The impact of community-based drug and alcohol treatment on reoffending in Indigenous communities Anthony Morgan, Tracy Cussen, Alex Gannoni & Jason Payne.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javier Leung and Kassy Tyler University of West Florida Educational Statistics III Dr. Carla Thompson.
Advertisements

Justice Reinvestment - a Federal Perspective National Centre for Indigenous Studies - Justice Reinvestment Forum Roger Wilkins AO 2 August 2012.
Does mentoring work? What the evidence tells us 25th June 2013.
The Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration State Care Coordination 1.
Delivering the Tri-borough programme YOUTH OFFENDING SERVICE Combining services to tackle common problems, improve people’s lives and make public money.
Neos Zavrou AOD Sector Reforms. THE PROBLEM – 108+ AOD service providers Poor quality data Many barriers Poor service integration Inadequate funding Limited.
A guide to local services. Sacro’s mission is to promote safe and cohesive communities by reducing conflict and offending.
'Women with Mental Health Issues in the Criminal Justice System in Northern Ireland- A Misunderstood and Victimised Group'. Elizabeth Craig-PhD Student.
NOMS Co-Financing Organisation Anthony Mulvihill Operational Performance Manager Ministry of Justice | National Offender Management Service | Commercial.
Adults and Communities Overview and Scrutiny Panel The Safer Doncaster Partnership (including an update on metal theft) 25 th June 2012.
Community-Oriented Defense Performance Indicators A Conceptual Overview Michael Rempel Center for Court Innovation Presented at the Community-Oriented.
April 2006 South Pacific Council of Youth and Children’s Courts 2006 Tasmanian Conference “ The Child Protection System and Magistrates Courts - A Focus.
PEER: Exploring the lives of sex workers in Tyne and Wear The PEER Research Team: The GAP project, Northumbria University and Peer Researchers.
PEER (Promoting Education, Empowerment and Research): Exploring the Lives of Sex Workers in Tyne and Wear Adele Irving and Dr Mary Laing.
+ Youth and Crime. + Beliefs... Society should concentrate on preventing crime and devoting more resources to the rehabilitation of young people who break.
Women and Corrections: A Model Program By Vanessa Alleyne,PhD.
Is a community court a program or a partnership?: Evaluation scope and design issues Stuart Ross & Karen Gelb, University of Melbourne BOCSAR Applied Research.
Group Risk Assessment Model Monitoring trends in re-offending among convicted offenders in adult and children’s court Fourth National Justice Modelling.
Alternatives to Prison: Exploring non-custodial sentencing of domestic violence offenders in NSW’s lower courts Christine Bond & Samantha Jeffries School.
Justice Griffith Family Youth Conferences and Indigenous Over-representation: Micro Simulation Case Study Anna Stewart.
The transition from juvenile to adult criminal careers Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
Southmead Project Building a pathway to recovery Rebuilding lives affected by abuse and trauma Registered charity number
Early intervention youth boot camp program Tender information session Gold Coast 30 August 2012.
Magistrates Court Specialist Division. Various Specialised Courts Drug Court The Drug Court division is concerned with sentencing and supervising people.
Persistent Offender Project Persistent Offender Project Joint Partnership between Glasgow Addiction Service & Strathclyde Police Funded by Glasgow Community.
The Northern Ireland Prison Service
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.
Juvenile Crime Categories of Crime – Legal Studies 3C.
Southampton City Council Actions to Reduce Re-Offending through Skills and Employment Denise Edghill.
ISMG ~ Interventions and Substance Misuse Group Data challenges & opportunities: offenders in custody and the community Caroline Bonds (Head of Strategic.
Kelvin Doherty Assistant Director Youth Justice Agency Children England Annual Conference 27/2/2013.
Nino Maddalena Criminal Justice Manager National Treatment Agency.
The Custodial Detention of Children and the Youth Justice Review Una Convery and Linda Moore Knowledge Exchange Seminar 21 March 2013.
