A CCOUNTABILITY & E VALUATION. Overview of this Session Defining Accountability & Evaluation MTSSS & Program Evaluation Issues Example of Evaluation in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Elementary School Counselor
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
D EVELOPING & S UPPORTING L EADERSHIP T EAMS TO E NGAGE IN A CADEMIC AND B EHAVIORAL PROBLEM - SOLVING Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Clark Dorman, Ed. S.
Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 1 Getting Ready for SIP: Developing the Action Sequences FALL 2006.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Florida Association of School Psychologists Annual Conference
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF SUPPORT COLLEGE AND CAREER READY FOR ALL Guidance and Counseling Fall 2011.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
F LORIDA ’ S I MPLEMENTATION OF M ULTI - TIERED S YSTEM OF S TUDENT S UPPORTS (MTSSS) Bambi J. Lockman, LL.D. Bureau Chief, Exceptional Education and Student.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
How to Teach Students Rules and Expectations for Behavior Under Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) Answers to 12 most common questions about.
C OACHING FOR MTSSS Florida Leadership Institute on Developing a Multi-tiered System of Student Supports June 22-24, 2011.
Systematic Evaluation Model to Ensure the Integrity of MTSS Implementation in Florida 2011 FASP Conference November 4 th, 2011 Kevin Stockslager Kelly.
Department of Response to Intervention Department of Learning Support Services.
Early Intervention Project 20 th Anniversary November 5, 2004.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Developing a Comprehensive State-wide Evaluation for PBS Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Donald K. Kincaid, Ed.D.
FloridaRtI.usf.edu A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Intervention Mapping.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida PS/RtI Train the Trainers Regional Meetings.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
L EADERSHIP : Contributions to Student Outcomes. Context: Michelle White, FLPBSClark Dorman, FL PS/RtI.
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,
Nancy Steele Kelly Vanderbosch The Power of Teams in RtI as a Multi-Tiered System of Support.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
“Kids are here to maintain our humility.” Dr. Rob Horner
The School Counseling Program
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
The Shifting Role of School Psychologists within a Multi-tiered System of Support Framework FASP Annual Conference October 29, 2015.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Welcome to Central Middle School
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Systems Review: Schoolwide Behavior Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Integrating the MTSS Framework at the Secondary Level Dr. Jayna Jenkins, Learning and Development Facilitator, MTSS Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charles.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
1 Tier 1 Effective Coaching Overview Monthly Coaching Meeting 2011 Module B DC Name and Date Here.
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT October 8, 2009 PBIS National Forum.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Texas Behavior Support (TBS): School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support (PBIS) “Overview”
Response to Instruction and Intervention and how it could apply to High Achievers/Gifted Education Tanya Morret, Dr. Christine.
Eight-Step Problem Solving for School Improvement Planning Presented by Region IV Differentiated Accountability.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
The School Counseling Program
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

A CCOUNTABILITY & E VALUATION

Overview of this Session Defining Accountability & Evaluation MTSSS & Program Evaluation Issues Example of Evaluation in MTSSS Discussion – Current status – Next steps

What does… Accountability mean to you? Evaluation mean to you?

Accountability in Florida Increasing accountability focus the last decade Examples include: – School grading – AYP – Special education rules – DA – FEAPS & Teacher evaluation systems

Impact of Accountability Criticisms Lack of educator involvement Controversy Consequence driven Compliance driven Conflicting requirements Duck and cover approach Positives Establishes and maintains standards for performance Reinforces use of data to monitor student outcomes Reinforces need to examine resource use Student outcome rather than process focus Success stories

(Hall & Hord)

Accountability & Evaluation Issues Compliance driven versus informative evaluation – Evaluation often done to meet accountability requirements – Evaluation can serve to help integrate and improve school and district services Evaluation is fundamental to MTSSS MTSSS has the potential to: – Be viewed as one more thing we have to do OR – Help address accountability & evaluation demands through the multi-tier framework

Mission and Vision Multi-Tiered System of Student Supports - Inter-Project Collaboration The collaborative vision of the Florida Problem-Solving/Response to Intervention (FL PS/RtI) and the Florida Positive Behavior Support/Response to Intervention for Behavior (FLPBS/RtI:B) Projects is to: Enhance the capacity of all Florida school districts to successfully implement and sustain a multi-tiered system of student supports with fidelity in every school; Accelerate and maximize student academic and social-emotional outcomes through the application of data-based problem solving utilized by effective leadership at all levels of the educational system; Inform the development, implementation, and ongoing evaluation of an integrated, aligned, and sustainable system of service delivery that prepares all students for post-secondary education and/or successful employment within our global society.

Important MTSSS Evaluation Issues Stakeholders should be involved in all aspects of planning and carrying out the evaluation process as well as in decision-making Goals through planning should drive the process Information obtained to: – Determine where you currently are (needs) – Take ongoing looks at how things are working – Make decisions about what to keep doing and what to change or eliminate

MTSSS Eval Issues cont. The data you collect should be driven by the questions you want to answer – Are students meeting expectations? Academically? Behaviorally? Social-emotionally? – Are we implementing MTSSS with fidelity? – Do we have the capacity to implement successfully? – Do staff buy into implementing MTSSS? *Example questions

E XAMPLE Q UESTIONS AND D ATA S OURCES

How Are Students Performing? Examples of data sources Academics – FCAT – FAIR – Core K-12 – End of Course Exams Behavior – Attendance – Tardies – Suspensions – Discipline referrals Global Outcomes – Graduation Rates

Are Schools Implementing MTSSS with Fidelity? Examples of data sources Curriculum and Instruction/Intervention – Principal walkthroughs – Lesson plans – Intervention Documentation Worksheets Components of MTSSS and Data-Based Problem- Solving* – BOQ, PIC, BAT – SAPSI, Tier I & II CCCs, Tier III CCCs * See and for more informationhttp://flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu/

Do We Have the Capacity to Implement MTSSS with Fidelity? Examples of data sources Leadership Team structure and functioning – Organizational charts – Minutes/meeting summaries – SAPSI, BOQ, PIC Staff knowledge and skills – FEAPs & teacher evaluation system – Staff development evaluations – Work samples Resources allocated to match needs – SIP, DIP – Master calendar/schedule – School rosters – Resource maps

Marzano Evaluation Domains Classroom Strategies and Behaviors Preparing and Planning Reflecting on Teaching Collegiality and Professionalism

Do Staff Buy Into Implementing MTSSS? Examples of data sources Leadership vision and commitment – SAPSI, BOQ, PIC – Required and non-required plans Staff buy in – SAPSI, BOQ, PIC – District/school staff and climate surveys – Dialogue – Brief interviews with key personnel

Discussion What are you currently doing to examine these areas in your district or school? – What are the critical questions you ask? – What data sources do you have to answer them? – What questions do you already have that you cannot answer with available data? – How do you use the data you collect to inform decisions? What areas need to be addressed as you return to your districts to plan? What are the priorities? – What critical questions do you need to start asking? – What data sources do you need? – How can you better use the data to inform decisions?

Our Plan for Moving Forward Learn more about your needs for evaluation support through needs assessment and DAPP protocol Develop resources for evaluating critical domains necessary to implement MTSSS such as: – Leadership – Coaching – Fidelity of implementation What additional supports can we provide?