DRAMA MODERATION PROTOCOL FET Drama. Introduction n Circular 128/2002 n Protocol to take effect 2003 n UMALUSI tasked with quality assuring provision.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Senior Verifier Update Robert Laird Administration and IT (VG363/389)
Advertisements

Accounting and Finance Verification Group 266 Verification Feedback Session 2006/2007 Kim Tree Senior Verifier.
Central Verification Kim Tree Senior Verifier – Accounting and Finance Iain Walker Senior Verifier – Business Management/Economics/Business Graded Unit.
1 Developing Assignments using the assessment grid.
Operation of Subject Examination Boards Sarah Lane Senior School Manager, School of Law.
SPS Quality Healthcheck: Supporting Customer Excellence.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY NEW STUDENTS: PROGRESSION AND AWARD How do I progress between levels? How is my final award calculated?
Business Management CPD Presentation External Verification School SQA Co-ordinators will receive notification of Verification Selection and Verification.
Internal verification and external standards moderation.
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners February 2013
Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services
National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) An overview.
Centre Quality Assurance Briefing for AIVs January 2013.
SQA School Co-ordinator Conference June 2014 Results Services.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Manage an assessment system for training outcomes
Teachers New to NCEA Workshop New Zealand education system receives international praise In 2011, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and.
SUBTITLE DAY, MONTH, YEAR Accreditation Support for Teachers Introduction to Accreditation at Proficient Teacher Module 3 of 5.
Computing Science CPD Presentation Internal Verification of National 4 and National 5 Units.
VETiS Moderation meetings – November 2012 Welcome to the Australian Institute of Education and Training.
SESSION 4 COLLECTING EVIDENCE OF LEARNER PERFORMANCE CAT AND IT.
Validation of Non-formal Adult Education courses REACTION No CP LT-GRUNDTVIG-G1.
Entry Pathways General Administration September 2012.
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2014/15 Stewart Smith-Langridge Annette Cooke Governance Services 5 November
Operation of Subject Examination Boards Sarah Lane Senior School Manager, School of Law March 2015.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Quality Assurance José Viegas Ribeiro IGF, Portugal SIGMA.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Judith Wheeler, OCN Eastern Region Quality Reviewer Direct Claims Status Or, what do we need to see when undertaking a monitoring visit?
Biology CPD Presentation Aims To supplement previously published information about the internal assessment of Biology Units at National 3, 4 and 5 To.
Setting up a Course and using the Course Tutor Guide Workshop A Kim Tree.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
New Zealand Diploma in Business National External Moderation Reports Tertiary Assessment & Moderation.
PRESENTATION ON ASSESSMENT Compiled & Presented by: Mrs T.P. Sithole.
Entry Pathways General Administration April 2012.
Ako Panuku Hui ā Tau Te Kāhui Kaiako Reo Māori o Aotearoa.
Policy on Learner Attendance North West Department of Education 7 January Briefing and implementation workshop.
Applying for HEA Fellowship What happens after you’ve submitted your application.
Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
MODERATION OF SCHOOL BASED ASSESSMENT IN THE WESTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
VCE Extended Investigation. Features of the study No pre-requisite Units 3 and 4 sequence only no discipline-specific prescribed content student directed.
Internal Verification Presentation to Presentation by: Chris Blewitt Date 17 th Nov 2010.
GENERAL EDUCATION CERTIFICATE(GEC) ABET Examination Cycle & Related Processes ABET IN THE WORKPLACE INDABA Presented by Mr. D. Govender.
PGCE Evaluation of Assessment Methods. Why do we assess? Diagnosis: establish entry behaviour, diagnose learning needs/difficulties. Diagnosis: establish.
INSETA ASSESSOR- MODERATOR REGISTRATION PROCESSES.
Art and Design Entry Level Guidance for Teachers.
National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) An overview.
An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Kate Fairweather CMCAust Marketing QAC Assessor & IQA
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
National Certificate (Vocational)
An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University
SVQ Business and Administration Network Event 2016
SVQ Business and Administration Network Event 2017
SVQ Business and Administration Network Event 2018
EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENT
LEJWELEPUTSWA DISTRICT EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENT
Matthew McCullagh Linking the Principles of Assessment to the QA Criteria.
Business Management and Business Graded Unit
Senior Verifier - Administration and IT
Umalusi Presentation to the
Entry Level Occupational Studies Agreement Trial
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners March 2014
Internal Verification and Standardisation
Internal Verification
Role of the Internal Verifier
Presentation transcript:

