1 DAQ Update MEG Review Meeting, Feb. 17 th 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Application of the DRS Chip for Fast Waveform Digitizing Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Advertisements

January 28th, 2010Clermont Ferrand, Paul Scherrer Institut DRS Chip Developments Stefan Ritt.
A scalable DAQ system using the DRS4 sampling chip H.Friederich 1, G.Davatz 1, U.Hartmann 2, A.Howard 1, H.Meyer 1, D.Murer 1, S.Ritt 2, N.Schlumpf 2 1.
CHL -2 Level 1 Trigger System Fully Pipelined Custom ElectronicsDigitization Drift Chamber Pre-amp The GlueX experiment will utilize fully pipelined front.
Alice EMCAL Meeting, July 2nd EMCAL global trigger status: STU design progress Olivier BOURRION LPSC, Grenoble.
RPC Electronics Status Overall system TDC –Digitizing frequency issue (determine the bin size of the TDC value) Discriminator test result Trigger module.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
Design and Performance of the 6 GS/s Waveform Digitizing Chip DRS4 Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland at 40 mW per channel.
Laser to RF synchronisation A.Winter, Aachen University and DESY Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and Timing.
Jianchun Wang Syracuse University 10/16/99 CLEO Meeting Outline DAQ problems solved Recent results Status of DAQ Work to be done.
NA61 Coll. Meeting 09 Oct Alessandro Bravar NA61 Readout Upgrade based on the DRS.
July 16/17, 2002 MUEGAMMA review PSI1 Slow Control.
U niversity of S cience and T echnology of C hina Design for Distributed Scheme of WCDA Readout Electronics CAO Zhe University of Science and Technology.
1 DAQ Update. 2 DAQ Status DAQ was running successfully and stably in ’07 beam time Trigger bus scheme has proven to be very flexible – Added additional.
TOF Electronics Qi An Fast Electronics Lab, USTC Sept. 16~17, 2002.
Fast Waveform Digitizing in Radiation Detection using Switched Capacitor Arrays Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Emlyn Corrin, DPNC, University of Geneva EUDAQ Status of the EUDET JRA1 DAQ software Emlyn Corrin, University of Geneva 1.
TID and TS J. William Gu Data Acquisition 1.Trigger distribution scheme 2.TID development 3.TID in test setup 4.TS development.
Trigger Supervisor (TS) J. William Gu Data Acquisition Group 1.TS position in the system 2.First prototype TS 3.TS functions 4.TS test status.
The GANDALF Multi-Channel Time-to-Digital Converter (TDC)  GANDALF module  TDC concepts  TDC implementation in the FPGA  measurements.
The Trigger Prototype Board Status Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa On behalf of trigger group D. Nicolò F. Morsani S. Galeotti M. Grassi.
Preliminary measurements for the 8 channel prototype of SPD discriminator ASIC I.The 8 channel prototype. II.Status of the test. III.Noise. IV.Gain. V.Test.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
LNL 1 SLOW CONTROLS FOR CMS DRIFT TUBE CHAMBERS M. Bellato, L. Castellani INFN Sezione di Padova.
DAQ+trigger operation during 2008 run D. Nicolò University of Pisa & INFN, Pisa.
Technical Part Laura Sartori. - System Overview - Hardware Configuration : description of the main tasks - L2 Decision CPU: algorithm timing analysis.
Prediction W. Buchmueller (DESY) arXiv:hep-ph/ (1999)
FADC progress in Vienna Reported by H.Ishino for Vienna FADC group M.Pernicka and H.Steininger.
Development of high speed waveform sampling ASICs Stefan Ritt - Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland NSNI – 2010, Mumbai, India.
Features of the new Alibava firmware: 1. Universal for laboratory use (readout of stand-alone detector via USB interface) and for the telescope readout.
The DRS2 Chip: A 4.5 GHz Waveform Digitizing Chip for the MEG Experiment Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
PSI - Jul. 18th, Status of the electronics and DAQ systems of the MEG experiment.
HBD electronics status All the ADC and XMIT boards are installed. –Top 3 crates are for the ADC, XMIT boards –Bottom crate is for test pulse boards/future.
First results from the DRS4 waveform digitizing chip
SoLiD/PVDIS DAQ Alexandre Camsonne. DAQ limitations Electronics Data transfer.
Jefferson Laboratory Hall A SuperBigBite Spectrometer Data Acquisition System Alexandre Camsonne APS DNP 2013 October 24 th 2013 Hall A Jefferson Laboratory.
Front-End Electronics for G-APDs Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
PSI - 11 Feb Status of the electronic systems of the MEG Experiment.
1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
TPC electronics Status, Plans, Needs Marcus Larwill April
Status of MAPMT FEE Electronics Boards Connector board – have 5 boards, 1 assembled Readout board (“MUX” board) – layout completed 12/2, but unfortunately.
Pisa - Apr. 28th, The Trigger System Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa.
RD51 GEM Telescope: results from June 2010 test beam and work in progress Matteo Alfonsi on behalf of CERN GDD group and Siena/PISA INFN group.
1 Timing of the calorimeter monitoring signals 1.Introduction 2.LED trigger signal timing * propagation delay of the broadcast calibration command * calibration.
THE WaveDAQ SYSTEM FOR THE MEG II UPGRADE … read out by MIDAS Stefan Ritt, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland 15 July 2015MIDAS Workshop, TRIUMF Paul.
DAQ ELECTRONICS 18 March 2015MEG Collaboration Meeting, Tokyo Stefan Ritt.
DAQ 1000 Tonko Ljubicic, Mike LeVine, Bob Scheetz, John Hammond, Danny Padrazo, Fred Bieser, Jeff Landgraf.
Application of the 5 GS/s Waveform Digitizing Chip DRS4 Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland UMC 0.25  m rad. hard 9 chn. each 1024 bins,
PHOTOTUBE SCANNING SETUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Doug Roberts U of Maryland, College Park.
TOP Electronics Status & Beam Test Experience Kurtis Nishimura January 16, 2012 University of Hawaii Belle II TRG/DAQ Workshop Belle II TRG/DAQ - January.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
Development of new DAQ system at Super-Kamiokande for nearby supernova A.Orii T. Tomura, K. Okumura, M. Shiozawa, M. Nakahata, S. Nakayama, Y. Hayato for.
DAQ ACQUISITION FOR THE dE/dX DETECTOR
AHCAL Beam Interface (BIF)
L0TP studies Clock and distribution Scheme Busy handling
96-channel, 10-bit, 20 MSPS ADC board with Gb Ethernet optical output
A New Clock Distribution/Topology Processor Module for KOTO (CDT)
The WaveDAQ System for the MEG II Upgrade
Hellenic Open University
Possible Upgrades ToF readout Trigger Forward tracking
TOF Clock Distribution
CLAS12 Timing Calibration
Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
The Trigger System Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
TOF read-out for high resolution timing
西村美紀(東大) 他 MEGIIコラボレーション 日本物理学会 第73回年次大会(2018年) 東京理科大学(野田キャンパス)
Orsay Talks Christophe : General questions and future developments.
Presentation transcript:

