FULL-SERVICE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS PRE-APPLICATION WEBINAR (MAY 21, 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary Document Promise Neighborhoods Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official Notice in the Federal Register.
Advertisements

FY 2013 Technical Assistance and Capacity Building under the Transformation Initiative OneCPD TA NOFA 1.
Health Care Workforce Development Encouraging Pursuit of Careers in Health Care Pre-Application Conference January 14, 2010.
TRIBAL COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES PROGRAM (TCUP). Purpose of the Program To assist Tribal Colleges and Universities to: Build, expand, renovate, and equip.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Grant Writing 101 – Part 2 Information and Tips for Preparing and Submitting a Grant Application Nancy Alexander, MBA Office of Sponsored Programs.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences: Information for the Grants Administrator Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner National.
Quality Improvement Capacity for Impact Project (QICIP) Pre-Review Conference Call Competitive Funding Opportunity Announcement: HRSA March 25,
LOCAL LEVEL ALIGNMENT UNDER WIOA Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education for NTI Conference November 12, 2014.
Arts in Education National Grant Program (AENP) Pre-Application Webinar U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Improvement Programs.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Centers for International Business Education—Technical Assistance.
Find HRSA Funding Opportunities. Grants.gov All discretionary grants offered by the 26 federal grant-making agencies can be found on Grants.gov. You do.
Tips for a Successful Federal Grant Application Deborah Rosenbloom Director of Programs Jewish Women International
Tennessee Promise Forward Mini- Grant Competition Tennessee Higher Education Commission Informational Webinar.
Developing Quality Grant Proposals U.S. Department of Education Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
Navigating and Preparing a HRSA Application Responding to a Funding Opportunity Announcement Sarah Hammond, Grants Policy Analyst HRSA’s Office of Federal.
School Leadership Program Pre-Application Slides United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Summary Document July 2011 P ROMISE N EIGHBORHOODS 2011 Competition Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official Notice.
Summary Document March 2010 Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice of.
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
Overview of the FY 2010 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey 1.
Overview Slides March 13, 2012 Q&A Webinar i3 Development Pre-Application Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official.
Grant Writing Workshop for Research on Adult Education Elizabeth R. Albro National Center for Education Research.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Professional Development for Arts Educators Program (PDAE) Pre-Application Webinar U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Improvement.
HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES. Purpose of the Program To assist Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) to expand their role.
HISPANIC-SERVING INSTITUTIONS ASSISTING COMMUNITIES (HSIAC) PROGRAM.
Presenters: Martin J. Blank, Martin J. Blank, President, Institute for Educational Leadership; Director, Coalition for Community Schools S. Kwesi Rollins.
Grant Writing 101 Information and Tips for Preparing and Submitting an Application Debbie Kalnasy Bryan Williams Office of Safe and Drug-Free School s.
Arts in Education Model Development and Dissemination Grant Program (AEMDD) Pre-Application Webinar U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and.
12/07/20101 Bidder’s Conference Call: ARRA Early On ® Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP) Grant and Climb to the Top.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
School Leadership Program Pre Application Meeting March 31, 2008 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived Information.
School Leadership Program Pre Application Meeting February 19, 2010 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived.
Full-Service Community Schools Pre-Application Meeting June 17, 2010 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Note: These.
ALASKA NATIVE/NATIVE HAWAIIAN INSTITUTIONS ASSISTING COMMUNITIES (AN/NHIAC) PROGRAM.
Predominantly Black Institutions Program CFDA: A FY 2015 PREAPPLICATION WEBINAR Washington, DC July 14, :00 AM. – 12:00 PM, EDT July 14, 2015.
CFDA E 2012 Application Technical Assistance Webinar.
Social Innovation Fund Creating an Application in eGrants Technical Assistance Call 1 – 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 19, ;
National Center for Information and Technical Support for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities (NCITSPSD) NCITSPSD Technical Assistance Workshop Orientation.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Fiscal Year 2011 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCAs) HRSA NCAs Technical Assistance (TA) Webpage:
NOTES FROM INFORMATIONAL BRIEFINGS FOR POTENTIAL REGIONAL CENTER AND CONTENT CENTER APPLICANTS JUNE 19,20 & 22, 2012 Comprehensive Centers Program.
1 Access to the World and Its Languages LRC Technical Assistance Workshop (Part 1) Access to the World and Its Languages I N T E R.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
FY 2010 Coordinated Family and Community Engagement Grant Application.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Making Grants.gov Work for You: U.S. Department of Education International Education Program Service Technical Assistance Workshop January 2009 Find. Apply.
COSCDA Annual Conference PROGRAM PURPOSE Goal: To encourage communities to focus on workforce development as a long-term economic development strategy.
Full-Service Community Schools Pre-Application Meeting March 12, 2008 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived.
OFFICE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION NATIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (NPD) NPD Grant Competition Webinar 2: GPRA & Selection Criteria January.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Preparing for the Title III Part F STEM Competition Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions Educators Grantsmanship Institute March 20, 2016.
Overview of the FY 2011 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. State Personnel Development Grants Program Lead 1.
Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program Grant Writing Workshop Preparing The Application These workshops are funded by the USDA’s Agricultural.
Office of Innovation and Improvement June 9, 2016 Academies for American History and Civics Grant Competition Note: These slides are intended as guidance.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: April 30, 2014 Presented by: U.S. Departments.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Briefing: Interdisciplinary Preparation for Personnel Serving Children with Disabilities Who Have High-Intensity Needs CFDA K Office of.
Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge Letters of Support Webinar
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Information and Tips for Preparing and Submitting an Application
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
FY18 Water Use Data and Research Program Q & A Session
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Presentation transcript:

