The NWP as a National Infrastructure that Encourages Writing and the Teaching of Writing NWP Annual Meeting 2005 Inverness Research Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU Presidency Conference Effective policies for the development of competencies of youth in Europe Warsaw, November 2011 Improving basic skills in.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Presented by the US Department of Education. More information at
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Northeast Regional Program in Charles City Questions & Answers.
The Legacies Of The National Writing Project (NWP) 30 years of Developing Working Assets For Ongoing Improvement.
Picture here “ Commitment to Quality Education for All ”
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
Learner Link – Durham County Increasing Access to Early Childhood College Courses Durham’s Partnership for Children Child Care Services Association Durham.
The Role of University Food Gardens in Higher Education Sustainability Sydney Klein April 3, 2014.
Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) in Engineering Program Engineering Education NSF Awardees Conference-Sept , 2007 Mary Poats, Program Manager-RET.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
IngImplementing ICT in School The British Council Seminar 0161 Alice Chiu, Shu-chuan Taipei Municipal Cheng-san Senior High School.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Growing Math Teachers and Institutional Agents Katrine Czajkowski (Mar Vista HS) Rafaela M. Santa Cruz (SDSU)
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
CSU Summit on the Preparation of Teachers Irvine, California February 14, 2011 Connecting Teacher and Administrator Preparation with After-School Learning.
The Dance Leadership Continuum for Young People Level One Key Stage 4 Level Two Key Stage 5 Level Three Key Stage 5 KS5 + Award in Dance Leadership Foundation.
Hertfordshire PE conference Headteacher workshop – ‘Primary PE and School Sport Premium: Evidence & Impact’
BC Yukon Technical Support Network BC & Yukon Technical Support Network Welcome.
Requirements for a District Title I Parent Involvement and Participation Plan Presented by: Diana LaMar, Ed.D. Director of State and Federal Programs September.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Lions Quest 1. What If Lions Could… Give kids the strength to resist drugs and alcohol, and make good choices Help children develop positive skills Bring.
EYC Environmental Youth Connections Connie Abert, Waupaca County UWEX & Gretchen Marshall, UWSP JCEP Conference April, 2011 University of Wisconsin, U.S.
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
World Languages Portfolio. Student Growth Portfolio with Peer Review 2  THE GOAL: A holistic and meaningful picture of the value a teacher adds to students,
1 Making the Case for Federal Support of the National Writing Project (An Evaluator’s Perspective) NWP Spring Meeting 2006 Inverness Research Associates.
IMPACT OF NWP ON TEACHERS’ CLASSROOM PRACTICE: Results of a teacher survey Inverness Research Associates NWP annual meeting 2001.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
The National Writing Project © 2015 Taylor & Francis.
European Broadband Portal Phase II Application of the Blueprint for “bottom-up” broadband initiatives.
Celebrating Nursery School Principles and Practice Margaret Edgington Independent Early years Consultant.
Reading the River Evaluation Summary Jeffrey Smith Department of Psychology Northern Kentucky University.
TICKIT Overview and Research: Rural Teacher Technology Integration Curtis J. Bonk, Indiana University
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Parent Night August 26, 2014 WELCOME to Kelly Edwards Elementary Where Dreams Begin Proud to be a Title I School.
K-12 Mathematics in Rapid City Longitudinal Findings from Project PRIME Ben Sayler & Susie Roth November 5, 2009.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 5 Reviewing and Establishing a Summative.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
WELCOME TO THE ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING FOR PARENTS PLEASE SIGN-IN.
Experiences in Professional Development from the Nebraska Earth Systems Education Network (NESEN) Dave Gosselin, Director Nebraska Earth Systems Education.
THE CASE FOR THE NATIONAL WRITING PROJECT AN EVALUATOR’S PERSPECTIVE Inverness Research Associates April 2005.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
New Employee Induction Program
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Crossing Boundaries in Service-Learning Professional Development: Preservice and Inservice Teachers Learning Together International Research Conference.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Planning for Professional Development. How do you currently plan for Professional Development?
WELCOME NEW SUPPORT PROVIDER INFORMATION Helpful Tips for LAUSD BTSA Support Providers.
Videoconferencing: Using Blended Technologies to Engage Students Alberta Education Welcome.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Invitational Institutes build teachers’ leadership capacity and knowledge. Saturday Seminars build community engagement Inservice.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Connection to Build Leadership: State Leadership Academies October 18, 2011 The Maryland Experience Martha J. Fields, Ed.D. Carol Ann Heath-Baglin, Ed.D.
Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.
Internationalizing the Technology Education Curriculum Dr. Edward M. Reeve Professor Utah State University.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Supporting the Primary PE and Sport Premium in London.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Board on science education
Talent Management Director
It has to provide a broad and balanced curriculum. The programme must
The Impact and Value of Instructional Coaching
Who Are We? United 4 Children (Birth –18) Child Day Care Association
Presentation transcript:

The NWP as a National Infrastructure that Encourages Writing and the Teaching of Writing NWP Annual Meeting 2005 Inverness Research Associates

Inverness Research Associates and our work with the NWP Education research and evaluation group headquartered in Calif. Bay Area Annual site profile—data on all sites’ programs since Annual surveys of institute participants Studies of various NWP initiatives Provide data and reports for NWP federal application, annual site reviews, spring meeting, annual meeting

The NWP as a national infrastructure

What do we mean by infrastructure? A foundational system that makes many kinds of work possible A unitary entity with thousands of connections Everyday examples—roads and highways, electricity, telephones, air flight systems, water systems

Some criteria for assessing a national infrastructure 1.Provides broad and equitable access 2.Functions at large scale 3.Uses strong central capacity to ensure provision of customized local services— e.g., encouraging writing and the teaching of writing 4.Local services are of reliably high quality

1. BROAD ACCESS

NWP service area provides potential access to teachers in 2,024 counties

NWP service area offers broad potential access to teachers

NWP services actually reached teachers in 818 counties in

NWP programs actually reached a substantial portion of the service area in

2. LARGE SCALE

Overall scale of work that NWP infrastructure supports in just one year 6,871 programs 12,238 active Teacher-Consultants 192,892 participants served 128,387 educator-participants served 86,858 individual educators served 20 hours on average per individual educator

Percentage of teachers in the nation served each year 2.9% of total K-12 teaching force (1 in 35) Estimated 1 out of 8 who are directly responsible for teaching writing

3. CENTRAL CAPACITY TO PROVIDE CUSTOMIZED LOCAL SERVICES …Encouraging writing and the teaching of writing

Who participates in NWP programs 23% students 61% teachers 15% administrators, preservice others

Encouraging students

Youth and community programs sites offered 707 Youth and Community programs. 45,267 students participated (~1 out of 1,000)

~600,000 students taught by Institute participants, Every year, Institute participants teach about 60,000 students

Estimating total numbers of students reached directly or indirectly in 1 year 45,000 1,945,000 60, ,000 1,600,000 students in Young Writers programs students of Institute participants students of 12,000 active TCs students of Inservice participants

Encouraging teachers

Each site creates a program of varied offerings for local teachers The average site offers— 1 Invitational institute 12 Continuity programs 21 Inservice programs 4 Youth and community programs

NWP serves teachers in depth A teacher at an Invitational Institute receives, on average, about 7 hours per day for 18 days. Teachers attending other NWP programs receive, on average, about 4 hours per day for 4 days. Invitational Institute: 121 hrs All other programs: 16 hrs

Local sites reach out to teachers in different contexts

37% of all teacher participants receive inservice in the context of a long-term partnership

Partnerships involve a wide range of activities customized for local context 22% of partnership work involved other activities such as coaching TCs, writing assessments,continuity work, other youth and community programs. Partnership work Curriculum development (14%) Teacher workshops (38%) Classroom coaching (10%) Training pre- service teachers (10%) College prep activities (5%) Study groups (8%) Conferences (6%) School planning (7%) Young writers programs (8%)

4. RELIABLY HIGH QUALITY

97% of teachers at NWP institutes say— NWP is better than other professional development What they learn translates into improved writing skills for their students

Institute participants say they gain knowledge and skills for teaching writing

Institute participants also get help with reading and technology

Promoting the growth and vitality of the national NWP infrastructure

The NWP continues to grow while maintaining quality 89 sites were started up during the last ten years 51 sites were “decommissioned” during the same period

NWP infrastructure supports new site development Average participant contact hours triple over first five years for new sites: 3,012 9,310

Young sites continue to become more productive as they mature Average participant contact hours double for sites 5-10 years old: 6,630 12,942

One way to think about Jim Gray’s legacy The NWP network has accumulated 3,126 “site-years” of experience!

Summary points The NWP is a national infrastructure that supports the work of local sites Local sites serve students, individual teachers, schools, and districts in a wide range of ways that encourage writing and promote effective practice The NWP is well designed to grow larger, with attention to high quality The evidence suggests that the NWP is a wise federal investment in educational improvement