The Make-Over of Strategý The Make-Over of Strategý Accentuating the Positive Musette France McKelvey Library Director, Interim Shaw University 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
March 23, Todays Outcomes By the end of todays workshop, participants will be able to... Revise and/or finalize SAOs within their areas Discover.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Engaging Online Faculty and Administrators in the Assessment Process at the American Public University System Assessment and Student Learning: Direct and.
the UNCG University Libraries ASERL Meeting November 13, 2012 Atlanta, GA Kathryn Crowe Associate Dean for Public Services
Aligning Employee Performance with Agency Mission
Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills 2012 HBCU Library Alliance Leadership Institute Presented By: Violene Williams, MLIS Reference Librarian James Herbert.
The Periodic Review Report at the Community College: Opportunities for Collaborative Institutional Renewal Valarie Avalone, Director of Planning Dr. Michael.
Strategic Plan Briefing Session Progress and Challenges Spring
The Value of Academic Libraries Initiative: A Briefing, A Discussion, and An Opportunity for Engagement Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe & Mary Ellen Davis 9 th.
Strategic Plan Prepared by Melissa Druckrey and Jama Lumumba Jackson State University Division of Library and Information Resources.
Specific outcomes can be compared to resources expended; and successful programs can be highlighted;
SEM Planning Model.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Strategic Planning Steering Committee Where Are We Now? UNO has been involved in strategic planning since its doors opened in Chancellor.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
POSITION AND SALARY MANAGEMENT LEAD 2012 Job Categories Position Descriptions Career Bands and Salary Ranges Position/Salary Change Requests 1.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Msubillings.edu/futureu PROVOST FORUM October 15, 2012 msubillings.edu/futureu.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK Learning and Teaching Board Background on the Board Processes (to give confidence in the results) Progress so far.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Aligning Evidence-Based Library Planning with School Goals Mary Virginia Meeks T.C. Marsh Middle School, Dallas ISD Maria Cahill, PhD Texas Woman’s University.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
(RTI) Response To Intervention Initial Meeting Quick Guide
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
Moving the Masses: Building a Collective Approach to Outcomes Assessment Beth Wuest, Director Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza, Director.
Preparing for SACS: Focusing our Quality Enhancement Plan.
Superintendent’s Entry Plan Dr. Lory D. Morrow. Dr. Lory Morrow will begin serving as superintendent of Davidson County Schools on January 1, The.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Periodic Review Report Committee Summary: Amended Monthly Progress Report December 22, 2003.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of International Affairs Director N.C. State Global Engagement and Competitiveness Enhanced Access & Staffing Rainmaker Global Engagement Partnership.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
Student Affairs Division Meeting September 19, 2012.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE DIVISION OF THE PRESIDENT Approved by the President in Spring  Provide students with a quality educational.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
EDUCATIONAL MASTER PLAN TIMELINE Mr. Rick Miranda Acting Vice President, Academic Affairs/Asst. Superintendent Dr. Kristi Blackburn Dean of Institutional.
Committee VII: Faculty. Continuing challenges regarding previous “findings” : Enhancement in faculty career development growing out of recent improvement.
College Success Program John Cowles, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success and Retention Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, Michigan.
ACUI TRAINING Core Competency Module. Purpose Overview of the 11 core competencies Introduction to the resources offered by ACUI regarding the core competencies.
ACCJC 18-Month Follow-up Report
Successes and Opportunities
Periodic Review Departmental Review.
Fort Valley State University
Presentation transcript:

The Make-Over of Strategý The Make-Over of Strategý Accentuating the Positive Musette France McKelvey Library Director, Interim Shaw University 1

SHAW UNIVERSITY Raleigh, North Carolina Established in 1865 Established in st black college or university in the south 1 st black college or university in the south 145 years later she is still graduating productive members of communities 145 years later she is still graduating productive members of communities Supported by a library that needs a Strategic Plan that is synchronized with the University’s Plan Supported by a library that needs a Strategic Plan that is synchronized with the University’s Plan 2

