Activity Reporting Lead Partner Seminar 20 th January 2011, Friars Carse Hotel, Dumfries, Scotland Rachel Burn.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Reporting Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 25th March 2015, Svolvær, Norway.
Advertisements

Northern Periphery Programme Final Content Report Lead Partner Seminar 28th September 2011 – Hotel Rica Alta, Alta, Norway.
How to make a Progress Report Activity Reporting Lead partner and partner seminar Voss, Norway June 2008 Maxi Nachtigall.
Application Form – Part C Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
Northern Periphery Programme Final Administrative Report Lead Partner Seminar 22 nd February 2012.
NPP Information sources & guidance documents Niclas Forsling Kirsti Mijnhijmer First Level Control Event 6 November 2008, Copenhagen European Union European.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Preparatory Project Application Form Kirsti Mijnhijmer 27 th August 2009 – Inverness, Scotland European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Northern Periphery Programme How to Close a Preparatory Project Christopher Parker 20th March 2014 North Atlantic House, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 5-6 February 2009 – Sundsvall, Sweden Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner Seminar 8 th September 2010 – Bunratty Co. Clare, Ireland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Project monitoring.
NPP concepts and communications Kirsti Mijnhijmer 21 August 2008 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development Fund.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
Northern Periphery Programme Final Project Claim 18th September 2013 Scandic Hotel, Skellefteå, Sweden Stefan Nyström.
Experience in Final Reporting from INTERREG III B “Castle Tomorrow” project perspective Marika Rudzite, Project coordinator (Head of Investment and Development.
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
Project Communication Kirsti Mijnhijmer & Christopher Parker 23 February 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 21 st April 2010 – Portrush, Northern Ireland Teresa Lennon and Michael O’Brien European Union European.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
ACP S&T Programme - Stakeholder conference October Implemented by the ACP Secretariat Funded by the European Union EDULINK - ACP Science and.
Orientation for new Lead Partners and Partners Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 12 June 2008 – Voss, Norway Kirsti.
Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner Seminar 28th September 2011 – Hotel Rica Alta, Alta, Norway Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Closing THING Project. First: Report no 5: SoE to FLC CoE to Lead Partner Report no 5 and Project claim to JPS All partners.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner Seminar 22 February 2012 Copenhagen Rachel Burn.
NPA eMS application Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015 – Copenhagen, Denmark.
Northern Periphery Programme Advice to Lead partners for final reports Lead Partner Seminar 18th September 2013 Scandic Hotel, Skellefteå, Sweden.
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
Northern Periphery Programme The challenge of communication in a large programme area OPEN DAYS - Workshop “Communicating Cohesion Policy Together”
Orientation for new project Lead partners and partners Overview of the claim system Lead partners and partner seminar Voss, Norway June 2008 Maxi.
Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme 2014 – 2020 Ole Damsgaard.
Overview of the claim system Lead partner and partner seminar Sundsvall, Sweden 5th February 2009 Maxi Nachtigall.
Wrap up and next steps 4 th February 2009 – Sundsvall, Sweden European Union European Regional Development Fund.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
ESPON Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 18 May 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Transnational Networking Activities (Projects carried through.
PROGRESS REPORTING Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 1st October - Kuopio, Finland.
Erasmus Mundus Joint Master courses How to write a good proposal ? Hélène Pinaud- 18 December 2015.
Part-financed by the European Union From application to implementation – the procedures Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar for 1st application.
Preparatory projects as tool for project development 4th February 2009 – Sundsvall, Sweden Maxi Nachtigall European Union European Regional Development.
PROJECT CHANGES Rachel Burn, Joint Secretariat April 20th, 2016 – Faroe Islands.
NPA eMS application – Project Information Joint Secretariat 1st June 2016 – Cork, Ireland.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 17 th June 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark Christopher Parker and Rachel Burn European Union European Regional.
Lead Partner Seminar Christopher Parker 13 th of June 2008 – Voss, Norway European Union European Regional Development Fund.
PARTNER ACTIVITY REPORTING Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat April 20th, 2016 – Faroe Islands.
REPORTING THROUGH THE EMS
GEF Familiarization Seminar
PARTNER ACTIVITY REPORTING
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
Activity Report in the Progress Report lifecycle
Introduction - Final activity reporting
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities th August 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark Christopher Parker and Rachel Burn European Union European.
PROJECT MANUAL Galina Georgieva Project Officer
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
NPA eMS application – Project Information
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
NPA eMS application – Project Information
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
Application Form – Part C
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
PROJECT CHANGES Rachel Burn, Joint Secretariat
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Interreg IPA CBC Programme "Greece - Albania "
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
Project Communication Niclas Forsling 21st and 22nd of September 2009 – Höfn, Iceland European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Presentation transcript:

Activity Reporting Lead Partner Seminar 20 th January 2011, Friars Carse Hotel, Dumfries, Scotland Rachel Burn

Activity Report in the Progress Report lifecycle

Why to Report? Projects are monitored by: The PMC, MA, and Secretariat Reporting ensures continous measurement and quantification of project outputs Reporting allows for cross checking between the project application/ decision and it’s implementation Reporting helps facilitate project goals reaching the wider public

Activity Report Template Available on Sections: General information Project Activities and Performance Project Indicators Project Financial Information Analysis of Project Activity and Outcomes Performance Project Management and Partnership Dynamics NPP Horizontal Principles Project Communication Other changes (partnership, target area, other) Additional information

Section 1: General Information Report number and period Project title Acronym and Duration Priority

Section 1: General Information Target area/ location of operation Partnership information Based on the information from the application Note: Changes need prior approval by the Secretariat Lead partner’s written request to Programme Secretariat by mail

Section 1: General Information Executive summary Overall description of project implementation process Status of development of products and services (outcomes so far, compared with objectives set out in application) Will be used for wider dissemination

Section 2: Project Activities and Performance Project activities Overall description of activities so far Highlights of most important activities for project implementation progress Links between Work Packages

Section 2: Project Activities and Performance Information taken from the application Description of each project work package Activities as planned in the activity plan in the approved application Results to date

Section 2: Project Activities and Performance Change of activities in comparison to approved application Any activity changes need pre- approval by Secretariat Justification of the change and impact on implementation of project 1 request for change per year

Section 3: Indicators General indicators based on indicators outlined in application and decision (reporting should be accumulative) Indication of university involvement, Technology institutes and SMEs should be ‘ticked or crossed’. Equal opportunity indicators based on indicators outlines in the application and decision (reporting should be accumulative) Involvement of Small & Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) based on numbers outlined in application and decision.

Section 3: Indicators Priority 1 or 2 specific indicators Activity Output Result

Section 3: Indicators Additional project indicators as in the approved application Change of indicators in comparison to approved application Any indicator changes need pre- approval by Secretariat Justification of the change and impact on implementation of project 1 request for change per year

Project Outcomes and Transnational Impact Project Outcomes Overall description of project implementation process. Status of development of products and services (outcomes, so far, compared with objectives set out in the application) Transnational impact Could the product/ service be transferred to other countries? How does it make a difference across the region? Organisational learning, i.e. Collaboration between SMEs and universities. Added value of the adopted transnational approach?

Section 4: Project Financial Information Project Expenditures Total approved project budget Total certified expenditures Current reporting period Accumulative

Section 4: Project Financial Information Analysis of the financial performance in comparison to approved total budget Underspendings/ Overspendings/ Unexpected expenditures % of budget spent vs. % of time spent according to project plan Will the project keep spending targets and still achieve outputs Good value for money Could have been more achieved with the same inputs of money or could same outcomes have been achieved with reduced financial inputs? Efficient use of the budget Cross referring to the financial report

Section 4: Project Financial Information Budget changes Justification for the change Description of impact of changes for the project implementation 1 request for change per year

Section 5: Analysis of Project Activity and Outcomes Performance Project activity and outcome performance Analysis of project activity and outcome performance in relation to: Indicators Time plan Budget

Section 6: Project Management and Partnership Dynamics Analysis of Project Management dynamics Arrangements that were used to implement the project, involved partners List of issues discussed List of decisions taken Description of impact of decision on project implementation Dynamics in the project partnership Advantages of the transnational partnership approach Challenges of international cooperation in transnational setting Project cooperation/ Synergies with other projects Concrete cooperation activities

Section 7: NPP Horizontal Principles Equal Opportunities – concrete steps and activities Gender: provision of day care for children during partner meetings Age: Special tailored staff recruitment plan for young employees Social: Special employment plan for indigenous people How did this change the working culture in the organisations participating in the project?

Section 7: NPP Horizontal Principles Sustainable Development – concrete steps and activities Implementation of Sustainable impact assessment tool for resource use Minimized travel plan for meetings – ICT solutions, use of environmental friendly transportation, voluntary carbon offset Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan Transnational/ shared use of rescue equipment How did this change the working culture in the organisations participating in the project?

Section 8: Project Communication Communication indicators to measure progress on the mandatory communication measures and expected attendance at NPP events accumulative List of all communication tools and promotional materials developed Purpose to exemplify indicators given in question 8.1 Examples: Brochure Website exhibition roll-up PowerPoint presentations Pens

Section 8: Project Communication Provide an analysis of the internal and external communication activities Purpose to get a sense of general performance on communication and best practices What activities worked well, any innovative steps to enhance performance Certification of compliance with the NPP and European publicity requirements Commission Regulation No 1828/2006, Articles 8 and 9. This is a matter of eligibility: European Commission recommends a 2% flat rate cut

Section 9: Changes in Project Partnership, Target Area and Other Changes Additional changes in comparison to the approved application/ to the decision All changes require pre-approval by Programme Secretariat: Partnership Target area Duration Work package structure

Section 10: Additional Information Contribution to relevant strategies for your region. Projects should outline the relevant international strategies which are applicable. Contribution to the EU Baltic Sea Region Strategy (EUBSRS) The project should advise if it is contributing to the strategy and note the priority area.

Feedback and Suggestions To NPP bodies/ the programme Background for evaluation activities in the programme Overview on other documents requested Project claim Certificates of Expenditure Summary of Certificates of Expenditure FLC checklists Examples of information/ dissemination material Signature

Submitting an Activity Report Please send the Activity report as part of the Progress Report together with other required documents to: Northern Periphery Programme Secretariat Att.: Responsible Desk Officer Strandgade 91, 4.Sal DK-1401 Copenhagen-K Denmark and per

Assessment of the Activity Report The Programme Secretariat is the body that receives the Progress Reports and assesses the Activity Report. The Project Claim is sent by the Secretariat to the MA for assessment in parallel. Assessment includes: Completeness of the information Eligibility of activities carried out Coherence of activities with objectives set out in the application and decision Concrete actions meeting the NPP horizontal principles Quality of partnership and distribution of roles between the partners Current degree of project progress achieved Efficiency and effectiveness of the project implementation process Measurement of quality and quantity of project outputs and results Impact, Added value and Sustainability Improvement proposed and anticipated results Analysis of project expenditure and other budgetary matters Assessment of activity report will be sent to Managing Authority

No Report = No Money!!

Thank you for listening!