Concerns, Data, Next Steps.  New Administration Software from Scantron  New Academic Senate Policy  New Items/Survey Form (ACE, Iowa Item Pool)  New.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Advertisements

University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.
W HAT IS M UTUAL AGREEMENT AND P ARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE ? Dr. Eric Oifer Randy Lawson August 26, 2010.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Service to Leadership Freshmen Orientation Assessment Service to Leadership Professional Development Training August 14, 2012 Agriculture Research Complex.
Overcoming the Rubber Stamp Phenomenon: The Shifting Sands of Curriculum and the Senate's Roles Comunicación y Gerencia Pat James Hanz Michelle Pilati.
Student Evaluations. Introduction: Conducted: Qualtrics Survey Fall 2011 o Sample Size: 642 o FT Tenured: 158, FT Untenured: 59 o Adjunct: 190 o Students:
SLO Process A process to document a measure of educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards.
Improving Student Evaluation of Teaching at an Urban Research University: Many Goals, A Few Directions Spannaus, Ouellett, Casey, Kernsmith, Smoller, Brockmeyer,
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.
Promotion and Tenure at Ohio University Martin Tuck PhD Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
ICE Evaluations Some Suggestions for Improvement.
Writing Program Assessment Report Fall 2002 through Spring 2004 Laurence Musgrove Writing Program Director Department of English and Foreign Languages.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
Review of SUNY Oneonta Course Evaluation Form Report and Recommendations from The Committee on Instruction: Part II October 4, 2010.
MyUCDavis Web Portal for Faculty and Students March 29, 2001 Joint Meeting Academic Computing Coordinating Council Administrative Computing Coordinating.
Using the UB Course Evaluation System A Guide for Staff The UB Course Evaluation System is powered by.
Training the Trainers – Dr. Sue LeBeau Jamie Kretsch Teaching Faculty to Teach Online.
Interpreting IDEA reports Diagnostic Form Short Form
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Techniques for Improving Student Learning Outcomes Lynn M. Forsythe Ida M. Jones Deborah J. Kemp Craig School of Business California State University,
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
+ Measuring Teaching Quality in the Online Classroom Ann H. Taylor Director, Dutton e-Education Institute College of Earth and Mineral Sciences.
Blackboard Strategies: Using Blackboard Pedagogically.
September 17,  SAC Chair Responsibilities  Liaising with your liaison (and vice versa)  Avoiding SAC Chair Burnout  How to do stuff  Meetings,
2014/15 Fixed Term Faculty Committee Nancy C. Fisher, Ph.D. Chair Report to UNC Chapel Hill Faculty Council April 24, 2015.
5 Sept 2013 Graduate Studies Committee  Overall GSC  Curriculum Sub- Committee: Issues and Directions.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
New Faculty Syllabus Workshop Session 1 Activity #1: Why Syllabi? Take five minutes to complete a brief journal entry in response to the following prompt:
Outcome Assessment Reporting for Undergraduate Programs Stefani Dawn and Bill Bogley Office of Academic Programs, Assessment & Accreditation Faculty Senate,
End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.
Survey Data Executive Summary Fall 2008.
Final Update on the New Faculty Course Evaluation & Online System November, 2003.
The Redesigned Elements of Statistics Course University of West Florida March 2008.
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education A Presentation by Ruth Dalrymple and Marilyn Mays based on Hunter R. Boylan’s work.
LoudCloud: Marking Substantive Posts. Faculty members are expected to clearly communicate the criteria they will be using in assessing participation.
Visioning 2 Committee 15,800 by 2018 JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research.
1 June 10-15, 2012 Growing Community; Growing Possibilities Switching to on-line evaluations for courses at UC Berkeley Daphne Ogle, Lead Design, UC Berkeley.
Fair and Appropriate Grading
Faculty Governance Jane Dillehay Faculty Chair Jan Hafer AAUP Chair 12 August 2011.
Relationship with Program DirectorsRelationship with Program Directors New major ideas are generated at the department level Departments offer courses.
Accreditation Who? Regional Accrediting Agency: NWCCU (Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities). What? Self-study followed by on-campus.
Shelton School District Hi Cap Program Review Results and Recommendations for April 29, 2014.
An Assessment of the Readiness of a Tertiary Healthcare Organization in Saudi Arabia, in Adopting Effective Online Staff Development Programs Adnan D.
Fall Convocation 2007 Faculty Senate Report Prepared by Chuck Winer Chair, Faculty Senate Welcome.
© 2014 K12 Insight Results and Analysis Campus Climate Survey – Saginaw Elementary School Eagle Mountain-Saginaw ISD January 27 - February 7, 2014.
© 2014 K12 Insight Results and Analysis Campus Climate Survey – Boswell High School Eagle Mountain-Saginaw ISD January 27 - February 7, 2014.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Foundations of Excellence SHARING THE InFOE. PowerPoint Overview  Survey Overview  Faculty/Staff Survey  Who Responded  Dimension Results  Student.
The Review Process: Where Do We Begin? Jennifer L. Bishoff June 7, 2001.
Faculty Forum: Evaluation of Teaching Sponsored by the Faculty Senate November 10, 2006.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
IN WHAT WAYS DO PRESERVICE TEACHERS UTILIZED AN WEB-BASED LEARNING SUPPORT SYSTEM? Fethi Ahmet Inan The University of Memphis Soner Yildirim.
W R I T I N G M A T T E R S A workshop of the Hoosier Writing Project a site of the National Writing Project at IUPUI Herb Budden, Co-director.
A Critical Friend: Peer Review of Teaching at AUS Daniel Kirk Daniel Kirk: Oct 2007.
Office of Measurement Services (OMS) Student Evaluation of Teaching June 2003.
TUSK - Faculty Overview. General information Describe your course material: Create and modify course objectives Outline the attendance and grading policies.
Keeping your Senate Involved, Engaged and On Course Grant Goold Professor & Chair, Emergency Medical Services, American River College Area A, Academic.
Student Evaluation of Teachers Committee Report
Course Evaluation System (CES)
New Department Chair Workshop
Division of Talent and Performance
Campus Climate Survey – Northbrook Elementary School
of Teaching: Challenges
Indiana University School of Social Work
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Academic Affairs Update Monday, November 20, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Concerns, Data, Next Steps

