® ® Focus on Place Types. ® ® Focus on: Approach and Classification Transitions Guidance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Advertisements

Presentation Outline What is a Healthy Neighborhood? Planning Trends and Impacts on Health Planning Tools for Healthy Communities.
ADVANCING REGIONAL TOD: CORRIDORS & CLASSIFICATIONS Partnership for Regional Opportunity TOD Work Group June 4, 2014 Mariia Zimmerman, MZ Strategies, LLC.
| 1 The Municipal Farm Sustainable Reuse Plan Project funded through a Brownfields Area-Wide Planning Pilot Grant from the United States Environmental.
HUD Community Challenge Planning Grant Tarrant County Consortium September 17, 2010.
From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
Equitable Transit Oriented Development the Denver perspective.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
Gabe Rousseau Federal Highway Administration Office of Human Environment.
Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc Hartford, CT Study Advisory Committee Meeting #2 April 10, 2014; 4-6 PM Route 1 Corridor Plan Clinton, Westbrook, Old Saybrook,
Scottish Urban Regeneration Forum – Perth, 7 th November 2006 Tom Warburton Head of Regeneration, One NorthEast.
South Gate General Plan: Addressing Health and Climate Change 22 January09.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
COMMUNITY ECONOMY ENVIRONMENTINFRASTRUCTURE P H O E N I X G E N E R A L P L A N U P D A T E Sustainability-Oriented.
WalkSanDiego, created 1998 Move San Diego, created 2004 Merged Staff 18 Board Members $1,040,000 Annual Budget.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Seattle Station Area Planning Milestones & Events Transit-Oriented Development Program Information & Schedule Station Area Atlas Station Area Recommendations.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
Growing Smart:Chapter 40R A New Tool for Communities Presented by Sarah B. Young Deputy Director for Policy January 7, 2005 Jane Wallis Gumble, Director.
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
1 Module 8 STATION AREA PLANNING. 2 Module 8 Station Area Planning Key Concepts and Definitions Station Area Planning Process 1.Define the Station Area.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Practical Design in ODOT Roadway Conference April 13, 2010 Cathy Nelson, PE Technical Services Manager/ Chief Engineer.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
City of Riverbank Planning Commission Meeting March 17, :00 p.m.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
Cape Town Spatial Development Framework PEPCO MEETING 14 th October ND May 2012.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Envisioning the Future of Minnesota Transportation Finance Advisory Committee April 20, 2012.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
1.Identify regional strategic areas for infill and investment 2.Develop “complete communities” 3.Develop nodes on a corridor 4.Plan for a changing demand.
F O R W A R D L A P O R T E What are the city’s top 3 economic development priorities? n=300.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
Session Two Perspectives on Smart Growth. American Planning Association Core Principles of Smart Growth A.Recognition that all levels of government, and.
DRAFT Unified Planning Work Program for State Fiscal Year (SFY) April 1, 2016-March 31, 2017 Program Dashboard for Public Review November 16, 2015 Program.
Sustainability, Community, Value 3. Criteria Transportation Development Walkability Resource Management Waste Management 41.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
COG Activity Center Update Climate, Energy, & Environment Policy Committee May 23 rd, 2012.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
Global Solution for Local Problems: Atlanta Aerotropolis 2014 AMPO Conference October 23, 2014 Nancey Green Leigh, PhD, FAICP Professor and Associate Dean.
The Concept for City Center – The Power of TOD TOD Advisory Committee Meeting 3 December 10, 2009 The Premier Place for a Premier City.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
SHRP2 C20: Freight Demand Modeling and Data Improvement Strategic Plan Introduction and National Perspectives September 18, 2014.
Objectives Today Introduction Key Items  Passing 100,000 population  3 rd largest city in region  Community of workers  Housing affordability edge.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 3 – NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE ELEMENTS 1/09/2014.
SCALING UP COMPACT CITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES – A SOLUTION TO COPE WITH URBAN SPRAWL IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES ? SANAA ANABTAWI 1), WALTER TIMO DE VRIES.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Partnering with Local Institutional Stakeholders.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
32 Transportation Midway City 2016 General Plan
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015 – 2021 Regional Transport Committee
What is the Regional Transportation Plan?
City of Rexburg 2020 Comprehensive Plan.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Louisville Metro Comprehensive Plan
VicRoads – Movement & Place
What is an MPO Anyway? (and why should I care?)
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

® ® Focus on Place Types

® ® Focus on: Approach and Classification Transitions Guidance

® ® 3 Workshop 1 How can the Smart Mobility Framework project make a single definition and a single set of smart mobility principles meaningful for application throughout the state?

