Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Thief River Watershed Sediment Investigation

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Thief River Watershed Sediment Investigation"— Presentation transcript:

1 Thief River Watershed Sediment Investigation
By: Corey Hanson, Water Quality Coordinator, Red Lake Watershed District For: January 10, 2007 Northwest Regional Sustainable Development Partnership Meeting Thief River Watershed Sediment Investigation

2 Project Origin Marshall County Water Resources Advisory Committee
Red River Basin Water Quality Team December 15, 2005 Impoundment Meeting Part of Marshall County Water Plan and the RLWD 10-Yr Plan

3 Thief River Watershed

4 Problems Sedimentation in the Thief River Falls Reservoir
Large flushes of suspended solids and nutrients during releases from Agassiz NWR Streambank/ditch erosion and sedimentation Channelization Flooding Low Dissolved Oxygen Hydrogen Sulfide

5 Evidence

6 Thief lake Deltas Moose River Spillway Ditch

7 How were problems identified
Red Lake Watershed District Long-Term Monitoring Program Identification of impairments Monitoring by Marshall County Investigative monitoring Created more questions than answers Complaints about poor water quality

8 Impaired Waters – New On 2006 List

9 Questions That will Be Addressed
Is Agassiz NWR really cause of water quality problems in the Thief River or does the problem come from what is entering the refuge? Influence of the Mud River? How often does turbidity increase between Thief Lake and Agassiz NWR and what is causing this problem? Is this reach impaired? Are ditches contributing to the Thief River water quality problems? What happens during runoff events? How is the rate of release from Agassiz Pool to the quality of water being released from the pool?

10 Suggested Solutions Intensive study that includes continuous monitoring. Focus on Thief Lake and Agassiz NWR Input vs Output TIMING Sediment Budgets Coordination Maintenance

11 Project Objectives Purchase Equipment
Equipment calibration and maintenance Water quality monitoring Flow monitoring Data entry and reduction Develop sediment budget Water quality modeling Assess Results Make recommendations Write and review report Publish Report Develop impaired waters work plans

12 Timeline February 2007 – February 2010
Continuous monitoring in open water months of all years. Equipment installed as soon as possible. Monthly sampling (at least) FLUX and SWAT Modeling will be done near the end of the project so that monitoring data may be used

13 Budget Objectives Funding Types Total Grant and Local Cash In-kind
1. Equipment – Purchase of 5 logging sondes, 3 level loggers, & construction materials; 3 level loggers, profiling sondes, & logging rain gauge are already available from the RLWD $39,600 2. Equipment Calibration & Maintenance $7,100 3. Water quality monitoring (Marshall Co. & RLWD) $27,050 $25,150 $52,200 4. Flow monitoring (RLWD) – rating curve development $9,900 5. Data entry & reduction (all) $10,350 $750 $11,100 6. Develop sediment budget – FLUX model (RLWD) $4,900 7. Water quality modeling – SWAT model (EERC) $45,000 8. Assess results (All) $1,500 $2,500 $4,000 9. Make recommendations ALL 10. Write and review report (All) $6,500 $9,000 11. Publish report (RLWD) $3,000 12. Develop impaired waters study work plans (All) $2,000 $1,200 $3,200 Total of Program Objectives $158,400 $34,600 $193,000

14 Funding Encouraged by Molly MacGregor of the MPCA to apply for a Clean Water Partnership Resource Investigation Grant. MPCA Approved $96,500 in Funding for the Project ($193,000 total budget) Cash Match from RLWD In-kind support Marshall County Water Plan, USFWS, DNR, Pennington County Red River Watershed Management Board?

15 Monitoring Plan Continuous Monitoring Sampling Flow Rating Curves
Streamgauging Data Analysis Modeling Flux SWAT Verification of existing impairments, ID of new ones

16 Monitoring Sites

17 Proposed Agassiz NWR Monitoring Sites

18 Continuous Monitoring
Eureka Manta Logging sondes with optical dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and water depth added. At least 5 or 6 sites Water level loggers at other sites 2 to 5 sites Weather

19 Sampling 11 sites Sampling by the RLWD and the Marshall Co. Water Plan
Total suspended solids Total phosphorus and orthophosphorus E-Coli Field Measurements Turbidity Dissolved Oxygen More

20 Modeling Soil and Water Assessment Tool Basic Tasks
Model Development, Calibration, and Validation Water Quality Assessment Identification of Target Areas and BMPs Evaluation of Hypothetical BMP Implementation Compilation of Results

21 Next Steps Getting a grant agreement to sign
Creating a detailed work plan and budget Review past studies/projects Piggyback Projects Monitoring by Agassiz NWR At outlet from Agassiz Pool to Ditch 11 Ditch 11 above Agassiz Pool Ditch 11 Erosion Control

22 Contact Information Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red Lake Watershed District 102 Main Ave N P.O. Box 803 Thief River Falls, MN Phone: Cell: Website:


Download ppt "Thief River Watershed Sediment Investigation"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google