Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 8, When 2 or more teachers deliver substantive instruction to a diverse group of students in a single classroom. May be general ed. + special.
Advertisements

Mentoring New Educators
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Leadership Workshop September 4, 2009
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
College of Education & Human Development Spring 2011 Be sure you have signed in and picked up handouts Welcome ULM Student Teachers.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 7: Preparing for My Mid-Year Conversation.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Creating a positive classroom atmosphere
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
Preparing for NCATE October 22-26, 2005 Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
(IN)FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT August Are You… ASSESSMENT SAVVY? Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning? Using it effectively.
Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - Schedule and Honorarium 3.Assignment B - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment.
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
NYC Teacher Effectiveness A Preview of the NYC Teacher Effectiveness Framework for Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers,
Dr. Marcia Matanin, Youngstown State University Dr. Julie M. Knutson, Minnesota State University-Moorhead.
Tim Wagner, MYP Coordinator
The difference between learning goals and activities
Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment.
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
Teacher/Principal Eval. Pilot Schools 17 districts/schools Will pilot both the teacher and principal evaluations during Based on the voluntary.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Evelyn Wassel, Ed.D. Summer  Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning?  Using it effectively to promote further learning?
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Mentor Teacher Program Collegial Support through Learning-Focused Relationships September 18, 2013.
Using Classroom Data to Drive Classroom Instruction Peggy Dersch and Jana Reiter Assessment FOR Learning.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Page 1 Caren Falascino, MYP Teacher Tim Wagner, MYP Coordinator.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
College of Education & Human Development Fall 2010 Be sure you have signed in and picked up handouts Welcome ULM Student Teachers.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
A Parent’s Guide to Formative Assessment Communication is Key! Education is shared between the home and the school. Good communication is important as.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Hawk Hour Lesson Plans Sept Day 1 – Sept.22, Mon. Essential Question: “How do my daily choices reflect who I am?” Discuss: Students will return.
Module 3: Unit 2, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 2.
Lesson Planning Session Planning effective, standards-based lessons within the practice teaching classroom.
Data/MTSS Team Training September, Learning Goals Data/MTSS Team members will be able to assist teachers in using data to write a SMARTer PDP goal.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
AssessmentAssessment. Assessment What are some of the components of assessment.
District Meeting # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
Initial Comparisons February, Crosswalk with SEPs InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards The Learning and Learning 1. Learner Development (11 standards)
Day 7. Agenda What’s the Buzz “Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of ELLs and students with disabilities” Mini-Lesson:
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. COMMON.
The Big Interview Amy Fouts EDU 650 Teaching, Learning, and Leading in the 21 st Century Instructor Richard Newman.
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT  EDU 310 Week 1 Individual Assignment Main Factors of Lesson plans EDU 310 Week 1 DQ 1 EDU 310 Week 1 DQ.
Professional Teaching Portfolio Valerie Waloven
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Teacher Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
INTASC Standards By: Maddie Gonsalves.
INTASC Standards By: Jackie Celia.
Coordinator of Field Placements
Cooperating Teacher In-Service
Elishah Benavides & Angie salvucci
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
Presentation transcript:

Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule

Professional Day  Let’s look at the packet  Letters  Evaluation  Checklist  Hours log  Let’s look at the packet  Letters  Evaluation  Checklist  Hours log

Assignment B  Due Tuesday, September 30  See website - Assignment BAssignment B  Don’t forget your calendar when you meet with your cooperating teacher!  Due Tuesday, September 30  See website - Assignment BAssignment B  Don’t forget your calendar when you meet with your cooperating teacher!