4 Places Types in Use Blueprint Planning Context Sensitive Solutions TOD Form Based Codes

® ® 5 Smart Mobility Place Types For classifying towns, cities and larger areas to identify an appropriate Smart Mobility Framework A basis for making investment, planning and management decisions that support smart mobility

® ® 6 Smart Mobility Place Types 1. Urban Centers 2. Close-in Compact Communities 3. Compact Communities 4. Suburban Communities 5. Rural and Agricultural Lands 6. Protected Lands 7. Special Use Areas

7 Complete Community Design Regional Accessibility Urban Centers HighestHigh Close In Compact High Compact HighModerate to low Suburban Variable Rural / Ag VariableLow Protected Very LowVariable Special Use LowVariable Place Types and Location Efficiency

® ® 8 Achieving Location Efficiency

® ® 9 Exhibit 7: Smart Mobility Place Types & Location Efficiency

A Closer Look 10 Urban CentersUrban Cores Urban Centers Close-in Compact Communities Centers Corridors Neighborhoods Dedicated Use Areas Compact Communities Suburban Communities Rural & Agricultural Lands Rural Towns Rural settlements and Agricultural Lands Protected Lands Special Use Areas

® ® 11 Exhibit 6: Place Type Detail Page 23

® ® Discussion Approach and Classification Transitions Guidance

® ® Focus on: Approach and Classification Transitions Guidance

® ® 14 Place Type Transitions Place types are tools for strategic decision-making about projects and programs that will support smart mobility as cities and towns change over time

® ® 15 Place Type Transitions Anchored Places. Ranking on the Smart Mobility factors may change somewhat but place type designation will not change. Transitional Places. Targeted for significant change that will result in a change in place type designation.

Place Type Transition 16

Place Type Transition 17

Place Type Transition 18

Change in Anchored Place Type 19

® ® 20 Place Type Transitions: Implications for Investments Anchored Places. Investment decisions emphasize enhancing Smart Mobility factors. Transitional Places. Investment emphasis is on supporting evolution to different place type with greater potential for Smart Mobility benefits. (Page 28, related exhibit p. 29)

21 Place Type Transition Place Type SM Emphasis Ultimate Place Type Urban CentersUrban Center Close-in Compact Communities or Close-in compact communities or Urban Centers Compact Communities Exhibit 8, page 29

® ® Discussion Approach and Classification Transitions Guidance

® ® Focus on: Approach and Classification Transitions Guidance

® ® 24 Place Type Guidance For Each Place Type Smart Mobility Framework Relevance of Principles Key Activities Planning Transportation Projects & Programs Development & Conservation Projects & Programs

® ® 25 Framework Minimize creation of new places ranking low on both factors Transition suburban centers and corridors to close-in compact centers and corridors Create benefits for surrounding suburban areas Example: Suburban Communities LOW High

® ® 26 Example: Guidance for Suburban Communities Planning: Key Activities Identify centers and corridors that can be transformed into more location-efficient places. Prioritize locations to align with market potential and other community objectives. Identify near term opportunities to improve health and safety Identify opportunities to improve reliability through operational improvements

® ® 27 Example: Guidance for Suburban Communities Likely transportation priorities Improving operational efficiency Improving connectivity “Complete streets” and safe routes to school Access management and speed management Commute transit service and rideshare promotion.

® ® 28 Example: Guidance for Suburban Communities Likely land use development priorities: Transit oriented development along high capacity transit corridors Strategic redevelopment of commercial corridors and dedicated use areas Complete community design elements for all new construction

® ® 29 Place Types in the Handbook Introduction Place Types and Location Efficiency Place Type Transitions Matching the Place Types to Real Places Guidance for Place Types Applying Performance Measures to Place Types

® ® Discussion in Small Groups Approach and Classification Transitions Guidance