An Overview of a Recent Study of Successful Multi-Sector Partnerships Focused on Improving Community Health ________________________________________ A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OUR STRATEGIC PLANNING JOURNEY. The Department of Medicine Strategic Plan  Our roadmap for the future  It will shape and guide what the Department of.
Advertisements

Twelve Cs for Team Building
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Principles of Standards and Measures
Presentation at The Conference for Family Literacy Louisville, Kentucky By Apter & O’Connor Associates April 2013 Evaluating Our Coalition: Are We Making.
Dr. Eddie R. Johnson Deputy State Superintendent of Education
Best practice partnership models
The Department of Communications and Engagement Jimmy Lee Peterkin, Jr., MBA District Business and Community Partnership Coordinator
Performance management guidance
Sustaining your Community Strategies & Structures Fran Butterfoss Coalitions Work Tim LaPier CDC’s Healthy Communities Program.
A Healthy Place to Live, Learn, Work and Play:
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Aligning Efforts— Statewide Commission Pat Simmons, MS, RD, LD Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
PRESENTATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Priorities for an Engaged Community of Employees TRU People Make Things Happen.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
Strategic Plan. April thru November 2011 Strategic Planning Cmmte/Staff Emerging Issues Document Trustee/Staff Meeting Community Listening Campaign SPC/Staff.
MeTA Jordan Executive Summary Baseline data is an important source for policy makers to diagnose the pharmaceutical and health sector situation in order.
Live Healthy Napa County Creating and Sustaining a Common Agenda.
1 Building an Exceptional Board: What Makes Great Boards Great? PNAIS Institutional Leadership Conference October 26, 2008 Nancy R. Axelrod Governance.
Strategic Planning Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint.
United Way Worldwide Talent Core Competencies October 2012.
Framework for Practice
1 Vision-Based Mission Planning Monson, Krejci and Associates.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
The League of California Cities Resources to Promote “Better Transportation” Eric Figueroa Regional Public Affairs Manager East Bay Division October 23,
THE ROLE OF STOP TB GHANA PARTNERSHIP Chief Austin A. Obiefuna National Coordinator SECRETARIAT CO-HOSTED BY AFRO GLOBAL ALLIANCE (GH) & GHANA SOCIETY.
Outline of Presentation 1.Mission, Vision and Values for Task Force 2.Definition of Engagement 3.Explanation of Research-Informed Framework 4.Characteristics.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Republic of the Sudan The National Audit Chamber (NAC) Presentation to: INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee (CBC) Stockholm – September 8, 2015.
Evaluation framework: Promoting health through strengthening community action Lori Baugh Littlejohns & Neale Smith David Thompson Health Region, Red Deer,
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Results Management: Principles and Strategies based on the work of Gary L. Bowen, Ph.D. and Dennis Orthner, Ph.D School of Social Work University of North.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Building Sustainable Community-Linked Infrastructure to Enable Health Science Research (RC4) RFA OD Pre-application workshop October 23, 2009.
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
2 Patient Family Advisory Councils- Creating Lasting Impact Kris White, MBA, BSN, RN.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Working in Partnership
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
An Introduction to Becoming a Commissioning Organisation 30 April 2012 APACE Commissioning Event Simon Marshall Offender Services Co-Commissioning Group.
Leveraging Data and Partnerships for Improved Public Health Presented to: Community Indicator Consortium Presented by: Veena Viswanathan and Cassandra.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
1 An Overview of Process and Procedures for Health IT Collaboration GSA Office of Citizen Services and Communications Intergovernmental Solutions Division.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
A Framework for Evaluating Coalitions Engaged in Collaboration ADRC National Meeting October 2, 2008 Glenn M. Landers.
Not Business as Usual: Using Collaborative Partnerships to Address Environmental Justice Issues.
Governance for a Board Monday March 14, Agenda  Introductions  Benefits and challenges of regional cooperation  What is governance  Governance.
Managing Talent – Maximizing Your Employee’s Potential 3 rd SACCO LEADERS’ FORUM Monique DunbarLorri Lochrie Communicating Arts Credit UnionCentral 1 Credit.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Strong leadership and whole school engagement – How does this happen? Rationale: Whole school change occurs when the leadership team has a common vision,
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Introduction to Program Evaluation
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Roadmap to an Organizational Culture of QI
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of a Recent Study of Successful Multi-Sector Partnerships Focused on Improving Community Health ________________________________________ A New Road Forward: How Hospital, Public Health, and Stakeholder Collaboration has Changed the Community Health Landscape Lawrence D. Prybil, PhD, LFACHE Norton Professor in Healthcare Leadership University of Kentucky October 15, 2015

I. Overview ____________________________________________________ Basic purpose of this study Phases of the study Core Characteristics of successful partnerships Study population Review selected recommendations (6 of 11) Concluding remarks 2

II. Purpose of this Study ______________________________________________________________________ Purpose: The overall purpose of the study was to identify and examine successful partnerships involving hospitals, public health departments, and other stakeholders who share commitment to improving the health of communities they serve and ascertain key lessons learned from their collective experience. The intent is to accelerate change, encourage collaboration, and contribute toward creating a “culture of health” in American communities. 3

