Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 AUDIT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION Peg Rosenberry, Director of Grants Management Claire Moreno, Audit Liaison, Office of Grants Management 9/18/2009 AMERICORPS.
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
5-Year Strategic Plan Title I Compliance. Assurances Assurances must be signed, dated and submitted to Jan Stanley, State Title I Director on or before.
Title I Directors Conference October 23-25, 2007 Waterfront Place Morgantown, WV Reading the Fine Print Monitoring K-3 Reading Programs Presenter: Pat.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Assurances are made a part of the Five-Year Plan. Assurances need not be submitted by mail to the State Title I Director.
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Presented By WVDE Federal Programs Staff July 15, 2009 Title III Monitoring and Fiscal Updates.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
NCLB Monitoring Cycle 1 Policies and Procedures. Letter  Explains monitoring process  Lists required documentation  Lists activities  Directions for.
Audit Requirements  A-133 Gov't, Education and Non-Profit  Thresholds $500K or more expended during the FY - Single Audit required  Audit Report - due.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Surviving Your First Audit AASBO Winter Conference Breakout Session III Nate Bowler, Buckeye Elementary.
BRIDGET BULLARD PROGRAM ADVISOR, CENTRAL ARKANSAS REGION REGINIA S. KIMBROUGH PROGRAM ADVISOR, NORTHWEST ARKANSAS REGION Adult Education Program Reviews.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
ESEA FINANCIAL ISSUES September 16, 2014 WVDE Office of Federal Programs Laura Pauley, CPA
PREPARING FOR A COMPLIANCE REVIEW PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
A Catalyst for Program Improvement Federal Monitoring: Added Value.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
Learning Objectives Conducting an On-Site Monitoring Review FPO calls the Grantee: “As you know, we’re a little more than nine months into your 24 month.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Title II, Part A, Division Improvement Procedures for Compliance with Section 2141 of Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education.
Arizona Department of Education Office of English Language Acquisition Services.
1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Special Education Compliance Monitoring. 3 Phases of Compliance Monitoring Review Pre-Site phase Pre-Site phase On-Site phase On-Site phase Post-Site.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
ESEA Consolidated Pre-Monitoring Meeting
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Presentation transcript:

Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results

Overview of Presentation Requirements for subrecipient monitoring Defining WV NCLB monitoring Procedures for monitoring Monitoring Schedules Review of monitoring documents

Review of the Procedures Document Search and Find Activity

Requirements for Subrecipient Monitoring

NCLB SEA files an assurance statement indicating that the recipient will monitor the subrecipients and enforce federal regulations General Education Provisions Act Section 440(a) Periodic visits by State personnel of programs Periodic audits of expenditures State investigates and resolves all complaints received by the State relating to the administration of such programs EDGAR SEA monitors subgrantees to ensure compliance with applicable federal requirements and that performance goals are being achieved

Requirements for Subrecipient Monitoring OMB Circular 110 SEA establishes and maintains internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements OMB Circular 133 Auditors and grantees conduct an audit to support a low assessed level of control risk for major programs West Virginia Department of Education Responsibilities It is the responsibility of the grant recipient (grantee) to meet the requirements of all Titles funded under this act

Defining WV's NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Process

Definition of NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Process of collecting information from grantees Review academic achievement Determine compliance with federal regulations Promote collaborative planning and budgeting across NCLB programs Provide technical assistance for program improvement Enforcement of legal obligations for implementing programs

Goals The West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE) monitoring process includes the following goals: Provide an academic focus for program improvement; Promote student achievement; and Provide technical assistance to schools and districts in utilizing federal funding to impact instructional practice and increase student performance.

