NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

Chemawawin Cree Nation. Community Planning Change, Expectations and Performance Some Observations Chief Clarence Easter Chemawawin Cree Nation Aboriginal.
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Carolyn M. Byerly, Ph.D., professor Department of Journalism and Graduate Program in Mass Comm & Media Studies TENURE: BASIC INFO AND ISSUES.
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
Medical Education Grand Rounds Self-Study Overview Middle States Commission on Higher Education January 13, 2010.
Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre April 1, 2010.
Learning Health System Challenge and Planning Awards Alexander K. Ommaya, DSc Sr. Dir. Clinical Effectiveness & Implementation Research Philip M. Alberti,
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences: Information for the Grants Administrator Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner National.
1 7th Framework Programme Specific Programme “Ideas” European Commission Directorate B November 2005.
1 CI Administrator’s Meeting October 26-27, 2005 CCNY, New York City Formal Reviews (Wed) –Transition to new review policy –NESDIS timelines and guidelines.
STRATEGIC PLANNING STATUS AND DIRECTION Report to the PPPC September 16, 2013 Michael Berman VP for Technology & Communication.
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program Office of Integrative Activities National Science.
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
Purpose of the Standards
Grants Business Process Re-Engineering (BPR) Overview
Promoting Objectivity in Research by Managing, Reducing, or Eliminating Conflicts of Interest UT HOP UT HOP The University of Texas at Austin.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
School Councils 101 Fall School Council Orientation Forum YRDSB 2009.
Charter, Contract, Laws, Policies, Regulations, and Statutes.
Grantwriting. Types of Grants Foundation Grants HancockREADS Grants Hancock Education Fund Grants.
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
The WIPO Development Agenda: An Overview Geneva May, 2009 Esteban Burrone World Intellectual Property Organization.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Module 4: Association Personnel – The Executive Director Presented by the Southern Early Childhood Association.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Meeting March 3, 2010 Overview of the DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship Program Julie Carruthers, Ph.D.
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Roles and Responsibilities
Department of Grants and District Initiatives 1 San Antonio Independent School District Department of Grants and District Initiatives The purpose of the.
BPR PHASE IV IMPLEMENTATION NOAA Business Process Re-Engineering Current Status: June 21, 2006 NESDIS Cooperative Institute Directors and Administrators.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
The Life of a Policy Council Member
September 22, 2010 Strategic Aerospace and Defence Initiative (SADI) Program Overview.
2 From the BOV Bylaws Faculty Representatives The Faculty shall elect a non-voting representative to the following committees of the Board: Academic.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,
1 CILER Review – 2005 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Carl Richards Chair, CILER Review Committee Director, US EPA Mid-Continent Ecology.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program NSDI Cooperative Agreements Program (CAP) Introduction to the Cooperative Agreements.
15 th NOAA Science Advisory Board Meeting NOAA Program Review Team Recommendations for Grants Administration Rimas T. Liogys NOAA Finance and Administration.
PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES Syed M. Ali Zaidi, P.Eng. PM(Stanford), Ph.D. Director, Strategic Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure.
REPORT OF THE NAGMS COUNCIL MORE DIVISION WORKING GROUP Charge to the Group The National Advisory General Medical Sciences (NAGMS) Council MORE Division.
NSF policies and requirements for Implementation of the America COMPETES Act. America COMPETES Act contains a number of new requirements for all those.
Research Funding Opportunity & Scientific Capacity Building in Developing Countries By Dina R. Andersson 1.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GOVERNOR ’ S TASK FORCE ON CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT REVIEW Report Overview PD Customer Forum September 2002.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
Local Station Grant Program Goals and Requirements.
The Role of a Program Director NCI Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop October 18-19, 2010 Jerry Li, MD, PhD Division of Cancer Biology NCI/NIH.
Effective Committees Governing Board Online Training Module.
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
Real Property Policy Update Planning and Development Committee August 4, 2015.
NATA Foundation Research Awards Process Announcements sent out (August & September) to NATA membership regarding nominations being solicited for the following.
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
Master Plan Updates February 2015 Salem, Oregon
Roles & Responsibilities of an Impressive Program Governance Plan
State Steering Committee
University Career Services Committee
How Does a State Make an Award to Eligible Providers?
Karen Ann Breslow, MA, SELPA Program Coordinator
SCD Grants & Contracts Policy & Procedure 670.
Promotion on the Clinician Educator and Clinical Practice Tracks
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Fort Valley State University
University of the Incarnate Word
Presentation transcript:

NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson

Outline Goal: Provide information about NOAA Cooperative Institutes (CIs) and the new CI policy. Introduction General Information about CIs New Policy New CI Handbook Transition

Introduction CIs represent one type of NOAA research partnerships: multiple long-term, and collaborative research projects with NOAA scientists. New NOAA-wide CI policy help ensure that NOAA meets its obligation to support a research portfolio that is excellent and aligned with its mission goals. NOAA Science Advisory Board recommended (2004) that NOAA develop a NOAA-wide policy and associated processes to manage CIs. NOAA adopted new policy on September 2005.

NOAA Cooperative Institutes Long-term collaborative research partnerships that conduct research in support of NOAA’s mission. Located at universities and non-profit research institutions in 17 states. Most CIs are located near NOAA facilities to encourage collaboration. Provide NOAA-related graduate degrees. Long and successful history: First CI began in NOAA administers CI awards in NOAA Line Offices (LOs). (cont.)

