Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

HEW Beamforming Enhancements

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "HEW Beamforming Enhancements"— Presentation transcript:

1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements
May 2013 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2013 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors: James Wang (MediaTek) James Wang (MediaTek)

2 2019/6/29 Background “Area throughput/Average Throughput per STA” is a new metric in HEW for dense deployment scenarios1 Performance enhancement for cell edge has also been highlighted as a key issue in dense deployment2 Current CSMA baseline channel access protocol is based on the omni-directional transmission This contribution presents some possible beamforming enhancement ideas for HEW Slide 2 James Wang (MediaTek)

3 Cell-Edge Performance
2019/6/29 Cell-Edge Performance Improved cell edge performance with TX or RX beamforming, more graceful degradation in dense deployment James Wang (Mediatek )

4 Beamforming for Cell Edge Performance Enhancement
2019/6/29 Beamforming for Cell Edge Performance Enhancement Beamforming is an effective way to enhance cell edge performance Higher phy rate can be achieved (versus non-beamformed) Reduced interference to OBSS (beamformed transmission) Reduced interference from OBSS interference (beamformed reception) Reduced delay spread When more energy is delivered to the targeted receiver through TX beamforming, the less interference toward others. RX beamforming mitigates the interference level. Higher number of antennas results in less interference. Potential to increase spatial reuse (higher area throughput) James Wang (MediaTek)

5 Scenario : Station at the cell edge
2019/6/29 Scenario : Station at the cell edge STA1 at the cell edge of BSS1 typically suffers from Difficulty with channel access (CCA busy) due to OBSS interference Higher packet collision rate from OBSS hidden nodes STA1 becomes interference to OBSS Goal: How to use beamforming to improve STA1 situation while reducing interference to OBSS (STA2 and AP2). Specifically, we want to explore the possibility of spatial reuse to improve network capacity AP1 STA3 STA1 BSS1 STA2 AP2 James Wang (MediaTek)

6 Spatially Reciprocal Transmission
2019/6/29 Spatially Reciprocal Transmission Define spatial reciprocity as a device capable of transmitting and receiving with same antenna pattern, via implicit or explicit calibration or other means. Spatially reciprocal devices provides the following benefits : A spatially reciprocal device can use its channel knowledge derived the received signal in its transmission It reduces the overhead of the over-the-air calibration if a device has already been calibrated. AP1 STA3 STA1 BSS1 STA2 AP2 James Wang (MediaTek)

7 Condition 1 - Spatially Orthogonal Condition
2019/6/29 Condition 1 - Spatially Orthogonal Condition Supposed that OBSS STA2 and AP2 are communicating and STA1 wishes to transmit to AP1 at the same time… To avoid STA1 interfering with OBSS STAs (STA2 and AP2), STA1 should satisfy spatially orthogonal (SO) condition before it transmits (allowing it to reset NAV) SO condition: STA1 does not receive AP2 and STA2 signal under beamformed condition during an observation duration * Note if STA1’s CCA is idle, the STA1 is allowed to transmit. AP1 STA3 STA1 BSS1 SO condition STA2 AP2 James Wang (MediaTek)

8 Condition 1- Spatially Orthogonal Condition
2019/6/29 Condition 1- Spatially Orthogonal Condition STA1 decides the beamforming weight for SO detection based on its knowledge of channel to AP1 and the OBSS interference (STA2&AP2) situations. STA1’s is only interested in communicating to AP1. SO condition can be established via beamforming toward AP1 to suppress interference, or using active nulling toward interference source (STA2/AP2) AP1 STA3 STA1 BSS1 SO condition STA2 AP2 James Wang (MediaTek)

9 Condition 2 – Use RTS/CTS to start a SO Frame Exchange
2019/6/29 Condition 2 – Use RTS/CTS to start a SO Frame Exchange STA1 should start the frame exchange with RTS/CTS with AP1 to avoid AP1 from interfering with AP2 or STA2 Note that the intended recipient of RTS (AP1) will not transmit CTS if its NAV≠0*. AP1 would not cause interference to OBSS STAs (AP2 and STA2). * REVmb: CTS procedure: If the NAV at the STA receiving the RTS indicates the medium is not idle, that STA shall not respond to the RTS frame. AP1 CTS STA3 RTS STA1 BSS1 STA2 AP2 James Wang (MediaTek)

