ASK  IT Aligning Student Knowledge through Inquiry Thinking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Advertisements

Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 2.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
The Northwest Georgia Science Education Partnership Mathematics and Science Partnership (MSP) Program.
EPAS: Elevating the Postsecondary Aspirations of Students! Using ACTs EPAS Data Effectively Glenn Beer Louisiana Tech University
ASK-IT 2 Aligning Student Knowledge through Inquiry Thinking Aug. 20, A presentation of the Green River Regional Educational Cooperative.
A Key Piece of the Puzzle: The EQuIP NGSS Rubric & Delaware’s NGSS Implementation Plan Shelley Rouser and John Moyer Delaware Department of Education.
KEDC Project for Special Educator Effectiveness (Project SEE) KEDC Special Education.
40. Overcoming Barriers to Transformation Through System-Wide Leadership Dr. Carol Johnson, Superintendent Central Dauphin School District.
Association of Science-Technology Annual Conference October 31-November 1, 2009 Session Leader: Diane LaFollette, Network Coordinator, Arkansas Discovery.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Developing District Level Professional Learning Communities Woodford County Schools Jimmy Adams, Candace James and Sam Watkins.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Promoting Learning & Understanding for Students MSP project meeting  January 9, 2014 MathPLUS 1 and 2.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
WELCOME June 17, 2015: Timely Mathematics Interventions (TMI) Grant Sponsor: Kentucky Department of Education(KDE) Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Funds.
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title IIA Guidance Teacher and Leader Keys Effectiveness.
Reservoir Primary School Literacy Share Day
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Science Teacher Leader Content Network September 25, 2013 Twitter: #kyscinet Website: grrecscinet.com.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW Raising Achievement and Improving Graduation Rates: How Nine HSTW Sites Are Doing It Gene Bottoms Southern Regional.
SciencePLUS (Promoting Learning & Understanding for Students) Network A Federally Funded Project through the Math-Science Partnership and the Kentucky.
Distributed Leadership for Mathematics Bringing Together District, School, & University Leadership to Support Highly Qualified Teachers University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships: FY 2005 Summary.
Next-Generation Standards and Accountability Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
October 3, 2014 Program & Services Advisory Council.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Supporting Special Education Teachers: Exploring Alternate Algorithm Strategies to Expand Student Experiences with Mathematics National Council of Supervisors.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Statewide Systems of Support Oregon School Improvement Facilitators Carol Larson, Willamette ESD Christina Reagle, Oregon Dept. of Education.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
Competency 010 Presented by Elizabeth Castillo. Competency 010 The Master Technology Teacher knows how to provide professional development and support.
WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION PRESENTED BY GIBSON & ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH GRANT WISE II Evaluation.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Science Instructional Guide For High School Integrated Coordinated Science Biology and Chemistry Professional Development Module 1 Introduction to the.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
South Jersey Math/Science Partnership at Rowan University Dr. Eric Milou Dr. Jill Perry SJMP.
1 CECV Intervention Framework Module 5A Learning & Teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Spring 2015 OMSP Request For Proposal. Important Dates Intent to Submit: March 21, 2015 Applications: 4:30 p.m., Friday, May 15, 2015 Announcement of.
Goals Increased Student Achievement Balanced Assessment System Summative Formative Assessment for Learning.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 26, 2009 Webinar.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
Office of Academics and Transformation
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Summit Hill Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

ASK  IT Aligning Student Knowledge through Inquiry Thinking

ASK  IT Project OverviewProject Overview StakeholdersStakeholders Roles and ResponsibilitiesRoles and Responsibilities Payment ProceduresPayment Procedures FormsForms

Project Overview Regions Served GRREC’s 32 districts Ask  It Ask  It (12 districts)

Project Overview GRREC’s 32 districts Ask  It (12 districts) Ask  It - $600,000 professional development initiative of the GRRECAsk  It - $600,000 professional development initiative of the GRREC The project is one of only seven awards made by the Kentucky Department of Education in 2007 from its U.S. Department of Education Math/Science Partnership Fund.The project is one of only seven awards made by the Kentucky Department of Education in 2007 from its U.S. Department of Education Math/Science Partnership Fund.

