Neutron Chopper Technologies Work Package

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROLE OF KEY PERSONNEL Bernd Madauss International Space University Strasbourg February, 2011
Advertisements

RAMIRI2 Prague 2012 Project management and the RI Life Cycle.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Site Preparation Lessons Learned Michael P. Bromfield, Construction Engineer Convention Facilities Advisory Committee Review.
Experimental Facilities DivisionORNL - SNS June 22, 2004 SNS Update – Team Building Steve Miller June 22, 2004 DANSE Meeting at Caltech.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 2 Slide 1 Socio-technical Systems.
Interfaces with the SNS Project for the ARCS Instrument Doug Abernathy ARCS Hardware Project Manager ARCS Construction Project Review DOE Germantown Aug.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported LicenseCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY). Project Management.
Defining the Activities. Documents  Goal Statement defines why helps manage expectations  Statement of Work what gets delivered defines scope  Software.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
Helmholtz Centre for Ion Research D. Krämer, 2nd Lab Directors Meeting, Protvino, January 15-16, 2008 Design and Engineering Issues; Standardization and.
S/W Project Management
Server Virtualization: Navy Network Operations Centers
Science Directorate Instrument Technologies division Neutron Chopper Group TAP Requirements of Instrument suite Iain Sutton Neutron Chopper Group.
From Research Prototype to Production
Experimental Facilities DivisionOak Ridge SNS INSTRUMENTS OVERVIEW R. K. Crawford Instrument Systems Senior Team Leader September 10, 2004 HYSPEC IDT Meeting.
VST: dome THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS Ing. Davide Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS.
Introduction- Project Management By Ctrl+C & Ctrl+V 1.
In-Kind Contribution Management Update Allen Weeks March 20, Lund.
ITEC 275 Computer Networks – Switching, Routing, and WANs Week 12 Chapter 14 Robert D’Andrea Some slides provide by Priscilla Oppenheimer and used with.
Managing Engineering Design - Infrastructure. Presentation Overview 1.Tools and Techniques 2.Design and Documentation 3.Estimating and Scheduling.
Michael deLamare Requirements Management Program Functions R-9.
Robotics & Engineering Design Projective Management Chin-Sung Lin Eleanor Roosevelt High School.
Technical advisory panel Mission Brief. Requirements Have the principal requirements of the facilities suite of instruments, in terms of equipment types.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
Fermilab Presentation Greg Bock, Pepin Carolan, Mike Lindgren, Elaine McCluskey 2014 SC PM Workshop July 2014.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 1 Diploma of Project Management.
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
Response to TAC8 and Annual Review Recommendations John Haines Head of Target Division April 2, 2014.
Accelerator/WP High Beta Structures Alan Wheelhouse HIGH-BETA CAVITY DELIVERY April 21, 2015.
Configuration Management Romuald Duperrier Head of Systems Engineering Division April 22, 2015.
Progress on Remote Handling Systems TAC 12 Magnus Göhran – WPM 15 th October 2015.
1 Managing New Product Introduction: Life Cycle Phases Team Members: Jhon Benavides Sabrina Patino Russ Watt June 5, 2009 Solar Plus.
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
Power Upgrade Project SNS September 21-22, TBM Cost Estimate Cost Estimate Schedule Approach Tom Mann October 27, 2005.
Illuminating Britelite’s Internal Services for Success Strategy for Process Improvement.
HNSciCloud Project MSc in Project Engineering delivered by Professor Gilles Vallet Oxford Academics for Computing Science Department, University of Chester.
ESS STRATEGY for supply of chopper systems to NSS project Science directorate Instrument technologies division Neutron chopper group leader --- DRAFT ----
Electrical Engineering for NSS - Status and Planning- Thomas Gahl Electrical Engineering Group Leader February 26, 2014.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.
European Spallation Source Overview and Status Technical Advisory Committee 1-2 April 2015 James H. Yeck ESS CEO & Director General
ITEC 275 Computer Networks – Switching, Routing, and WANs Week 12 Chapter 14 Robert D’Andrea Some slides provide by Priscilla Oppenheimer and used with.
Personnel Safety Systems Stuart Birch Senior Engineer, Personnel Safety Systems November 6 th, 2014.
Conventional Facilities integration: Approach and Issues Daniel Piso Fernández WP Leader (WP13 Conventional Facilities Integration Support) November 5,
1 Working with Project Stakeholders in a Statewide Project PMI-SVC PMO Forum Monthly Meeting Dan Conway, PMP October 22, 2008.
Instrument Construction Phase 1 and beyond Rob Connatser Chief Instrument Project Engineer September, 2014.
In-Kind Strategy Integrated Control Systems Garry Trahern Head of ICS Division TAC 9, 3 rd April, 2014, ESS, Lund.
MMT Retreat Technical Services across ESS Peter Rådahl
ACCSYS Design Reviews J. G. Weisend II Deputy Head of Accelerator Projects.
Integrated Control Systems Status and Plans Garry Trahern Head of ICS Division TAC 9, 3 rd April, 2014, ESS, Lund.
Technical External Management Requirements Technology Complexity Interfaces Reliability / Performance Quality Planning Controlling Funding / Resources.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
Overview of Project Planning
Uppsala Commitment to ESS and FREIA Planning
Current Status of ITER I&C System as Integration Begins
ESS RF Development at Uppsala University
Description of Revision
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
By Jeff Burklo, Director
The Bunker Project Overview Zvonko Lazic
Bunker Internal Review Welcome & Charge
Progress on Standardization
Imaging & Engineering STAP Meeting 12th-13th of April 2018
IKON 15 Talal Osman & Iain Sutton
TG3 Process /Part 2 Gábor László NSS Lead Instrument Engineer
NSS integrated installation plan workshop Introduction
Bunker Project Operation aspects
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
CF Scope, Management & Organization
Presentation transcript:

Neutron Chopper Technologies Work Package Good morning My name is Iain Sutton I am currently the Group leader for Neutron choppers And In the following 10mn I will attempt to present the Status and strategy of NG Tech work package Iain Sutton Neutron Chopper Group Leader www.europeanspallationsource.se

Agenda Scope Schedule Budget Organisation In-kind & procurement Risk Next six months Summary Quick breakdown of what you can expect As I am sure that at this point you have already seen a number of presentations along these lines from my colleges and I would like to have time for your questions I will not linger We will start with the WHY and the WHEN And then move quickly on to the HOW & WHAT And the WHAT to watch out for. So moving right along to WHY

? Scope - Mission Deliverables Equipment standards and guidelines Mission statement This work package concerns the study, selection and develop of chopper systems’ and associated supporting technologies, required for the scientific operation of the neutron instrument suite at ESS. Principal objectives Reducing the risk (budget/ schedule/performance) to instrument projects To raise performance and quality of installations across the instrument suite Reduce the overall cost of installations to the facility both in construction and operation Ensure instrument availability through reliability and serviceability Build up infra-structure, internal human resources, and competence. Deliverables ‘Implementation ready’ Technologies & Design concepts Equipment standards Instrument technologies Infra-structure In-house competence Deliverables Equipment standards and guidelines - for instrument design & procurement ‘Implementation ready’ Technologies & design concepts - for integration into instruments In-house competence & technologies Infra-structure - to support instrument construction activities and instrument operation. WHY are we here ? WHAT are we trying to achieve Well like all of the tech groups we are here initially to support instrument construction and then to support their operation Bridging the gap from ‘concepts to construction’ In common with a number of other large project which depend on technological innovation a strategic decision was made decouple the development of core technologies from the development of the instruments themselves Number of benefits Reduced risk Reduce NRE Raise performance and quality through developing solutions coherent across whole suite address facility conserns Availability address cost issues in Construction & Operations Build up infra structure to support operation ?

Scope - from Concepts to Construction TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 - 9 Exploration of Requirements Theoretical studies Engineering studies Engineering Specification Instrument Construction |---------NEUTRON CHOPPER TECHNOLOGIES WP------------------------------| |--CONSTRUCTION > quick look at the activities we are involved with All starts with Requirements Engineering studies Computer and Physical prototypes Exploration of Requirements Theoretical studies Engineering studies Engineering Specification Procurement

Scope -WBS Instrument performance issues Facility performance Issues Neutron Chopper Technologies WP Management Disc Chopper Technologies (DC) Small Rotor (DC-SR) Large Rotor (DC-LR) PPS Chopper Technologies (PPSc) Conventional Low Maintenance Fermi Chopper Technologies Support Systems Pit systems Vacuum Cooling Facilities Chopper Lab Operations 1 & 2 Serviceability Radiation hardness Service Tooling Methods & Technologies Equipment standards Design standards Chopper development work package is composed on a number of work unit each intended to address the principal issues in the field On the left Units related to Instrument performance Development of technology which is vital to instruments and which is not available commercially Long pulse requires a number of specific techniques to be employed These in turn require specific solutions to be developed RRM WFM Long pulse PPS systems All these techniques are critical to harnessing the power of the long pulse and making instruments possible. On the right Units relating to facility issues Measures to reduce operating costs Ensure reliability and instrument availability Infra-structure Reliability Availability Serviceability Rep Rate Multiplication Imperative for use of straight guides Wave frame Multiplication Infra-structure Instrument performance issues Facility performance Issues Reducing facility operating costs

Procurement & Fabrication Instrument projects overview 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Operations Schedule #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 1st Neutrons Initial Design Final Design Procurement & Fabrication Construction Installation Cold Commissioning Hot Commissioning

