Enterprise Architecture & Process Improvement EPIC Process Improvement Workshop April 17, 2007 Dick Burk Chief Architect and Manager, Federal Enterprise.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CPIC Training Session: Enterprise Architecture
Advertisements

An Overview of the Federal Segment Architecture Methodology
BENEFITS OF SUCCESSFUL IT MODERNIZATION
DRAFT Reporting Department of Defense Programs to OMB Improving PEO and Local Program Manager Use of Exhibit 300s to Show Business Value / Architecture.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Enterprise Architecture Managing the Paradigm Shift Deborah Carter, CEA Director, Office of Enterprise.
Principles of Quality Architecture and Moving Forward Towards a Unified Common Approach 5 January 2012 Walt Okon Senior Architect Engineer Architecture.
EGovernment National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations November 19, 2004.
1 IT Security (ITS) Line of Business (LoB) Kick-Off Meeting (Slides will be posted on March 23, 2005.
Enterprise Service Solutions Research Portal: The Current State of Service Oriented Architecture June 9 th, 2009.
6/3/2015 4:26:17 AM 5864_ER_HEALTH 1 EPA SOA Implementation Strategy Making a Difference in our Environment OEI Service Advisory Group December 13, 2007.
Reference Models مدل های مرجع معماری.
Students and Citizens: Enterprise Architectures for Education and Government Keith Hazelton.
A Very Big Branch You’ve ran across some acronyms in the reading. See if you can remember these:
Considering an Enterprise Architecture for the NSDI
Doug Nebert FGDC Secretariat June 2006
The topics addressed in this briefing include:
Vers. national spatial data infrastructure training program Geospatial Business Planning Introduction to FGDC Initiatives Related to Geospatial Business.
Investment Management Concepts Portfolio Management | Segment Architecture March 25, 2009 Adrienne Walker and Kshemendra Paul
Department of the Treasury Fiscal Service Financial Management Information System American Recovery & Reinvestment Accountability & Transparency In Government:
0 United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Enterprise Architecture Working Group.
Embedding Records Management into Agency Processes The FEA Records Management Profile Laurence Brewer, CRM National Archives and Records Administration.
Proposed EA Assessment Framework 2.0 Chief Architect’s Forum (CAF) Dick Burk Chief Architect and Director of Federal Enterprise Architecture Program, OMB.
1 11 June 22-24, 2008 ArchitectureGov Conference Next Generation Federal Segment Architecture Guidance Initiative.
U.S. Federal Enterprise Architecture World Bank Seminar November 22, 2006 Dick Burk Chief Architect and Manager, Federal Enterprise Architecture Program,
0 Un ited States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Enterprise Architecture Working Group.
Transforming the Business of Government Through Shared Services JOHN SINDELAR Deputy Associate Administrator United States General Services Administration.
Pennsylvania GTO 3-Year Strategic Plan NSGIC Annual Conference 2005 Rochester, NY Jim Knudson Stacey White
Government of CanadaGouvernement du Canada Service Transformation through Government On-Line Helen McDonald Director General, Office of the Chief Information.
Importance of a Geospatial Architecture Geospatial Best Practices for Architects Workshop April 11, 2007 Dick Burk Chief Architect and Manager, Federal.
Geospatial Enterprise Architecture Community of Practice Working Group Geospatial Community of Practice: Development of an FEA Geospatial Profile Briefing.
“FEA: Beyond Reference Models” September 07, 2006 Dick Burk Chief Architect and Manager, Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office – OMB.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
EPA EA Program Results Analysis February 29, 2008.
Texas Emergency Management Conference San Antonio April 3, 2012.
August 3, 2010ETDD Architecture GroupPage 1 Enforcement Targeting & Data Division (ETDD) Architecture Scope, Accomplishments, Challenges.
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA) Department of the Interior (DOI) Presented by: Diane A. Woodson-Reeves, Department Business Architect March, 2008.
I. Structure II. Coordination III. Staff.  I. The structure of the executive branch -State Department (Sec. of State) -Dpt of the Treasury -Dpt of the.
0 Un ited States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Enterprise Architecture Working Group.
Department of Agriculture Department of Commerce Department of Defense Department of Education Department of Energy Department of Health and Human Services.
FEA DRM Management Strategy Presented by : Mary McCaffery, US EPA.
Department of Defense Knowledge Fair Tim Young Office of Management and Budget September 27, 2007.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program CIO Bi-Weekly Briefing October 31, 2007.
1 DAS Annual Review June 2008 “Build to Share” Suzanne Acar, US DOIAdrian Gardner, US National Weather ServiceCo-Chair, Federal DAS
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
National e-Government Strategies: Designing for Success Tim Young Office of Management and Budget June 19, 2007.
Federal Enterprise BOF Rick Murphy Chief Architect, Blueprint Technologies June 7, 2004.
Cartographic Users Advisory Council The National Spatial Data Infrastructure and the Geospatial One Stop E-Gov Initiative May 3, 2002 John Moeller Staff.
Chunk 6 - Implementation Definition: Implement – put into effect.
 Section 808(d) of the Fair Housing Act, as amended, provides:  All executive departments and agencies shall administer their programs and activities.
Jeb Bush Governor Lucy D. Hadi Secretary 1 OQM, PaRTs, Sterling Overview Florida Department of Children and Families Office of Quality Management Child.
NGAC Discussion – Toward a National Geospatial Strategy National Geospatial Advisory Committee June 4, 2008.
The United States Foreign Assistance Reforms: An Overview.
© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved EA in the Federal Enterprise Life Cycle September 2006 Steve Decker MITRE Corporation Center for Enterprise.
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Architecture Plus Meeting December 4, 2007 Kshemendra Paul (Acting) Chief Architect.
U.S. General Services Administration Open Collaboration: Networking Financial Management Communities to Advance Information-Sharing and Best Practices.
Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (EPHTN): Enterprise Architecture (EA) Ray Buckner Environmental Health Tracking Branch Division of Environmental.
Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office April 2003 Draft Performance Reference Model: Overview for Federal Agencies.
Geospatial Line of Business FGDC Steering Committee Meeting October 23, 2006.
Managing Enterprise Architecture
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA)
Transforming the Business of Government Through Shared Services JOHN SINDELAR Deputy Associate Administrator United States General Services Administration.
CSPP Spring 2011 FEA and FSAM.
Enterprise Architecture Methods
About The Federal Data Architecture Subcommittee (DAS) 2008
CAF Quarterly Meeting Measuring the Value of an EA Practice
Vijay Rachamadugu and David Snyder September 7, 2006
B4: Bureaucracies.
Chapter 9: The Federal Bureaucracy
Presentation transcript:

Enterprise Architecture & Process Improvement EPIC Process Improvement Workshop April 17, 2007 Dick Burk Chief Architect and Manager, Federal Enterprise Architecture Program, OMB

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 2 Value to the Mission Increase the value of architecture activities to improve results in agency mission areas.

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 3 Strategic Outcomes from EA Operational excellence More customer intimacy Better services to citizens (customers) More strategic agility Source: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy, Jeanne Ross, Peter Weill and David Robertson

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 4 FEA Strategic Initiatives for FY07 Deliver Value to Core Mission Program Areas Accelerate Adoption of Cross Agency Initiatives Develop Measures of EA Performance

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 5 Enterprise Architecture provides “big picture” view across the organization Segment Architecture focus on specific areas of the business and is more detailed and results-oriented –Improve program performance and better customer (citizen) service –Perform operations more efficiently and effectively Based on the Business Reference Model (BRM) and Service Component Reference Model (SRM). Why Segment Architecture?

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 6 HHS Energy DHS Interior Justice EPA SBA Defense Treasury Agencies Business Services Human Resources Financial Management Economic Development Education Community and Social Services Health Human Resources Financial Management Natural Resources Homeland Security HHS Energy DHS Interior Justice EPA SBA Defense Treasury Reusable Service Components Core Mission Area Agencies Business Services Mapping / Geospatial / Elevation / GPS Security Management Records Management Economic Development Education Community and Social Services Health Human Resources Financial Management Natural Resources Homeland Security HHS Energy DHS Interior Justice EPA SBA Defense Treasury Enterprise Services Core Mission Area Agencies Business Services Architecture Segments: LoBs and Services

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 7 Segment Identification

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 8 Architecture Levels

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 9 Core Mission Area –Unique service area defining the mission or purpose of the agency –Core mission areas are defined in the agency Business Model. Business Service: –Common or shared business service supporting a core mission area. –Business services are defined in the agency Business Model and include the processes and back office services used to achieve the purpose of the agency. Enterprise Service: –Common or shared IT service supporting core mission areas and business services. –Enterprise services are defined in the agency Service Model and include the applications and service components used to achieve the purpose of the agency. Three Types of Segments

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 10 Concepts described in the FEA Practice Guidance –Segment Architecture –Enterprise Architecture (EA) Transition Strategy –Measuring EA Value Sections: –Section 1 – Overview –Section 2 – Introducing Segment Architecture –Section 3 – Developing Segment Architecture –Section 4 – EA Transition Strategy –Section 5 – Measuring the Value of EA Programs (Draft) FEA Practice Guidance

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 11 Architecture – Budget Schedule

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 12 Agency Example: Housing Mortgage Insurance at the Department of Housing and Urban Development Agency Example

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 13 Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government Mortgage Insurance LoB: Current Architecture

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 14 Mortgage Insurance LoB: Target Architecture

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 15 Functions Processes Functions Processes Systems Reporting Stakeholder Management Core Mission Areas Enterprise Services Current Architecture Target Architecture Transition Strategy Financial Management Result: More Efficient Support for the Business

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 16 Return on Investment Inputs Four months of time from Architects and Program Officials Three years to transition to target state $9 million dollars in DME (not including infrastructure) Outputs Reduced the number of systems by nearly 80% Minimized functional overlap in the Mortgage Insurance LoB Modernized HUD’s technology base Decreased the total cost of ownership from $28 million dollars to $16 million Outcomes Increased the number of loans processed per day Identified faster, the number of lenders who are illegally discriminating Identified earlier, the lenders providing HUD with bad loans Identified non-viable lenders, and responded faster

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 17 For Further Information: