Sumner’s TPEP Journey: Artifacts and Student Growth

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Training Overview For separate modules:
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Teacher Performance Assessment System The Processes.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
TPEP Teacher and Principal Evaluation Process Bellevue Chamber of Commerce Presentation January 15, 2015 Presented by: Dr. Patty Siegwarth: Bellevue School.
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 1 Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson
Arkansas Teacher Excellence and Support System: Guide to Evidence & Artifacts.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Artifacts 101: The Role of Artifacts in Educator Support and Evaluation Spring 2015 Webinar.
Who’s on our Team? CLASS Phoenix Design Team Classroom educators, specialists, administrators, and classified from all grade levels Association groups.
Guidance Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation September 13, 2012.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Update on Teacher Principal Evaluation System (TPEP) Implementation July, 2014.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
TPGES & PPGES Training Modules TOOLS FOR SUPPORTING PGES IMPLEMENTATION.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
© TNTP 2014 March Principal Training. / 2 Do Now Reflect on your progress from the last session: How successful were you in supporting a teacher to identify.
District Meeting #3 Year One East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium
Bremerton School District ACT System. OVERVIEW OF THE INTER ACT IVE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MODEL.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Session Materials  Wiki
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
South Dakota’s Teacher Effectiveness Model February 20, 2015 Presented by Dr. Sally Crowser and John Swanson, TIE.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
LESSON DESIGN WORKSHOP
Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E
Presentation transcript:

Sumner’s TPEP Journey: Artifacts and Student Growth

Overview of Sumner’s Timeline Convened Guiding Team March ‘12 Selected Danielson for Teaching June ‘12 Began Pilot Aug. ‘12 Summative Training next week

Big Idea: We Want Growth Process in the Big Font

Guiding Team Whole Team: Decisions about Transition Subcommittees: Artifacts Student Growth Training Logistics/Contracts

Artifacts Artifacts: Guiding principles Key artifacts collected by all (standardized) Choice artifacts with parameters Non-artifact evidence included Teacher reflection and analysis of artifacts IS evidence and is the key to the process

Artifact Guide

Artifact Guide 8 Required Pieces (high leverage) 5 Choice Pieces (esp. 4C Communicating with Families) Includes Student Growth artifact

Non-Artifact Evidence for 4b-4e

Student Growth: Goals All on Comprehensive set 4 SMART goals based on data and self-assessment in Sept. 1 Component goal (ex. 3b Questioning Techniques) 3 Student Growth Goals (think nested dolls) PLC Goal (Criteria 8) Whole Class Goal (Criteria 6) Subgroup Goal (Criteria 3)

Lessons Learned Give more guidance, more models on goals Defining what we mean by terms like “whole class growth.” More training/time on goal setting, planning for assessments/data collection and analysis

Training Matrix Process Growth Calibration Teachers and Evaluators together Unpacking the Frameworks, Teachscape Constantly changing, improving; flexibility required Reflection, Self Assessment, Evaluator PLC – Collaborative Analysis of Teacher Evals Everyone contributes to the process Learning Walks, Learning Centered Conferences Teachers into other teacher’s classroom, collaboratively analyzing practice on Frameworks

Overall Successes The pilot process has helped us develop the process that we believe will work for the rest Teachers are seeing examples of how the framework can change thinking about teaching and ramp up performance Everyone is seeing how the Framework can anchor all of the change initiatives

Biggest Challenges Constant tension between the professional growth vs process/accountability Transition rate (how much, how fast) Relevance for all certs; all levels/subjects Training: When? What? Who? How? B

Moving All To a Growth Mindset

Questions?