Project Overview Ask  It The Research Upon Which Ask  It is Based Formative Assessment for Student Learning: –Assessment for student learning can increase achievement by percentiles. This is affirmed in the research by Paul Black and Dylan Wiliam (1996, 2004), Richard Stiggins (2002), and Robert Marzano (2006). Rigor and Relevance: –Digging deeper into content that connects to what students both want and need to know creates greater meaning and success. This is supported by KDE/DOK, confirmed by Willard Daggett, 2005; Doug Reeves, 2004; Harvey Silver and Richard Strong; Inquiry-based learning: –Students build science knowledge from the new skills and challenges that come as they investigate. This is confirmed by the work of the National Research Council (Suzanne Donovan and John Bransford, 2005) and other national organizations and their peer reviewed work (Peter Dow, et al, 2000; NSTA, 2004). Embedded, collegial learning of teachers: –Learning must occur based on established standards, such as those endorsed by the KDE and the National Staff Development Council, and championed by GRREC. Further, professional learning must consider the needs of adult learners, as outlined by educators Marsha Speck (1996, 2003), Stephen Shaha et al (2004), and the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (Hunt, 2003).

Regional Need Rural farming areas of 8,000 to 23,000 people, with high levels of poverty. More than half of our students qualify for free/reduced lunch. GRREC surveys indicate teachers had limited opportunity to participate together in collegial learning related to science. Most Teacher Leaders within this project have an average of just three years in the classroom. Students within these schools (75%) reported on the KCCT that there were questions on the test which had not been covered in the classroom. And 60% reported that they never or just sometimes used strategies considered inquiry-based. 80 percent of students said they tried very hard on the 2006 KCCT, only 27 percent walked away from the test thinking they had performed well. Project Overview

Non-F/R lunch Free/Reduced No disability With disabilities 42% 63% Poverty 47%77% Disability Our students by subgroup BELOW Proficient 2006 KCCT in Science at 7 th grade

Project Overview Key components 1.Program Review Within a pre-designed framework and with guidance from project staff and consultants, this Team will begin to inventory individual and collective talents and deficits 2.Action Plan Science teachers will create an Action Plan to address the issues they’ve uncovered; it will guide the local work over the three-year project 3.Professional Development GRREC will call in the experts 4.FOSS Modules and Other Curricular Resources Scientifically research-based modules aligned to middle school science core content standards and the big ideas of the Program of Studies / Other resources to include “Script Sheets”

Project Overview Project Goals Goal 1: Create a culture of rigor and relevance within each science classroom (teachers) Goal 2: Increase academic achievement for all students (students)

Stakeholders Ask  It Regional Ask  It Team Liz Storey, Executive Director of GRREC Brian Womack, Project Director Mindy Alexander, Professional Development Coordinator Rico Tyler, Middle Grades/Secondary Professional in Residence (Physics) at WKU Doug Jenkins, Adjunct Science Faculty (WKU) and President, BRIMS Dr. Jeanne Fiene, Project Evaluator/WKU

Stakeholders School-Based Learning Teams In part patterned after the National Staff Development Council’s “Learning Teams” concept “Common Thread” - 7th-grade science

Team Leader Benefits –$1,000/semester stipend for extra duty –Substitute reimbursement for school –$2,500/year in FOSS classroom materials –$125/day for summer training sessions –11 days of professional development annually –Regular work with consultants/experts (up to 3 days per year) –Support staff through GRREC

Stakeholders Team Leader responsibilities –8 release days/school per year –3 days of PD each summer –Facilitate webcam sessions –Guide Student Friendly Learning target work of the Learning Teams (after school; other) –Share Action Plan work; refine as determined by staff, WKU faculty, experts –Take all pre-/post-tests; assist program review –Complete monthly reflection logs –Share finished products created through the initiative with others in project, GRREC

Stakeholders Team Member benefits –$25/hour for after school meetings (up to 10 per year) –$125/day for summer training (1 day) –Shared materials and new curricula items –Regular work with consultants/experts –Support staff through GRREC

Stakeholders Team Member Responsibilities –Work with the Teacher Leader to develop and implement the Action Plan –Participate with the Team to observe new strategies, review student work –Participate in periodic webcam sessions –Implement Student Friendly Learning targets within the classroom –Take all pre-/post-tests; comply and assist with program review

Stakeholders Partners Provide classroom feedback through real world teaching and learning. Science faculty from Western Kentucky University’s Ogden College of Science and Engineering Barren River Imaginative Museum of Sciences (BRIMS) Kentucky Dataseam

Stakeholders Project Staff Roberta Johnson, Director of Finance Terri Stice, Technology Coordinator Ann Burden, Technology Specialist Johna Rodgers, Grant Writer

Things to remember…. Payment Invoices Due: December 14 th and May 16 th FAX# Both are located at the bottom of the forms section in the notebook Questions????