III. Phases in the Study’s Methodology _______________________________________ 1.Identify the core characteristics of successful partnerships 2.Invite partnerships that demonstrate “core characteristics of successful partnerships” to participate in the study 3.Select what appear to be highly successful partnerships from the pool of 157 nominees located in 44 states through a four- step process involving members of our National Advisory Committee 4.Conduct site visits to a selected set of twelve partnerships which had demonstrated exceptional durability and success 4

III. Phases in the Study’s Methodology Continued _______________________________________ 5.Verify, tabulate, and analyze data obtained through the nomination process, official documents, confidential, structured interviews with partnership leaders, and small- group discussions during site visits. 6.Determine key findings, patterns and conclusions, and formulate recommendations for local leaders and public policy makers. 5

IV. Core Characteristics of Successful Partnerships Focused on Community Health Improvement ______________________________________________ Vision, Mission, and Values – The partnership’s vision, mission, and values are clearly stated, reflect a strong, direct focus on improving community health, and are firmly supported by the partners. Culture – The partners demonstrate a culture of collaboration with other parties, understand the challenges in forming and operating partnerships, and enjoy mutual respect and trust. Goals and objectives – The goals and objectives of the partnership are clearly stated, widely communicated, and strongly supported by the partners and the partnership staff 6

IV. Core Characteristics of Successful Partnerships Focused on Community Health Improvement Continued ______________________________________________ Organizational structure – A durable structure is in place to carry out the mission and goals of the collaborative arrangement. This can take the form of a corporate entity, an affiliation agreement, or other less formal arrangements such as community coalitions. Leadership – The partners jointly have designated well-qualified and dedicated persons to manage the partnership and its programs Partnership Operations – The partnership’s programs and functions operate effectively and efficiently. Performance Evaluation and Improvement – The partnership monitors and measures its performance regularly against agreed upon goals, objectives, and metrics Program Success and Sustainability – The collaborative partnership has demonstrated operational success, durability, and positive impact on the health of the population served 7

V. Study Population: 12 Partnerships Located in 11 States ___________________________________________ National Community Health Initiative Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Health Plan Oakland, California California Healthier Living Coalition Sacramento, California St. Johns County Health Leadership Council St. Augustine, Florida Quad City Health Initiative Quad Cities, Iowa-Illinois Fit NOLA Partnership New Orleans, Louisiana HOMEtowns Partnership Portland, Maine Healthy Montgomery Rockville, Maryland Detroit Regional Infant Mortality Reduction Task Force, Detroit, Michigan Hearts Beat Back: The Heart of New Ulm Project New Ulm, Minnesota Healthy Monadnock 2020 Keene, New Hampshire Healthy Cabarrus Kannapolis, North Carolina Transforming Health in King County, Washington Seattle, Washington 8

VI. Review Selected Recommendations _____________________________________________ 9 Recommendation #2: “ Whenever possible, partnerships should be built on a foundation of pre-existing, trust- based relationships among some, if not all, of the principal founding partners. Others partners can and should be added as the organization becomes operational, but building and maintaining trust among all members is essential.”

VI. Review Selected Recommendations Continued _____________________________________________ 10 Recommendation #4: “For long-term success, partnerships need to have one or more ‘anchor institutions’ with dedication to the partnership’s mission and strong commitment to provide on-going financial support for it”

VI. Review Selected Recommendations Continued _____________________________________________ 11 Recommendation #5: “Partnerships focused on improving community health should have a designated body with a clearly-defined charter that is empowered by the principal partners to set policy and provide strategic leadership for the partnership.”

VI. Review Selected Recommendations _____________________________________________ 12 Recommendation #6: “ Partnership leaders should strive to build a clear, mutual understanding of ‘population health’ concepts, definitions, and principles among the partners, participants, and, in so far as possible, within the community at large.”

VI. Review Selected Recommendations _____________________________________________ 13 Recommendation #7: “To enable objective, evidence- based evaluation of a partnership’s progress in achieving its goals and fulfill its accountability to key stakeholders, the partnership’s leadership must specify the community health measures they want to address, the particular targets they intend to achieve, and the metrics and tools they will use to track and monitor progress.”

VI. Review Selected Recommendations _____________________________________________ 14 Recommendation #8: “All partnerships focused on improving community health should place priority on developing and disseminating ‘impact statements’ that present an evidence-based picture of the effects the partnership’s efforts are having in relation to the direct and indirect costs the partnership is incurring.”

VII. Concluding Remarks _______________________________________ Our team believes a paradigm shift is occurring in America: there is growing realization that controlling the increase in health expenditures and improving the health of our nation’s population will require major changes in traditional policies, practices, and organizational models. We view these partnerships as pioneers and, we hope, as harbingers of a new era of innovation and multi-sector collaboration focused on building a robust culture of health in communities throughout America. The PDF version of our full report can be accessed and downloaded without cost at: 15