Review of Data for Districts and Schools On-site Monitoring Monitoring Report Monitoring Response Appeals Process Procedures

Change in Procedures Review of district and school data and other indicators Reports of AYP status and the accountability measures is reviewed by WVDE staff members prior to each on site visit Summary of the strengths and weaknesses is developed, discussed during the entrance conference and included within the monitoring report

Items reviewed in the data analysis include the following areas : Academic performance District AYP status Percentage of schools in the district meeting AYP State/district comparison of WESTEST data Trend Assessment Data (Title I schools) Individual school data for Title I schools Other performance indicators Attendance rate Graduation rate Writing Assessment

On Site Monitoring Remains on a three year cycle, unless more frequent monitoring is determined necessary by WVDE Consolidated team from WVDE for the following programs Title I, Part A – Title I, Part C – Title I Part D Title II Part A and Title II Part D Title III Title V Title VI Homeless and McKinney Vento NOTE CHANGE: Title IV will be conducting individual monitoring

On Site Monitoring Preparation – WVDE Responsibilities Annual calendar for monitoring is developed and distributed prior to the opening of school Grantee notifies WVDE by September 1 of conflict in scheduling WVDE team leader verifies date one month prior to onsite visit WVDE team leader collaborates with LEA designee to establish a schedule for reviewing the programs and visiting the schools WVDE federal programs staff verifies schedule with respective district federal program directors

On Site Monitoring Preparation – LEA Responsibilities Review the monitoring procedures and document with all district federal program directors Notify Title I schools of monitoring schedule Review the school monitoring documents with principals and Title I teachers (Title I director) Notify federally funded staff members of availability for interviews (e.g., coaches, technology integration specials) Ensure that documentation is readily available and organized at the district and school levels (all federal program directors)

On Site Monitoring Activities During the On Site Review Conduct an entrance conference Discussion of the data analysis Discussion of district initiatives Discussion for progress towards universality for Pre-K students Review of documentation to ensure compliance with federal requirement Interview district federal program directors to verify compliance

On Site Monitoring Activities During the On Site Review Interview federally funded staff members from the district and school levels District Title I Director Title I teachers Academic coaches Technology integration specialists Conduct school visits and interviews of school staff as applicable for federal programs Principals Classroom teachers Conduct an exit conference to provide an opportunity for clarifications and provide technical assistance for program improvement

Written Monitoring Report Issued within 40 working days of the exit conference Mailed to superintendent – return receipt requested Identifies commendations, recommendations and findings Identifies required corrective action and timeline for implementation for any findings Identifies recommended technical assistance/professional development suggested by the SEA Creates an expectation for including recommendations within the LEA/school strategic plans

Monitoring Report Response Required for all subgrantees having recommendations or findings within the report Provide an explanation of the implementation of recommendations/corrective actions Submit documentation as required by the report Submit to the SEA on or before 30 working days following receipt of the monitoring report Confirmation of receipt of monitoring response will be provided by WVDE Withholding of federal funding will occur for failure to provide a written response within the required time frame

Appeals Process Submit a written appeal within 30 working days of receipt of the monitoring report May request reconsideration of specific finding if the district concludes the finding is inaccurate Submit written documentation to support the questioned finding Review of documentation and a final decision will be issued within 30 business days of receipt of the written appeal The decision of the respective SEA State Title Program Director is considered final.

Monitoring Documents

Review of Monitoring Documents Compliance Documents LEA document Title I schoolwide program document Title I targeted assistance program document

Additional Monitoring Instruments School Assessment for the Implementation of the Tiered Instructional Reading Model Utilized at the school level as the basis of a discussion with principals and staff concerning the school’s progress in implementing the tiered instruction for reading in all grades Review of all current reading programs being utilized by the school Generate discussion on recommended professional development/technical assistance needed for successful implementation

Additional Monitoring Documents Teacher Responsibilities for Tracking and Monitoring Below Mastery Students Relates directly to compliance indicator for the needs assessment Relates directly to compliance indicator for including teachers in decisions regarding academic assessments for improved student achievement and improvement of the Title I program Relates directly to compliance indicators for identifying eligible students in a TA program

Additional Monitoring Documents Interview questions for instructional coaches Interview questions for technology integration specialists

Final Thoughts… “What gets measured, gets done. If you don’t measure results, you can’t tell success from failure. If you can’t recognize failure, you can’t correct it. If you can’t see success, you can’t reward it. If you can’t see success, you can’t learn from it.” From “Reinventing Government” by David Osborne & Ted Gaebler