8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU IMPACTS OF ISTANBUL EMISSIONS ON REGIONAL AIR QUALITY:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Sulfur & Nitrogen Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Advertisements

Template Development and Testing of PinG and VBS modules in CMAQ 5.01 Prakash Karamchandani, Bonyoung Koo, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah Johnson ENVIRON International.
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development October 30, 2013 Prakash V. Bhave, Mary K. McCabe, Valerie C. Garcia Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Integration of CMAQ into the Western Macedonia environmental management system A. Sfetsos 1,2, J. Bartzis 2 1 Environmental Research Laboratory, NCSR Demokritos.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Emissions and meteorological Aspects of the 2001 ICAP Simulation Adel Hanna,
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
Modelling the impact of three sets of future vehicle emission standards on PM concentrations in the Lower Fraser Valley Weimin Jiang, Éric Giroux, Dazhong.
1 icfi.com | 1 HIGH-RESOLUTION AIR QUALITY MODELING OF NEW YORK CITY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FUELS FOR BOILERS AND POWER GENERATION 13 th Annual.
Modeling the Co-Benefits of Carbon Standards for Existing Power Plants STI-6102 Stephen Reid, Ken Craig, Garnet Erdakos Sonoma Technology, Inc. Jonathan.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
October 17, CMAS 2006 conference
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
Background Air Quality in the United States Under Current and Future Emissions Scenarios Zachariah Adelman, Meridith Fry, J. Jason West Department of Environmental.
Muntaseer Billah, Satoru Chatani and Kengo Sudo Department of Earth and Environmental Science Graduate School of Environmental Studies Nagoya University,
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
TFMM & TFEIP Workshop, Dublin, 2007 Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E.
Examination of the impact of recent laboratory evidence of photoexcited NO 2 chemistry on simulated summer-time regional air quality Golam Sarwar, Robert.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
Land Processes Group, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL Response of Atmospheric Model Predictions at Different Grid Resolutions Maudood.
Page1 PAGE 1 The influence of MM5 nudging schemes on CMAQ simulations of benzo(a)pyrene concentrations and depositions in Europe Volker Matthias, GKSS.
1 René Parra, Pedro Jiménez and José M. Baldasano Environmental Modeling Laboratory, UPC Barcelona, Spain Models-3 Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
Impact of Emissions on Intercontinental Long-Range Transport Joshua Fu, Yun-Fat Lam and Yang Gao, University of Tennessee, USA Rokjin Park, Seoul National.
Harikishan Perugu, Ph.D. Heng Wei, Ph.D. PE
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008.
Evaluation and Application of Air Quality Model System in Shanghai Qian Wang 1, Qingyan Fu 1, Yufei Zou 1, Yanmin Huang 1, Huxiong Cui 1, Junming Zhao.
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Models-3 Adel Hanna Carolina Environmental Program University of North Carolina.
25/04/2007INGAS Air Quality Improvement and Natural Gas Use in Istanbul Omar ALAGHA,PhD Fatih University, Department of Environmental Engineering,
CMAS Conference 2009 Johannes Bieser, Institute for Coastal Research – GKSS Science Center CMAS Conference 2009 Enhancing SMOKE to create European emissions.
2012 CMAS meeting Yunsoo Choi, Assistant Professor Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston NOAA Air quality forecasting and.
Application of the CMAQ Particle and Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) to Support Water Quality Planning for the Virginia Mercury Study 6 th Annual.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
EVALUATION OF THE CMAQ5.0 IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE CALIOPE AIR QUALITY FORECASTING SYSTEM OVER EUROPE M.T. Pay 1. J. M. Baldasano 1,2, S. Gassó.
Georgia Institute of Technology Assessing the Impacts of Hartsfield- Jackson Airport on PM and Ozone in Atlanta Area Alper Unal, Talat Odman and Ted Russell.
CMAS Conference 2011 Comparative analysis of CMAQ simulations of a particulate matter episode over Germany Chapel Hill, October 26, 2011 V. Matthias, A.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
C. Hogrefe 1,2, W. Hao 2, E.E. Zalewsky 2, J.-Y. Ku 2, B. Lynn 3, C. Rosenzweig 4, M. Schultz 5, S. Rast 6, M. Newchurch 7, L. Wang 7, P.L. Kinney 8, and.
Post-processing air quality model predictions of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) at NCEP James Wilczak, Irina Djalalova, Dave Allured (ESRL) Jianping Huang,
Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Identifying Optimal Temporal Scale for the Correlation of AOD and Ground.
GOING FROM 12-KM TO 250-M RESOLUTION Josephine Bates 1, Audrey Flak 2, Howard Chang 2, Heather Holmes 3, David Lavoue 1, Mitchel Klein 2, Matthew Strickland.
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ I. Results from the 2003 Release II. Plans for the 2004 Release Model Evaluation Team Members Prakash Bhave, Robin Dennis,
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 16 October 2012 Integrating source.
NO x emission estimates from space Ronald van der A Bas Mijling Jieying Ding.
Evaluation of Polyphemus for 2004 Janusz Zyśk, Yelva Roustan, Artur Wyrwa, Denis Quelo. Atelier Polyphemus Champs-sur-Marne, 28th October 2008.
‘APEC Blue’ in North China simulated with the high resolution nested GEOS-Chem model Yixuan Gu 1,2, Hong Liao 1 1 State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
Influence of Lightning-produced NOx on upper tropospheric ozone Using TES/O3&CO, OMI/NO2&HCHO in CMAQ modeling study M. J. Newchurch 1, A. P. Biazar.
Impact assessment of anthropogenic emission control upon aerosol mass burden during heavy pollution episodes over North China Plain Meigen Zhang, Xiao.
Response of fine particles to the reduction of precursor emissions in Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China Juan Li 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yang Gao 1, Yun-Fat Lam.
Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of the 2006 Air Quality Forecasting Operation in Georgia Talat Odman, Yongtao Hu, Ted Russell School of Civil.
February 11, 2016 Nitrogen Oxides (NO x ) Emissions from U.S. Shale Plays using an Integrated Top-down and Bottom-up Approach Speaker: Andy Chang, PhD.
Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
FUTURE PREDICTION OF SURFACE OZONE OVER EAST ASIA UP TO 2020
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Impact of GOES Enhanced WRF Fields on Air Quality Model Performance
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
A. Aulinger, V. Matthias, M. Quante, Institute for Coastal Research
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
Presentation transcript:

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU IMPACTS OF ISTANBUL EMISSIONS ON REGIONAL AIR QUALITY: QUANTIFICATION USING MODELS-3 FRAMEWORK AND TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS Huseyin Ozdemir a, Ulas Im b, Markakis Kostandinos c, Tugba Agacayak d, Alper Unal d, Tayfun Kindap d, Maudood Khan e a Bahcesehir University, Environmental Engineering Department, Istanbul, TURKEY b Bogazici University, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Istanbul, TURKEY c Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Physics, Thessaloniki, GREECE d Istanbul Technical University, Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Istanbul, TURKEY e Universities Space Research Association NASA Marshall Square Flight Center, Huntsville AL., USA

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Outline  Introduction  Episode selection  Trajectory analysis  Emissions modeling  Air quality modeling results  Discussions and conclusions

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Istanbul

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Research Objectives  Identify the reasons for high PM levels in Istanbul  Quantify effect of Istanbul emissions on regional air quality  Method:  Comprehensive high resolution anthropogenic emission inventory  Models-3 modeling framework

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Observations

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Episode January 13-17, 2008

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Trajectory Analysis Autumn Spring SummerWinter Forward trajectory method by Pettersen (1956)

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Modeling Domain

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Emission Inventory  92 x 57 km area with 2 km grid spacing  Temporal resolution on monthly, weekly and diurnal processing  Compiling the emission inventory (bottom-up methodology) -Residential and industrial combustion -Energy sector -Maritime sector -Solvents use and coal extraction emissions

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Emission Inventory  High quality geographical information (GIS)  Mapbasic 9.0 programming language  Mapinfo 9.0 GIS software  39 chemical species

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Schematic diagram of the emission processor (Kostandinos et al., 2009, submitted)

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Chemistry and Transport Modeling  The US EPA Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, version 4.6  Three domains (on lambert conformal projection) -Europe in a 163×150 grid system of 30 km res. -Balkan region in a 140×155 grids domain of 10 km res. - Istanbul in a 92×57 grids domain of 2 km res vertical layers  The first three days - spin-up period

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU MODELING RESULTS

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU MODELING RESULTS MeasuresPM 10 Correlation0.62 Observed Mean (µg/m 3 )81.74 Model Mean / Obs. Mean0.55 Observed STDDEV (µg/m 3 )15.14 Model STDEV / Obs. STDEV1.25 BIAS (µg/m 3 ) ABSE (µg/m 3 )47.73 RMSE (µg/m 3 )49.77 IOA0.38

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Obs. Mean (µg/m 3 ) Model Mean/Obs Mean BIAS (µg/m 3 ) ABSE (µg/m 3 ) RMSE (µg/m 3 ) Alibeyköy Beşiktaş Saraçhane Sarıyer Yenibosna Esenler Kartal Ümraniye Üsküdar MODELING RESULTS

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Summary  The PM 10 levels calculated by the model underestimated the observations with an average of 30%.  Uncertainties between model results and observations  Lacking of temporal profiles  Meteorology may introduce large uncertainties  Static boundary conditions may introduce high uncertainties  Performance evaluation for meteorology model results are underway  For future work we are planning to improve emissions data

8th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, October 19-21, 2009 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences / ITU Thank you.