DRAMA MODERATION PROTOCOL FET Drama

Introduction n Circular 128/2002 n Protocol to take effect 2003 n UMALUSI tasked with quality assuring provision of education

Umalusi n Replaces former SAFCERT n To quality assure the GET and FET assessment processes for certification n To ensure same standard of assessment across different examining bodies

Moderation policy for WCED n Province has to quality assure assessment of learners for progression, promotion or qualifications

Main functions of moderation system n Verify that assessment is: n Fair n Valid n Reliable n Consistent Practicable

n To ensure that learners within same LA/Subject are treated equitably n Validate authenticity of learners work n To identify the need to redesign the assessment

n To provide for an appeal procedure for learners n To provide support, advice and guidance to assessors

Moderation methods n Face moderation e.g. for practical work, products n Cluster Moderation

Cluster moderation n Time-effective n Human resource effective

Why cluster moderation? n Mechanism to develop human resources n To set standards n Stimulates collegiality n Create shared understanding of standards and assessment requirements in a collegial environment

Evidence required for moderation Dramatic Arts : 1. Educator File. See Cover pages 2. Learner Assessment Evidence. See Cover pages

Moderators n Senior Education Specialist n Educators n Within schools: subject heads

Types of moderation n INTERNAL n To ensure school based assessment is consistent, accurate and well designed n EXTERNAL n To validate school based assessment

Functions of Internal moderation n Verify assessment is fair n Ensure learners in same subject in different classes are treated equitably n Validate authenticity n Ensure school-based assessment is continuous

Criteria for internal moderation n Assessment and moderation criteria for each subject n All educators in subject are involved

Functions of external moderation n To verify assessment is fair across schools n To ensure learners in same subject but in different schools are treated equitably n To validate authenticity n To identify the need to redesign assessments

Moderation sample n Generally a 10% sample n (Up to 15%)

Cluster moderation n Educators come together with Educator- and Learner assessment Evidence files n Moderation is based on group evaluation and discussion n On a consensus basis or a weighted system of scoring

n Cluster meetings conducted by senior education specialist n Head Office will set official clusters n Regular meeting during year to discuss details regarding procedures in the subject

External face moderation n Practical work n All candidates in Dramatic Arts

Adjustment of marks n After scrutiny and discussion: n If average difference between marks allocated by the school and by the moderation panel is greater than 10% Then: n the marks of all candidates are adjusted up or down according to the average difference

Irregularities n Candidates who fail to hand in work n School to inform parents n Work still not submitted give ‘incomplete’ - indicate that follow up action was taken n Keep record of interventions in Educator File

n If candidate does not hand in any SBA give “incomplete” n Candidate can re-enter the following year n If learner hands in work not worth marks give ZERO n No SBA, for medical reasons, mark absent,SBA calculated out of lower mark

SBA appeal n LEARNERS n To HOD n To Senior Education Specialist n SCHOOLS n To CCA within 5 days n Will appoint another specialist to re-assess

Developmental moderation n Via school visits n Via clusters

Via school visits n MFT’s n Support visits n Educator files and learner assessment Files n Return visits n Developmental reports on a personal level n General routine reports to schools

Via clusters n A series of developmental meetings n Samples of work will be observed n Joint standard setting exercises will take place

Final moderation n Internal and developmental moderation should have ensured a degree of standardisation n Head Office must provide dates & venues for Dramatic Arts n At least one educator per school n 15% of schools total sample (5% if there are queries) n If there are less than 12 learners per school, then ALL the files

n Full set of educator files n Mark schedules n Group assessment takes place n Consensus decision about marks n Each educator file to be studied by at least three educators

Administration n Educator provides marks as per guidelines n Computer sheets completed n Educator signs n Principal signs n SES checks and signs n Assessment coordinator submits to examinations directorate