Program Evaluation Overview. Definitions of Program Evaluation systematic collection of information abut the activities, characteristics, and outcome.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines
Advertisements

Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Health impact assessment explained
STRATEGIES FOR COURSE REDESIGN EVALUATION Laura M. Stapleton Human Development and Quantitative Methodology University of Maryland, College Park
MODULE 8: PROJECT TRACKING AND EVALUATION
Designing an Effective Evaluation Strategy
Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
Laura Pejsa Goff Pejsa & Associates MESI 2014
Introduction to Research Methodology
 Systematic determination of the quality or value of something (Scriven, 1991)  What can we evaluate?  Projects, programs, or organizations  Personnel.
V MEASURING IMPACT Kristy Muir Stephen Bennett ENACTUS November 2013.
Evaluation.
A brief overview What is program evaluation? How is an evaluation conducted? When should it be used? When can it be used? Used with Permission of: John.
Getting on the same page… Creating a common language to use today.
Planning a measurement program What is a metrics plan? A metrics plan must describe the who, what, where, when, how, and why of metrics. It begins with.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2.
S519: Evaluation of Information Systems Understanding Evaluation Ch1+2.
WRITING the Research Problem.
Types of Evaluation.
EDU555 CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION ENCIK MUHAMAD FURKAN MAT SALLEH WEEK 4 CURRICULUM EVALUATION.
How to Write Goals and Objectives
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
REC 375—Leadership and Management of Parks and Recreation Services Jim Herstine, Ph.D., CPRP Assistant Professor Parks and Recreation Management UNC Wilmington.
Product Evaluation the outcome phase. Do the magic bullets work? How do you know when an innovative educational program has “worked”? How do you know.
Proposal Writing for Competitive Grant Systems
Investment Portfolio Methodologies Pertemuan Matakuliah: A Strategi Investasi IT Tahun: 2009.
Sociology 3322a. “…the systematic assessment of the operation and/or outcomes of a program or policy, compared to a set of explicit or implicit standards.
Too expensive Too complicated Too time consuming.
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
1 ECGD3110 Systems Engineering & Economy. 2 Lecture 1 Introduction to Engineering Economics.
Athlete Selection Leadership. Contents  Athlete selection definition and explanation  Athlete selection policy  Athlete selection procedures  Athlete.
Evidence-based policies and indicator systems 2006 Conducting effective research and analysis to support policy delivery. The Green Book: Appraisal and.
QUICK OVERVIEW - REDUCING REOFFENDING EVALUATION PACK INTRODUCTION TO A 4 STEP EVALUATION APPROACH.
1 Unit 1 Information for management. 2 Introduction Decision-making is the primary role of the management function. The manager’s decision will depend.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Health Impact Assessment.
Review: Alternative Approaches II What three approaches did we last cover? What three approaches did we last cover? Describe one benefit of each approach.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
20081 E-learning Lecture-10: EVALUATING THE IMPACTS OF E-LEARNING week 12- Semester-4/ 2009 Dr. Anwar Mousa University of Palestine Faculty of Information.
EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.
CHAPTER 12 Descriptive, Program Evaluation, and Advanced Methods.
Program Evaluation.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Implementation and follow up Critically important but relatively neglected stages of EIA process Surveillance, monitoring, auditing, evaluation and other.
Program Evaluation for Nonprofit Professionals Unit 1 Part 1: Introduction to Nonprofit Evaluation.
Program Assessment. Before you get started Need to determine if the program can be evaluated or should be evaluated. Is the answer already available?
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
Planning Evaluation Setting the Course Source: Thompson & McClintock (1998) Demonstrating your program’s worth. Atlanta: CDC/National Center for Injury.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Session VI Evaluation & Wrap Up. Evaluation Activities directed at collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating information about the effectiveness.
Data Driven Planning and Decision-making for Continuous School Improvement: Developing a Program Evaluation Plan Leadership for Innovative Omani Schools.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Basic Concepts of Outcome-Informed Practice (OIP).
Six Steps To Problem Solving A simple systematic approach to problems and issues faced by students By MK NKWANE g15N7271 TUESDAY GROUP.
Decision Making Although we all have experience in making decisions intuitively, it is important to examine the process of decision making in a systematic.
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
.  Evaluators are not only faced with methodological challenges but also ethical challenges on a daily basis.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
C. What is a Feasibility report
Right-sized Evaluation
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Controlling Measuring Quality of Patient Care
WEEK 4 CURRICULUM EVALUATION
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
Presentation transcript:

Program Evaluation Overview

Definitions of Program Evaluation systematic collection of information abut the activities, characteristics, and outcome of programs for use by specific people to reduce uncertainties, improve effectiveness, and make decisions with regard to what those programs are doing and affecting (Patton, 1986).

Definitions of Program Evaluation establish and provide useful information for judging decision alternatives; assist an audience to judge and improve the worth of some educational program or object; assist the improvement of policies and programs. Stufflebeam

Purpose of Program Evaluation Improve Maintain Stop

Objectives of Program Evaluation Discover whether and how effectively the objectives are being met Discover unplanned and unexpected consequences Determine underlying policies and related activities that contribute to success or failure in particular areas Provide continuous feedback

Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation The CIPP Model

Aspect of evaluation Type of decisionKind of question answered ContextPlanning decisions What should we do? InputStructuring decisions How should we do it? ProcessImplementing decisions Are we doing it as planned? And if not, why not? ProductRecycling decisions Did it work?

CIPP Model Simple systems model applied to program evaluation. context evaluation, input evaluation, process evaluation, and product evaluation. These types are typically viewed as separate forms of evaluation, but they can also be viewed as steps or stages in a comprehensive evaluation

Formative Summative With the CIPP model, there is a clear distinction between formative evaluation (conducted for the purpose of improving the program) and summative evaluation (conducted for the purpose of accountability which requires determining the overall effectiveness or merit of the program).

Context Evaluation includes examining and describing the context of the program being evaluated, conducting a needs and goals assessment, determining the objectives of the program, and determining whether the proposed objectives will be sufficiently responsive to the identified needs. It helps in making program planning decisions.

Input Evaluation includes activities such as a description of the program inputs and resources, a comparison of how the program might perform compared to other programs, a prospective benefit/cost assessment (i.e., decide whether you think the benefits will outweigh the costs, before it is actually implemented), an evaluation of the proposed design of the program, and an examination of what alternative strategies and procedures should be considered and recommended. In short, this type of evaluation examines what the program plans on doing. It helps in making program structuring decisions.

Process Evaluation includes examining how a program is being implemented, monitoring how the program is performing, auditing the program to make sure it is following required legal and ethical guidelines, and identifying defects in the procedural design or in the implementation of the program. It is here that evaluators provide information about what is actually occurring in the program. Evaluators typically provide this kind of feedback to program personnel because it can be helpful in making formative evaluation decisions (i.e., decisions about how to modify or improve the program). In general, process evaluation helps in making implementing decisions.

Product Evaluation includes determining and examining the general and specific outcomes of the program (using impact or outcome assessment techniques), measuring anticipated outcomes, attempting to identify unanticipated outcomes, assessing the merit of the program, conducting a retrospective benefit/cost assessment (to establish actual worth or value), and/or conducting a cost effectiveness assessment (to determine if the program is cost effective compared to other similar programs). Product evaluation is very helpful in making summative evaluation decisions (e.g., What is the merit and worth of the program? Should it be continued?)