End Station A Test Beam (ESTB) Carsten Hast and Mauro Pivi August 23 th 2012 Proposals, Procedures, Schedule.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FACET: The Proposal Process with Q & A Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Advertisements

ESTB Test Beam Procedures User Support Operations Schedules Carsten Hast March 17 th 2011.
FACET: A National User Facility Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
FACET Safety and Procedures Christine Clarke August 29 th 2011.
FAC 4/20/06 D. Schultz 1 The SAD and ARR for Commissioning The Status of the SAD Being written as a part of the SLAC Linac SAD The Status of the ARR Design.
1 Roger Erickson 1 Coordination with Accelerator Systems NEH Accelerator Readiness Review Coordination with Accelerator Systems.
1 Stefan Moeller 1 AMO Instrument Schedule ARR AMO Instrument Schedule Stefan Moeller – XES Manager June 30, 2009.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Project Management John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
Safety Oversight for SLAC Accelerator Department Operations
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
D. Peterson, “Tracking Detector R&D at Cornell University and Purdue University” ALCPG SLAC 07-Jan Tracking Detector R&D at Cornell University and.
An updated Baseline Design for MICE From proposal to technical reference Paul Drumm, Dec 2003.
CHEDS Experiment Title…… o Experimental Staff & Affiliation:  Principal Investigator (PI)  Co-PI  Post Doc  Graduate Students  Undergraduate Students.
A. Minchella (RSAC c/o ESA-ESRIN) on behalf of ESA EOPI Team ESA Advanced Training Course in Land Remote Sensing, 2 July 2013, Athens, Greece Access to.
LCLS NEH Operational and User Safety Programs
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.
PRODUCT TRANSFER.
Magnet Lab User Portal August 2010.
Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act 2002 (PPEA) Joe Damico.
Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013.
Combined Test Beams Definition of Combined Test Beams Why would we want them? Why we might not want them? Host laboratory issues? Experimenter issues.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
1 EARLY SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS AND EXPERIMENTS HSE UNIT PH DSO EDMS No
1 Zoe Van Hoover 1 User Safety: Commissioning and Early Experiments NEH ARR User Safety: LCLS NEH Commissioning and Early Experiments.
Validation | Slide 1 of 27 August 2006 Validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006.
Workshop #1: Introduction to Graduation Project Wednesday September 2 nd at 10 am Capstone Committee Department of Computer Science.
FACET User Support Carsten Hast Accelerator Research Division Test Facilities Department
Marcin Płóciennik Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center OGF23, Barcelona, Spain, June 3rd, 2008 Use case of NMR spectrometry in Virtual Laboratory.
AboutFACET What is FACET Current Research PUBLICATIONS NAVIGATE UP Dielectric Wakefields.
Page © ASME 2015 Module B – Process B4.Initiating and Terminating Standards Projects Standards and Certification Training.
SABER, “maybe” a new facility in the South Arc (South Arc Beam Experimental Region) End Station A (ESA) in 2007 ILC Test Beams in 2008 Test Beams beyond.
Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
End Station A Test Beam (ESTB) Carsten Hast and Mauro Pivi August 23 th 2012 Proposals, Procedures, Schedule.
End Station A Test Beam Facility ESTB Carsten Hast SiD Workshop SLAC, January 16-18, 2013,
NA62 Organisation of the work - proposal 2/24/20161PD/DT/PO-MH.
The Planning Phase Recognize the problem MIS steering committee 7. ManagerSystems analyst Define the problem Set system objectives Identify system constraints.
Mike Scharfenstein LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 ES&H Overview p. 1 LCLS Ultrafast Science Instruments (LUSI) M. Scharfenstein.
WA 104 : TOOLS FOR WORK ORGANIZATION IN THE CLEAN ROOM Erwan Bertrand Olga Beltramello.
Interface of FP420 to LHC FP420 meeting 28-Sep-2006.
Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration CERN Project Structure Edda Gschwendtner, CERN Lisbon Meeting, 22 June 2012Edda Gschwendtner, CERN2.
Proposal for the End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC John Jaros ALCPG09 Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
Mike AlbrowSept 8 th 2005Test Beam for FP420 Vacuum Chambers/Detectors 1 Things we need to test (and why) How we could, together with BTeV people, detectors,
CORES Software User Training WVU Shared Research Facilities 2014 SRF CORES USER TRAINING
Thomas Gutberlet HZB User Coordination NMI3-II Neutron scattering and Muon spectroscopy Integrated Initiative WP5 Integrated User Access.
ACCESSING AND UTILIZING THE PROVIDER PORTAL MEDICAL AUTHORIZATION UNIT 1.
Anytime, Anywhere Access Benefits Functionality Work Order Administration Dispatch Work Order Work Order Details New Work Order Additional Functionality.
Overview of FESHCom Subcommittees Don Cossairt, Radiation Protection Manager, ESH&Q Section October 1, 2013.
Test beam check list Michael JECKEL EN-EA-EC. Content: Safety & Radiation Protection Arrival Access Installation Departure Michael JECKEL EN-EA-EC.
MAC meeting (12-13 January 2010) Machine Advisory Committee participants: B.Sharkov (ITEP/FAIR) P.Belochitskii (CERN) S.Ivanov (IHEP, Protvino) M.Steck.
ORSP Service Center User Tutorial
Mandate Priorities Other tasks Membership Forthcoming reports to CTC
Declaring intent in leo
Test beam check list Michael JECKEL EN-EA-EC.
IAEA E-learning Program
WP13: Access to Plasma Beam testing facilities
KEK news ( ) S.Tanaka.
The ORR/RA Pre-Visit and Other Prior Planning Items May 2005 Revision
ALBA-IPM collaboration Logistic details
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
Standards and Certification Training
1 Zoe Van Hoover 1 User Safety: Commissioning and Early Experiments NEH ARR User Safety: LCLS NEH Commissioning and Early Experiments.
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
SLAC Beam Test Facilities Overview (emphasis ESTB) Carsten Hast, SLAC
Regulation applied (European and French) Microorganisms and GMO
Ian Evans SSRL Safety Office
Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance Program
T-489: Induced Activity and Residual Dose Rates
Safety Readiness Review (SRR) Thomas Hansson, ESH
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Safety Program for LCLS Experiments
Presentation transcript:

End Station A Test Beam (ESTB) Carsten Hast and Mauro Pivi August 23 th 2012 Proposals, Procedures, Schedule

2 ESTB Proposals Submission and Review Process ESTB Scientific Committee (SC) - Appointed by SLAC Management (PPA-ALD) - Evaluates and prioritizes proposals There are two fundamentally different types of experiments which can be conducted at ESTB: - Accelerator physics experiments like machine detector interface, linear collider beam delivery studies - Detector R&D experiments including radiation tests The ESTB Scientific Committee will direct accelerator physics experiments to be reviewed by SAREC (SLAC Accelerator Research Experimental Program Committee) All other proposals will be reviewed directly by ESTB SC

3 ESTB Proposals Submission and Review Process For detector R&D or radiation tests user submits a comprehensive proposal which includes: PI, members and institutions involved Short description of the overall physics goals Detailed description of the experimental apparatus - Sketch of the planned layout with dimensions - Description of the DAQ system coming with the experiment and what additional DAQ will be needed from SLAC - Other electronics components (HV supplies, scopes, etc.) - Cooling or gas supply needs - Computing infrastructure needs - Any other aspect which might be of importance - Support needed from SLAC: riggers, technicians, DAQ systems, cooling, gas lines, etc. Preferred beam parameters and acceptable beam parameters Estimated installation time Run plan (e.g. how many data points, how many modifications of the apparatus, etc.) Preferred running time Any other aspects of importance

4 ESTB Proposals Submission and Review Process Proposal (2-5 pages) is submitted to C. Hast Proposal is reviewed by ESTB Scientific Committee C. Field, P. Grenier, C. Hast, B. Ratcliff + additional members (as needed) Accelerator physics proposal are send to SAREC for review Criteria for proposal evaluation: - scientific value - feasibility - evaluation of resources - scheduling and prioritization SAREC will provide a prioritized list of their reviewed proposals to ESTB SC Proposal will be reviewed by SLAC Safety Committees as appropriate (ESTB Operations Manager directs this process) - Electrical - Earthquake - Hazardous Experimental Equipment Committee - Radiation Physics - etc. ESTB Scientific Committee will provide a prioritized list of experiments to the ESTB Operations Manager who will schedule the experiments Typical turn around for detector R&D proposals between 1 and 3 months

5 ESTB Proposals Submission and Review Process The ESTB Scientific Committee will direct accelerator physics experiments to be reviewed by SAREC (SLAC Accelerator Research Experimental Program Committee) SAREC has a similar but more elaborated review process SAREC’s main task is to review FACET proposal. This process is documented here: SAREC meets once per year, but proposals can be submitted at any time Next SAREC meeting October 11/12, 2012

6 ESTB Proposals Submission and Review Process User Proposal ESTB SC Review SAREC Review ESTB SC Prioritization ESTB Operations Schedules Experiments

7 After Your Proposal is Accepted Any experimental setup needs review and approval to be installed and operated at SLAC Safety Oversight Committee (SOC) - Looks at experimental equipment and will request Safety Officers and others to review your setup Test Facilities (TF) is instrumental in getting the necessary approvals for you - We know how the system works - We are part of the system - We can do many things for you – If you tell us what you want to do - This process can be quite fast for “normal” setups - But if you need “more exotic” components (e.g. hazardous gases) will take more time Electrical components need to be UL listed (or equivalent) - That’s a tough one, because many devices you are using in your home institutes are not! - A European “CE” is not good enough at SLAC - SLAC has an inspection process to approve non listed devices TF can do that We will only allow the operation of approved devices Radioactive sources need to be registered with RP prior to their arrival

8 Becoming a User Users will register with the SLAC Users Organization SLUO SLUO will work with the PI on a generic MoU between Stanford University and your home institution (mainly about intellectual property rights…) Each individual user needs to agree to that MoU SLUO will get users a SLAC systems ID and a computer account We might change to the SSRL/LCLS style user organization, but that will be transparent to ESTB users A SLAC Contact will be assigned to each experiment and user This SLAC Contact functions as your supervisor here at SLAC Carsten Hast will be the Operations Manager for ESTB in FY13 SLAC Contact defines the training requirements Most training can be done remotely via web training (after you have a SLAC system ID) Couple of things on first day of arrival We will setup a web page which will lay out what you need to do