10 Spatial Reuse of the Wireless Medium
2019/6/29 Spatial Reuse of the Wireless Medium A spatially reciprocal (SR) HEW device should be allowed to gain access to the channel when SO condition is satisfied, with beamforming weights determined by the HEW device based on its channel knowledge Under the SO condition, the HEW device can start a SO frame exchange by employing the beamformed (preamble & payload) transmission and reception for the TXOP starting with a RTS/CTS Note that spatial re-use of the wireless medium is be achieved in this condition. AP1 STA2 STA1 BSS1 STA3 AP3 TXOP RTS Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration AP WM Access (SO Detection) WM Access (SO Detection) CTS STA James Wang (MediaTek)

11 Beamformed Transmission Issues
2019/6/29 Beamformed Transmission Issues PPDU-based Beamforming: Switching between a omni-preamble to a beamformed-transmission after omni-preamble is also hard for OBSS receiver to predict the channel conditions Omni-preamble AP Beamformed Time Beamformed STA James Wang (MediaTek)

12 TXOP-based Beamformed Frame Exchange
When an AP is engaged in a frame exchange with a selected STA, it should inform all STAs within the BSS defer properly. This requires some omni-directional transmission. TXOP-based beamformed frame exchange: A proposed solution is to employ the omni-beam transmission at the beginning of an TXOP to set up protection duration (NAV) and then to switch to the beamformed (both preamble and payload) transmission and reception for the remainder of the TXOP duration Desirable to have minimum omni-beam duration and then to maintain beamformed transmission thru the TXOP  minimum interference to OBSS TXOP Omni-Beam Duration Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration AP WM Access NAV WM Access STA NAV More Interference to OBSS Reduced Interference to OBSS James Wang (MediaTek)

13 TXOP-based Beamformed and SO Frame Exchange
July 2013 TXOP-based Beamformed and SO Frame Exchange During a TXOP-based beamformed frame exchange (AP1 & STA2), an OBSS device (STA3 or AP3) should be allowed to start a frame exchange starting with a RTS/CTS if the SO condition is satisfied  spatial reuse cab be achieved AP1 can have more antennas for beamforming resulting in less interference TXOP-based beamformed FX enable simple STAs to spatially re-use the medium (only need to detect SO condition either with or without beamforming) AP1 STA2 BSS1 STA1 STA3 AP3 An OBSS STA can start a SO frame exchange (RTS/CTS) upon detecting the SO condition James Wang(MediaTek)

14 Combined SR beamformed and TXOP-based Beamformed FXs
2019/6/29 Combined SR beamformed and TXOP-based Beamformed FXs Note that the beamformed FX (by STA) and the TXOP-based beamformed FX (by AP) can be combined in an TXOP TXOP AP uses TXOP-based Beamformed FX Omni-Beam Duration Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration AP WM Access NAV WM Access STA NAV Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration STA uses SR Beamformed FX TXOP AP uses TXOP-based Beamformed FX Omni-Beam Duration Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration AP CTS WM Access NAV WM Access STA RTS NAV Beamformed Transmission and Reception Duration STA uses SR beamformed FX James Wang (MediaTek)

15 2019/6/29 Summary Discuss potential beamforming enhancement ideas with the following benefits: increase likelihood of channel access under dense deployment condition reduce interference to OBSS reduce collision during reception increase likelihood of spatial re-use in dense deployment scenario, leading to higher network throughput The proposed beamforming enhancement is suitable for HEW, because there is no control of the WLNA deployment scenario due to unlicensed spectrum no BSS-BSS coordination is required distributed algorithm accommodates mobile APs/devices and changing channel conditions James Wang (MediaTek)

16 2019/6/29 References Ref 1: Usage models and requirements for IEEE High Efficiency WLAN study group (HEW SG) – Liaison with WFA, Laurent Cariou, Orange Ref 2: WNG Carrier-oriented WiFi for cellular offload, Laurent Cariou, Orange James Wang (MediaTek)


Download ppt "HEW Beamforming Enhancements"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google