FULL-SERVICE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS PRE-APPLICATION WEBINAR (MAY 21, 2014)

Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official documents published in the Federal Register.

AGENDA  Purpose  Eligible Applicants  Award Information  Cost Sharing or Matching  Planning  Absolute Priority  Eligible Services  Q&A  Requirements  Competitive Preference Priority  Selection Criteria  Objectives and Performance Measures  Q&A  Application Components  Application Submission: How to Apply  Peer Review Process  Important Dates and Resources  Contact Information  Q & A 3

PURPOSE  Full-Service Community Schools (FSCS): – Authorized under the Fund for Improvement of Education. – Encourages coordination of academic, social, and health services through partnerships between:  (1) public elementary and secondary schools;  (2) the schools’ local educational agencies (LEAs); and  (3) community-based organizations, non-profit organizations, and public or private entities. PROGRAM OVERVIEW 4

PURPOSE  Public elementary or secondary school that works with its LEA and community-based organizations, nonprofit organizations, and other public or private entities to provide a coordinated and integrated set of comprehensive academic, social, and health services that respond to the needs of its students, students’ family members, and community members. DEFINITION OF FSCS 5

ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS  Applicant must be part of a consortium that consists of a local educational agency and one or more community-based organizations, non-profit organizations, or other public or private entities. (34 CFR )  Eligible parties may apply as a group. The term used to refer to the group may vary. Commonly used terms include (but are not limited to): – Consortium – Joint Application – Cooperative Arrangement 6

ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS  Members must designate one member of the group to apply for the grant or establish a separate, eligible legal entity to apply.  The members of the group must enter into an agreement detailing the activities that each member of the group plans to perform and binds each member of the group to every statement and assurance made in the application.  The agreement must be included in the application. GROUP APPLICATIONS 7

ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS  The applicant for the group is the grantee and is legally responsible for: – The use of all grant funds. – Ensuring that the project is carried out by the group in accordance with Federal requirements. – Ensuring that indirect cost funds are determined as required under Sec (e). LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (75.129) 8

ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS  With regards to group applications, each member of the group is legally responsible to: – Carry out the activities it agrees to perform; and – Use the funds that it receives under the agreement in accordance with Federal requirements that apply to the grant. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES (§75.129) 9

ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS  Any of the following document nonprofit status: – IRS recognition under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; – A statement from a State taxing body or the State attorney general certifying nonprofit operating status within the State; – A certified copy of the applicant's certificate of incorporation or similar document if it clearly establishes the nonprofit status of the applicant; or – Any of the above if that item applies to a State or national parent organization, together with a statement by the State or parent organization that the applicant is a local nonprofit affiliate. NONPROFIT STATUS (§75.51) 10

AWARD INFORMATION  Estimated available funds: $4.57M  Estimated award range: $275,000 - $500,000 per year  Estimated number of awards: 10  Project period: up to 5 years  Maximum award: $500,000 per year 11

COST SHARING/ MATCHING  A portion of the services provided by the applicant must be supported through non-Federal contributions, either in cash or in-kind donations. The applicant must propose the amount of cash or in-kind resources to be contributed for each year of the grant.  An applicant is encouraged to provide a minimum match of 20 percent through non-Federal contributions, either in cash or in-kind donations.  34 CRF and

PLANNING  Funds received during the first year of the project period may be devoted to comprehensive program planning, establishing results-focused partnerships, and capacity building. Funding received by grantees during the remainder of the project period must be devoted to program implementation. 13

ABSOLUTE PRIORITY  Projects that Establish or Expand Full-Service Community Schools – To meet this priority, an applicant must propose a project that is based on scientifically based research--as defined in section 9101(37) of the ESEA--and that establishes or expands a full- service community school. 14

ELIGIBLE SERVICES  High-quality early learning programs or services.  Remedial education, aligned with academic supports and other enrichment activities, providing students with a comprehensive academic program.  Family engagement, including parental involvement, parent leadership, family literacy, and parent education programs.  Mentoring and other youth development programs.  Community service and service learning opportunities.  Programs that provide assistance to students who have been chronically absent, truant, suspended, or expelled. 15

ELIGIBLE SERVICES  Job training and career counseling services.  Nutrition services and physical activities.  Primary health and dental care.  Activities that improve access to and use of social service programs and programs that promote family financial stability.  Mental health services.  Adult education and literacy services including instruction of adults in English as a second language. 16

REQUIREMENTS 1. A description of the needs of the students, students’ family members, and community members to be served, including information about (a) the basic demographic characteristics of the students, students’ family members, and community members; (b) the magnitude or severity of the needs to be addressed by the project; and (c) the extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services, infrastructures, or opportunities have been identified and will be addressed by the proposed project. 17

REQUIREMENTS 2. A list of entities that will partner with the applicant to coordinate existing services or to provide additional services that promote successful student, family, and community results and outcomes. The applicant must describe how existing resources and services will be coordinated and integrated with new resources and services. 3. A memorandum of understanding between the applicant and all partner entities, describing the role each partner will assume, the services or resources each one will provide, and the desired results and outcomes. 18

REQUIREMENTS 4. A description of the organizational capacity of the applicant to provide and coordinate eligible services at a full- service community school that will support increased student achievement. The description must include the applicant’s experience partnering with the target school(s) and other partner entities; examples of how the applicant has responded to challenges working with these schools and entities; lessons learned from similar work or previous community-school efforts, and a description of the existing or proposed infrastructure to support the implementation and sustainability of the full-service community school. 19

REQUIREMENTS 4 (con’t) Applicants must also describe their past experience (a) building relationships and community support to achieve results; and (b) collecting and using data for decision-making and continuous improvement. 20

REQUIREMENTS  5. A comprehensive plan based on results-focused partnerships (as defined in this notice) that includes a description of well-aligned goals, services, activities, objectives, performance measures, and project results and outcomes. In addition, the plan must include the estimated total number of individuals to be served, disaggregated by the number of students, students’ family members, and community members, and the type and frequency of services to be provided to each group.  Note: Applicants are also encouraged to articulate in the comprehensive plan how the proposed FSCS strategy is aligned with other school improvement strategies and Federal funding streams. 21