 New Administration Software from Scantron  New Academic Senate Policy  New Items/Survey Form (ACE, Iowa Item Pool)  New formative evaluation questions for open- ended responses  New Scale (1 to 6 previous 1 to 5)  Communication Plan for Faculty  Communication Plan for Students

 Student Focus Group  Pilot 1: COE (Summer, 2012) ◦ Item Responses (ST. Agree to ST. Disagree)  Pilot 2: CNSM (Mid-Fall, 2012) ◦ Item Responses (ST. Disagree to ST. Agree) – *recommended by ACE Research Center  All pilot data indicated a significant increase in student open-ended responses. ◦ Increased opportunity to assess internal reliability

 Presentation/Discussion in Academic Senate  Revision of Instructions to Chairs  Revision of Instructions to Faculty  s to all faculty  Open web page (instrument, resources, item pool)  FAQs

 Consultation with Associated Students President ◦ to all students ◦ BeachBoard Newsfeed ◦ Associated Students Forum ◦ Revised Instructions for Class Distribution

ATTENTION STUDENTS: NEW TEACHING EVALUATION FORM President Alexander and the CSULB Academic Senate approved a new Student Evaluation of Teaching Policy and Form effective Fall The new form is called “Student Perceptions of Teaching” or SPOT. Please take your time reading the new items and response options – they are very different from the old form. Your feedback on SPOT will be used in the evaluation of faculty and accurate responses to the items are necessary. All courses may not be evaluated, but all classes that are evaluated will use the new SPOT form. READ EACH ITEM AND RESPONSE OPTION CAREFFULLY!

 Old Item 8: ◦ Rate the Overall Teaching Effectiveness of this Instructor in this Course.  NEW Item (#5) ◦ The instructor was effective teaching the subject matter in this course.  Campus Means ◦ Typically, the campus mean on item 8 ranged from (standard deviations slightly under 1.0) on a five-point scale. ◦ The campus mean on item 5 for Fall 2012 is 5.3 (on a six- point scale) and the standard deviation is 1.2.

 Old Item: ◦ Instructor provided clear and accurate information regarding course objectives, requirements, and grading procedures.  New Item: ◦ The grading criteria for this course were clearly defined.

 CLA Example: Year/TermItem MeanItem SD FA (5 point scale).90 FA (5 point scale).89 FA (5 point scale).88 FA (5 point scale).90 FA (6 point scale)*1.1 FA 2013 Global Mean 5.44 (6 point scale) 1.0

 April notification to students with link to instrument.  Best Practices for Faculty: ◦ Preparing Students to Respond to the Instrument ◦ Using formative feedback ◦ Documenting Your Teaching (wiki)  Campus Conversation: ◦ Student Perceptions of Teaching ◦ Teaching Effectiveness