Report of the Technical Subcommittee Mario Bergeron, Technical Subcommittee Chair/NGEC Vice Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Starting Planning for the 2010 Policy Key Issues Notes for the TAC Executive Committee April 8, 2009 Phil Hattis, AIAA VP for Public Policy.
Advertisements

AIAA Task Force on Earth Observations 2 October 2009 AIAA HQ Reston VA.
PRESENTATION TO THE JOINT RULES COMMITTEE 15 MARCH 2012 ON THE PROGRESS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PANEL ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED.
Section 4.9 Review Work Group Update to Board of Directors March 11, 2015.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
Copyright © 2008 Software Defined Radio Forum, Inc. All Rights Reserved SDR Forum Document Development Process.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC Subcommittee 5 – Immunity Stephen R Whitesell SC-5 Chair 11/13/2014.
Section 305 Technical Subcommittee Boston, MA: June 14, 2014.
1 May 8, 2006 Briefing to Northwest Congressional Delegation Staff.
Section 305 Technical Subcommittee Chicago IL June 22 nd 2011.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Standardization Working Group Report
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
HAAGA-HELIA’s accreditation process stages for AACSB Fall 2010Spring 2011Fall The applicant school establishes AACSB International membership.
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
Section 305 Technical Subcommittee Progress Report Mario Bergeron-Chairman Dale Engelhardt-Vice Chairman Charlotte, NC September 15, 2011.
Railroad 101 Equipment April 9, Next Generation Corridor Equipment Committee  Established by Section 305 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement.
1 Chapter Officer Roles & Responsibilities. 2 Chapter Officers/Leadership Team Serving on the Chapter Leadership Team is a privilege as well as a responsibility.
Service Equality Team July 2005 Action for Equality Briefing.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Update on the California Dairy Future Task Force and moving forward December 5, 2012 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific.
ISO 9001:2015 Revision overview - General users
MAC Committee Update Robert Kondziolka, MAC Chair.
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
Bylaws, Rules, and Periodic Review – Updates from Standards and Practices Julie Adams, ASCCC Executive Director Craig Rutan, ASCCC South Representative.
0 PRIIA 305 Technical Subcommittee PRIIA Executive Board Meeting March 10, 2010.
1 Delta Levees Investment Strategy Delta Stewardship Council Central Valley Flood Protection Board Levees Workshop July 10, 2015.
PRIIA Section 305 Next Generation Equipment Pool Committee Ken Uznanski Amtrak Policy and Development SCORT National Meeting September 21, 2010.
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
JJ Jamieson MIC Chair MIC Report for ISAS August 2014 Salt Lake City.
School Finances for Finance Subcommittees School Councils.
JJ Jamieson MIC Chair JGC update September 2014 Salt Lake City.
Candidate for Standardization Pilot Program - Status Report September 27, 2011 Michael Burshtin, Standardization Coordinator Dale Engelhardt, Vice Chair.
CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE SERVICE ACT 2 OF 2011 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON POLICE.
© 2013 IBM Corporation OSLC WG Transition **DRAFT** Plan 8 April 2013 Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration Lifecycle integration inspired by the web.
SC14 Report to the SC13 Plenary Larry Schultz, Chairman Erin Cliggett Kahn, Secretary 17 June 2008.
PPTA Governance Review Shorter term considerations.
0 PRIIA 305 Technical Subcommittee Conference Call March 4, :00 pm ET.
API 17N Subsea Production System Reliability, Integrity, and Technical Risk Management Don Wells Hess Corporation.
PRIIA 305 Diesel Electric Locomotive Specification Independent Review Larry Salci February 15, 2011 Washington, D.C.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update January 14, NSDI Strategic Plan High-level Timeline 2 Timeframe Activity Dec - Feb Project Start-up – COMPLETED Feb -
Long Term Move-In Move-Out Development Strategy August 19, 2002 DRAFT.
Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.
NGEC, moving forward Next Generation Equipment Committee October 24, 2014.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
FRA Presentation to PRIIA 305 Tech Subc 22 Apri Kevin Kesler Equipment & Operating Practices Division PRIIA Section 305 Next Generation Passenger.
Section 305 Technical Subcommittee Progress Report Dale Engelhardt-Acting Chairman Washington, DC Feb. 21,
Andy Meyers ISAS Chair OC Report ISAS Subcommittee August 2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
South Tyneside Neighbourhood Services and Children and Young People Scrutiny Committees – 20 March 2008 Healthcare Commission Standards for Better Health.
Section 305 Technical Subcommittee Sub Group Leader Discussion Dale Engelhardt June 14, 2012.
PRIIA 305 Technical Subcommittee Systems Engineering Processes for Passenger Equipment Acquisition and Life Cycle Support Presented at: NGEC Executive.
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
Update to Members Analysis Team Update on current activities for comment List of proposed new project ideas Opportunity for Members to suggest new projects.
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
Next-Generation Equipment Committee Executive Board
Section 305 Technical Subcommittee Progress Report
Next-Generation Equipment Committee Executive Board
Continuum of Care Metropolitan Homelessness Commission
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Next-Generation Equipment Committee Executive Board
NGEC Executive Board Chairman’s Report
EVP Message to the Board
Candidate for Standardization Pilot Program - Status Report
Report of the Technical Subcommittee
NGEC Executive Board Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Report of the Technical Subcommittee Mario Bergeron, Technical Subcommittee Chair/NGEC Vice Chair