REQUIREMENTS  6. A list and description of the eligible services to be provided or coordinated by the applicant and the partner entities; a description of the applicant’s approach to integrating new and existing programs and services with the school’s (or schools’) core instructional program; and identification of the intended results and outcomes. 22

REQUIREMENTS  7. A description of how the applicant will use data to drive decision-making and measure success. This includes a description of the applicant’s plans to monitor and assess outcomes of the eligible services provided and coordinated by the FSCS project, as well as the number of individuals served, while complying with Federal, State, and other privacy laws and requirements. 23

REQUIREMENTS  8. A description of the roles and responsibilities of a full-time full- service community school coordinator and the proposed approach to ensuring that the full-service community school coordinator engages in joint planning with the principal and key community stakeholders to guide the proposed full- service community school.  Applications that do not meet these requirements will not be read and will not be considered for funding. 24

COMPETITIVE PREFERENCE PRIORITY  Awarded a Promise Zone designation.  Five Promise Zones: – The Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma – Los Angeles – Philadelphia – San Antonio – Kentucky Highlands  Applicants should submit a letter of support from the lead organization of a designated Promise Zone attesting to the contribution of the applicant’s proposed activities. A list of designated Promise Zones and lead organizations can be found at PROMISE ZONES (0 OR 3 POINTS) 25

SELECTION CRITERIA  Quality of the Project Design (Up to 25 points)  Adequacy of Resources (Up to 20 points)  Quality of Management Plan (Up to 25 points)  Quality of Project Services (Up to 20 points)  Quality of Project Evaluation (Up to 10 points) 26

SELECTION CRITERIA  In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the extent to which the proposed project consists of a comprehensive plan that includes a description of: – The project objectives; – The students, students’ family members, and community to be served, including information about the demographic characteristics and needs of the students, students’ family members, and other community members and the estimated number of individuals to be served; and QUALITY OF THE PROJECT DESIGN (UP TO 25 POINTS) 27

SELECTION CRITERIA  (C) The eligible services (as listed in the Absolute Priority described elsewhere in this notice) to be provided or coordinated by the applicant and its partner entities, how those services will meet the needs of students, students’ family members, and other community members, and the frequency with which those services will be provided to students, students’ family members, and community members. QUALITY OF THE PROJECT DESIGN (CONT.) 28

SELECTION CRITERIA  The adequacy of support, including facilities, equipment, supplies, and other resources to be provided by the applicant organization and consortium partners.  The relevance and demonstrated commitment of each partner in the proposed project to the implementation and success of the project.  The extent to which costs are reasonable in relation to the number of persons to be served and services to be provided. ADEQUACY OF RESOURCES (UP TO 20 POINTS) 29

SELECTION CRITERIA  The extent to which the proposed project consists of a comprehensive plan that includes a description of planning, coordination, management, and oversight of the eligible services (as listed in the Absolute Priority described elsewhere in the notice) to be provided at each school to be served, including the role of the school principal, the FSCS coordinator, partner entities, parents, and community members; QUALITY OF MANAGEMENT PLAN (UP TO 25 POINTS) 30

SELECTION CRITERIA  The qualifications, including relevant training and experience, of the FSCS coordinator and other key project personnel including prior performance of the applicant on similar or related efforts; and  The extent to which the time commitments of the project director, the FSCS coordinator, and other key project personnel are appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed project. QUALITY OF MANAGEMENT PLAN (CONT.) 31

SELECTION CRITERIA  The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed project reflect up-to-date knowledge from research and effective practice; and  The likelihood that the services to be provided by the proposed project will lead to improvements in the achievement of students as measured against rigorous academic standards. QUALITY OF PROJECT SERVICES (UP TO 20 POINTS) 32

