Community College Faculty & Staff Tell it Like it Is! The El Paso Community College Employee Survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Advertisements

Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
Heritage Valley Health System Heritage Valley Beaver and SEIU Healthcare PA RNs Joint Leadership Collaboration for Quality Improvement.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
The Center for Personal Transformation 1 A Sample SWOT Analysis - Case I STRENGTHS Excellent regional reputation Excellent value for the money Student-centered.
Student Satisfaction Geneva College Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI: Noel-Levitz) 1997 to 2013.
Law School Survey of Student Engagement Users’ Workshop November 4, 2011 Seton Hall Law School 1.
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Program Assessment Team Visit Exit Meeting. Mechanical Engineering Program.
INQUIREINSPIREINNOVATEIMPLEMENT Leadership, Community and Values University of Washington LEADERSHIP, COMMUNITY and VALUES Preliminary Findings: Surveys.
EXCELLENCE CANADA UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO LIBRARY PILOT April 22, 2014 Excellence Canada – University of Waterloo Library Pilot.
SET UP SLIDE. Survey of Organizational Effectiveness Meeting July 13, 2001 Presentation by Dr. Karen Haynes, President University of Houston-Victoria.
UGA Libraries Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Conducted Spring 2006.
INTRODUCTION Performance management is a relatively new concept to the field of management.
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Department of Institutional Research.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
What is the Focus?  Round 2 Analysis observed trends in student perception after first survey.  Allows us to recognize improvements of lower measures.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
Department of Administration Employee Relations Committee 2012 Survey.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Example of Maryland Performance Management Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator MARYLAND STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Fall 2008.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
PBA Highlights Staff Education Fund – 31 staff employees received assistance Staff Development Fund – 12 departments/26 staff employees.
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
1 Strategic Thinking for IT Leaders View from the CFO Seminars in Academic Computing Executive Leadership Institute.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Dolina Dowling December 2010 Presentations 2, 3 1
M ARK M ACIAS S HAWN B EARD SCC O FFICE OF I NSTITUTIONAL R ESEARCH 2007 SCC Employee Opinion Survey.
January 18, 2012 Administrative Council Presentation.
UBC Department of Finance Office Staff Survey Forum Presentation March 17, 2004.
HERI FACULTY SURVEY Surveys mailed through campus mail to all Full-Time faculty during the Spring 2005 semester A follow-up second mailing for non- respondents.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Student Satisfaction Report: Pacific Oaks College: Addendum: Instructional Sites Vs. Cohorts Office of Institutional Research TCS Education System September.
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
Teacher Satisfaction Whitney Zimmerman Christine Henry.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Teacher Survey Highlights R&E/LWW May2014.
Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,
Welcome to HR Presents July 23, :30 am – 12:00 pm Milton Hall, Room 85.
2015 SAA Board Survey. Raw Board Survey ResultsStrongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Don't Know Total Points Responses minus DKs Average Score.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
Powered by Results of Survey On Work-Life Balance Administered by Caregiver Support Working Group of The New School Social Justice Committee
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.
Chelan Community College Completion Project By: Ardith, Megan, & Michelle.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Survey Summary of Fall 2014 Results Presentation to College Council Executive Cabinet August 5, 2015.
STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR EQUITY AT DIABLO VALLEY COLLEGE:
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Practical Library Assessment Stephen Spohn. About me Academic libraries University of Maryland - George Mason University - Northern Essex Community.
0 Faculty Senate October 17, 2006 Working at IOWA.
Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness
AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results
Woodland Public Schools Staff Survey Results
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Survey of Organizational Excellence
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
2019 School Climate Survey Results and Analysis Nampa School District
Presentation transcript:

Community College Faculty & Staff Tell it Like it Is! The El Paso Community College Employee Survey

Methodology Surveys were distributed by campus mail to all employees  Total:2,768  Faculty:1,319  Staff:1,449  Total Responses by Employee Type (% of Total Sent)  Total: 93434%  Faculty: 40731%  Staff: 38427%  Staff Only: 193 N/A  Both Faculty/Staff: 191 N/A  Unknown 143N/A  SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) was used to perform the analysis

