Laboratory Phonology 11, 30 June - 2 July 2008, Wellington, New Zealand The Gradient Phonotactics of English CVC Syllables Olga Dmitrieva & Arto Anttila.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Syllable Structure in English
Advertisements

Optimality Theory (OT) Prepared and presented by: Abdullah Bosaad & Liú Chàng Spring 2011.
The Sound Patterns of Language: Phonology
Syllables Most of us have an intuitive feeling about syllables No doubt about the number of syllables in the majority of words. However, there is no agreed.
Prosodics, Part 1 LIN Prosodics, or Suprasegmentals Remember, from our first discussions in class, that speech is really a continuous flow of initiation,
Syllable. Definition A syllable is a unit of sound composed of a central peak of sonority (usually a vowel), and the consonants that cluster around this.
Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 1993). Outline Phonetics and Phonology OT Characteristics Output-Oriented Conflicting Soft Well-formedness Constraints.
Nuclear Accent Shape and the Perception of Prominence Rachael-Anne Knight Prosody and Pragmatics 15 th November 2003.
Phonotactic Restrictions on Ejectives A Typological Survey ___________________________ Carmen Jany
Evidence of a Production Basis for Front/Back Vowel Harmony Jennifer Cole, Gary Dell, Alina Khasanova University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Is there.
A cross-linguistic comparison of the coordination between hand gestures and phonological prominence Giorgos Tserdanelis.
AN ACOUSTIC PROFILE OF SPEECH EFFICIENCY R.J.J.H. van Son, Barbertje M. Streefkerk, and Louis C.W. Pols Institute of Phonetic Sciences / ACLC University.
Introduction to Linguistics Ms. Suha Jawabreh Lecture 10.
Clinical Phonetics.
Gestural overlap and self-organizing phonological contrasts Contrast in Phonology, University of Toronto May 3-5, 2002 Alexei Kochetov Haskins Laboratories/
OCP-Driven variation in American English schwa production Mary Ann Walter MIT.
The Scope of Generalization in Phonology Gregory R. Guy New York University VGFP Workshop, Stanford, July 07.
Syllabification Principles
Experiment 2: MEG Study Materials and Methods: 11 right-handed subjects with 20:20 vision were run. 3 subjects’ data was discarded because of poor performance.
Phonetic Similarity Effects in Masked Priming Marja-Liisa Mailend 1, Edwin Maas 1, & Kenneth I. Forster 2 1 Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing.
The sound patterns of language
A Study of Speech Perception: Julie Langevin Communication Sciences and Disorders Faculty Mentor: Timothy Bryant The Psychological Reality of the Obligatory.
Autosegmental Phonology
Consonant Length in Russian: Factors Affecting Variability in Production Olga Dmitrieva, Department of Linguistics, Stanford University Workshop on Variation,
Phonetics The study of productive sounds within a language 2 Basic types of sounds in English: Consonants (C): restriction on airflow Vowels (V): no restriction.
Predicting the Semantic Orientation of Adjective Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou and Kathleen R. McKeown Presented By Yash Satsangi.
Research on teaching and learning pronunciation
January 24-25, 2003Workshop on Markedness and the Lexicon1 On the Priority of Markedness Paul Smolensky Cognitive Science Department Johns Hopkins University.
Presenter: Dung Thi Nguyen Date: September 15, 2011.
Revision: What are pure vowel sounds?
MTP I Stage Project Presentation Guided by- Presented by- Prof. Pushpak Bhattacharyya Abhijeet Padhye Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian.
Phonology, phonotactics, and suprasegmentals
[kmpjuteynl] [fownldi]
Chapter 3 Phonology.
Phonetics and Phonology
Measuring Hint Level in Open Cloze Questions Juan Pino, Maxine Eskenazi Language Technologies Institute Carnegie Mellon University International Florida.
Phonological Theory Beijing Foreign Studies University 2008.
Whither Linguistic Interpretation of Acoustic Pronunciation Variation Annika Hämäläinen, Yan Han, Lou Boves & Louis ten Bosch.
Perceived prominence and nuclear accent shape Rachael-Anne Knight LAGB 5 th September 2003.
Introduction in Linguistics Tongji University November Marjoleine Sloos.
LING 001 Introduction to Linguistics Fall 2010 Sound Structure I: Phonetics Acoustic phonetics Jan. 27.
* p
Phonological Theory.
English Linguistics: An Introduction
Introduction to Linguistics Ms. Suha Jawabreh Lecture 9.
5aSC5. The Correlation between Perceiving and Producing English Obstruents across Korean Learners Kenneth de Jong & Yen-chen Hao Department of Linguistics.
Evaluating prosody prediction in synthesis with respect to Modern Greek prenuclear accents Elisabeth Chorianopoulou MSc in Speech and Language Processing.
A Fully Annotated Corpus of Russian Speech
A Psycholinguistic Perspective on Child Phonology Sharon Peperkamp Emmanuel Dupoux Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, EHESS-CNRS,
2.3 Markedness Differential Hypothesis (MDH)
THE SOUND PATTERNS OF LANGUAGE
Principles Rules or Constraints
Graded Constraints in English Word Forms: Theory and Data James L. McClelland and Brent C. Vander Wyk.
Suprasegmental Properties of Speech Robert A. Prosek, Ph.D. CSD 301 Robert A. Prosek, Ph.D. CSD 301.
