Iowa Geological Survey Iowa Geographic Information Council 2007 NSDI 50 States Cap Grant A Business Plan for the Iowa Geospatial Infrastructure (IGI) Jim.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FGDC Fifty States Initiative November 16, Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Fifty States Initiative USGS Cooperative Agreement Partnership.
Advertisements

NC OneMap: Building the Statewide Geospatial Data Resource Jeffrey Brown Center for Geographic Information and Analysis October 28, 2004.
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Geospatial Technologies Briefing PEMA Law Enforcement Briefing 22 March 2004 Jim Knudson, Director GT
UNSD-CELADE Regional Workshop on Census Cartography for the 2010 Latin America’s census round Census Cartography: Organizational and Institutional Issues.
Collection of Critical Infrastructure Data by Regional Planning Commissions in Missouri Ray Fox USGS Geospatial Data Liaison To Missouri, Nebraska, and.
Slide 1 NSDI: Advancing the Fifty States Initiative Return on Investment 2010 National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) Cooperative Agreements Program.
Ellen F. Heineman, Ph.D. National Cancer Institute Epidemiology & Genetics Research Program The GIS for the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project.
The Delaware DataMIL A Pilot Project for The National Map July 25, 2002 State of Delaware Council of Geographic Names Authorities (COGNA)
VGIN 5 Year GIS Strategic Plan
1 Virginia Geographic Information Network Virginia’s Elevation Framework Layer Upcoming LiDAR Projects and the Elevation FIAT John.
Florida GIS Coordination
Geographic Information Council Framework Subcommittee.
Community Update and Transportation Data Donald Cooke, Founder Geographic Data Technology, Inc NATMEC 2000 August 29, 2000 ***USE “NOTES” VIEW IN POWERPOINT***
Copyright 2000 Digital Quest Inc. COURSE 2000 Delivering RS/GIS training in Classrooms by Eddie Hanebuth Digital Quest Inc. Toll Free 877-4REMOTE
ESRI International Users Conference The Delaware DataMIL The DataMIL Team.
WHO ARE WE? The Alabama Association of Regional Councils (AARC) is composed of twelve regions. Each regional planning council is a public organization.
Use of Geospatial Technologies for Census Data Collection: Issues and Considerations Timothy Trainor U.S. Census Bureau.
State of Tennessee Office for Information Resources – GIS Services State of Tennessee and Enterprise GIS Activities Oak Ridge National Lab February 26,
Adem.alabama.gov GIS for Water Management: Flow Data Flow Building a Framework for Alabama.
Iowa Geological Survey Iowa Geographic Information Council 2007 NSDI 50 States Cap Grant A Business Plan for the Iowa Geospatial Infrastructure (IGI) Jim.
The West Virginia GIS Program: A Decade of Progress, A Future of Promise Craig A. Neidig WV State GIS Coordinator WV Geological & Economic Survey Chairman,
Slide 1 NSDI: Advancing the Fifty States Initiative Implementing Statewide Strategic and Business Plans National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) Advancing.
Geospatial Concepts for Executives April 11, 2007 Shirley Hall GIS Program Manager USDA-FSA Geospatial Information Systems in the Farm Service Agency.
Office for Information Resources GIS Services The Tennessee Base Mapping Program “Moving Forward” Dennis Pedersen, Director OIR – GIS Services.
The State of Kansas Data Access and Support Center (DASC)
1 navigat OR – Oregon’s GIS Utility n An enterprise approach to information management based on partnerships with all Oregon governments navigatOR is accelerated.
Iowa Geological Survey Iowa Geographic Information Council 2007 NSDI 50 States Cap Grant A Business Plan for the Iowa Geospatial Infrastructure (IGI) Jim.
The United States National Spatial Data Infrastructure.
OHIO GEOGRAPHICALLY REFERENCED INFORMATION PROGRAM Dave Blackstone Technical Services Manager Ohio Department of Transportation Jeff Smith Ohio Spatial.
The State of Kansas Data Access and Support Center (DASC)
Building Blocks for Implementing the National Spatial Data Infrastructure Hank Garie Executive Director (703)
Local-State-Federal Data Sharing Intergovernmental Data Sharing.