Activities of the Tech Subcommittee Establishment of the subcommittee Process for specification development Activities undertaken by the committee in the last year Current activities Plans for the coming year

Establishment of the Subcommittee The NGEC decided in its byelaws on the need for a technical subcommittee in January 2010 The role of the subcommittee was to initially take leadership on the development of technical specifications and then deal with all issues of a technical nature facing NGEC Deliver the specifications identified by the NGEC against the dates set The core team is made up of the FRA, the states and Amtrak Coordinate the involvement of all interested industry members in the development process Reconcile the various goals set out for the NGEC as they relate to the content of specifications

Processes for Specification Development Conference calls were held to organize structure of subcommittee Opening industry forum in April 2010 with 150 attendees Subgroups formed for individual technical areas – Mechanical-Jeff Gordon – Structural-Eloy Martinez/Anand Prabhakaran – Locomotive-Steve Fretwell – Electrical-Tammy Krause – Interiors-Andrew Wood – VTI-John Tunna/Brian Marquis Volunteers stepped forward to work on subgroups Subgroups met on a regular basis to determine the content of specifications in their specialist areas Technical subcommittee continues to hold regular conference calls and remains very active

Specification Process (cont.) A requirements document for each vehicle type was provided from the Executive Board Subgroups provided their input for the relevant sections of the specification based on a strawman document (originally Caltrans C21 specification) All input is provided to Amtrak staff and supporting specification writer Consolidation process raises questions on the input received. Amtrak staff interface with subgroup leaders to resolve these issues Draft specification compiled and put on the NGEC website Opportunity for everyone to review all of the spec – not just the elements they had worked on Specification further updated based on industry comments

Specification Process (cont.) Final draft placed on the website Meeting of the full technical subcommittee scheduled Industry members can submit final questions and suggestions. These are reviewed at the meeting and a final decision made by Amtrak specification team and relevant subgroup leader Vote taken on the acceptability or otherwise of the specification Once approved, the specification is forwarded to Executive Board for approval Executive Board appoints review panel to evaluate the specification against the requirements document Review Panel makes recommendation to the Executive Board Executive Board votes on acceptance or otherwise of the specification

What has the Subcommittee Done This Year? Three specification goals were set for the subcommittee by the NGEC – Bi-Level car specification by end of July 2010 – Single Level car specification by end of December 2010 – High speed diesel-electric locomotive by end of December 2010 – Commencement of a trainset specification All of these dates were met* – The timeline was aggressive – More effort was required than originally anticipated – It would not have been possible without the huge contributions of industry members – The technical documents produced are of a high quality The next goal is to get acquisition programs underway to justify the investment industry has made

Additional Tasks Undertaken Commencement of creation of a systems engineering process Definition of what is required for standardization Position papers on key technical issues Projection of future developmental opportunities Further investigation of the potential demand for equipment types

Current Activities Finalization of the diesel-electric locomotive specification – Specification developed from scratch by the team – Review panel identified issues with structure and format – Technical content has broadly met the goals – An update is currently underway and approval is now set for mid-March 2011 Development of the trainset specification Progression of the standardization policy Development of the systems engineering policy Provision of support to states in the development of their rail planning Determination of the approach to other equipment types

Plans for the Coming Year Completion of the specification tasks identified previously – Diesel-electric locomotive – Trainset Turn the policy documents developed into working processes – Systems engineering – Standardization Preparation for and support of the first acquisition programs Creation of task force to research options for New York dual mode locomotive replacement Creation of engineering policies and support strategies for the options under consideration for a corporate entity Continue to find ways to ensure the collaborative approach that has been taken with all parts of the industry continues for the future work of the NGEC

Conclusion Thank you to many people – Industry members for their willing participation and commitment – Amtrak staff for their support throughout the process – FRA for providing resources and leadership – The states for contributing their people and for providing a focus on the underlying needs – Everyone for taking challenging targets and delivering against them