Portals and Web Standards Lessons Learned and Applied David Cook Copyright The University of Texas at Austin 2003. This work is the.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

“Build It and They Will Come," But Will They? A Poster Presentation by Abdul Shibli Harvard Graduate School of Education Cambridge, Massachusetts

Advertisements

November 6, 2003 Copyright Robert J. Beck This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.

Web Application Management Moving Beyond CMS Douglas Clark Director, Web Applications Copyright Douglas Clark 2003 This work is the intellectual property.

Lynn Ray ISO Towson University Strategic Planning for IT Security Copyright Lynn Ray, This work is the intellectual property rights of the author.

Copyright Robert J. Beck This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

Copyright Ellen C. Ramsey and Ryan P. Looney This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.

E-Biz Forum 2002 E-Business Forum May 16, 2002 Steve Relyea Vice Chancellor – Business Affairs University of California, San Diego.

Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.

November 6, 2003 E-Learning Objects: Benefits and Repository Issues Dr. Robert J. Beck University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.

Innovation and Outcomes: Voices of Experience Purdue University Calumet Midwest Educause Conference Monday, March 13, 2006 Heather L. Zamojski: Course.

Copyright Jill M. Forrester This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non- commercial,

CCSU’s E-portfolio Initiative and the IT Career Ladder Jo Kinnard, Ph.D. Clayton College and State University, Morrow, GA.

1 Penn State/Napster 2.0 Trial Russell S Vaught Associate Vice Provost, Information Technology Copyright Russell S. Vaught This work.

Office of the Vice President Copyright Notice Copyright Greg Hedrick, Matthew Wirges This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.

Migrating to uPortal 2 at UBC Paul Zablosky University of British Columbia Copyright Paul Zablosky This work is the intellectual property of the.

JA-SIG CAS Enterprise Single Sign-On Scott Battaglia Application Developer Enterprise Systems & Services Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey Copyright.

 Copyright Curtis D. Edmonds,  This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

Copyright Statement © Jason Rhode and Carol Scheidenhelm This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material.

Developing a Successful Model for Online and Tech-Enhanced Learning Mamie How Janet Willett Patricia Delich Presented April 27, 2005 Copyright Patricia.

Copyright Dong Chen, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

1 sm Using E-Business Solutions to Meet Management Challenges: Interoperability & Flexibility Bring Success to the Implementation of Specialized Components.

Copyright Anthony K. Holden, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

University of Washington CUMREC 2003 Uncompromised Web Applications: Variety Without Chaos University of Washington CUMREC 2003 Copyright University of.

Unraveling Web Development PRESENTERS: Bob Nakles and Paras Kaul, George Mason University.

Copyright Shanna Smith & Tom Bohman (2003). This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.

University of California, Irvine Security Access Management at UC Irvine: Adding Decentralization and Ending Paper Mark Askren, Assistant Vice Chancellor.

Moving Your Paperwork Online Western Washington University E-Sign Web Forms Copyright Western Washington University, This work is the intellectual.

Darrel S. Huish Katherine J. Ranes Arizona State University Lessons Learned During the First Year of myASU, a Large Institution Portal Copyright Darrel.

So You Want to Switch Course Management Systems? We Have! Come Find Out What We’ve Learned. Copyright University of Okahoma This work is the intellectual.

Open Your Eyes: Open Architecture, Open Source, Open Projects Mid-Atlantic Educause January 12, 2005 Copyright Patricia Gertz This work is the intellectual.

Putting the We in… We are Penn State! Copyright [Carol Findley, Lisa Dibert] [2003]. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission.

Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.

The Team Approach: A Paradigm Shift for Designing Successful Online Courses NERCOMP 2005 College for Lifelong Learning, Manchester, NH.

Classroom Technologies Re-organization Copyright Kathy Bohnstedt, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for.

Baylor University and Xythos EduCause Southwest 2007 Dr. Sandra Bennett Program Manager Online Teaching and Learning System Copyright Sandra Bennett 2007.

Sharing MU's SharePoint Experience 2005 Midwest Regional Conference Innovative Use of Technology: Getting IT Done Wednesday, March 23, 2005.

Copyright Emory University, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

Sharing Information and Controlling Content: Continuing Challenges for Higher Education Susanna Frederick Fischer Assistant Professor Columbus School of.

Beyond the Campus Gates: Bringing Alumni, Parents, and Prospects into the Campus Portal William P. Wilson Mark R. Albert John C. Duffy Gettysburg College.

Moving Your Paperwork Online University of California, Irvine presents PayQuest Copyright UC,Irvine This work is the.

This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided.

Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.

Issues Associated with ePortfolios in Small Colleges EDUCAUSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference 2006 Ed Barboni, Senior Advisor, Council of Independent.

Megan Adams, Swarthmore College Mark Colvson, Bryn Mawr College January 17, 2003 Collaborative Virtual Reference Services: The Tri-College Libraries’ Experience.

Center for Planning and Information Technology T HE C ATHOLIC U NIVERSITY of A MERICA ERP Systems: Ongoing Support Challenges and Opportunities Copyright.

Discussion Panelists: Justin C. Klein Keane Sr. Information Security Specialist University of Pennsylvania Jonathan Hanny Application Security Specialist.

March 26, 2003The Navigo Project Hans C. Masing, The University of Michigan Lance D. Speelmon, Indiana University An IMS and OKI Compliant Open Source.

UWM CIO Office Where Did These Customizations Come From? Do We Need Them? March 14, 2007 Jill Unglaub, Senior Application Analyst Information and Media.

1 Professor Emeritus Ray Schroeder Director of Technology-Enhanced Learning University of Illinois at Springfield Copyright Ray Schroeder, This work.

Security Access Management at UCI – Slaying the Paper Forms Dragon Mark Askren, Assistant Vice Chancellor Valerie Jones, Project Lead Jennifer Lane, Help.

1 Copyright Carl Berger This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

Copyright © 2003, The University of Texas at Austin. This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.

Getting Everyone "On Board" for a Major IT Project Presentation to CUMREC MAY 16, 2002 Warren Mills, CEO Copyright Advantiv, Inc This work is the.

1 Presenters: Lucretia Parham Sara Connor Armstrong Atlantic State University October 30, :45 – 12:35 Copyright Sara Connor and Lucretia Parham,

My UW-Madison Enterprise Portal Migration to Open Source Framework Jim Helwig EDUCAUSE Midwest Regional Conference, Chicago March 23, 2005

A Cat-Herding Tale Forging a Single Course Management System for a Decentralized Institution Copyright Abdul Shibli, 2004.This work is the intellectual.

A Strategy for Moving from Commercial to an Open Source Environment Jeshua Pacifici, GEDI Assistant Director and Learning Systems Consultant.

1 Effective Incident Response Presented by Greg Hedrick, Manager of Security Services Copyright Purdue University This work is the intellectual property.

Wake Forest Content Migration Strategy Jolie Tingen – WF, Patty Wolfe – Unicon, Dan McCallum – Unicon Sakai Conference - Denver, Jun 17, 2010 © Copyright.

Improving Campus IT Accessibility Dr. Jonathan Lazar Dept. of Computer and Information Sciences Towson University Copyright Jonathan Lazar This work.

Copyright James Kulich This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

Copyright Michael White and Sylvia Maxwell, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.

© Scottsdale Community College Leveraging the Power of E-Learning Taking your course to a higher level Presented by Sidne Tate Director, Instructional.

Julian Hooker Assistant Managing Director Educause Southwest

Defining an IT Workflow, from Request to Support

Blaine A. Brownell, President,

Project for OnLine Instructional Support (POLIS)

myIS.neu.edu – presentation screen shots accompany:

An App A Day Copyright Tina Oestreich and Brian Yuhnke This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material.

Bad News Messages: How Much and How Often?

Presentation transcript:

Portals and Web Standards Lessons Learned and Applied David Cook Copyright The University of Texas at Austin This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.

UT Direct Background/History UT’s Technology Environment UT Direct 1.0 UT Direct 2.0 Vision Web Standards Challenges

A Bit of History President Faulkner’s State of the University address in Fall 1999 Original goals of this vision –Improved quality of service –Improved efficiencies Help students, faculty, and staff with their university business Many services on the Web already

Technology Environment Unified databases Distributed application development; 175 trained developers ADABAS/Natural/webAgent

Sample Services Before UT Direct

UT Direct 1.0 Launched in August 2000 Customized and personalized experience to students, faculty and staff based on primary role Over 100 services

UT Direct 1.0 Development Effort 45 staff, 14,000 hours Estimated 50% of development hours spent on browser issues

UT Direct 1.0

UT Direct Usage 195K total users Spring 2002 –35K unique users per month –22K repeat visitors each month

Sample Services Before UT Direct

Similar Services After UT Direct 2.0

Issues faced with UT Direct 1.0 Changing templates Browser problems and updates; 50% of staff maintenance time Frames Some usability issues Component institution branding More granular role information needed

A vision for UT Direct 2.0 Removal of frames Web standards (XHTML/CSS/DOM) Support for other UT System components Inline functionality rather than just links to services

UT Direct 2.0 Vision (continued) Support for non-webAgent technologies Improved modularity and maintainability Improved accessibility Closer alignment with redesigned public site

Implementing UT Direct 2.0 Gathered developer community to outline vision Developed UT Direct “API” Web standards education and evangelization Usability/accessibility testing Interface guidelines Conversion

UT Direct 2.0

Anatomy of a UT Direct 2.0 Service

Why Were Web Standards Important Multiple browser problems Accessibility Developers would not be drawing the complete page Benefits to developers, end users, and support staff Reduced costs

Validation Tool for Secure Pages

Sample Tab Code Tabs: My Home My Bookmarks

Bookmarks Before – 6 pages After – 60 lines

Logon Screen Warning

Standard vs. Non-standard Browsers

Benefits of UT Direct Development Common look and feel for UT and other components Service can be easily bookmarked Service usage can be logged Developers make fewer interface decisions

Component Support

Challenges in Development Technical Issues –webAgent 1 and webAgent 2 –CSS Issues –Content Registry Political issues –Conversion –Priorities –Control

Future Move toward Java for portal framework Still must support webAgent applications Closer examination of uPortal features More open architecture Better alignment with public site

URLs Information on UT Direct Web Standards and CSS –World Wide Web Consortium –Web Standards Project –Wired Redesign –ESPN Redesign –CSS-discus Wiki –The DAO of Web Design