GIS data sources Data capture and compilation is very time consuming and costly Up to 80% cost of a GIS (Longley et al.) Primary Data – data captured specifically.
Office for Information Resources GIS Services Eastern Region NSDI Partner Meeting: Tennessee Report Dennis Pedersen Director, GIS Services.
Enterprise GIS A Multi User System Jefferson County, Illinois.
Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,
Office for Information Resources GIS Services Tennessee Base Mapping Program Dennis T. Pedersen, Department of Finance and Administration Office for Information.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The National Map in North Dakota The National Map in North Dakota Ron Wencl State Mapping Liaison.
Office for Information Resources GIS Services Flood Map Modernization and the Tennessee Base Mapping Program Dennis Pedersen, Director F&A, OIR – GIS Services.
Office for Information Resources GIS Services The Tennessee Base Mapping Program “A New Beginning” Dennis Pedersen, Director OIR – GIS Services.
Statewide Technology and Electronic Commerce Advisory Council Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Initiative Todd S. Bacastow November 20, 2003.
Office for Information Resources GIS Services The Tennessee Base Mapping Program “A New Beginning” Dennis Pedersen, Director OIR – GIS Services.
Frank Winters NYS Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services Office Information Technology Services February 5, 2013.
The Iowa Geospatial Infrastructure Return on Investment Studies Jim Giglierano Iowa Geographic Information Council.
Gearing up for 2010 Geographic Programs Leading up to the Census Katy Rossiter US Census Bureau – Denver North Dakota GIS Users Conference October 24,
Geospatial Metrics John Palatiello MAPPS Executive Director.
Steve Gay - GIS Manager Mid America Regional Council Kansas City, MO.
OIR – GIS Services 1 Tennessee Base Mapping Program Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration Office for Information Resources – GIS Services.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Geospatial Liaisons - Supporting NHD Stewardship NHD Workshop April 14, 2009.
National Spatial Data Infrastructure Federal Geographic Data Committee David Painter 2001 NSDI Cooperative Agreements Program.
Local/State Data Partnerships Providing Services to Citizens.
Minnesota Statewide Advisory Council 1.  One meter, leaf-on (Improvements to existing NAIP Program)  One foot, leaf-off (newly proposed program)  Both.
Contra Costa County Orthophoto Project Coordinated Partnership of CCC, CC Clean Water Program, Iron House and Central CC Sanitation District Presented.
Geospatial Information One-Stop E-Government Workshop URISA Chicago 2002 Milo Robinson.
…..Kansas Department of Revenue – Property Valuation Division – Kansas GIS Policy Board - DASC ….. Statewide Tax Units Database A collaborative partnership.
The Delaware DataMIL A Pilot Project for The National Map IASSIST 2002 Conference Storrs, CT June 13, 2002 Richard S. Sacher Research & Data Management.
1 What have we been learning? Hank Garie, A Year in the Life of Geospatial One-Stop FGDC Steering.
IGIC Committee and Workgroup Initiatives Bill Holder, GISP Kosciusko County GIS IGIC President.
Vector Data Input Chapter 4. Data Buy or make - sources Base map - layers Standards – accuracy Metadata As bad as the worst component.
City of Charlotte EA: Developing the Geospatial Data Architecture for Citizen Service, Regional Strategy, State Integration & Federal Alignment Twyla McDermott.
Building Blocks for Implementing the National Spatial Data Infrastructure Hank Garie Executive Director (703)
National Geospatial Enterprise Architecture N S D I National Spatial Data Infrastructure An Architectural Process Overview Presented by Eliot Christian.
Local/State Data Sharing Partnership Proposed Action Plan (Winter 2007/2008)
“It’s Not a Sprint – It’s a Marathon” GIS 101 For Local Government ICIT Midyear Conference June 17, 2010 Jeff Miller, Dubuque County Matt Boeck, Story.
McCracken and Paducah Geographic Information System
GIS Basic Training June 7, 2007 – ICIT Midyear Conference
Iowa Geographic Information Council Infrastructure Update
Statewide / Framework Datasets: Approaches and Outcomes
MAPPING AFRICA FOR AFRICA INITIATIVE
Presentation transcript:

Iowa Geological Survey Iowa Geographic Information Council 2007 NSDI 50 States Cap Grant A Business Plan for the Iowa Geospatial Infrastructure (IGI) Jim Giglierano October 7, 2008

Iowa Geological Survey What is the IGI? Iowa Geospatial Infrastructure (IGI) is Iowa’s contribution to the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) IGI’s central focus is on the collection of consistent, common, integrated, standardized local, state, federal and other GIS data layers (“framework” data layers in NSDI terminology) that are freely available to the public through the Internet IGI will follow NSDI practices for metadata and data standards, and use Iowa’s data clearinghouse for data discovery IGI includes people, technology and agreements to make this happen

Iowa Geological Survey Components of IGI 1)Framework GIS Data 2)Infrastructure Technology 3)People 4)Community

Iowa Geological Survey IGI Framework Layers 1.Geodetic control: county GPS control monuments and NGS benchmarks - counties 2.Ortho imagery: BW, color and CIR orthorectified aerial imagery – counties, state, federal 3.Administrative boundaries: city, county and state boundaries - counties 4.Cadastral data: public land survey section corners, section lines and parcel boundaries - counties 5.Transportation: road centerlines, railroads, trails, airports, waterways – counties and state 6.Elevation: digital elevation models and contours - state 7.Hydrography: rivers and streams, water bodies, watershed boundaries - state 8.Address points – counties and state 9.Structures: 2D building footprints, bridges, towers – counties and state

Iowa Geological Survey ROI Study – Costs Benefits of IGI Interviewed Counties with GIS Interviewed Counties without GIS Interviewed State and a few Federal Agencies Utilities and others

Iowa Geological Survey Benefits to Counties with GIS Participating in IGI Using lidar in county engineer office for road maintenance $12k-90k/yr Using lidar in county engineer office for surveying and design $10k-50k/yr Cost avoidance for web mapping server $10k/yr Cost avoidance for aerial photography $20k/yr through participation in IFTN From $50k to $150k in benefits per county per year

Iowa Geological Survey Costs to Participate in IGI County GIS staff has to provide data to IGI County Staff – learning to use IGI layers, ie. lidar elevation Participate in Imagery for the Nation (IFTN) ~ $5k-6k in real costs per county per year to participate in IGI

Iowa Geological Survey IGI County GIS Service Bureau Gets county data into IGI, helps counties do GIS more effectively Job functions: about 4 FTEs –County IGI coordinator –County ortho-imagery coordinator –GIS web application developer –GIS tech/training specialist Funded by the state – free to counties who participate in IGI

Iowa Geological Survey 66 Counties WITH GIS participating in IGI Breakeven Year:2009 Payback Period (in Years):1 Net Present Value:$218,563,418 Present Value of Costs:$5,808,835 Return on Investment:188.13%(Annualized)

Iowa Geological Survey ROI Results: Counties WITHOUT GIS Typical approach for counties wanting to adopt GIS: –Initial outlay of $200k to $500k for GPS control, orthos, centerlines and parcel conversion project –GIS staff: coordinator and half-time tech –2 or more copies of desktop GIS software; GIS hardware, servers, plotter –Web mapping server –OR all above services provided by a vendor Many of the remaining counties can’t afford startup or maintenance costs of GIS

Iowa Geological Survey Status of County GIS Programs

Iowa Geological Survey Counties adopting a minimal GIS: parcel maintenance and tax assessment only Breakeven Year: Does Not Break Even Payback Period (in Years): No Payback Anticipated Net Present Value:($1,106,613) Present Value of Costs:$2,423,193 Return on Investment: -2.28% Annualized One County Stand Alone $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000, Cumulative Costs Cumulative Benefits