Employee Type N = 934

Campus

Goal: 80% or > Agree/Strongly Agree with a Statement Color Key >=90% (Outstanding) >=80% & <90% / (Met / Surpassed Goal) >=70% < 80% (Concern) >=60% & <70% (Important Concern) < 60% (Vital Concern)

Employee Knowledge of EPCC Mission Statement and Strategic Goals

Mission Statement and Strategic Goals are Well- Known: Employee Type EPCC has (a) Well-Known.. District Both Faculty & Staff Faculty Only Staff Only Strongly Agree/Agree Mission Statement94% 95% Strategic Goals87%86%88%86% Mission Statement and Strategic Goals: Average 91%90%91%90%

Mission Statement and Strategic Goals are Well- Known: Site EPCC has (a) Well-Known.. DistrictASCMDPNWRGTMVV Strongly Agree/Agree Mission Statement94% 96%94%95%94% Strategic Goals87%91% 88%91% 84% Mission Statement and Strategic Goals: Average 91%92%94%91%93%92%89%

Mission Statement and Strategic Goals are Well-Known: Year-to-Year EPCC has (a) Well-Known (Base) 2007GAP % Agree/Strongly Agree Strategic Goals57%87%30% Mission Statement70%94%25% Mission Statement & Strategic Goals: Average 63%91%27%

College Consistency with the Mission Statement: Employee Type The Following are Consistent with the EPCC Mission District Both Faculty & Staff Faculty Only Staff Only % Strongly Agree/Agree Curriculum93%94%95%93% Planning & Evaluation Process87%86%87%88% Financial & Physical Resources85%83%84%81% Educational Programs94% 95%92% Educational Support Services88% 89%86% Administrative Processes85%84% Consistency with Mission Statement: Average89%88%89%87%

College Consistency with the Mission Statement: Site The Following are Consistent with the EPCC Mission DistrictASCMDPNWRGTMVV Strongly Agree/Agree Curriculum93%95%92%87%95%97%92% Planning & Evaluation Process87%93%89%84%87%90%86% Financial & Physical Resources85%96%81%87%84%90%82% Educational Programs94%98%93%99%93%96%94% Educational Support Services88%82%96%94%95%87%88% Administrative Processes85%87%84%88%90%83%91% Consistency with Mission Statement: Average 89%92%89%90% 89%

College Consistency with the Mission Statement: Year-to-Year The Following are Consistent with the EPCC Mission 2001 (Base) 2007GAP % Agree/Strongly Agree Financial & Physical Resources44%85%41% Planning & Evaluation Process63%87%24% Curriculum72%93%21% Educational Programs Not Asked 94% N/A Educational Support Services88% Administrative Processes85% Consistency with Mission: Average60%89%29%

Working Environment Human Relations Factors

Human Relations Factors: Employee Type There is (a) District Both Faculty & Staff Faculty Only Staff Only % Strongly Agree/Agree Focus on Students in All We Do86%85%86%87% Satisfactory Communication77%76%74%78% Effective Leadership84%83%82%83% Satisfactory Shared Governance81%80%79%80% Teamwork & Collegiality82%80%78%84% Good Working Relationship with My Supervisor91% 90%93% Work Satisfaction for Me95%93% 98% Human Relations Factors: Average85%84%83%86%

Human Relations Factors: Site There is (a) DistrictASCMDPNWRGTMVV Strongly Agree/Agree Focus on Students in All We Do86%94%88%90%89%88%85% Satisfactory Communication77%86%83%79%80%87%74% Effective Leadership84%88%89%85%89%90%81% Satisfactory Shared Governance81%86%87%75%88%91%77% Teamwork & Collegiality82%85%86%88%87%91%77% Good Working Relationship with My Supervisor 91%97% 91%93%92%89% Work Satisfaction for Me95%97% 99%98%97%93% Human Relations Factors: Average85%90% 87%89%91%82%

