Sep 2013 Jinsoo Choi, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Discussion on HEW Functional Requirements Date: 2013-09-15 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1389r1 November 2013 Kiseon Ryu et.al, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Discussion on HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1377r0 Submission November 2013 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 DL efficiency enhancement in high dense network Date:
Discussion on OFDMA in HEW
Doc.: IEEE /1176r0 Submission Sep 2013 Reza Hedayat (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 Some Simulation Scenarios for HEW NameAffiliationPhone Reza HedayatCisco.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1437r1 November 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Efficient Wider Bandwidth Operation in IEEE ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1167r2 Sept 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) TGax Functional Requirement Discussion Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on ax OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0026r1 January 2014 Yong Liu, et al.Slide 1 Thoughts on HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0787r0 Submission July 2013 Wu TianyuSlide 1 Follow-up Discussions on HEW Functional Requirements Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
September 2013 doc.: IEEE 11-13/1105r0 Submission Meng Yang (CATR) Discussion on Access Mechanism for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0534r1 May 2013 HanGyu Cho, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Direction and Use Cases for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0214r0 Submission February 2014 Perahia, Cariou, Cho, Inoue, Liu and TaoriSlide 1 High Efficiency WLAN Overview Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0214r1 Submission February 2014 Perahia, Cariou, Cho, Inoue, Liu and TaoriSlide 1 High Efficiency WLAN Overview Date: Authors:
July 2013 Jinsoo Choi, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Functional Requirements in HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0089r0 Submission Listen interval update Jan 2013 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0523r2 May 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Understanding Current Situation of Public Wi-Fi Usage - Possible.
Doc.: IEEE /0800r3 SubmissionHemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Study Group Documentation Date: Authors: July 2013.
Doc.:IEEE /0821r3 Submission July 2008 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Some Ambiguities about Throughput Conditions in PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0835r2 July 2014 Joe Kwak, InterDigitalSlide 1 Functional Requirements Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0878r0 Submission July 2013 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Efficiency enhancement for dense WLAN environment Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0805-r1 SubmissionSlide 1 On Definition of Dense Networks and Performance Metric Date: Authors: Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek.
Doc.: IEEE /1061r0 Submission September 2013 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Multicast Transmission for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0805-r0 SubmissionSlide 1 On Definition of Dense Networks and Performance Metric Date: Authors: Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0588r0 Submission PHY power saving feature considerations Slide 1 May 2010 Yujin Noh, LG Electronics Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1054 Sept 2013 SubmissionYonggang Fang, ZTETX HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1366r3 Submission November 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition Date: 2013-xx-11Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1420r0 November 2013 Igal Kotzer, General MotorsSlide 1 HEW Considerations for the Vehicular Environment Date: Authors:
HEW Considerations for the Vehicular Environment
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Considerations on HEW Evaluation Methodology
Requirements Discussion
HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
WUR and Efficiency Tradeoffs
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
HEW Study Group Documentation
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
WUR and Efficiency Tradeoffs
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
Simulation Scenario for Unplanned Wi-Fi Network
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Efficient Frequency Spectrum Utilization
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
HEW Beamforming Enhancements
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Presentation transcript:

Sep 2013 Jinsoo Choi, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Discussion on HEW Functional Requirements Date: Authors:

Introduction In the previous meeting, several contributions from [1] to [4] discussed about functional requirements considering –AP and STA density –Indoor and outdoor channel environment –And more requirement like backward compatibility Functional requirements can be categorized as two aspects –System-perspective requirements –User-perspective requirements This contribution discusses about functional requirements focusing on “User-perspective” LG ElectronicsSlide 2

System-perspective requirements System-perspective requirements are categorized as follows: –Throughput averaged over unit area bps/Hz/unit area or bps/unit area called as ‘area throughput’, ‘aggregated BSS throughput per area’, or etc –Throughput averaged over BSS bps/Hz/BSS or bps/BSS called as ‘average throughput per BSS’, or etc One candidate baseline: area throughput [5] –One of unique metrics to identify HEW –Captures well most of use cases in high dense environment [6] LG ElectronicsSlide 3

Motivation on user-perspective requirements As Wi-Fi usage in CE devices is increasing, quality of experience (QoE) of each user becomes dominant –70% of mobile users use Wi-Fi for data traffic [7] An end user is interested in not system-perspective performance, but user-perspective performance –Even though system performance is good, there might be users feeling ‘bad’, e.g. Some fixed users with continuous bad-channel/interference condition Some users moving back and force across small BSSs –If they don’t feel good at Wi-Fi, they usually complain to device vendors System-wise feather alone can not fully reflect user fairness and throughput distribution e.g. (Total transmitted bits to MAC SAP at all APs/STAs) / time / m 2 LG ElectronicsSlide 4

Proposed metrics for user-perspective requirements From the perspective of user throughput –Minimum throughput per STA How can we guarantee it in contention-based Wi-Fi? –Suggested metric: Average 5 th percentile user throughput Observed by 5th percentile point of throughput CDF Counts for BSS edge-user performance as well as performance in bad channel conditions Usually used in cellular network and considerable in high-dense Wi-Fi –Suggested metric: Average throughput per STA Directly derived by dividing average throughput per BSS or areal throughput by the number of STAs in a given condition From the perspective of delay/latency –Minimum delay/jitter, average access delay, number of active real-time service users, etc One of important terms for QoE But, need to discuss more how to define and quantize LG ElectronicsSlide 5

Conclusion Main goal of HEW changes from legacy standards –More interest in ‘average’ system-perspective performance in ‘real’ world than ‘maximum’ performance in ‘ideal’ world In addition, there is increasing needs to enhance quality of experience (QoE) from user-perspective HEW should capture both system-perspective and user- perspective requirements, and candidate metrics are: –Area throughput –Average 5 th percentile user throughput –Average throughput per STA LG ElectronicsSlide 6

Reference [1]13/0787 “Followup on Functional Requirements”, Wu Tianyu (Huawei) [2]13/0850 “Quantitative QoE Requirements for HEW”, Huai-Rong Shao (Samsung Electronics) [3]13/0840 “HEW functional requirements follow-up”, Minho Cheong (ETRI) [4]13/0798 “Functional requirements in HEW”, Jinsoo Choi (LG Electronics) [5] 13/1097 “Functional requirements for the HEW PAR”, Minho Cheong (ETRI) [6] 13/0657r6 “Usage models for IEEE High Efficiency WLAN study group (HEW SG) – Liaison with WFA”, Laurent Cariou (Orange) [7] “Understanding today’s smartphone user: Demystifying data usage trends on cellular & Wi-Fi networks,” Mobidia, Feb. 27, 2012” LG ElectronicsSlide 7

LG ElectronicsSlide 8 [1][2][3][4] Quality of user experience - Delay, packet loss -Minimum average data rate - Maximum connection setup delay - Maximum packet transmission delay - Maximum information unit transmission delay Agreed on this metric - Minimum per device through put - Average access delay - Average round trip delay - X number of active real-time service users Area throughputAgreed on this metric - Aggregated BSS throughput per area Agreed on this metric Spectrum efficiency (suggest to replace it by below requirements) -Maximum single/multi-STA spectral efficiency (spectrum widening aspect) - Maximum single/multi-STA throughput Others - MAC efficiency - Throughput of AP - Backward compatibility /coexistence - Maintaining user experience - Performance reliability in outdoor Appendix: Discussed functional requirements & metrics from [1] to [4]