1 DAQ Update MEG Review Meeting, Feb. 17 th 2010

2 DAQ Status DAQ modifications Replace DRS2 by DRS4 boards Added synchronization signal between boards Added slow control equipment into DAQ allowing remote control Overview of DAQ performance Average total trigger rate 6.4 Hz ~5 minutes runs with 2000 events Inter-run time: 6.8 s Event size: 9 MB (raw)  2.6 MB (zero suppressed) Data rate 16.6 MB/s, 1.4 TB/day Offline compression ÷ 2  38 TB taken in ~54 days DAQ issues during routine running Lost sync signal: twice a day  run restart (10 s) Run startup problem: every few hours  retry start (4 s)

3 Offline Cluster 64 CPUs 150 TB disk DAQ scheme TRG1TRG2TRG3TRG9DRS4DRS5DRS6DRS7DRS8 trigger & sync & trigger type & event # LSB busy internal trigger & busy SYSTEM01SYSTEM02SYSTEM03SYSTEM04SYSTEM05SYSTEM06SYSTEM07SYSTEM08SYSTEM09 Event Builder SYSTEM Logger Archiver

4 Examples of remote control

5 “Ghost pulse” problem R “Ghost pulse” 2 GHz “Ghost pulse” 2 GHz After sampling a pulse, some residual charge remains in the capacitors on the next turn and can mimic wrong pulses Solution: Clear before write write clear Fixed in DRS4 chip

6 Problems with DRS2 Ghost pulse effect (previous slide) Clock crosstalk (1-2 mV) Temperature dependence offset and gain Complicated calibration  DAQ rate was limited by front-end computer software calibration Offset shift of last 64 bins Offset shift with readout frequency Redesign of DRS chip and replacement of complete DAQ electronics

7 New DRS4 Mezzanine Board clock chip 4 x DRS4 chips (was 2 x DRS2)

8 On-chip PLL PLL Reference Clock V speed Internal PLL On-chip PLL locks sampling speed to external clock f clk = f samp / 2048 On-chip PLL locks sampling speed to external clock f clk = f samp / 2048