An outcome evaluation of three restorative justice initiatives delivered by Thames Valley Probation Wager, N a, O’Keeffe, C b., Bates, A c. & Emerson,
To examine the extent to which offenders with mental health or learning disabilities could, in appropriate cases, be diverted from prison to other services.
Police and Crime Standards Directorate The New Delivery and Performance Management Landscape Anne Taylor Head of Partnership Support Police and Partnerships.
All children are equal…..but outcomes are not. Peter Lauener Director, Local Transformation DCSF Health inequalities conference 20 May 2008.
Transitional Support Scheme SOUTH WALES AND GWENT AREA Workshop Presentation for The Howard League for Penal Reform Community Sentences Cut Crime Conference.
Evaluations of CDCR Substance Abuse Programs: Lessons Learned Michael L. Prendergast, Ph.D. Criminal Justice Research Group UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: What do the Data Tell Us? Recovery Community Services Program Grantee Meeting December 14, 2007.
Australian Government Australian Institute of Criminology Drugs, Alcohol and Crime: A study of juvenile detainees Jason Payne ‘AIJA Youth.
Drugs and Criminal Justice in Scotland: Policy Overview Scottish Drugs Forum 15 September 2009.
Australian alternatives to arrest and imprisonment for drug and drug-related offenders: Assessing program and system outcomes Dr Caitlin Hughes and Dr.
How Might SBIRT Impact Adolescent Treatment? Shelly Dutch, CSAC, ICS.
Salford’s Alcohol Strategy Background Salford’s Drug and Alcohol Strategy Safe. Sensible. Social. : next steps in the national alcohol.
Borallon will be the leading centre for rehabilitating young male offenders in Australia, to keep communities safe and break the costly cycle of crime.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
SENTENCE:  punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime.
Southend Children’s Partnership SOUTHEND YOUTH OFFENDING SERVICE Report to Children & Lifelong Learning Scrutiny Committee JULY 2009.
Introduction Results and Conclusions On demographic variables, analyses revealed that ATR clients were more likely to be Hispanic and employed, whereas.
Tier 4 CAMHS: Criminal Justice Pathfinder Team Richard Deehan - Clinical Nurse Specialist Michael Taylor - Community Mental Health Nurse, Acting Team Manager.
CSV2115 Leadership & Management in Community Service Organisations Week 8 Funding Submission Writing.
Introduction Results Treatment Needs and Treatment Completion as Predictors of Return-to-Prison Following Community Treatment for Substance-Abusing Female.
Developing RJ in England and Wales Roger Cullen Senior Policy Adviser.
The SaferMK Plan Richard Solly. Core Principles To be Proactive SaferMK Plan Partnership Focus Realistic Outcome focus AliveConciseTransparent.
National Offender Management Service Strategic Framework.
Early Intervention Program & Early Family Support Services: Analyzing Program Outcomes with the Omaha System of Documentation Presented to: Minnesota Omaha.
Youth Criminal Justice Act. to prevent youth crime to have meaningful consequences and ensure accountability for youth crime to improve rehabilitation.
Evaluating screening and brief intervention in a criminal justice setting Adrian Barton & Greta Squire School of Law and Social Science University of Plymouth.
DIVERSION TO ASSETS An Evidence Based Opportunity To create community supports for first-time youth offenders, diverting them away from the system and.
Brighton Oasis Project Our contribution to safeguarding children in the city February 26 th 2016.
Suffolk Strategic Partnership Safer Suffolk Delivery Partnership Board Babergh Community Safety Partnership Safer Suffolk Delivery Partnership Executive.
Recidivism Rates for DCJ Offenders Exiting Residential Treatment June 2007 Kim Pascual Research & Evaluation.
Shared Responsibility in Action- Whole Family Teams August 2012.
Stronger FamiliesPhase /15 Phase /20 Stronger Families Programme DCLG Troubled Families Programme Identifying, tracking and supporting.
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
Social Return on Investment (SROI) Evaluation and Impact Manager
Are there Lessons to be Learnt from the Youth Justice System?
Presentation transcript:

The impact of community-based drug and alcohol treatment on reoffending in Indigenous communities Anthony Morgan, Tracy Cussen, Alex Gannoni & Jason Payne Applied Research in Crime and Justice Conference 18 February 2015

Background National Indigenous Law and Justice Framework Previously funded evaluations of sentencing courts and conferences, offender support and reintegration, diversion programs and night and community patrols Goal 4: Increased safety and a reduction in offending within Indigenous communities by addressing alcohol and substance misuse.

Importance of drug and alcohol treatment High rates of substance misuse within some Indigenous communities Significant consequences for individuals, families and communities Contributes to high rates of offending, victimisation and overrepresentation in the CJS Evidence that drug and alcohol treatment is an effective response to AOD misuse and in reducing reoffending

BUT…there are significant gaps in our evidence base around the effectiveness of treatment for Indigenous people

Evaluation methodology Interviews and focus groups with program staff and clients Analysis of client case files Program entry and exit assessment Analysis of reoffending using police and court data

Overview of evaluated drug and alcohol programs Program AProgram BProgram CProgram D Primary goals Reduce harm from AOD use Reduce alcohol misuse and related harms Successful rehab of substance misuse, abuse and domestic violence issues Reduce AOD abuse in a healing environment LocationNorthern Territory New South WalesVictoria Program duration12 weeks12-24 weeks8-26 weeks16 weeks Capacity20 clients50 clients12-14 clients8-10 clients Indigenous specificNo Yes Target population Adult males and females (incl couples) Adult males Young males years Model Residential rehabilitation Healing centre Treatment approach Harm minimisation and abstinence

Program participants and participation (%) Program AProgram BProgram CProgram D Indigenous Male Principal drug of concern Alcohol Used daily Referral source Criminal justice referral Mandated to participate (CJS referrals only) Program status Completed Terminated Absconded Mean days (completed)

Improvements in client health and wellbeing (program completers only) Physical and mental health (programs A, B & C) Social skills and relationships (program C) Employment readiness and status (programs A & B) Living arrangements (programs A & C)

Residential rehabilitation provides opportunities for respite – a break from challenging circumstances, family pressures and problems with police

Time to first offence following treatment, by completion status, Program A (% survived)

Cox regression predicting reoffending (any offence) among program participants, Program A hr95% CI (lower)95% CI (upper)p Completed program (vs did not complete) Male (vs female) to 30 years (vs 17 to 25 years) to 40 years (vs 17 to 25 years) years or older (vs 17 to 25 years) CJS referral (vs other referrals) Violent offence before treatment (vs any other offence) –40 prior offences to treatment (vs 0–20 prior offences) or more prior offences to treatment (vs 0–20 prior offences) Model chi square53.58 Log likelihood p0.00 n132 Limited to those offenders whose had entered into treatment between June 2010 and July 2012 Source: AIC, Indigenous drug and alcohol treatment database [computer file]

Limited to those offenders whose had entered into treatment between June 2010 and July 2012 Source: AIC, Indigenous drug and alcohol treatment database [computer file] Negative binomial regression predicting frequency of offending, Program A IRR95% CI (lower)95% CI (upper)p Completed program (vs did not complete) Male (vs female) to 30 years (vs 17 to 25 years) to 40 years (vs 17 to 25 years) years or older (vs 17 to 25 years) CJS referral (vs other referrals) Violent offence before treatment (vs any other offence) –40 prior offences to treatment (vs 0–20 prior offences) or more prior offences to treatment (vs 0–20 prior offences) to 40 years and completed program (vs all others) Model chi square70.02 df10 p0.000 n132

Time to first offence following treatment, by completion status, Program B (% survived)

a: p<0.05 Source: AIC, Indigenous drug and alcohol treatment database [computer file] Comparison in offending frequency among Program B participants before and after treatment episode (based on number of offences per 365 free days) Pre-treatmentPost-treatment nMeanMediannMeanMedian 30 days or less –75 days More than 75 days a

Time to first offence following treatment, by completion status, Program C (% survived)

Cox regression predicting reoffending (any offence) among program participants, Program C hr95% CI (lower)95% CI (upper)p 80 days or more in program (vs less than 80 days) to 30 years (vs 25 years and under) to 40 years (vs 25 years and under) years or older (vs 25 years and under) CJS referral (vs other referrals) Violent offence before treatment (vs any other offence) –40 prior offences to treatment (vs 0–20 prior offences) or more prior offences to treatment (vs 0–20 prior offences) Model chi-square34.09 Log likelihood p0.000 n120 Limited to those offenders whose had entered into treatment between June 2010 and July 2012 Source: AIC, Indigenous drug and alcohol treatment database [computer file]

Summary of key findings Positive impact on health and wellbeing outcomes Promising evidence of impact on reoffending No significant difference in outcomes between CJS referrals and other referral sources Breadth of service delivery is important Program location matters Multiple factors contribute to the impact of treatment in the community

Study limitations Comparison group Accounting for free time Small sample sizes Administrative data on program participation Capacity to follow clients post-treatment Reliance on case manager assessments Changes to programs

Did the programs have an impact or was it the motivation to change?

Some reflections about the evaluation of programs in Indigenous communities Need to evaluate programs outside of the criminal justice system Build evaluation capacity within community-based organisations Establish mechanisms that encourage regular assessments of program outcomes

The impact of community-based drug and alcohol treatment on reoffending in Indigenous communities Anthony Morgan, Tracy Cussen, Alex Gannoni & Jason Payne Applied Research in Crime and Justice Conference 18 February 2015