Iowa Geological Survey Problems “Standard” GIS approach is not cost effective for smaller counties if parcel maintenance and tax assessment are the only applications of GIS Many counties WITH GIS are not getting all the possible benefits of their GIS if all they do is parcel maintenance and tax assessment May feel compelled to sell data to recoup costs IGI (and therefore NSDI) won’t happen without major assistance to local data producers to lower their ongoing costs, and expand their overall benefits of having a GIS

Iowa Geological Survey IGI Benefits IGI County Coordinator helps with regional approach starting a GIS –Sets up agreement to share a GIS person among 3 counties –Assists with contracting for GIS data conversion among 3 or more counties; parcel maintenance outsourcing –Data hosting and web application by service bureau Benefits of access to IGI data (lidar contours, etc).

Iowa Geological Survey Breakeven Year:2018 Payback Period (in Years):10 Net Present Value:$590,491 Present Value of Costs:$905,393 Return on Investment:3.26% County Adopting GIS with IGI Assistance – sharing costs with 2 other counties, plus other IGI benefits One County with IGI $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000, Cumulative Costs Cumulative Benefits

Iowa Geological Survey IGI State GIS Service Bureau* Helps get state data into IGI and helps state agencies do GIS more effectively Job functions – 4 FTEs –GIS database/clearinghouse administrator –Web application developer –GIS tech/training specialist –IGI state agency coordinator probably located at state emergency management agency Funded by the state – free to state agencies Geocoding is a big need for state agencies * Not equivalent to a state agency “bureau”

Iowa Geological Survey The IGI ROI Calculation – 20 year cost scenario 20 counties w/o GIS will build county GIS programs, phased into GIS/IGI over 10 years 79 counties w/ GIS, will participate in IGI, phased in over 10 years State and federal agencies will provide funding GIS service bureaus and IFTN Costs of participating were phased in over first 10 years, then full cost of maintaining for next 10 years

Iowa Geological Survey Summary of IGI Costs $385k/yr state service bureau $600k/yr new orthos and lidar $385k/yr county service bureau $300k/yr county data projects $2M one time data projects (hydro, structures, address points) 1M/yr county data costs (new and existing) (1M/yr federal contribution to IFTN –not counted in analysis) Total of about $3M/yr average cost over 20 years (2M state, 1M county)

Iowa Geological Survey Quantitative Measures NPV Subtract Costs from Benefits ROI Divide Benefits by Cost Break Even Cumulative Benefits Equal Cumulative Costs Pay Back Time from Now to Breakeven Point

Iowa Geological Survey Multi-agency IGI Study Breakeven Year:2010 Payback Period (in Years):2 Net Present Value:$271,103,423 Present Value of Costs:$55,983,503 Return on Investment:24.21% annualized Multiagency Cumulative Costs and Benefits $0 $50,000,000 $100,000,000 $150,000,000 $200,000,000 $250,000,000 $300,000,000 $350,000, Cumulative Costs Cumulative Benefits

Iowa Geological Survey Major Findings – ROI Spreadsheets The 20 year analysis shows Net Present Value of $271M and Return on Investment of 24.21%. Present value of total 20 yr costs is $56M (about $3M a year). Sensitivity analysis shows that delayed adoption of GIS, with counties phasing in GIS capabilities over 20 years instead of the desired 10 year span, does not result in extreme detriment to the project. NPV is reduced from $271M to $230M and ROI is reduced from 24% to 22%.

Iowa Geological Survey Major Findings – Economic Development Interviews A Chamber of Commerce interview cited GIS as contributing more than 50% of the resources needed to bring in new business Estimate of $13.5M/year in benefits to a community of modest size Did not use this in the ROI spreadsheets but it certainly shows the potential for growth in this area

Iowa Geological Survey ROI Study Summary! IGI is possible, and financially compelling Everyone benefits by participating in IGI Move ahead to funding sources in the next year

Iowa Geological Survey Questions so far? Jim Giglierano

Iowa Geological Survey Iowa Geospatial Infrastructure Check out Appendix A with text of interviews

Iowa Geological Survey Why are we doing this?