9 Old vs. New Synchronization DRS2 signal clock trigger DRS4 signal Channel 0 Inverter Chain Channel 1 Channel 2 Channel 3 Channel 4 Channel 5 Channel 6 Channel 7 Channel 8 PLL Skipping Channel 8 during readout reduces dead time by 11%

10 Global Synchronization master quartz fan out VME Board DRS chips Clock divider and jitter cleaner (LMK03000) 20 MHz 0.78 MHz

11 Synchronization of clock chips 1.2 GHz 0.78 MHz Chip MHz Chip 2 n * 0.83 ns SYNC & 20 MHz SYNC has to arrive on all board within 50 ns  trigger bus 20 MHz MEG clock has to arrive on all boards within 0.83 ns SYNC has to arrive on all board within 50 ns  trigger bus 20 MHz MEG clock has to arrive on all boards within 0.83 ns 20 MHz 50 ns

12 Problems with synchronization Synchronization pulse has to arrive within 50 ns on all boards  optimize trigger bus cabling Clock divider chips need several configuration cycles Re-timing with global clock required firmware modification  due to bug in original version syncing did not work initially Time frame changed (global clock edge vs. bin #0 time)  modification in analysis and calibration database Due to these problems, the deployment of the DRS4 boards were not as smooth as anticipated

13 Timing Limitations Requirements: « 100 ps Current timing resolutions measured with split signal: 15 ps (same chip) 30 ps (different chips same mezzanine board) 130 ps (different VME boards) Worse than for DRS2 chips (  Ryu’s talk) Inter-board timing limits our experiment Immediate changes “Bypass wire” Keep DRS3 for timing counters Possible causes Global Clock Jitter Jitter inside DRS4 boards Jitter added by active splitter ~10 MHz 1 mV noise on top of signal clock fan-out PMT splitter trigger + = threshold

14 Clock Distribution LMK < 20 ps period < 20 ps period (was 120 ps with old resistor) LMK < 32 ps relative mezzanine added “bypass wire” to sample original clock  jitter of on-board clock distribution eliminated

15 Aperture Jitter inside DRS chip 3.2 GHz 1.6 GHz slope Intrinsic DRS aperture jitter  1/f sampling if power supply (U) is constant Intrinsic DRS aperture jitter  1/f sampling if power supply (U) is constant

16 Plan to improve timing Increase sampling speed 1.6 GSPS  3.2 GSPS only firmware modification required goal: end of March Disentangle different contributions to timing Re-measure global clock jitter between crates Measure split pulse jitter before/after active splitter Investigate noise situation in area (XEC timing improved in ’09, e + -  timing decreased, TC uses same electronics (DRS3)  noise in TC signals ???) Optimize DRS4 timing calibration algorithm  can also be applied to old data Lab tests showed ~10 ps accuracy with sampling technique (DRS4 [PSI], SAM [Saclay], BLAB [U.Hawaii]) Goal: Electronics should not limit capabilities of experiment

17 Daisy-chaining of channels Channel 0 – 1024 cells Channel 1 – 1024 cells Channel 2 – 1024 cells Channel 3 – 1024 cells Channel 4 – 1024 cells Channel 5 – 1024 cells Channel 6 – 1024 cells Channel 7 – 1024 cells Domino Wave Generation DRS4 can be partitioned in 4x2048 cells Running with 2048 cell channels allow sampling speed of 1.6 GHz * 2 = 3.2 GHz with current trigger latency  internal timing accuracy should improve ~2x Deal with increased data rate by on-board averaging DRS4 can be partitioned in 4x2048 cells Running with 2048 cell channels allow sampling speed of 1.6 GHz * 2 = 3.2 GHz with current trigger latency  internal timing accuracy should improve ~2x Deal with increased data rate by on-board averaging 1.6  3.2 averaging

18 Reduce dead time Use various binning regions in waveforms Double-buffering in front-end electronics Use multi-threading in run start/stop sequencing (6.8 s inter-run gap  3-4 s = 1% dead time improvement) VME Transfer Further plans Rebinning 2:1, 4:1, … Chip readout 0.5 ms VME Transfer 25 ms Chip readout VME Transfer now reduced data size multi-event buffers Chip readout ready for next event

19 2 nd Level Trigger Drift Chamber wires are connected to trigger, but too slow to be included in trigger decision (400 ns) Would be possible with 2 nd level trigger scheme Only firmware modifications (spare bits on trigger bus) If trigger rate ÷2, dead time would be ~÷2 1 st LT 400 ns25 ms event stop DRS chips 2 nd LT 1 us Chip readout VME Transfer trigger DRS boards restart DRS chips