chief Governmental Relations.

MSHA Rule Making Process Terry L. Bentley Acting Deputy Administrator Coal Mine Safety and Health.

What county clerks should know about Idaho public defense reform

Researching Recent California Regulations

Implementation Guide Change Process (DSMO)

Recommendations From the Student Success Task Force: Student Services

FY17 Proposed Budget Fiscal Year

NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIAL ORIENTATION Florida Property Appraisers Florida Tax Collectors February 7-10, 2017.

An Overview of the Small Business Advocacy Review Panel Process

Understanding the Appropriations Documents

SMSD….A District of Innovation

Standards Development: An Overview

Water Quality Credit Trading

Implementation Guide Change Process (DSMO)

Administrative Rulemaking

Follow the Rules: An overview of the rulemaking process and the Solid Waste Handling Standards Upate.

ADVISORY BOARDS How Can You Help?

Joint Powers Agreement

Minnesota’s Academic Standards

Statewide Accountability

Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management

Phase 1 Rulemaking Timeline*

Update on The Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) --Stakeholder Input March 2019 Sandra Garcia Director, State and Federal Programs.

Rule Adoption Process Under IC 22-12, 22-13, 22-14, 22-15

District of Innovation

RULES GOVERNING THE INTERIM JOINT COMMITTEE ON SCRUTINY OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION Presentation by NA Table to Interim Joint Committee on Scrutiny of Delegated.

Status of Exceptional Events Implementation Guidance

Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules (G.S. 150B-21.3A)

Presentation transcript:

Administrative Rules 101 A Presentation for the 2013 New Board Member Orientation 1/8/2013

What Are The Steps In The Process? 1.Legislative Authorization of Rule-Making Authority 2.Initial Draft of the Rules 3.Stakeholder Input 4.State Board of Education Committee Discussion 5.Common Sense Initiative Review 6.State Board of Education Resolution of Intent to Adopt The Rule

Steps in the Process (continued) 7.Public Hearing (at State Board of Education Meeting) 8.JCARR Review 9.State Board of Education Resolution to Adopt 10. Final File With JCARR

JCARR Review JCARR can recommend invalidation of a rule for any one of five reasons: 1.Lack of statutory authority to promulgate the rule; 2.The rule violates the intent of the legislation; 3.The rule conflicts with an existing rule; or 4.The rule was filed with an incomplete or inaccurate Rule Summary or Fiscal Analysis Form. 5.The agency did not comply with the Common Sense Business initiative.

A Typical Timeline for Rule Adoption Month 1 – Discussion of the Rule in Committee Month 2 – Resolution of Intent to Adopt/Full Board Discussion Month 3 – Rule is filed with JCARR Month 4 – Public Hearing; JCARR hearing Month 5 – Final Adoption by State Board of Education