Consonant Inventory Distribution of Consonants  All consonants can be in the onset, i.e. begin a word.  Not all consonants can be in coda position.
Optimality Theory. Linguistic theory in the 1990s... and beyond!
Past tense forms in English
English Plurals FAITH (voi): Voicing must be same in input and output FAITH (voi): Voicing must be same in input and output FAITHV:Vowels in input and.
E MERGENCE OF P HONOTACTIC C OMPLEXITY IN E ARLY P HONOLOGICAL D EVELOPMENT Barbara L. Davis, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX USA Phonbank.
Introduction to Linguistics
Theoretical Discussion on the
Adaptations of English coda [m] in Standard Mandarin loanwords
PHONOLOGY Arranged By: Sapitra Rizky Tiara Ayu Yosi Ariani SyLLABLES
Consonant variegations in first words: Infants’ actual productions of
Understanding Variation of VOT in spontaneous speech
T-Orders and Variation Arto Anttila Stanford University
Review.
Phonetics & Phonology 2.
Review for Test 2.
Sounds of English Semester II Lesson 2.
Presentation transcript:

Laboratory Phonology 11, 30 June - 2 July 2008, Wellington, New Zealand The Gradient Phonotactics of English CVC Syllables Olga Dmitrieva & Arto Anttila Department of Linguistics, Stanford University Introduction Factors affecting the well-formedness of English CVC syllables: OCP-place: gradient prohibition against homorganic consonants in C1 and C2 (e.g. gag vs. gap). HYPOTHESIS: Syllables with C1 and C2 of the same place of articulation are underrepresented. Prominence alignment between stress, vowel height, and consonant place: HYPOTHESIS: Syllables that violate prominence alignment are underrepresented. Methods Material: CMU pronunciation dictionary and CELEX lemma lexicon. Stress: primary stress vs. no stress. Consonants: coronal, dorsal, labial. Vowels: high (= high or reduced) and low (= low or mid). Effect size evaluation: Observed frequency/Expected frequency ratio (O/E ratio): P(dorsal-V-dorsal) = P(onset=dorsal) * P(coda=dorsal) E(dorsal-V-dorsal) = P(dorsal-V-dorsal) * Total Multiple regression. Results Regression OT Analysis Conclusions 3. Syllables violating consonant-vowel alignment are underrepresented:1. Syllables that violate OCP-place are underrepresented: CMU CELEX CMU Onset-coda cooccurrences (O/E values): 2. Syllables that violate consonant-stress alignment are underrepresented: a. Labials and dorsals in unstressed syllables. b. Coronals in stressed syllables. CMU CELEX 4. Syllables that violate vowel-stress assignment are underrepresented: a. Low vowels in unstressed syllables. b. High vowels in stressed syllables. CMU CELEX R = (F(6, 35) = , p < 0.001) R = (F(6, 35) = , p < 0.001) 25,888 CVC syllables from CELEX 83,798 CVC syllables from CMU [rI] repeat [pit] O/E ratio > 1.00 overrepresentation O/E ratio < 1.00 underrepresentation Cases: 36 syllable types: 3 onset place * 3 coda place * 2 stress * 2 vowel height e.g. LLHS - labial-labial, high vowel, stressed In CMU significant factors: Vowel-stress alignment OCP No labial/dorsal in unstressed syllables In CELEX significant factors: Vowel-stress alignment OCP No labial/dorsal with high vowels CMU CELEX A set of unranked OT constraints generate implicational universals that reflect relative phonotactic markedness: More marked forms entail less marked forms. More marked forms surface less frequently. Sample universal: If a language allows gag (violates OCP) it also allows gap. Gap is always more frequent than gag. The implicational universals can be described graphically as a partial order. Precision (how many of the predicted relationships are correct):CMU 0.85 CELEX 0.86 Gradient OCP-place is active in all CVC syllables (not just monosyllabic words, cf. Berkley 1994). Prominence alignment in CVC syllables: The best stressed syllable has low or mid vowels. The best unstressed syllable has high or reduced vowels and coronal consonants. Positional neutralization and augmentation for vowels. Only positional neutralization for consonants. References: Anttila, A. (2008). Gradient phonotactics and the Complexity Hypothesis. To appear in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Anttila, A. & Andrus, C. (2006). T-Orders. Ms., Stanford University. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor]. Berkley, D. (1994). Variability in Obligatory Contour Principle effects. CLS 30, pp Coetzee, A., & Pater, J. (2008). Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic. To appear in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Weide, R. (1998). The CMU pronunciation dictionary (Release 0.6). Carnegie Mellon University. Available online at Constraints (significant regression factors): OCP Avoid homorganic C1 and C2 *x/a Avoid unstressed low vowels *X/I Avoid stressed high vowels *x/p_ Avoid labial/dorsal C1 in unstressed syllables *x/_p Avoid labial/dorsal C2 in unstressed syllables *p_/I Avoid labial/dorsal C1 + high vowel *i/_p/ Avoid high vowel + labial/dorsal C2 Faith Do not change input segments Graphic representation of implicational relationships in CELEX data. Dependent variable: Log of the observed frequency. Independent variable: Log of the expected frequency. Binary coded phonotactics factors: 1 – violates, 0 – does not violate. a. Low vowels with coronals. b. High vowels with labials or dorsals. stressed > unstressed low vowel > high vowel labial/dorsal > coronal