SELECTION CRITERIA  Sets out methods of evaluation that include the use of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and qualitative data to the extent possible.  Will provide timely and valid information on the management, implementation, or efficiency of the project.  Will provide guidance on or strategies for replicating or testing the project intervention in multiple settings. QUALITY OF PROJECT EVALUATION (UP TO 10 POINTS) 33

PROGRAM PERFORMANCE MEASURE  The percentage of individuals targeted for services who receive services during each year of the project period increases annually. GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE AND RESULTS ACT (GPRA) 34

APPLICATION COMPONENTS  Abstract Narrative (one page, single-spaced)  Project Narrative (maximum 35 pages, double-spaced)  Budget Narrative  Appendices  Resumes of Key Personnel  Memorandum of Understanding (maximum 10 pages, double- spaced)  Documentation of match  Required Forms and Assurances 35

HOW TO APPLY  Applications for grants under this program must be submitted electronically using the Grants.gov.  You must complete the electronic submission of your grant application by 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.  We strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline date to begin the application process. GRANTS.GOV 36

HOW TO APPLY  Register and submit early  Use the application checklist  Verify submission is OK  For more information about Grants.gov, please refer to the instructions in the FSCS Application Package or GRANTS.GOV (CON’T) 37

HOW TO APPLY  Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification Number, and System for Award Management Registry: To do business with the Department of Education, you must— – a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN); – b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the System for Award Management (SAM) (formerly the Central Contractor Registry (CCR)), the Government’s primary registrant database; DUNS & TIN NUMBERS 38

HOW TO APPLY – c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and – d. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information while your application is under review by the Department and, if you are awarded a grant, during the project period.  You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number can be created within one-to-two business days. DUNS & TIN NUMBERS (CON’T) 39

HOW TO APPLY  If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service. If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration.  If you need a new TIN, please allow 2–5 weeks for your TIN to become active. DUNS & TIN NUMBERS (CON’T) 40

HOW TO APPLY  SAM registration process can take approximately seven business days (but may take upwards of several weeks) – Allow sufficient time to obtain and register your DUNS number and TIN.  We strongly recommend that you register early.  Once your SAM registration is active, you will need to allow 24 to 48 hours for the information to be available in Grants.gov and before you can submit an application through Grants.gov. SAM 41

HOW TO APPLY  If you are currently registered with SAM, you may not need to make any changes.  Make certain that the TIN associated with your DUNS number is correct.  Update your registration annually (3-4 business days)  Information about SAM is available at SAM (CON’T) 42

HOW TO APPLY  To further assist you with obtaining and registering your DUNS number and TIN in SAM or updating your existing SAM account, we have prepared a SAM.gov Tip Sheet, which you can find at: faqs.html. SAM (CON’T) 43

HOW TO APPLY  If you are submitting your application via Grants.gov, you must: – A. Be designated by your organization as an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR); and – B. Register yourself with Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the following Grants.gov Web page: SUBMITTING YOUR APPLICATION 44

PEER REVIEW PROCESS  The Call for Peer Reviewers seeks individuals with expertise in community and youth development, education reform & policy, strategic planning & partnerships, and program evaluation.  Reviewers will read, prepare a written evaluation, and score the applications assigned to their panel using the selection criteria.  The Department will prepare a rank order of applications based on the evaluation of their quality by the peer reviewers according to the selection criteria. 45

IMPORTANT DATES  Intent to Apply: May 21, 2014  Applications Due: June 20, 2014  Applications Reviewed: Summer 2014  All Grant Awards Announced: September

OTHER IMPORTANT RESOURCES  Full-Service Community Schools Website: – www2.ed.gov/programs/communityschools/index.html  Federal Register Notice Inviting Applications  Federal Register Notice of Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria  Application Package (includes the Notice Inviting Applications)  Frequently Asked Questions (updated regularly)  Pre-Application Meeting Resources  Call for Peer Reviewers 47

CONTACT INFORMATION  For further information regarding the FSCS program: – – Program website: 48