US Fleet Forces US Marine Corps Forces Hostile Neutral / UndecidedFriendly Level of Influence More Less Garnet PHARM IDPs VEOS GOA PIA GOAL Criminal Elements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disaster Management Civil-Military Coordination
Advertisements

Air Force Core Functions
Determine Prioritized Supporting Efforts Ops End States Stable & secured environm ent DP 7 : CTF Organised and Mission-Ready SE 17: Effective force composition.
Building a Strategy for Combating Terrorism. “We have to fight terrorists as if there were no rules, and preserve our open society as if there were no.
US Army Combined Arms Center UNCLASSIFIEDAs of 13 FEB 09 Information Engagement in Counterinsurgency 1.
Timetable to Freedom A Plan for Iraqi Stability and Sovereignty.
METT-T CAPT MULVANEY. MISSION What is required by the tactical task given to you?
UNCLASSIFIED The Overall Classification of this Briefing is UNCLASSIFIED For Additional Assistance with this briefing or for release authority outside.
Introduction to Information Operations Attaché Corps- SEP 09
Campaign Planning Process 28 March 2006 Step 4A – Develop The Campaign Framework UNCLASSIFIED.
United States Marine Corps
Review of Situation Incident 2 Phosgene Release –hijacked phosgene tanker explodes in the center of Boise, upwind of the Kuhistan national government center.
TLO 2: Action: Plan operational security. Intermediate-level training.
BA-14 Intelligence Update. New UNSCR (SEPT). Piracy Increasing
United Nations Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination
United States Army War College “Not to Promote War but to Foster Peace” Private Security Companies in Complex Contingencies: Opportunities and Risks A.
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 9b - Department of Homeland Security Strategic Plan.
Overall Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO/REL USA, MNFA
Privatizing Peacekeeping : The Growing Prominence of Private Security Companies in Conflict and Crisis Colonel Christopher T. Mayer, U.S. Army NOTE: This.
Ambush Disrupt Occupy Attack by Fire Penetrate FIX Relief in Place
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Industry Day Brief 18 September 2014.
WHAT DO YOU DO IN THE NATIONAL SECURITY PATHWAY? Protecting the nation!
Mitigating the KFC. Stakeholders KFC MPAK MW Mestizo KUH Govt CTF IPM SIS Cadre Materials Sanctuary Public Face ? Terror Actions Incidental Attacks.
Campaign Planning Process Step 3B – System Center of Gravity Analysis
Operations Security (OPSEC) Introduction  Standard  Application  Objectives  Regulations and Guidance  OPSEC Definition  Indicators.
US Army Combined Arms Center Approach to the IW Environment.
OPT 1 Decisive Points Analysis (Step 4B) DP 1. Lines of Ops, Decisive Points, S-COG and End States DP 3 : Belligerents’ & Terrorists’ freedom of action.
EVOLVING MODERN PEACE OPERATIONS
MPAT TE-2 COMBINED TASK FORCE TRAINING Information Management.
US Fleet Forces US Marine Corps Forces DRAFT CTF 956 Mission Statement 1 NLT 01 AUG 2014, EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL GROUP TWO (FWD) DEPLOY AS CTF 956.
US Fleet Forces US Marine Corps Forces Scenario Timeline / Road to Crisis UNCLASSIFIED Savannah mayor secedes UNSCR 1658: Establishes embargo / sanctions.
US Fleet Forces US Marine Corps Forces Navy Expeditionary Force (NEF) CTF-956 LCDR Kent, Christopher 1 Sep 2014 Overall Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO/REL.
DP 3 : Hostile Groups’ freedom of action & sanctuary are denied SE 1a TGT/A Lead Supported (Supporting)EntitiesMOEsMOEIs Deny hostile groups’ movement.
0 Peter F. Verga U.S. Department of Defense 2 Definitions Homeland Security – A concerted national effort to prevent terrorist attacks within the United.
1 The U. S. Coast Guard Maritime Strategy for Homeland Security Captain Dan Deputy Chief of Cutter Forces, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters Captain Dan Deputy.
 Relationship between terrorism and political systems is multifaceted.
Joint Training Challenges of Irregular Warfare/COIN and Full Spectrum Training Requirements Brief for WJTSC LtCol John Merna, J7/9-TJ 23 September.
Crisis Action Planning Process پروسه پلان گذاری عملکرد بحران Situation Development Crisis Assessment COA Development COA Selection Execution Planning Execution.
U.S. Coast Guard Intelligence & Criminal Investigations
CTF PACIFIC Date Course of Action Development Brief UNCLASSIFIED.
Challenges in the Contemporary Peacekeeping Environment A Personal Perspective 21 September 2011 Presented by Lieutenant Colonel Paul Armitage MBE.
COL Mark D. Rosengard SOJ3
MISSION PLANNER CIVIL MILITARY FORCES: RIMPAC 00.
The Department of the Navy. Role of the Navy Organization of the Navy Naval DoctrineOverview.
U.S. ARMY 4632A21 Information Operations and Public Affairs 1 3/1/2007 BNCOC PA Supervisor Course Information Operations.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 1 Course of Action Development (MDMP) 3 Mar 08 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT)
Warfare Communities of the Fleet and Marine Forces
Campaign Planning Process Guide / Brief Template
By CPT Robert L. Crabtree
Purpose To understand Commander’s Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action planning Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action.
Perception in working in conflict environments. Neutral, impartial and independent humanitarian organisation Mandated by the community of states, through.
Course of Action Comparison Purpose u Define course of action comparison and its role in the crisis action planning process u Discuss the associated task.
C5 Cell Step 4 - Decisive Points (DRAFT). DP 1 : Hostility Between Kuhistan and Sonora has Ceased Ending Conditions Key Components Critical to successful.
U.S. Air Force “ Above All” Founded in 1947 The mission of the U. S. Air Force is to fly, fight and win... in air, space, and cyberspace.
Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff
Center of Excellence PEACE OPERATIONS COMMAND & CONTROL AND COMMAND & CONTROL AND TRANSITION ISSUES Lt Col (R) John Derick Osman Center of Excellence in.
November 19, 2002 – Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, creating a new cabinet-level agency DHS activated in early 2003 Original Mission.
Employment Considerations: Considerations at the Outset of Combat
UNCLASSIFIED 6/24/2016 8:12:34 PM Szymanski UNCLASSIFIED Page 1 of 15 Pages Space Policy Issues - Space Principles of War - 14 June, 2010.
WARFARE COMMUNITIES OF THE FLEET AND MARINE FORCES.
EMerge Status Report COIT September 18, Description Deploy a Human Resources Information System using a secure and robust technical platform for.
Peace Support Training Centre / Centre de formation pour le soutien de la paix INTRO TO PSYOPS AIYJ PSTC Template designed by Maj McQueen.
Campaign Planning Process Working Overview Slides
Current Event Brief!.
OPT 2 Decisive Point Brief (DP 2)
US Marine Corps
Scenario Overview Road to War: Mission: Key Tasks:
Operations Security (OPSEC)
GLOBAL CENTRE FOR THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT
Presentation transcript:

US Fleet Forces US Marine Corps Forces Hostile Neutral / UndecidedFriendly Level of Influence More Less Garnet PHARM IDPs VEOS GOA PIA GOAL Criminal Elements Muskagee Population Shahida Population GOP NGOs GARNET PHARM IDPs VEOs PIA Criminal Elements Muskagee Population Shahida Population IGO / NGOs

US Fleet Forces US Marine Corps Forces 2 CENTER OF GRAVITY ANALYSIS – NEF Center of Gravity: NEF Camps UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO/REL TO USA, MNFA 17 Sep 2014 (Draft) Critical Capabilities: NEF TOC (C2 & Comms) Maritime Security Landward Security Critical Requirements: HN Political Support Common Intel Picture / Operational Picture Robust Coalition Communications Plan Ability to Communicate/Coordinate with Higher HQ and HN government ISR to Understand FP Concerns and/or Emerging Crisis Critical Vulnerabilities: INT’L Legitimacy of Mission HN Public Support/Perception HN Security Freedom/Use of GLOC/SLOC HN/US/Coalition Logistic Support Breach of ROEs / Local national casualties, caused by CF activities Lack a deep understanding of the situation (risk making the situation worse).

US Fleet Forces US Marine Corps Forces CENTER OF GRAVITY ANALYSIS – HN 3 UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO/REL TO USA, MNFA 17 Sep 2014 (Draft) Center of Gravity: AMBERLAND Govt. Critical Vulnerabilities: PHARM Freedom of Movement/Maneuver Lovisa Clan Support of PHARM GARNETIAN Support of PHARM GLOC/SLOC Vulnerable to VEO Disruption Commerce Vulnerable to VEO Disruption Immature AMBERLAND Security Force Insecure Borders (Ungoverned Space) Clan Alliances Public Perception Vulnerable to Deceptive Messaging (Internal/External) Critical Capabilities: Rule of Law INT’L Legitimacy Freedom of Commerce Amberlandian Public Support Critical Requirements: UN Sanctions Deterring Increased Aggression Presence of Unified INT’L Response INT’L Political / Military Support IGO/NGO Support Clan Support Ability to Communicate/Coordinate with Coalition/IGO/NGOs Ability to Disrupt VEO Activity Ability to Control Public Perception Ability to Identify/Address Clan Concerns Ability to Identify/Address Public Concerns

US Fleet Forces US Marine Corps Forces Center of Gravity: Lovisa Clan Facilitation UNCLASSIFIED 4 03 Sep 2013 (V1) Critical Capabilities: Recruit Fighters Provide Safe Haven Gain External Support Discredit Government of AMBERLAND (GOAL) Critical Requirements: Freedom of Maneuver in AMBERLAND Provide alternate governance model Align goals/objectives with the Lovisa Clan Access to finance, arms and training provided by GARNET Conduct attacks against GOAL locations & forces Info Ops campaign to exploit actions and GOAL bias Critical Vulnerabilities: Exposure of lack of civil freedoms & atrocities under PHARM rule Interdiction of weapons and finance coming from GARNET Inability to enforce directives of shadow government Hostility of remaining 3 clans within AMBERLAND Delivery of effective GOAL governance & enfranchisement of the Lovisa Clan Western financial support/NGO activity Perceptions of PHARM as GARNET puppet CENTER OF GRAVITY ANALYSIS – PHARM UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO/REL TO USA, MNFA 17 Sep 2014 (Draft)

US Fleet Forces US Marine Corps Forces Hostile Neutral / UndecidedFriendly Level of Influence More Less Garnet PHARM IDPs VEOS GOA PIA GOAL Criminal Elements Muskagee Population Shahida Population GOP NGOs GARNET PHARM IDPs VEOs PIA Criminal Elements Muskagee Population Shahida Population IGO / NGOs

US Fleet Forces US Marine Corps Forces Risk to Force (Threa t Envir onme nt) Hostile Friendly DP LEGEND LEGEND: = NEF Decision Point PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 0 NEF – PHASE of OPERATION COAs COAs: -Do Nothing (Accept Risk to F/M) - Request Augment NEF (Mitigate Risk to F/M) - Request Change MSN (Mitigate Risk to F) -i.e. Consolidate SECFOR to protect key ports/airfields for follow-on forces - Request Subordinate NEF -to Adjacent CTF - Request Redeploy NEF (Unacceptable Risk)