Integrating a Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network into Texas’ Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Jill D. Csekitz, Aquatic Scientist Texas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Advertisements

TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Louisville, KY August 30, 2011.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
James Beckley. Virginia and DEQ Virginia has > 52,255 miles of rivers and streams 116,364 acres of significant lakes and reservoirs 2,684 square miles.
QA/QC and QAPP: How to Get Professional Quality Data From a Volunteer Program.
Paul Bireta December 4, 2012 The Impact of Large Storm Events on Nutrient Loadings in Texas Rivers 1.
Project Venue Little Bear River –Cache County, UT –5-20 km from Utah State University –Existing cyberinfra-structure from ongoing projects with EPA/USDA/USU/
Texas Stream Team …is a joint partnership with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, U.S. EPA Region VI, Texas State University-San Marcos, and numerous.
DESIGNING MONITORING PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE BMP EFFECTIVENESS Funded by grants from USDA- CSREES, EPA 319, NSF Nancy Mesner - Utah State University, Dept.
A Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring Network for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques David K. Stevens 1, Jeffery.
Spatial and temporal trends in dissolved oxygen concentrations and dissolved oxygen depletion (hypoxia) in the Delaware River Basin Demonstration Area.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Integrating Historical and Realtime Monitoring Data into an Internet Based Watershed Information System for the Bear River Basin Jeff Horsburgh David Stevens,
1 National Hydrography Dataset Applications Overview Symposium on Terrain Analysis for Water Resources Applications Austin, Texas December 16, 2002.
Problem Description: To develop an autonomous network for monitoring aquatic environment Problem Description: To develop an autonomous network for monitoring.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
Water | Slide 1 of 16 January 2006 Water for Pharmaceutical Use Part 4: Commissioning, Qualification and validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good.
Flowchart for the Laboratory Sampling Sample Subsample Sub- suplying lab LIMS Analyte A Analyte B Analyte C Analyte D Analyte Y Result A Result B Result.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT
Management Issues in the Lake Michigan Basin  Aquatic invasive species  Nutrient enrichment  Beach Health  Contaminants – in Sediments, Fish and Drinking.
Overview of Continuous Water-Quality Monitoring. Purpose of Monitoring Define the objectives of the water quality monitoring project 1. Environmental.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Ecosystems Climate and Land-Use Change Water Natural Hazards Core Science Systems Energy and Minerals, and Environmental Health U.S. Geological Survey.
Historic Water Quality Concerns High nutrients Impacts on downstream Cutler Reservoir Causes included poor management of riparian corridors and uplands,
Understanding and Implementing SWAMP Comparability: Quality Assurance SWAMP Quality Assurance Help Desk Quality Assurance Research.
Texas Clean Rivers Program Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens.
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
More than you probably wanted to know about NWIS and NWISWeb U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey Kenneth J. Lanfear USGS.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
1 Dec. 8, 1997 LEADS Quality Assurance Summary Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
Dr. Matt Helmers Assistant Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University How is.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
STATUS OF GREEN LAKE. Status of Green Lake Lake Management Plan Approved Lake Management Plan Approved Three Grants Awarded Three Grants Awarded.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Dr. Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water April 16, 2007 USGS: Water Resources Program.
INTERREG IV A « 2 Mers Sea Zeeën » The DYMAPHY project is part of the European cross- border cooperation programme INTERREG IV A « 2 Seas ». The project.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
An Overview of Quality Assurance Project Plans Kuskokwim Watershed Council Water Quality Training Workshop August 2007 Facilitated by Zender Environmental.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Laboratory Certification Update Part 2 Common Findings KWWOA Louisville April 15, 2015 Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
USGS Kansas Water Science Center
OHIO RIVER MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT Program Overview.
Surface Water Quality Monitoring Information System (SWQMIS) Cindi Atwood Tetra Tech, Inc. (703) Nancy Ragland TCEQ.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Dam Removal as a Solution to Increase Water Quality Matthew Nechvatal, Tim Granata Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science.
Monitoring water resources, water use, water pollution and compliance IWRM for River Basin Organisations.
Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,
LEADS/EMS DATA VALIDATION IPS MeteoStar December 11, 2006 WHAT IS VALIDATION? From The Dictionary: 1a. To Make Legally Valid 1b. To Grant Official.
CyAN (Cyanobacteria Assessment Network) Project Work Package 1: Field Data Collation/Interpretation Keith Loftin, USGS PI and WP1 team lead.
Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director.
The Bear Creek Watershed Association protects & restores water & environmental quality within the Bear Creek Watershed from the effects of land use. Bear.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
BMW Association 2006 Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir Watershed Management Plan ~ Brief History of the Reservoirs ~ Overview of the BMW Association ~ Outline.
Impacts of Livestock Waste on Surface Water Quality By the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality For the Livestock Manure Nutrient.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
Dodge County Water Monitoring Update
Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative
What’s in Your Watershed? Fall and Virgil Creeks
Water for Pharmaceutical Use
Thief River Watershed Sediment Investigation
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
How many ways do you see water being used?
US Environmental Protection Agency
Paulding County, Georgia
Provider, Supervision & QC Codes
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Marco island water quality monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Integrating a Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network into Texas’ Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Jill D. Csekitz, Aquatic Scientist Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Austin Texas Austin Texas

Disclaimer The use of firm, trade, or brand names is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the TCEQ. The use of firm, trade, or brand names is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the TCEQ.