Human Relations Factors: Year-to-Year There is (a) 2001 (Base) 2007GAP % Agree/Strongly Agree Effective Leadership56%84%28% Satisfactory Shared Governance55%81%27% Satisfactory Communication53%77%24% Teamwork & Collegiality65%82%18% Focus on Students in All We Do71%86%15% Work Satisfaction for Me87%95%8% Good Working Relationship with My Supervisor86%91%5% Human Factor Average67%85%18%

Working Environment Support Factors

Support Factors: Employee Type There (is a (an) / are) District Both Faculty & Staff Faculty Only Staff Only % Strongly Agree/Agree Effective Hiring Procedure72%70%67%75% Salaries/Benefits Attracting Good Employees65%63%62%67% Effective Wages, Hours & Working Conditions Grievance Procedure 76%73%71%82% Time Allowed for Professional Development85% 84% Satisfactory Staff Scholarships81%82%81%74% Physically Safe Environment90%89%87%90% Well-Maintained Facilities79%78% 76% Computer/Software Adequate for My Job88%89%90%85% Support Factors: Average79%78% 79%

Support Factors: Site There (is a (an) / are) DistrictASCMDPNWRGTMVV Strongly Agree/Agree Effective Hiring Procedure72%63%79%78%82%84%67% Salaries/Benefits Attracting Good Employees 65%71%66%59%62%73%60% Effective Wages, Hours & Working Conditions Grievance Procedure 76%67%73% 81%85%72% Time Allowed for Professional Development 85%83%85%80%88% 83% Satisfactory Staff Scholarships81%83%73%76%87%84%81% Physically Safe Environment90%92%94%99%92%89% Well-Maintained Facilities79%89%91%97%76%80%75% Computer/Software Adequate for My Job88%92%96%90%88%91%88% Support Factors: Average79%80%82% 84%77%

Support Factors: Year-to-Year There (is a (an) / are) 2001 (Base) 2007GAP % Agree/Strongly Agree Satisfactory Staff Scholarships55%81%26% An Effective Hiring Procedure55%72%17% Salaries/Benefits Attracting Good Employees48%65%16% Well Maintained Facilities64%79%15% Time Allowed for Professional Development71%85%14% Physically Safe Environment83%90%7% Computer/software adequate for my job Not Asked 88% N/A Effective Wages, Hours & Working Conditions Grievance Procedure 76% Support Factors: Average63%79%17%

Auxiliary Services

Auxiliary Services % Satisfied: District Institutional Services Externally Contracted Services

Auxiliary Services % Satisfied Overall: Site

Faculty Use of Computer Technology in the Classroom

% of Faculty Using Computer Technology in the Classroom by Type of Use: District Total Respondents = 205

Overall Faculty Use of Computer Technology in the Classroom: Site

Faculty Ratings of Libraries, Labs, and Learning Skills Centers

Libraries, Labs, & Learning Skills Centers % Satisfied with Services: District

Libraries, Labs, and Learning Skills Centers % Satisfied with Services Overall: Site

Selected Comments  Staff Member : …our Administration… [should] …not overlook the continuing increase in enrollment that is thinning out our support services, which in turn translates to … quality or lack of quality in customer service. I recognize that priority is placed at the faculty level but the majority of … overall services are provided by staff members. I hope to see an increase in staff to off-set the increase in students so that customer services can at least be at an average or good level.  Faculty Member : The hiring process is broken. It is too political.  Staff Member : The overall operation of the College is aligned with the vision, mission, goals and values of the College.  Faculty Member : …it would be in our best interest to increase the number of full-time faculty… If we want to attract the best instructors, we need to be able to pay them accordingly. Part-time instructors are the framework of the College and they are an exploited under-class, many of whom could be classified as the working poor. That is appalling, especially considering our mission statement.  Faculty Member : I think the College is fine. Even though I am a part-time instructor I feel EPCC has been accommodating for students as well as instructors.  Unknown Employee Type : Thank You!

Some Factors Influencing Employee Perceptions at EPCC  Employee Constituency Groups  Faculty Senate  Classified Staff Association  Professional Staff Association  Shared Governance of the College  District Institutional Effectiveness Committee  Campus Institutional Effectiveness Teams  Standing Committees  EPCC Leadership Academy  Administrators  Faculty  Staff  Town Hall Meetings