Teacher Standards  Ultimately these are what all your classes are preparing you for  Something to assess you with  Uniformity across all teacher preparation programs and for beginning teachers  Ultimately these are what all your classes are preparing you for  Something to assess you with  Uniformity across all teacher preparation programs and for beginning teachers

INTASC & MN SEP  INTASC - Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium  MN SEP - Minnesota Standards of Effective Practice  INTASC - Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium  MN SEP - Minnesota Standards of Effective Practice

INTASC & MN SEP  One - Subject Area  Two - Student Learning  Three - Diverse Learners  Four - Instructional Strategies  Five - Learning Environment  Six - Communication  Seven - Planning Instruction  Eight - Assessment  Nine - Reflection & Professional Development  Ten - Collaboration, Ethics & Relationships  One - Subject Area  Two - Student Learning  Three - Diverse Learners  Four - Instructional Strategies  Five - Learning Environment  Six - Communication  Seven - Planning Instruction  Eight - Assessment  Nine - Reflection & Professional Development  Ten - Collaboration, Ethics & Relationships

Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson  Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility  Domain 1: Planning and Preparation  Domain 2: The Classroom Environment  Domain 3: Instruction  Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities (within each domain sits components)  Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility  Domain 1: Planning and Preparation  Domain 2: The Classroom Environment  Domain 3: Instruction  Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities (within each domain sits components)

Setting Goals within Framework  What is a goal?  Why set a goal?  How do we know when we’ve achieved it?  Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan  What is a goal?  Why set a goal?  How do we know when we’ve achieved it?  Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan

SMART Goal Focus Area  Domain 3: Instruction  Component 3d: Providing Feedback to Students  Domain 3: Instruction  Component 3d: Providing Feedback to Students

My Goal  To provide effective feedback to teacher-candidates.

My SMART Goal  To provide feedback to teacher- candidates in General Instructional Methods and MS Apprenticeship within two weeks of giving the assignment, using rubrics that are provided to the teacher-candidates prior to their turning in of the assignment.

SMART Goal Justification  I personally like written feedback that is specific to the assignment.  I want to continue my work in designing formative and summative assessments that require more engagement on the students part.  I am changing how I grade in MS Apprenticeship, from a point system to feedback then final grade.  Every semester students comment that I need to return work sooner.  I personally like written feedback that is specific to the assignment.  I want to continue my work in designing formative and summative assessments that require more engagement on the students part.  I am changing how I grade in MS Apprenticeship, from a point system to feedback then final grade.  Every semester students comment that I need to return work sooner.

My Improvement Plan In order to achieve my goal I need to: 1.Talk with Block One faculty about my ideas for changing Lesson Plan rubric to better meet teacher-candidate needs (within first few weeks of semester). 2.Have all rubrics created prior to giving assignments. All assignments can be accessed on my website (should be up by end of week!). 1.Talk with Block One faculty about my ideas for changing Lesson Plan rubric to better meet teacher-candidate needs (within first few weeks of semester). 2.Have all rubrics created prior to giving assignments. All assignments can be accessed on my website (should be up by end of week!).

My Improvement Plan cont. 1.In addition to using the rubric I will also write specific comments to provide more constructive feedback for the teacher- candidate (this will be done with every assignment turned in). 2.I will meet every week with Block One faculty to discuss assignments and assessment. 3.I will consult my calendar on a regular basis to be sure I return items within two week time period! 1.In addition to using the rubric I will also write specific comments to provide more constructive feedback for the teacher- candidate (this will be done with every assignment turned in). 2.I will meet every week with Block One faculty to discuss assignments and assessment. 3.I will consult my calendar on a regular basis to be sure I return items within two week time period!

My Improvement Plan cont. 1.I will have teacher-candidates fill out an evaluation about my work towards my goal (mid- semester evaluation and end of semester evaluation). 2.Continue to track teacher-candidate progress through use of feedback and rubrics (this is part of an overall tracking for class revision - done at end of semester). 1.I will have teacher-candidates fill out an evaluation about my work towards my goal (mid- semester evaluation and end of semester evaluation). 2.Continue to track teacher-candidate progress through use of feedback and rubrics (this is part of an overall tracking for class revision - done at end of semester).

Professional Development Plan  Examples of goal setting as part of contractual agreement:  PDP PDP  PDP Winter Progress Report PDP Winter Progress Report  PDP Spring Progress Report PDP Spring Progress Report  Examples of goal setting as part of contractual agreement:  PDP PDP  PDP Winter Progress Report PDP Winter Progress Report  PDP Spring Progress Report PDP Spring Progress Report