What is Continuous Monitoring? A device that makes repeated measurements over time A device that makes repeated measurements over time Deployed over an extended length of time Deployed over an extended length of time Samples at high frequencies to identify trends or events Samples at high frequencies to identify trends or events Data is usually available in real-time over the internet Data is usually available in real-time over the internet

Total Area: 268, 581 sq. miles Water Area: 6, 784 sq. miles France: 211, 209 sq. miles 1754 Active Routine Surface Water Quality Monitoring Stations 23 Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Stations © Texas and The Territories, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The TCEQ Continuous Water Quality Initiative Upstream Dairies -Erath County -Cow Population: 50,000 -North Bosque River impaired -phosphorus -excessive algae Downstream drinking water -Lake Waco -Taste and odor -City of Waco -People Population: 117,464 TCEQ adds continuous monitoring in Bosque watershed to track improvements in water quality

TCEQ’s Existing Program 23 stations in TX 23 stations in TX 2 stations deployed in stations deployed in stations each year since stations each year since 2001 Partnerships with local, state and federal entities Partnerships with local, state and federal entities Parameters monitored Parameters monitored Physical parameters Physical parameters Nutrients – nitrate, ammonia, and total reactive phosphorus Nutrients – nitrate, ammonia, and total reactive phosphorus Depth profiling in reservoirs Depth profiling in reservoirs

Deployed Stations

Equipment

Costs of Establishing and Maintaining a Monitoring Site

How Does TCEQ Mitigate Cost of Network? Form partnerships with local, state, and federal entities Form partnerships with local, state, and federal entities 12 participating entities 12 participating entities Share resource burden Share resource burden Use existing infrastructure (USGS) Use existing infrastructure (USGS) Host data Host data

Data Record Produced Wow… 525, 600 data points! What do we do with them? Grab vs. Continuous: Why Compare? -Different monitoring objectives -Based on different scale of sampling

Uses of Continuous Monitoring Yield high resolution data Yield high resolution data Public display of data Public display of data Identify seasonal trends and daily variation Identify seasonal trends and daily variation Assess point and non-point impacts Assess point and non-point impacts Assess improvement after BMPs are in place Assess improvement after BMPs are in place

General Quality Assurance Continuous monitoring network - specific QAPP Continuous monitoring network - specific QAPP SOPs written for site deployment, equipment operation and maintenance, and data validation SOPs written for site deployment, equipment operation and maintenance, and data validation Technical Systems Audits Technical Systems Audits Pre-processed automatic validation Pre-processed automatic validation Suspicious values Suspicious values Instrument limits Instrument limits Database automatically “grades” multiprobe data according to calibration verification results Database automatically “grades” multiprobe data according to calibration verification results Data Validator manually validates all data Data Validator manually validates all data Only data that passes validation is publicly displayed Only data that passes validation is publicly displayed

How Do We Get the Most Out of Our Continuous Data? Variety of Data Users Variety of Data Users Identify data quality – let users decide what they need Identify data quality – let users decide what they need

Multiprobe Calibration Verification

Aqualab QC Daily calibration of Physicals and TRP Daily calibration of Physicals and TRP On-board laboratory control standards (ammonia, nitrate, and TRP) On-board laboratory control standards (ammonia, nitrate, and TRP) Dynamic calibration of ammonia and nitrate (every measurement) Dynamic calibration of ammonia and nitrate (every measurement) On-board standards are made and certified by a contract lab On-board standards are made and certified by a contract lab Output of all calibration data Output of all calibration data

Aqualab Conductivity QC

Aqualab NO 3 and NH 3 Diagnostics Shows sensor response to on-board standards

Aqualab Automated QC Actual LCS Concentrations -155 ppb - 40 ppb Instrument blanks

TCEQ’s Uses of Continuous Monitoring Data Water diversion from drinking water supplies Water diversion from drinking water supplies Characterizing golden algae blooms Characterizing golden algae blooms Targeting field investigations Targeting field investigations BMP effectiveness BMP effectiveness Effectiveness of salt cedar eradication Effectiveness of salt cedar eradication Trend analysis of specific conductance, pH and DO Trend analysis of specific conductance, pH and DO 305b reporting 305b reporting

Available Data Parameters Parameters DO* DO* pH* pH* Temp* Temp* Conductivity* Conductivity* Turbidity Turbidity Chlorophyll Chlorophyll Nitrate Nitrate Ammonia Ammonia Total Reactive Phosphorus Total Reactive Phosphorus Flow Flow Not all parameters available at every station Not all parameters available at every station Most Stations: only field parameters are measured Most Stations: only field parameters are measured

Data on the Web Or… Search “continuous water data” on TCEQ home Page:

Questions? Jill Texas Commission on Environmental Quality MC – 165 PO Box Austin, TX –