1. Course Evaluation System (CES)
January 2017
Hae Okimoto, PhD
Director, Academic Technologies, ITS

2. Value of CES
Students able to provide feedback on their learning for all their courses.
Faculty can receive useful feedback on their teaching practices & have an additional tool to demonstrate teaching effectiveness.
Deans, directors or chairs can get another data point regarding curriculum & program effectiveness.

3. Similarities Faculty can copy surveys between semesters & years.
Faculty can publish surveys to website.
Aggregate means for common questions available on results.
Results downloadable in PDF & Excel formats.
Results archived.
Results available for use by faculty as part of their T&P documentation.
Improve way results downloaded (separate # and % - currently in same cell)

4. Difference from eCAFE
Campuses, divisions, departments can determine questions sets for courses at various levels.
100%* of credit courses will be assessed.
Mobile and web access.
ADA compliant.
Results shared with department/division chair.
Aggregate results of common questions will be shared according to campus guidelines.
Faculty section:
Ability to add own questions
Ability to curate questions
Aggregation among sections

5. Faculty Section

6. Student Notice

7. Viewing Results CES will close the last day of instruction.
Faculty will receive results once grades posted or rolled.
Unit chairs will automatically receive results.
Aggregate results for common question will be shared according to campus policies & procedures.

8. Faculty Dashboard

9. Next Steps AY ‘16-’17– establishment of questions in tiers 1-4.
Lead discussions, along with campus assessment specialists, with faculty senate, divisions, departments
Establish campus guidelines, procedures, practices
August 2017
Send questions to ITS
ITS sends instructions to campus coordinators
Fall Semester 2017 – System open, eCAFE put into archive mode

10. Q & A