Schedule 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Management ESS Disc Chopper: Design/Procurement specification ESS Fermi Chopper: Design/Proc Specification ESS Disc Chopper: Large Rotor Prototype ESS PPSc: Design specification ESS PPSc: Prototype Disc Chopper Tech ESS Disc chopper: Large rotor: Install ready (TRL6) ESS PPSc: V1.0 Install ready (TRL6) ESS PPSc: V2.0 (high reliability) Install ready (TRL6) ESS Disc chopper: Validated components (TRL5) Fermi Chopper A few words about the schedule This is development & capacity building activities - front weighted The deliverables are potentially on the critical path of many all instruments Schedule is constrained by ensuring deployment ready for day 1. For this reason so many activities are launched in parallel Most systems will be available for implementation in 2018 Some may be in All be some in a preliminary form Element of risk in new technologies Considerable effort in testing and refinement is expected Ensure performance of ESS unique solution have to be demonstrated as early as possible. running paralell to this is the build up of the team and the facilities to support these activities Prompt pulse suppression ESS Chopper design Standards & Methods Methods ESS Chopper support systems Specification Facilities ESS Chopper Lab ESS Chopper operations facility

Organization -work units / resource affectation SUMMARY ENGINEER BLUE 5 TECHNICIAN GREEN 4 CONTRACTS GREY 3 WP Team Management Snr Engineer Disc chopper technologies Engineer Mech Engineer Control (0.25) Technician (Mech) Technician E&E (0.25) Designer (0.5) Fermi Chopper Technologies Prompt Pulse Suppression Control (0.25) Standards / Methods Support Systems Control (0.5) SW 0.5 (Mech) E&E (0.5) End 2015 End 2014 As one would expect the organisation of the group reflects that of the activities Two principal poles Engineering Operation The permanent group will compose 9 full time staff in addition to my self The Engineering function will compose 4.

Resource requirements 2014 - 2025 OPERATIONS STAFF LEVEL Human resources Human Resource build up follows the spend profile Heavily front loaded Peaking around 2016 and then tailing off I believe very strongly in building a core team in-house to ensure knowledge retention and continuity – and you can see that here However looking forward to how many people we will need in operation it’s clear that there is a mis match - so I am proposing to cover the peak load with contracted staff. Note that from 2017 onwards many of these people will be workong on instrument construction and will not disappear

Budget Breakdown by Class Overall yearly expendature – cash flow As one might expect there is a very rapid early build up And peak as capacity is built and development programs get underway This is followed by a reduction as programs terminate and technology are progressively made available Tails off – with the longer development programs and endurance testing activities which inherently take time Early years are dominated by spends staffing – both permanent and contracted required to get the ball rolling Equipment both on programmes and to set up facilities – this is a green field site

Organization - External interfaces INSTRUMENT PROJECTS REQUIREMENTS DISCUSSION EXPERIENCE EQUIPMENT INDUSTRIAL STANDARDS TECHNICAL ADVISORY PANEL Collaboration on equipment development ESS / SNS / ISIS Tech Collaboration Potential Equipment Standards & Technologies COMMERCIAL SYSTEM SUPPLIERS In-kind Instrument Collaboration Potential In-kind procurement Potential CENTERS OF COMPETENCE We are not going to be able to pull this off alone We need the support of the community And by this I mean the engineering community We need their knowledge Their experience Guidance We crrently have a TAC panel to TECHNOLOGY SUPPLIERS Consultation on equipment standardisation

ESS Instrument Neutron Chopper systems Risk & Mitigation Risk Consequence Probability / Impact Mitigation Development effort fails. ESS specific equipment can not achieve required performance levels. The functionality or performance of instruments are degraded. Instrument concept is no longer viable. Moderate / High Manage expectations Prioritize critical aspects of development Start early with staged deliverables Design in stretch Development activities are slowed due to resource bleed to construction projects The delivery of technologies is delayed. The construction of instruments is delayed. High / Moderate Separate development and construction activities & personnel Difficulties arising from in-kind arrangements delay or disrupt in-house activities. Reduce exposure of critical projects to risks of in-kind. Devote effort to well define contracts & Start early The serviceability requirements of the facility are not achieved Instrument breakdown frequency increases reducing availability. The operating cost of suite increases High / Low (High during op’s) Prioritize issues during development of equipment Prioritize issues during design of instrument Start early & stage targets Prioritize critical issues, start early and stage deliverables Ring fence development activities Organization for in-kind activities must be settled early on Consider facility objectives from start of development ESS Instrument Neutron Chopper systems Standard Systems Standardised Components Standardised design Custom One - Off or Very High Performance ESS Instrument Neutron Chopper systems Standard Systems Standardised Components Standardised design Custom One - Off or Very High Performance ESS Instrument Neutron Chopper systems Standard Systems Standardised Components Standardised design Custom One - Off or Very High Performance