NOAA Cooperative Institutes (cont.)

NOAA Cooperative Institutes Mutual Benefits: –Access to outstanding research scientists and facilities. –Funding and research activities support education goals of the CI’s parent research institution(s). –Long-term commitment of research support. –Training and Outreach Activities. –Quick funding mechanism. –Provides future NOAA scientists. (cont.)

NOAA Cooperative Institutes (cont.) Director Associate Director Division 1Division 2Division 3 Executive Board (Includes NOAA management) Science Fellows (Includes NOAA employees) Financial Administrator Typical CI Organization

NOAA Cooperative Institutes CIs foster collaboration among multiple programs and research institutions. CI Research Institution Dept. NOAA Office Research Institution NOAA Office NOAA Office (cont.)

Typical Cooperative Institute Activities Task I – Support CI administration and other activities that provide overall benefit to the CI (e.g., education, outreach, postdocs, visiting scientists) Task II – Research that involves NOAA scientists. Task III – Research with minimal NOAA scientist involvement.

New NOAA Policy on Cooperative Institutes NOAA Administrative Order : NOAA Policy on Cooperative Institutes (effective 9/2/05). NOAA’s CI policy sets forth basic principles to be applied in making decisions regarding NOAA CIs. Describes why and how NOAA would establish a CI. –For NOAA, the purpose of this partnership is to promote research, education, training, and outreach aligned with NOAA’s mission, to obtain research capabilities that do not exist internally, and/or to expand research capacity in NOAA-related sciences. (cont.)

New NOAA Policy on Cooperative Institutes Establishes a CI Committee under the NOAA Research Council (RC) to assist with oversight responsibilities. Establishes a CI Handbook (describes all procedures for implementing the CI policy). (cont.)

NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee Mission: Ensure compliance with the NOAA CI policy described in NAO –Established to provide the RC with support to fulfill its oversight responsibility of the NOAA CI program. Membership: Includes a representative from each LO and the NOAA Acquisition and Grants Office. –Members and the Committee Chairperson are appointed by the Research Council chairperson. (cont.)

NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee Responsibilities –Develop and maintain policies and procedures for the NOAA CI Program. –Serve as the primary NOAA source for information on the NOAA CI program. –Take action on topics and issues related to the CI program as directed by the RC. (cont.)

Cooperative Institute Handbook Documents all procedures associated with NOAA CIs –Establishment –Maintenance –Renewals and Reviews –Sunsetting –Early Termination Public comment period: 12/2/05 – 1/18/06.

Establishment Request for new CIs is made to the RC by NOAA LOs and Goal Teams after internal evaluation to determine need. NOAA Administrator approves establishment of all new CIs prior to competitive announcement. NOAA publishes a Federal Funding Opportunity in Grants.gov and the Federal Register describing competition for the new CI. Proposals are submitted through Grants.gov and are reviewed according to NOAA standard grant procedures. Initial cooperative agreement awarded for 5 years. (cont.)

Establishment Standard Evaluation Criteria or Selection Factors (see Handbook for complete list): –Internationally recognized experts with a demonstrated record of outstanding performance to conduct collaborative/interdisciplinary research. –Demonstrated commitment (resources and facilities) to enhance existing NOAA and university resources. –Strong education program with established graduate degrees in NOAA-related sciences. –Well-developed business plan. –Clearly stated goals to be achieved during award period. –Cost-sharing (required). (cont.)

Maintenance: Beyond Establishment Handbook describes processes associated with CI award activities, including: –Submission and review of proposals through Grants.gov –Use and access to federal and CI facilities and computer systems –Intellectual property rights –Annual CI meetings –Annual performance reporting

Renewals and Reviews Annual review of performance reports. One non-competitive renewal up to five additional years is allowed pending the outcome of a peer review in the fourth year of the cooperative agreement. Review is conducted under the auspices of the NOAA Science Advisory Board and organized by the CI and the responsible NOAA LO. (cont.)

Renewals and Reviews Review outcomes: –Outstanding - consistently demonstrated superior achievement. NOAA will renew up to 5 additional years, pending available funding. –Satisfactory - achieved some or all of its goals and demonstrated acceptable performance. NOAA may renew less than 5 years at reduced funding. –Unsatisfactory - demonstrated failure to achieve some or all of its agreed-upon goals. NOAA will not renew award. (cont.)

Sunsetting Sunset - The process by which a CI closes gracefully at the end of an award period. –Occurs after one renewal if NOAA does not recompete the CI or the CI unsuccessfully competes in the recompetition. –Occurs if the CI award is terminated early. Sunset period is typically one year. NOAA will work closely with a CI to minimize the impact on people and research.

Transition: Implementing the New Policy NOAA Transition Plan available at CI website: Current CIs will be sunsetted according to a staggered schedule through NOAA will determine whether new CIs should be established prior to the end of each current CI award. All new CIs will be established according to the procedures in the CI Handbook.

Final Thoughts CIs are valuable resources to NOAA and represent one mechanism to collaborate with the external community. NOAA’s CI policy sets forth basic principles to be applied in making decisions regarding NOAA CIs. –Supports “One NOAA” –Ensures consistent use of CIs across all NOAA LOs –Emphasizes competition

Questions?