Presentation Outline The project and its goals The project and its goals Describe/show the steps taken to achieve those goals Describe/show the steps taken to achieve those goals Evaluate the outcomes Evaluate the outcomes What’s next? What’s next? 3

The Library’s Project The 5 “W”s Who- Shaw University Library System Who- Shaw University Library System What- Synchronize the Library’s Plan with the University’s Strategic Plan What- Synchronize the Library’s Plan with the University’s Strategic Plan Where- Main campus and 8 remote sites Where- Main campus and 8 remote sites When Academic Year When Academic Year Why- To enhance the quality, quantity and access to information Why- To enhance the quality, quantity and access to information 4

Project Goal 1 Strategic Plan Strategic Plan  Create Committee Identify stakeholders; did we forget anybody Identify stakeholders; did we forget anybody  Get consultant to help committee set goals and objectives aligned with new administration  Present Library’s Strategic Plan to new administration 5

Approach & Outcome Approach Approach  Meet with VP of Academic Affairs to propose creation of Library SP Committee Outcome Outcome  This is a new administration that needed time to catch its breath which resulted in the postponement of this part of the project for this period of time. 6

Primary Goal 2 To produce a video to record the progress of creating the Strategic Planning Committee. Seniors in the Mass Communications program would be used as the crew. To produce a video to record the progress of creating the Strategic Planning Committee. Seniors in the Mass Communications program would be used as the crew. 7

The video could be used for: The video could be used for:  this (HBCU) project  inclusion in the students’ employment portfolio  evidence of how the library can partner with other departments on campus to share and/or create information/media. Project Goal 2 (Con’t.) 8

Approach & Outcome Approach Approach  Met with Dean of Humanities and Chair of Mass Communications to discuss Senior Project. Outcome Outcome  The Dean of Humanities and Chair of Mass Communications did not agree to the timing of this project. It was not a confirmed NO; just a “not now.” 9

Too Much, Too Soon? Strategý was not discouraged 10

What Happened: Project Review ‘A’ The two major elements of the project were abandoned due to circumstances beyond our control; creation of the Strategic Planning Committee and production of the video The two major elements of the project were abandoned due to circumstances beyond our control; creation of the Strategic Planning Committee and production of the video  Environmental scanning; not paying attention to external events, trends and developments 11

Strategýs Strategy Get Over It! Get Over It! 12

Re-Strategize We have a grant to begin the make-over, or enhancement. We have a grant to begin the make-over, or enhancement. The grant allows us to hire a consultant to analyze our print and electronic collections as well as our facilities. The grant allows us to hire a consultant to analyze our print and electronic collections as well as our facilities. The consultant will give us a report on his findings and a Plan for enhancement. The consultant will give us a report on his findings and a Plan for enhancement. 13

Plan of Action Select consultant based NC State Library recommendations Select consultant based NC State Library recommendations Identify stakeholders Identify stakeholders  Library staff Consultant meets with library staff Consultant meets with library staff Library Director creates an internal Strategic Planning Committee Library Director creates an internal Strategic Planning Committee 14

Library Strategic Planning Committee Meeting This created a forum for discussion of what a strategic planning committee is This created a forum for discussion of what a strategic planning committee is  more meetings will be needed before strategic plan is ready to be shared with administration  staff members were assigned tasks based on need and skill 15

16

What Happened Project Review ‘B’ Internal Strategic Planning Committee Internal Strategic Planning Committee  Consists of library staff  Different from staff meeting because it addresses specific issues 17

What Happened Project Review ‘C’ Consultant delivers preliminary reports on the book collection and facilities in the Main Library Consultant delivers preliminary reports on the book collection and facilities in the Main Library 18

Outcome The initial project had to be revised The initial project had to be revised Leadership institute skills were used to recover from challenges Leadership institute skills were used to recover from challenges Leadership institute teachings lead the director to examine behavior and make some changes Leadership institute teachings lead the director to examine behavior and make some changes  Include staff in planning process  Staff actively participates 19

Overall Outcome In the end, our goals were met and we are on target and the next grant in the series, the LSTA Technology Grant has been written. In the end, our goals were met and we are on target and the next grant in the series, the LSTA Technology Grant has been written. 20