© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1  Describe major characteristics of students with learning disabilities.  Explain key issues and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
How to teach students that are behind others
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Literacy for All: NCLB, RTI, and Diversity in the Literacy Program
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention This ppt is an adaptation of a specific PISD Training on RTI, The Educational Testing and.
Promoting Inclusion with Classroom Peers
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
RtI Day 2 EXCEED Trainer of Trainers SDUSD October 2011 Linda Trousdale Michelle Crisci Several slides were adapted from: Washoe County School District,
What is RtI? Considering the “I” in RtI CFN 207 Peggy Miller, Network Leader Lena Kim.
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Halloween….a little late…. “I'll get you, my pretty…and your Jimmy Choo's too!!!!!”
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Ventura County SELPA Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses (PSW) Model: An Overview This PowerPoint is provided as an overview to the Ventura County SELPA.
Students with Learning Disabilities
Learning Disabilities
Learning Disabilities. Agenda Definition Eligibility Requirements Characteristics Accommodations.
Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Melissa Tilton EDUC533PA.
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
Dyslexia and the Brain Dys= poor Lexis = words/language
Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities
Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities ED222 Psychology of the Exceptional Individual Fall 2009.
Effective Differentiated Instruction for All Students
A Three-Tiered Model: early intervention for students “at- risk” for learning difficulties CASP Convention 2004 Allan Lloyd-Jones Special Education Consultant.
University of Rhode Island EDC 452. A process of:  Providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and  Using learning.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
RTI² Overview Response to Intervention? RTI² is NOT......Just a special education initiative...Only for students with disabilities...Only for beginning.
Chapter 5 Learning Disabilities
Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5-1 ADHD.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1  Two Major Types  Language disorders include formulating and comprehending spoken messages. ▪ Categories:
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
Learning and Intellectual Disabilities in the Classroom
Strategies for Teaching Students with Learning and Behavior Problems, 8e Vaughn and Bos ISBN: © 2012, 2009, 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Developed and implemented by the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Class #6 – Wednesday July 8 th Homework – Chapter Presentations – Lesson Plan Student Scenario B – Quiz #2 Review of Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Discussion.
The Three-Tiered Model and SIOP: How do we meet the needs of struggling students? Adapted from Sheltered Content Instruction: Teaching English Learners.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1: An Introduction To Assessing.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Learning Disabilities A general term describing a group of learning problems Largest single disability area 4.0% of all school-age children are classified.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities ED222 Psychology of the Exceptional Individual Fall 2010.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) LEARNING DISABILITIES (LD) By: Julia Bjerke, Monica Fontana Crystal Schlosser, & Jessica Ringwelski.
Title, Edition ISBN © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education, 9th Edition ISBN X.
Response to Intervention Instruction. Agenda Ultimate Purpose Components of RtI Expectations Break Problem Solving Teams Homework.
Rosenberg/Westling/McLeskey Special Education for Today’s Teachers: An Introduction Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Chapter 5 Learning Disabilities
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Evidence-Based Practices: Tier 1
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Overview of Individual Student Systems
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Gail E. Tompkins California State University, Fresno
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1  Describe major characteristics of students with learning disabilities.  Explain key issues and challenges related to including students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms.  Describe effective practices for addressing the needs of students with learning disabilities in elementary and secondary classrooms.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Students with learning disabilities exhibit an uneven pattern of academic development, including unexpected underachievement in one or more academic areas.  This underachievement is not explained by another disability or by environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 3  The severe discrepancy approach examines the discrepancy between a student’s actual and expected achievement levels and then using the exclusion clause to eliminate possible causes for the severe discrepancy. It also includes documenting the need for special education and related services.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 4  Criticisms  The method requires that a student fall significantly behind grade level academically before a significant discrepancy exists.  The methods that are used to determine a severe discrepancy are not reliable or valid.  Professionals lack a systematic method for determining whether a student’s academic difficulty was due to a lack of good teaching or a persistent learning disability.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5  Continues to emphasize the use of unexpected underachievement as the primary criterion for student identification. The steps are described as Tiers 1, 2, and 3.  Tier 1: Students receive high-quality instruction in the general education classroom in core content areas.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6  Educators use screening measures to determine students who struggle academically, in spite of high-quality instruction in the general education classroom.  Tier 2: For students who struggle academically, teachers provide secondary prevention instructions. This may include systematic, structured teaching, small group instruction, peer tutoring, etc.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 7  Tier 3:  Teachers monitor progress for those who receive Tier 2 instruction. ▪ For those who continue to struggle, teachers provide Tier 3 instruction, which includes intensive, individualized interventions using highly effective instruction and frequent monitoring of student progress.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8  For students who do not respond to Tier 3 instruction, poor teaching has been eliminated as a possible cause of the student’s low achievement.  These students are then referred to a multidisciplinary team for possible identification with a disability.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9  Learning disabilities is the largest disability group.  Nearly one-half of all students with disabilities are identified with learning disabilities.  At least one student with a learning disability is included in most general education classes, and most have more than one student.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10  The major characteristic of the learning disability category is its heterogeneity.  The main characteristics that educators use to identify students with learning disabilities is underachievement  The most common learning disability is in the area of reading. Math and written expression are other deficit areas.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 11  Attentional problems ▪ Difficulty selectively attending to information and sustaining attention over time. ▪ Problems related to impulsivity when presented with both oral and written problems or questions in class. ▪ Difficulty sitting still in class and may be easily distracted.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12  Reading difficulties often relate to problems with word recognition, spelling, reading fluency and automaticity, and/or reading comprehension.  Reading difficulties can cause problems with all subject areas. Reading difficulties become increasingly challenging for adolescents with learning disabilities as content becomes more complex.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 13  Some students with learning disabilities have difficulty with written expression. They produce written products with technical errors, poor organization, and limited development of ideas.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 14  Some students with learning disabilities also have difficulty in learning mathematics. Problems may relate to difficulty with math computations or math problem solving.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 15  Social problems ▪ Lack of skills needed to build social relationships. ▪ Exhibiting aggressive actions or negative verbal behavior. ▪ More attention-seeking or disruptive behaviors ▪ Displaying more insensitive, and less tactful or cooperative behaviors when interacting with others (Bryan, Burstein, & Ergul, 2004)

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 16  A major challenge relates to the higher expectations students with learning disabilities face in general education classrooms.  Another challenge is helping students with learning disabilities understand their disability and how to get things done in spite of it.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 17  Employ strategies to increase student attention to and engagement in tasks.  Break a long task into shorter parts.  Use distributed practice.  Use strategies to make tasks more interesting.  Alternate tasks that are high interest for students with those that are low interest.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 18 Increase active student learning through high-access instructional strategies that (Feldman & Denti, 2004):  Provide thinking time for students  Assume different levels of knowledge and skill regarding content  Create low levels of threat  Carefully structure student interactions  Provide for differentiated instruction based on student skill levels and learning needs.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 19  Provide students with supports by using strategies such as scaffolding as they learn complex content.  Scaffolding occurs as a teacher breaks down a problem into steps, provide students with background information regarding how to solve each step, and then combines all steps to solve the problem.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 20  Provide students with strategies for learning information.  Mnemonic devices has proven effective in improving the memory of students with disabilities.